On the acquisition of visual functions following early-onset and prolonged visual deprivation
Udi Zohary· Hebrew University
Tue, Apr 13 · 13:00 UTC
Seminars and recordings
Udi Zohary· Hebrew University
Tue, Apr 13 · 13:00 UTC
Leon Deouell· Hebrew University
Tue, Apr 6 · 13:00 UTC
Pieter Roelfsema· Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience
Tue, Mar 9 · 13:00 UTC
I will discuss the mechanisms that determine whether a weak visual stimulus will reach consciousness or not. If the stimulus is simple, early visual cortex acts as a relay station that sends the information to higher visual areas. If the stimulus arrives at a minimal strength, it will be stored in working memory. However, during more complex visual perceptions, which for example depend on the segregation of a figure from the background, early visual cortex’ role goes beyond a simply relay. It now acts as a cognitive blackboard and conscious perception depends on it. Our results also inspire new approaches to create a visual prosthesis for the blind, by creating a direct interface with the visual cortex. I will discuss how high-channel-number interfaces with the visual cortex might be used to restore a rudimentary form of vision in blind individuals.
Galit Yovel· Tel Aviv Univ.
Tue, Mar 2 · 16:00 UTC
Marlene Behrmann· CMU
Tue, Feb 23 · 16:00 UTC
Ella Striem-Amit· Georgetown University
Tue, Feb 16 · 16:00 UTC
Bob Shapley· NYU
Tue, Feb 9 · 16:00 UTC
Tzvi Ganel· Ben Gurion University
Tue, Feb 2 · 13:00 UTC
Anat Perry· Hebrew Univ.
Tue, Jan 26 · 13:00 UTC
Bruno Rossion· Université de Lorraine
Tue, Jan 19 · 13:00 UTC
The face is the primary source of information for recognizing the identity of people around us, but the neural basis of this astonishing ability remains largely unknown. In this presentation, I will define the fundamental problem of face identity recognition, arguing that there is a specific expertise of the human species at this function. I will then attempt to integrate a large corpus of observations from lesion studies, neuroimaging, human intracerebral recordings and stimulation into a coherent framework to shed light on the neural mechanisms of human face identity recognition.
Yaffa Yeshurun· Haifa University
Tue, Jan 12 · 13:00 UTC
Michal Ben Shachar· Bar Ilan University
Tue, Jan 5 · 13:00 UTC
Christopher Tyler· City University, London; Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
Tue, Dec 29 · 18:00 UTC
Nachum Soroker· Tel Aviv University and Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital
Tue, Dec 22 · 13:00 UTC
Wu Li· Beijing Normal University
Tue, Dec 15 · 13:00 UTC
Joseph Brooks· Keele University
Tue, Dec 8 · 13:00 UTC
Figure-ground organisation and perceptual grouping are classic topics in Gestalt and perceptual psychology. They often appear alongside one another in introductory textbook chapters on perception and have a long history of investigation. However, they are typically discussed as separate processes of perceptual organisation with their own distinct phenomena and mechanisms. Here, I will propose that perceptual grouping and figure-ground organisation are strongly linked. In particular, perceptual grouping can provide a basis for, and may share mechanisms with, a wide range of figure-ground principles. To support this claim, I will describe a new class of figure-ground principles based on perceptual grouping between edges and demonstrate that this inter-edge grouping (IEG) is a powerful influence on figure-ground organisation. I will also draw support from our other results showing that grouping between edges and regions (i.e., edge-region grouping) can affect figure-ground organisation (Palmer & Brooks, 2008) and that contextual influences in figure-ground organisation can be gated by perceptual grouping between edges (Brooks & Driver, 2010). In addition to these modern observations, I will also argue that we can describe some classic figure-ground principles (e.g., symmetry, convexity, etc.) using perceptual grouping mechanisms. These results suggest that figure-ground organisation and perceptual grouping have more than a mere association under the umbrella topics of Gestalt psychology and perceptual organisation. Instead, perceptual grouping may provide a mechanism underlying a broad class of new and extant figure-ground principles.
It has long been known that when viewing a set of images, we misjudge individual elements as being closer to the mean than they are (Hollingworth, 1910) and recall seeing the (absent) set mean (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott (1995). Recent studies found that viewing sets of images, simultaneously or sequentially, leads to perception of set statistics (mean, range) with poor memory for individual elements. Ensemble perception was found for sets of simple images (e.g. circles varying in size or brightness; lines of varying orientation), complex objects (e.g. faces of varying emotion), as well as for objects belonging to the same category. When the viewed set does not include its mean or prototype, nevertheless, observers report and act as if they have seen this central image or object – a form of false memory. Physiologically, detailed sensory information at cortical input levels is processed hierarchically to form an integrated scene gist at higher levels. However, we are aware of the gist before the details. We propose that images and objects belonging to a set or category are represented as their gist, mean or prototype, plus individual differences from that gist. Under constrained viewing conditions, only the gist is perceived and remembered. This theory also provides a basis for compressed neural representation. Extending this theory to scenes and episodes supplies a generalized basis for false memories. They seem right, match generalized expectations, so are believable without challenging examination. This theory could be tested by analyzing the typicality of false memories, compared to rejected alternatives.
Marcello Rosa· Monash University
Tue, Nov 17 · 13:00 UTC
Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are small South American monkeys which are being increasingly becoming adopted as animal models in neuroscience. Knowledge about the marmoset visual system has developed rapidly over the last decade. But what are the comparative advantages, and disadvantages involved in adopting this emerging model, as opposed to the more traditionally used macaque monkey? In this talk I will present case studies where the simpler brain morphology and short developmental cycle of the marmoset have been key factors in facilitating discoveries about the anatomy and physiology of the visual system. Although no single species provides the “ideal” animal model for invasive studies of the neural bases of visual processing, I argue that the development of robust methodologies for the study of the marmoset brain provides exciting opportunities to address long-standing problems in neuroscience.
We use cookies for analytics.