The David Smith Lectures in Anatomical Neuropharmacology, Part of the 'Pharmacology, Anatomical Neuropharmacology and Drug Discovery Seminars Series', Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford. The 15th David Smith Award Lecture in Anatomical Neuropharmacology will be delivered by Professor Tim Bliss, Visiting Professor at UCL and the Frontier Institutes of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, and is hosted by Professor Nigel Emptage. This award lecture was set up to celebrate the vision of Professor A David Smith, namely, that explanations of the action of drugs on the brain requires the definition of neuronal circuits, the location and interactions of molecules. Tim Bliss gained his PhD at McGill University in Canada. He joined the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London in 1967, where he remained throughout his career. His work with Terje Lømo in the late 1960’s established the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) as the dominant synaptic model of how the mammalian brain stores memories. He was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1994 and is a founding fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences. He shared the Bristol Myers Squibb award for Neuroscience with Eric Kandel in 1991, the Ipsen Prize for Neural Plasticity with Richard Morris and Yadin Dudai in 2013. In May 2012 he gave the annual Croonian Lecture at the Royal Society on ‘The Mechanics of Memory’. In 2016 Tim, with Graham Collingridge and Richard Morris shared the Brain Prize, one of the world's most coveted science prizes. Abstract: In 1966 there appeared in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica an abstract of a talk given by Terje Lømo, a PhD student in Per Andersen’s laboratory at the University of Oslo. In it Lømo described the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic responses in the dentate gyrus of the anaesthetised rabbit that followed repeated episodes of 10-20Hz stimulation of the perforant path. Thus, heralded and almost entirely unnoticed, one of the most consequential discoveries of 20th century neuroscience was ushered into the world. Two years later I arrived in Oslo as a visiting post-doc from the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London. In this talk I recall the events that led us to embark on a systematic reinvestigation of the phenomenon now known as long-term potentiation (LTP) and will then go on to describe the discoveries and controversies that enlivened the early decades of research into synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. I will end with an observer’s view of the current state of research in the field, and what we might expect from it in the future.

Measuring the degree of consciousness an organism possesses has remained a longstanding challenge in Neuroscience. In part, this is due to the difficulty of finding the appropriate mathematical tools for describing such a subjective phenomenon. Current methods relate the level of consciousness to the complexity of neural activity, i.e., using the information contained in a stream of recorded signals they can tell whether the subject might be awake, asleep, or anaesthetised. Usually, the signals stemming from a complex system are correlated in time; the behaviour of the future depends on the patterns in the neural activity of the past. However these past-future relationships remain either hidden to, or not taken into account in the current measures of consciousness. These past-future correlations are likely to contain more information and thus can reveal a richer understanding about the behaviour of complex systems like a brain. Our work employs the "epsilon-machines” framework to account for the time correlations in neural recordings. In a nutshell, epsilon-machines reveal how much of the past neural activity is needed in order to accurately predict how the activity in the future will behave, and this is summarised in a single number called "statistical complexity". If a lot of past neural activity is required to predict the future behaviour, then can we say that the brain was more “awake" at the time of recording? Furthermore, if we read the recordings in reverse, does the difference between forward and reverse-time statistical complexity allow us to quantify the level of time asymmetry in the brain? Neuroscience predicts that there should be a degree of time asymmetry in the brain. However, this has never been measured. To test this, we used neural recordings measured from the brains of fruit flies and inferred the epsilon-machines. We found that the nature of the past and future correlations of neural activity in the brain, drastically changes depending on whether the fly was awake or anaesthetised. Not only does our study find that wakeful and anaesthetised fly brains are distinguished by how statistically complex they are, but that the amount of correlations in wakeful fly brains was much more sensitive to whether the neural recordings were read forward vs. backwards in time, compared to anaesthetised brains. In other words, wakeful fly brains were more complex, and time asymmetric than anaesthetised ones.