Structure and function of the hippocampal CA3 module

A key issue in understanding circuit operations is the extent to which neuronal spiking reflects local computation or responses to upstream inputs. Several studies have lesioned or silenced inputs to area CA1 of the hippocampus - either area CA3 or the entorhinal cortex and examined the effect on CA1 pyramidal cells. However, the types of the reported physiological impairments vary widely, primarily because simultaneous manipulations of these redundant inputs have never been performed. In this study, I combined optogenetic silencing of unilateral and bilateral mEC, of the local CA1 region, and performed bilateral pharmacogenetic silencing of CA3. I combined this with high spatial resolution extracellular recordings along the CA1-dentate axis. Silencing the medial entorhinal largely abolished extracellular theta and gamma currents in CA1, without affecting firing rates. In contrast, CA3 and local CA1 silencing strongly decreased firing of CA1 neurons without affecting theta currents. Each perturbation reconfigured the CA1 spatial map. Yet, the ability of the CA1 circuit to support place field activity persisted, maintaining the same fraction of spatially tuned place fields. In contrast to these results, unilateral mEC manipulations that were ineffective in impacting place cells during awake behavior were found to alter sharp-wave ripple sequences activated during sleep. Thus, intrinsic excitatory-inhibitory circuits within CA1 can generate neuronal assemblies in the absence of external inputs, although external synaptic inputs are critical to reconfigure (remap) neuronal assemblies in a brain-state dependent manner.

In understanding circuit operations, a key issue is the extent to which neuronal spiking reflects local computation or responses to upstream inputs. Because pyramidal cells in CA1 do not have local recurrent projections, it is currently assumed that firing in CA1 is inherited from its inputs – thus, entorhinal inputs provide communication with the rest of the neocortex and the outside world, whereas CA3 inputs provide internal and past memory representations. Several studies have attempted to prove this hypothesis, by lesioning or silencing either area CA3 or the entorhinal cortex and examining the effect of firing on CA1 pyramidal cells. Despite the intense and careful work in this research area, the magnitudes and types of the reported physiological impairments vary widely across experiments. At least part of the existing variability and conflicts is due to the different behavioral paradigms, designs and evaluation methods used by different investigators. Simultaneous manipulations in the same animal or even separate manipulations of the different inputs to the hippocampal circuits in the same experiment are rare. To address these issues, I used optogenetic silencing of unilateral and bilateral mEC, of the local CA1 region, and performed bilateral pharmacogenetic silencing of the entire CA3 region. I combined this with high spatial resolution recording of local field potentials (LFP) in the CA1-dentate axis and simultaneously collected firing pattern data from thousands of single neurons. Each experimental animal had up to two of these manipulations being performed simultaneously. Silencing the medial entorhinal (mEC) largely abolished extracellular theta and gamma currents in CA1, without affecting firing rates. In contrast, CA3 and local CA1 silencing strongly decreased firing of CA1 neurons without affecting theta currents. Each perturbation reconfigured the CA1 spatial map. Yet, the ability of the CA1 circuit to support place field activity persisted, maintaining the same fraction of spatially tuned place fields, and reliable assembly expression as in the intact mouse. Thus, the CA1 network can maintain autonomous computation to support coordinated place cell assemblies without reliance on its inputs, yet these inputs can effectively reconfigure and assist in maintaining stability of the CA1 map.

CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus are the initial locus of episodic memory. The action of acetylcholine alters cellular excitability, modifies neuronal networks, and triggers secondary signaling that directly affects long-term plasticity (LTP) (the cellular underpinning of memory). It is therefore considered a critical regulator of learning and memory in the brain. Its action via M4 metabotropic receptors in the presynaptic terminal of the CA3 neurons and M1 metabotropic receptors in the postsynaptic spines of CA1 neurons produce rich dynamics across multiple timescales. We developed a model to describe the activation of postsynaptic M1 receptors that leads to IP3 production from membrane PIP2 molecules. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ultimately causes calcium release. This calcium release from the ER activates potassium channels like the calcium-activated SK channels and alters different aspects of synaptic signaling. In an independent signaling cascade, M1 receptors also directly suppress SK channels and the voltage-activated KCNQ2/3 channels, enhancing post-synaptic excitability. In the CA3 presynaptic terminal, we model the reduction of the voltage sensitivity of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and the resulting suppression of neurotransmitter release by the action of the M4 receptors. Our results show that the reduced initial release probability because of acetylcholine alters short-term plasticity (STP) dynamics. We characterize the dichotomy of suppressing neurotransmitter release from CA3 neurons and the enhanced excitability of the postsynaptic CA1 spine. Mechanisms underlying STP operate over a few seconds, while those responsible for LTP last for hours, and both forms of plasticity have been linked with very distinct functions in the brain. We show that the concurrent suppression of neurotransmitter release and increased sensitivity conserves neurotransmitter vesicles and enhances the reliability in plasticity. Our work establishes a relationship between STP and LTP coordinated by neuromodulation with acetylcholine.

Neocortical-hippocampal interactions during off-line periods such as slow-wave sleep are implicated in memory processing. In particular, recent memory traces are replayed in hippocampus during some sharp-wave ripple (SWR) events, and these replay events are positively correlated with neocortical memory trace reactivation. A prevalent model is that SWR arise ‘spontaneously’ in CA3 and propagate recent memory ‘indices’ outward to the neocortex to enable memory consolidation there; however, the spatiotemporal distribution of neocortical activation relative to SWR is incompletely understood. We used wide-field optical imaging to study voltage and glutamate release transients in dorsal neocortex in relation to CA1 multiunit activity (MUA) and SWR of sleeping and urethane anesthetized mice. Modulation of voltage and glutamate release signals in relation to SWRs varied across superficial neocortical regions, and it was largest in posteromedial regions surrounding retrosplenial cortex (RSC), which receives strong hippocampal output connections. Activity tended to spread sequentially from more medial towards more lateral regions. Contrary to the unidirectional hypothesis, activation exhibited a continuum of timing relative to SWRs, varying from neocortex leading to neocortex lagging the SWRs (± ~250 msec). The timing continuum was correlated with the skewness of peri-SWR hippocampal MUA and with a tendency for some SWR to occur in clusters. Thus, contrary to the model in which SWRs arise spontaneously in hippocampus, neocortical activation often precedes SWRs and may thus constitute a trigger event in which neocortical information seeds associative reactivation of hippocampal ‘indices’.