Neuroscience seminars

Dietary protein quantity and quality greatly impact metabolic health via evolutionary-conserved mechanisms that ensure avoidance of amino acid imbalanced food sources, promote hyperphagia when dietary protein density is low, and conversely produce satiety when dietary protein density is high. Growing evidence support the emerging concept of protein homeostasis in mammals, where protein intake is maintained within a tight range independently of energy intake to reach a target protein intake. The behavioural and neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying these adaptations are unclear and form the focus of our research.

I am interested in developing a neurally mechanistic understanding of how primate brains represent the world through its visual system and how such representations enable a remarkable set of intelligent behaviors. In this talk, I will primarily highlight aspects of my current research that focuses on dissecting the brain circuits that support core object recognition behavior (primates’ ability to categorize objects within hundreds of milliseconds) in non-human primates. On the one hand, my work empirically examines how well computational models of the primate ventral visual pathways embed knowledge of the visual brain function (e.g., Bashivan*, Kar*, DiCarlo, Science, 2019). On the other hand, my work has led to various functional and architectural insights that help improve such brain models. For instance, we have exposed the necessity of recurrent computations in primate core object recognition (Kar et al., Nature Neuroscience, 2019), one that is strikingly missing from most feedforward artificial neural network models. Specifically, we have observed that the primate ventral stream requires fast recurrent processing via ventrolateral PFC for robust core object recognition (Kar and DiCarlo, Neuron, 2021). In addition, I have been currently developing various chemogenetic strategies to causally target specific bidirectional neural circuits in the macaque brain during multiple object recognition tasks to further probe their relevance during this behavior. I plan to transform these data and insights into tangible progress in neuroscience via my collaboration with various computational groups and building improved brain models of object recognition. I hope to end the talk with a brief glimpse of some of my planned future work!

Dr. Gupta is carrying out his post doctoral studies in the Buter Laboratory in UCLA. He is applying his his knowledge of embryology to stem cells for developing regenerative therapies to treat spinal cord injuries. In this talk, he will discuss how understanding the logic for spinal cord development led us to derive diverse sensory neuronal classes from embryonic stem cells. The spinal sensory neurons enableus to perceive our environment through modalities that are lost in spinal injury patients. These ESC derived senory neurons can help regain sensation in spina cord injury patients through regenerative therapies.

The typical goal of homeostatic mechanisms is to ensure a system operates at or in the vicinity of a stable set point, where a particular measure is relatively constant and stable. Neural firing rate homeostasis is unusual in that a set point of fixed firing rate is at odds with the goal of a neuron to convey information, or produce timed motor responses, which require temporal variations in firing rate. Therefore, for a neuron, a range of firing rates is required for optimal function, which could, for example, be set by a dual system that controls both mean and variance of firing rate. We explore, both via simulations and analysis, how two experimentally measured mechanisms for firing rate homeostasis can cooperate to improve information processing and avoid the pitfall of pulling in different directions when their set points do not appear to match.

The human brain is a complex network of neuronal connections. The precise arrangement of these connections, otherwise known as the topology of the network, is crucial to its functioning. Recent efforts to understand how the complex topology of the brain has emerged have used generative mathematical models, which grow synthetic networks according to specific wiring rules. Evidence suggests that a wiring rule which emulates a trade-off between connection costs and functional benefits can produce networks that capture essential topological properties of brain networks. In this webinar, Professor Alex Fornito and Dr Stuart Oldham will discuss these previous findings, as well as their own efforts in creating more physiologically constrained generative models. Professor Alex Fornito is Head of the Brain Mapping and Modelling Research Program at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health. His research focuses on developing new imaging techniques for mapping human brain connectivity and applying these methods to shed light on brain function in health and disease. Dr Stuart Oldham is a Research Fellow at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and a Research Officer at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. He is interested in characterising the organisation of human brain networks, with particular focus on how this organisation develops, using neuroimaging and computational tools.

There is little consensus on the level of spatial complexity at which dendrites operate. On the one hand, emergent evidence indicates that synapses cluster at micrometer spatial scales. On the other hand, most modelling and network studies ignore dendrites altogether. This dichotomy raises an urgent question: what is the smallest relevant spatial scale for understanding dendritic computation? We have developed a method to construct compartmental models at any level of spatial complexity. Through carefully chosen parameter fits, solvable in the least-squares sense, we obtain accurate reduced compartmental models. Thus, we are able to systematically construct passive as well as active dendrite models at varying degrees of spatial complexity. We evaluate which elements of the dendritic computational repertoire are captured by these models. We show that many canonical elements of the dendritic computational repertoire can be reproduced with few compartments. For instance, for a model to behave as a two-layer network, it is sufficient to fit a reduced model at the soma and at locations at the dendritic tips. In the basal dendrites of an L2/3 pyramidal model, we reproduce the backpropagation of somatic action potentials (APs) with a single dendritic compartment at the tip. Further, we obtain the well-known Ca-spike coincidence detection mechanism in L5 Pyramidal cells with as few as eleven compartments, the requirement being that their spacing along the apical trunk supports AP backpropagation. We also investigate whether afferent spatial connectivity motifs admit simplification by ablating targeted branches and grouping affected synapses onto the next proximal dendrite. We find that voltage in the remaining branches is reproduced if temporal conductance fluctuations stay below a limit that depends on the average difference in input resistance between the ablated branches and the next proximal dendrite. Consequently, when the average conductance load on distal synapses is constant, the dendritic tree can be simplified while appropriately decreasing synaptic weights. When the conductance level fluctuates strongly, for instance through a-priori unpredictable fluctuations in NMDA activation, a constant weight rescale factor cannot be found, and the dendrite cannot be simplified. We have created an open source Python toolbox (NEAT - https://neatdend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) that automatises the simplification process. A NEST implementation of the reduced models, currently under construction, will enable the simulation of few-compartment models in large-scale networks, thus bridging the gap between cellular and network level neuroscience.

A basic time scale in neural dynamics from single cells to the network level is the membrane time constant - set by a neuron’s input resistance and its capacitance. Interestingly, the membrane capacitance appears to be more dynamic than previously assumed with implications for neural function and pathology. Indeed, altered membrane capacitance has been observed in reaction to physiological changes like neural swelling, but also in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Importantly, according to theory, even small changes of the capacitance can affect neuronal signal processing, e.g. increase network synchronization or facilitate transmission of high frequencies. In experiment, robust methods to modify the capacitance of a neuron have been missing. Here, we present the capacitance clamp - an electrophysiological method for capacitance control based on an unconventional application of the dynamic clamp. In its original form, dynamic clamp mimics additional synaptic or ionic conductances by injecting their respective currents. Whereas a conductance directly governs a current, the membrane capacitance determines how fast the voltage responds to a current. Accordingly, capacitance clamp mimics an altered capacitance by injecting a dynamic current that slows down or speeds up the voltage response (Fig 1 A). For the required dynamic current, the experimenter only has to specify the original cell and the desired target capacitance. In particular, capacitance clamp requires no detailed model of present conductances and thus can be applied in every excitable cell. To validate the capacitance clamp, we performed numerical simulations of the protocol and applied it to modify the capacitance of cultured neurons. First, we simulated capacitance clamp in conductance based neuron models and analysed impedance and firing frequency to verify the altered capacitance. Second, in dentate gyrus granule cells from rats, we could reliably control the capacitance in a range of 75 to 200% of the original capacitance and observed pronounced changes in the shape of the action potentials: increasing the capacitance reduced after-hyperpolarization amplitudes and slowed down repolarization. To conclude, we present a novel tool for electrophysiology: the capacitance clamp provides reliable control over the capacitance of a neuron and thereby opens a new way to study the temporal dynamics of excitable cells.

There is a growing body of evidence that reproducibility or replication is low in neuroscience and in neuroimaging in particular, but the factors affecting studies solidity are still generally poorly understood, and the solutions are not clearly exposed to the neuroimaging scientific community. In this talk, I will review the key factors contributing to irreproducible results in neuroimaging specifically in the context of explanatory or prediction studies and propose a series of practical steps to improve the neuroimaging (and neuroscience) results robustness and re-usability.

Studying the pathophysiology of late stage Parkinson’s disease (PD) – after the patients have experienced severe neuronal loss – has helped develop various symptomatic treatments for PD (e.g., deep brain stimulation). However, it has been of limited use in developing neuroprotective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), because DMTs require interventions at much earlier stages of PD when vulnerable neurons are still intact. Because PD patients exhibit various non-motor prodromal symptoms (ie, symptoms that predate diagnosis), understanding the pathophysiology underlying these symptom could lead to earlier diagnosis and intervention. In my talk, I will present a recently elucidated example of how PD pathologies alter the channel biophysics of intact vagal motoneurons (known to be selectively vulnerable in PD) to drive dysautonomia that is reminiscent of prodromal PD. I will discuss how elucidating the pathophysiology of prodromal symptoms can lead to earlier diagnosis through the development of physiological biomarkers for PD.

In this talk series, addiction neuroscientists from across the world share their personal stories/experiences on the beauty of addiction neuroscience and how/why they have decided to invest their scientific life in this field. We hope that this talk series would encourage and support a new generation of young and passionate addiction neuroscientists in different countries to revolutionize the field of addiction medicine.

The neurobiology of decision-making is informed by neurons capable of representing information over time scales of seconds. Such neurons were initially characterized in studies of spatial working memory, motor planning (e.g., Richard Andersen lab) and spatial attention. For decision-making, such neurons emit graded spike rates, that represent the accumulated evidence for or against a choice. They establish the conduit between the formation of the decision and its completion, usually in the form of a commitment to an action, even if provisional. Indeed, many decisions appear to arise through an accumulation of noisy samples of evidence to a terminating threshold, or bound. Previous studies show that single neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) represent the accumulation of evidence when monkeys make decisions about the direction of random dot motion (RDM) and express their decision with a saccade to the neuron’s preferred target. The mechanism of termination (the bound) is elusive. LIP is interconnected with other brain regions that also display decision-related activity. Whether these areas play roles in the decision process that are similar to or fundamentally different from that of LIP is unclear. I will present new unpublished experiments that begin to resolve these issues by recording from populations of neurons simultaneously in LIP and one of its primary targets, the superior colliculus (SC), while monkeys make difficult perceptual decisions.

The ability to simultaneously record the activity from tens to thousands to tens of thousands of neurons has allowed us to analyze the computational role of population activity as opposed to single neuron activity. Recent work on a variety of cortical areas suggests that neural function may be built on the activation of population-wide activity patterns, the neural modes, rather than on the independent modulation of individual neural activity. These neural modes, the dominant covariation patterns within the neural population, define a low dimensional neural manifold that captures most of the variance in the recorded neural activity. We refer to the time-dependent activation of the neural modes as their latent dynamics. As an example, we focus on the ability to execute learned actions in a reliable and stable manner. We hypothesize that the ability to perform a given behavior in a consistent manner requires that the latent dynamics underlying the behavior also be stable. The stable latent dynamics, once identified, allows for the prediction of various behavioral features, using models whose parameters remain fixed throughout long timespans. We posit that latent cortical dynamics within the manifold are the fundamental and stable building blocks underlying consistent behavioral execution.