Vision for perception versus vision for action: dissociable contributions of visual sensory drives from primary visual cortex and superior colliculus neurons to orienting behaviors
Vision Science, Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognition and seminar by Prof. Dr. Ziad M. Hafed, Werner Reichardt Center for Integrative Neuroscience, and; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research; University of Tübingen
Hosted by LOOPS de Hoz - Hechavarria
Wednesday 17:00–18:10 Berlin (GMT+1)
Ended
Abstract
The primary visual cortex (V1) directly projects to the superior colliculus (SC) and is believed to provide sensory drive for eye movements. Consistent with this, a majority of saccade-related SC neurons also exhibit short-latency, stimulus-driven visual responses, which are additionally feature-tuned. However, direct neurophysiological comparisons of the visual response properties of the two anatomically-connected brain areas are surprisingly lacking, especially with respect to active looking behaviors. I will describe a series of experiments characterizing visual response properties in primate V1 and SC neurons, exploring feature dimensions like visual field location, spatial frequency, orientation, contrast, and luminance polarity. The results suggest a substantial, qualitative reformatting of SC visual responses when compared to V1. For example, SC visual response latencies are actively delayed, independent of individual neuron tuning preferences, as a function of increasing spatial frequency, and this phenomenon is directly correlated with saccadic reaction times. Such “coarse-to-fine” rank ordering of SC visual response latencies as a function of spatial frequency is much weaker in V1, suggesting a dissociation of V1 responses from saccade timing. Consistent with this, when we next explored trial-by-trial correlations of individual neurons’ visual response strengths and visual response latencies with saccadic reaction times, we found that most SC neurons exhibited, on a trial-by-trial basis, stronger and earlier visual responses for faster saccadic reaction times. Moreover, these correlations were substantially higher for visual-motor neurons in the intermediate and deep layers than for more superficial visual-only neurons. No such correlations existed systematically in V1. Thus, visual responses in SC and V1 serve fundamentally different roles in active vision: V1 jumpstarts sensing and image analysis, but SC jumpstarts moving. I will finish by demonstrating, using V1 reversible inactivation, that, despite reformatting of signals from V1 to the brainstem, V1 is still a necessary gateway for visually-driven oculomotor responses to occur, even for the most reflexive of eye movement phenomena. This is a fundamental difference from rodent studies demonstrating clear V1-independent processing in afferent visual pathways bypassing the geniculostriate one, and it demonstrates the importance of multi-species comparisons in the study of oculomotor control.
Topics
Related seminars
Arousal modulates retinal output
Video · 1 h 2 min · Feb 22, 2021Sylvia Schröder, University of SussexMore on superior colliculus and visionNeural mechanisms of active vision in the marmoset monkey
Video · May 12, 2021Jude Mitchell, University of Rochester
More from LOOPS de Hoz - Hechavarria
All talksPredictive Coding Light
Feb 11, 2026Prof. Dr. Jochen TrieschComputational Mechanisms of Predictive Processing in Brains and Machines
Dec 10, 2025Dr. Antonino GrecoTop-down control of neocortical threat memory
Nov 12, 2025Prof. Dr. Johannes LetzkusCompeting Rhythms: Understanding and Modulating Auditory Neural Entrainment
Oct 8, 2025Dr. Yuranny Cabral-Calderin
Upcoming in Vision Science
All seminarsEmpirical Vision Neuroscience for Next-Generation AI
Nov 18, 2026Radoslaw Martin Cichy