Seminars

In this webinar on spatial navigation circuits, three researchers—Ann Hermundstad, Ila Fiete, and Barbara Webb—discussed how diverse species solve navigation problems using specialized yet evolutionarily conserved brain structures. Hermundstad illustrated the fruit fly’s central complex, focusing on how hardwired circuit motifs (e.g., sinusoidal steering curves) enable rapid, flexible learning of goal-directed navigation. This framework combines internal heading representations with modifiable goal signals, leveraging activity-dependent plasticity to adapt to new environments. Fiete explored the mammalian head-direction system, demonstrating how population recordings reveal a one-dimensional ring attractor underlying continuous integration of angular velocity. She showed that key theoretical predictions—low-dimensional manifold structure, isometry, uniform stability—are experimentally validated, underscoring parallels to insect circuits. Finally, Webb described honeybee navigation, featuring path integration, vector memories, route optimization, and the famous waggle dance. She proposed that allocentric velocity signals and vector manipulation within the central complex can encode and transmit distances and directions, enabling both sophisticated foraging and inter-bee communication via dance-based cues.

When experts are immersed in a task, a natural assumption is that their brains prioritize task-related activity. Accordingly, most efforts to understand neural activity during well-learned tasks focus on cognitive computations and task-related movements. Surprisingly, we observed that during decision-making, the cortex-wide activity of multiple cell types is dominated by movements, especially “uninstructed movements”, that are spontaneously expressed. These observations argue that animals execute expert decisions while performing richly varied, uninstructed movements that profoundly shape neural activity. To understand the relationship between these movements and decision-making, we examined the movements more closely. We tested whether the magnitude or the timing of the movements was correlated with decision-making performance. To do this, we partitioned movements into two groups: task-aligned movements that were well predicted by task events (such as the onset of the sensory stimulus or choice) and task independent movement (TIM) that occurred independently of task events. TIM had a reliable, inverse correlation with performance in head-restrained mice and freely moving rats. This hinted that the timing of spontaneous movements could indicate periods of disengagement. To confirm this, we compared TIM to the latent behavioral states recovered by a hidden Markov model with Bernoulli generalized linear model observations (GLM-HMM) and found these, again, to be inversely correlated. Finally, we examined the impact of these behavioral states on neural activity. Surprisingly, we found that the same movement impacts neural activity more strongly when animals are disengaged. An intriguing possibility is that these larger movement signals disrupt cognitive computations, leading to poor decision-making performance. Taken together, these observations argue that movements and cognitionare closely intertwined, even during expert decision-making.

It is critical for all animals to make appropriate, but also flexible, foraging decisions, especially when facing starvation. Sensing olfactory information is essential to evaluate food quality before ingestion. Previously, we found that Drosophila larvae switch their response to certain odors from aversion to attraction when food deprived. The neural mechanism underlying this switch in behavior involves serotonergic modulation and reconfiguration of odor processing in the early olfactory sensory system. We now investigate if a change in hunger state also influences other behavioral decisions. Since it had been shown that fly larvae can perform cannibalism, we investigate the effect of food deprivation on feeding on dead conspecifics. We find that fed fly larvae rarely use dead conspecifics as a food source. However, food deprivation largely enhances this behavior. We will now also investigate the underlying neural mechanisms that mediate this enhancement and compare it to the already described mechanism for a switch in olfactory choice behavior. Generally, this flexibility in foraging behavior enables the larva to explore a broader range of stimuli and to expand their feeding choices to overcome starvation.

Inter-individual variability refers to differences in the expression of behaviors between members of a population. For instance, some individuals take greater risks, are more attracted to immediate gains or are more susceptible to drugs of abuse than others. To probe the neural bases of inter-individual variability we study reward seeking and decision-making in mice, and dissect the specific role of dopamine in the modulation of these behaviors. Using a spatial version of the multi-armed bandit task, in which mice are faced with consecutive binary choices, we could link modifications of midbrain dopamine cell dynamics with modulation of exploratory behaviors, a major component of individual characteristics in mice. By analyzing mouse behaviors in semi-naturalistic environments, we then explored the role of social relationships in the shaping of dopamine activity and associated beahviors. I will present recent data from the laboratory suggesting that changes in the activity of dopaminergic networks link social influences with variations in the expression of non-social behaviors: by acting on the dopamine system, the social context may indeed affect the capacity of individuals to make decisions, as well as their vulnerability to drugs of abuse, in particular nicotine.

Mammals instinctively explore and form mental maps of their spatial environments. Models of cognitive mapping in neuroscience mostly depict map-learning as a process of random or biased diffusion. In practice, however, animals explore spaces using structured, purposeful, sensory-guided actions. We have used threat-evoked escape behavior in mice to probe the relationship between ethological exploratory behavior and abstract spatial cognition. First, we show that in arenas with obstacles and a shelter, mice spontaneously learn efficient multi-step escape routes by memorizing allocentric subgoal locations. Using closed-loop neural manipulations to interrupt running movements during exploration, we next found that blocking runs targeting an obstacle edge abolished subgoal learning. We conclude that mice use an action-driven learning process to identify subgoals, and these subgoals are then integrated into an allocentric map-like representation. We suggest a conceptual framework for spatial learning that is compatible with the successor representation from reinforcement learning and sensorimotor enactivism from cognitive science.

The last decade in the field of neuroscience has been marked by intense debate on the meaning of the term fear. Whereas some have argued that fear (as well as other emotions) relies on cognitive capacities that are unique to humans, others view it as a negative state constructed from essential building blocks. This latter definition posits that fear states are associated with varying readouts that one could consider to be parallel processes or serial events tied to a specific hierarchy. Within this framework, innate defensive behaviors are considered to be common displays of fear states that lie under the control of hard-wired brain circuits. As a general rule, these defensive behaviors can be classified as either reactive or cognitive based on a thread imminence continuum. However, while evidence of the neuronal circuits that lead to these divergent behavioral strategies has accrued over the last decades, most literature has considered these responses in isolation. As a result, important misconceptions have arisen regarding how fear circuits are distributed in the brain and the contribution of specific nodes within these circuits to defensive behaviors. To mitigate the status quo, I will conduct a systematic comparison of brain circuits driving the expression of freezing and active avoidance behavior, which I will use as well-studied proxies of reactive and cognitive fear, respectively. In addition, I propose that by integrating associative information with interoceptive and exteroceptive signals the central nucleus of the amygdala plays a crucial role in biasing the selection of defensive behaviors.

During natural behavior animals dynamically switch between different behaviors, yet little is known about how the brain performs behavioral-switches. Navigation is a complex dynamic behavior that enables testing these kind of behavioral switches: It requires the animal to know its own allocentric (world-centered) location within the environment, while also paying attention to incoming sudden events such as obstacles or other conspecifics – and therefore the animal may need to rapidly switch from representing its own allocentric position to egocentrically representing ‘things out-there’. Here we used an ethological task where two bats flew together in a very large environment (130 meters), and had to switch between two behaviors: (i) navigation, and (ii) obstacle-avoidance during ‘cross-over’ events with the other bat. Bats increased their echolocation click-rate before a cross-over, indicating spatial attention to the other bat. Hippocampal CA1 neurons represented the bat’s own position when flying alone (allocentric place-coding); surprisingly, when meeting the other bat, neurons switched very rapidly to jointly representing the inter-bat distance × position (egocentric × allocentric coding). This switching to a neuronal representation of the other bat was correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with the attention signal, as indexed by the bat’s echolocation calls – suggesting that sensory attention is controlling these major switches in neural coding. Interestingly, we found that in place-cells, the different place-fields of the same neuron could exhibit very different tuning to inter-bat distance – creating a non-separable coding of allocentric position × egocentric distance. Together, our results suggest that attentional switches during navigation – which in bats can be measured directly based on their echolocation signals – elicit rapid dynamics of hippocampal spatial coding. More broadly, this study demonstrates that during natural behavior, when animals often switch between different behaviors, neural circuits can rapidly and flexibly switch their core computations.

Many flexible behaviors are thought to rely on internal representations of an animal’s spatial relationship to its environment and of the consequences of its actions in that environment. While such representations—e.g. of head direction and value—have been extensively studied, how they are combined to guide behavior is not well understood. I will discuss how we are exploring these questions using a classical visual learning paradigm for the fly. I’ll begin by describing a simple policy that, when tethered to an internal representation of heading, captures structured behavioral variability in this task. I’ll describe how ambiguities in the fly’s visual surroundings affect its perception and, when coupled to this policy, manifest in predictable changes in behavior. Informed by newly-released connectomic data, I’ll then discuss how these computations might be carried out and combined within specific circuits in the fly’s central brain, and how perception and action might interact to shape individual differences in learning performance.

Drosophila can learn to associate odours with reward or punishment and the resulting memories direct odour-specific approach or avoidance behaviours. Recent progress has revealed a straightforward model for learning in which reinforcing dopaminergic neurons assign valence to odour representations in the neural ensemble of the mushroom bodies. Dopamine directed synaptic depression alters the route of odour-driven activity through the mushroom body output network. This circuit configuration and influence of internal state guide the expression of appropriate behaviour. Importantly, learned behaviour is flexible and can be updated as the fly accumulates additional experience. Our latest studies demonstrate that well-informed behaviour is guided by combining parallel conflicting and complementary memories of opposite valence.

For social animals, successfully communicating with others is essential for interactions and survival. My research aims to answer a central question on the neuronal basis of this ability, from the perspective of the listener: how do our brains enable us to communicate with each other? My work develops nonhuman animal models to study the behavioural and neuronal mechanisms underlying the perception of vocal patterns. I will start by providing an overview of my past research characterizing the neuronal-level substrates of voice processing along the primate temporal lobe. I will then focus on my current work on vocal perception in mice, in which I utilize natural male-female courtship behaviour to evaluate the acoustic dimensions extracted by listeners from ultrasonic sequences. I will then talk about ongoing work investigating the neuronal substrates supporting the perception of behaviourally relevant acoustic cues from mouse vocal sequences.