Seminars

(1) We (Grace Lindsay) used convolutional neural nets to model attention, by scaling the input/output function of neurons in an imagenet-trained network according to their selectivity for the feature or object category being attended. While this was effective in improving performance on difficult tasks, it was far less effective in earlier than in later layers. This indicated that neurons selective for a feature in earlier layers did not necessarily drive neurons selective for that feature in later layers. In contrast, applying attention according to the gradient for improving task performance worked well in early as well as late layers. This raises the question whether biological attentional modulation might reflect task requirements and not only the features of the stimuli to be attended. We suggest a simple experiment to answer this question, which we hope to convince an appropriate lab to carry out. (2) In E/I networks, a "paradoxical" response to stimulation has been shown: If the excitatory neurons would be unstable by themselves, but are stabilized by feedback inhibition (an "inhibition-stabilized network", or ISN), then, in response to addition of excitatory input to inhibitory neurons, their steady-state firing rates paradoxically decrease. In circuits with multiple inhibitory cell types, this has been generalized: in an ISN, if there is an added stimulus only to inhibitory cells, there will be a paradoxical change in the net inhibition received by excitatory cells -- e.g., if excitatory firing rates increase, so too will the net inhibition they receive. This does not imply that the firing rates of any particular inhibitory cell type will change paradoxically. Here we (Agostina Palmigiano along with Francesco Fumarola, and experimental work of Dan Mossing in the Adesnik lab) generalize the conditions for a paradoxical firing rate response, including in responses to partial as well as full perturbation of the neurons of a given cell type. We work in the context of the circuit with three inhibitory cell types (PV, SOM, VIP) in mouse V1. We show that, if a given cell type shows a paradoxical response to its own full stimulation, then the circuit without that cell type is unstable. This and experimental results to date, as well as our models fitted to data, suggest that PV but not SOM interneurons stabilize the circuit of layer 2/3 of mouse V1, at least for smaller visual stimulus sizes. For partial perturbations of a fraction f of a cell type that responds paradoxically to a full perturbation, there is a "fractional paradoxical effect": the proportion of all the cells of that type, stimulated and unstimulated, that respond opposite to the stimulation (i.e. negative response to excitation), changes non-monotonically, approaching 1 for f→0, decreasing with increasing f, and then increasing again to again approach 1 as f→1. I'll explain the origins of this behavior.3) We (Mario Dipoppa, in collaboration with the experimental work of Andy Keller and Morgane Roth from the Scanziani lab) have studied the E-PV-SOM-VIP circuit underlying contextual modulation in layer 2/3 of mouse V1. Experiments showed that E, PV, and VIP are suppressed by a surround stimuus that has the same orientation as, but not by one orthogonal to, the center stimulus. SOM neurons show the opposite behavior, being suppressed by an orthogonal but much less by a parallel surround. A combination of theory and optogenetic experiments show that the disinhibitory circuit -- VIP inhibits SOM, which inhibits E -- modulate responses between the two conditions. However, it does so, as part of the recurrent circuit, primarily by changing the recurrent excitation E cells receive, rather than by directly changing the inhibition received, in a manner reminiscent of the paradoxical response. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2021-06-09. Recording duration: 00:51:59.

The hippocampus and the amygdala are two structures required for emotional memory. While the hippocampus encodes the contextual part of the memory, the amygdala processes its emotional valence. During Non-REM sleep, the hippocampus displays high frequency oscillations called “ripples”. Our early work shows that the suppression of ripples during sleep impairs performance on a spatial task, underlying their crucial role in memory consolidation. We more recently showed that the joint amygdala-hippocampus activity linked to aversive learning is reinstated during the following Non-REM sleep epochs, specifically during ripples. This mechanism potentially sustains the consolidation of aversive associative memories during Non REM sleep. On the other hand, REM sleep is associated with regular 8 Hz theta oscillations, and is believed to play a role in emotional processing. A crucial, initial step in understanding this role is to unravel sleep dynamics related to REM sleep in the hippocampus-amygdala network

Several studies have showed that face stimuli elicit extremely fast and involuntary saccadic responses toward them, relative to other categories of visual stimuli. In the talk, I will mainly focus on a quite recent research done in our team that investigated to what extent face stimuli influence the programming and execution of saccades. In this research, two experiments were performed using a saccadic choice task: two images (one with a face, one with a vehicle) were simultaneously displayed in the left and right visual fields of participants who had to execute a saccade toward the image (Experiment 1) or toward a cross added in the center of the image (Experiment 2) containing a target stimulus (a face or a vehicle). As expected participants were faster to execute a saccade toward a face than toward a vehicle and did less errors. We also observed shorter saccades toward vehicle than face targets, even if participants were explicitly asked to perform their saccades toward a specific location (Experiment 2). Further analyses, that I will detailed in the talk, showed that error saccades might be interrupted in mid-fight to initiate a concurrently programmed corrective saccade.

Methodology for understanding the basic phenomena of life can be done in vitro or in vivo, under tightly-controlled experimental conditions designed to limit variability. However stringent the protocol, these experiments do not occur in a cultural vacuum and they are often subject to the same societal biases as other research disciplines. Many researchers uphold the status quo of biased basic research by not questioning the characteristics of their experimental animals, or the people from whom their tissue samples were collected. This means that our fundamental understanding of life has been built on biased models. This session will explore the ways in which basic life sciences research can be biased and the implications of this. We will discuss practical ways to assess your research design and how to make sure it is representative.

We see the last cookie in the box and think, can I take that? We reach a hand out. In the 2.1 seconds that this impulse travels through our brain, billions of neurons communicate with one another, sending blips of voltage through our sensory and motor regions. Neuroscientists call these blips “spikes.” Spikes enable us to do everything: talk, eat, run, see, plan, and decide. In The Spike, Mark Humphries takes readers on the epic journey of a spike through a single, brief reaction. In vivid language, Humphries tells the story of what happens in our brain, what we know about spikes, and what we still have left to understand about them. Drawing on decades of research in neuroscience, Humphries explores how spikes are born, how they are transmitted, and how they lead us to action. He dives into previously unanswered mysteries: Why are most neurons silent? What causes neurons to fire spikes spontaneously, without input from other neurons or the outside world? Why do most spikes fail to reach any destination? Humphries presents a new vision of the brain, one where fundamental computations are carried out by spontaneous spikes that predict what will happen in the world, helping us to perceive, decide, and react quickly enough for our survival. Traversing neuroscience’s expansive terrain, The Spike follows a single electrical response to illuminate how our extraordinary brains work.

Age-associated dementias are neuropathologically characterized by the identification of hallmark intracellular and extracellular deposition of proteins, i.e., hyperphosphorylated-tau, amyloid-β, and α-synuclein, or cerebrovascular lesions. The neuropathological assessment and staging of these pathologies allows for a diagnosis of a distinct disease, e.g., amyloid-β plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropathological assessment in large scale cohorts, such as the UK’s Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) programme, has made it increasingly clear that the ageing brain is characterized by the presence of multiple age-associated pathologies rather than just the ‘pure’ hallmark lesion as commonly perceived. These additional pathologies can range from low/intermediate levels, that are assumed to have little if any clinical significance, to a full-blown mixed disease where there is the presence of two distinct diseases. In our recent paper (McAleese et al. 2021 Concomitant neurodegenerative pathologies contribute to the transition from mild cognitive impairment to dementia, https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/alz.12291, Alzheimer's & Dementia), using the BDR cohort, we investigated the frequency of multimorbidity and specifically investigated the impact of additional low-level pathology on cognition. In this study, of 670 donated post-mortem brains, we found that almost 70% of cases exhibited multimorbidity and only 22% were considered a pure diagnosis. Importantly, no case of Lewy Body dementia or vascular dementia was considered pure. A key finding is that the presence of low levels of additional pathology increased the likelihood of having mild dementia vs mild cognitive impairment by almost 20-fold, indicating low levels of additional pathology do impact the clinical progression of a distinct disease. Given the high prevalence and the potential clinical impact, cerebral multimorbidity should be at the forefront of consideration in dementia research.

Coordinated activity across networks of neurons is a hallmark of both resting and active behavioral states in many species, including worms, flies, fish, mice and humans. These global patterns alter energy metabolism in the brain over seconds to hours, making oxygen consumption and glucose uptake widely used proxies of neural activity. However, whether changes in neural activity are causally related to changes in metabolic flux in intact circuits on the sub-second timescales associated with behavior, is unclear. Moreover, it is unclear whether differences between rest and action are associated with spatiotemporally structured changes in neuronal energy metabolism at the subcellular level. My work combines two-photon microscopy across the fruit fly brain with sensors that allow simultaneous measurements of neural activity and metabolic flux, across both resting and active behavioral states. It demonstrates that neural activity drives changes in metabolic flux, creating a tight coupling between these signals that can be measured across large-scale brain networks. Further, using local optogenetic perturbation, I show that even transient increases in neural activity result in rapid and persistent increases in cytosolic ATP, suggesting that neuronal metabolism predictively allocates resources to meet the energy demands of future neural activity. Finally, these studies reveal that the initiation of even minimal behavioral movements causes large-scale changes in the pattern of neural activity and energy metabolism, revealing unexpectedly widespread engagement of the central brain.

Traditionally, the dorsolateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of the thalamus has been considered a feedforward relay station for retinal signals to reach primary visual cortex. The local and long-range circuits of dLGN, however, suggest that this view is not correct. Indeed, besides the thalamo-cortical relay cells, dLGN contains local inhibitory interneurons, and receives not only feedforward input from the retina, but also massive direct and indirect feedback from primary visual cortex. Furthermore, it is one of the earliest processing stages in the visual system that integrates visual information with neuromodulatory signals.

The spontaneous collective motion of self-propelled agents is ubiquitous in the natural world, and it often occurs in complex environments, be it bacteria and cells migrating through polymeric extracellular matrix or animal herds and human crowds navigating structured terrains. Much is known about flocking dynamics in pristine backgrounds, but how do spatio-temporal heterogeneities in the environment impact such collective self-organization? I will present two model systems, a colloidal active fluid negotiating disordered obstacles and a confined dense bacterial suspension in a viscoelastic medium, as controllable platforms to explore this question and highlight general mechanisms for active self-organization in complex environments. By combining theory and experiment, I will show how flocks on disordered substrates organize into a novel dynamic vortex glass phase, akin to vortex glasses in dirty superconductors, while the presence of viscoelasticity can calm the otherwise turbulent swarming of bacteria, allowing the emergence of a large scale coherent and even oscillatory vortex when confined on the millimetre scale.

Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. But what is the ethical thing to do? Should researchers be allowed or encouraged to self-experiment? Should institutions support or hinder them? Where do you think that this process of self-experimentation could take us? This presentation by Dr Matt Lennon and Professor Zoltan Molnar of the University of Oxford, will explore the history, future and ethics of self-experimentation. It will explore notable examples of self-experimenters including Isaac Newton, Angelo Ruffini and Oliver Sacks and how a number of these pivotal experiments created paradigm shifts in neuroscience. The presentation will open up a forum for all participants to be involved asking key ethical questions around what should and should not be allowed in self-experimentation research.

FED3 is a device for behavioral training of mice in vivarium home-cages. Mice interact with FED3 through two nose-pokes and FED3 responds with visual stimuli, auditory stimuli, and by dispensing pellets. As it is used in the home-cage FED3 can be used for around-the-clock training of mice over several weeks. FED3 is open-source and can be built by users for ~10-20x less than commercial solutions for training mice. The control code is also open-source and was designed to be easily modified by users.