1 h 24 min
The When, Where and What of visual memory formation
Computational Neuroscience, Cognition, Cognitive Psychology and seminar by Brad Wyble, Pennsylvania State University
Hosted by The Neurotheory Forum
Friday 16:00–17:10 Vienna (GMT+1)
Recording available
Recording
Abstract
The eyes send a continuous stream of about two million nerve fibers to the brain, but only a fraction of this information is stored as visual memories. This talk will detail three neurocomputational models that attempt an understanding how the visual system makes on-the-fly decisions about how to encode that information. First, the STST family of models (Bowman & Wyble 2007; Wyble, Potter, Bowman & Nieuwenstein 2011) proposes mechanisms for temporal segmentation of continuous input. The conclusion of this work is that the visual system has mechanisms for rapidly creating brief episodes of attention that highlight important moments in time, and also separates each episode from temporally adjacent neighbors to benefit learning.
Next, the RAGNAROC model (Wyble et al. 2019) describes a decision process for determining the spatial focus (or foci) of attention in a spatiotopic field and the neural mechanisms that provide enhancement of targets and suppression of highly distracting information. This work highlights the importance of integrating behavioral and electrophysiological data to provide empirical constraints on a neurally plausible model of spatial attention. The model also highlights how a neural circuit can make decisions in a continuous space, rather than among discrete alternatives.
Finally, the binding pool (Swan & Wyble 2014; Hedayati, O’Donnell, Wyble in Prep) provides a mechanism for selectively encoding specific attributes (i.e. color, shape, category) of a visual object to be stored in a consolidated memory representation. The binding pool is akin to a holographic memory system that layers representations of select latent representations corresponding to different attributes of a given object. Moreover, it can bind features into distinct objects by linking them to token placeholders.
Future work looks toward combining these models into a coherent framework for understanding the full measure of on-the-fly attentional mechanisms and how they improve learning.
Topics
Related seminars
Modeling Visual Attention in Neuroscience, Psychology, and Machine Learning
Video page · Feb 15, 2022Grace Lindsay, University College LondonThe hippocampus, visual perception and visual memory
Video · 1 h 16 min · May 6, 2025Morris Moscovitch, University of TorontoA dynamical model of the visual cortex
Video · 48 min · Jun 2, 2021Lai-Sang, Young Courant Institute
More from The Neurotheory Forum
All talksSleepless in Vienna - how to rescue folding-deficient dopamine transporters by pharmacochaperoning
Jun 18, 2021Michael FreissmuthCombining two mechanisms to produce neural firing rate homeostasis
Video · 1 h 7 min · Jun 11, 2021Paul MillerExtracting heading and goal through structured action
Video · 1 h 26 min · May 14, 2021Ann HermundstadMemory, learning to learn, and control of cognitive representations
Video · 1 h 26 min · May 7, 2021André Fenton
More with Brad Wyble
All their workUsing navigational information to learn visual representations
ePoster · Mar 19, 2022COSYNE 2022Memory for Latent Representations: An Account of Working Memory that Builds on Visual Knowledge for Efficient and Detailed Visual Representations
Seminar · Jul 7, 2021Distributed WM Series
Upcoming in Computational Neuroscience
All seminarsThe organisation of experience: Neural persistence from neuronal ensembles to EEG microstates
Nov 5, 2026Domenico GuarinoEmpirical Vision Neuroscience for Next-Generation AI
Nov 18, 2026Radoslaw Martin Cichy