This webinar will showcase new approaches for electrophysiological recordings using our silicon neural probes and surface arrays combined with diverse optical methods such as wide-field or 2-photon imaging, fiber photometry, and optogenetic perturbations in awake, behaving mice. Multi-modal recording of single units and local field potentials across cortex, hippocampus and thalamus alongside calcium activity via GCaMP6F in cortical neurons in triple-transgenic animals or in hippocampal astrocytes via viral transduction are brought to bear to reveal hitherto inaccessible and under-appreciated aspects of coordinated dynamics in the brain.

The size and structure of the dendritic arbor play important roles in determining how synaptic inputs of neurons are converted to action potential output and how neurons are integrated in the surrounding neuronal network. Accordingly, neurons with aberrant morphology have been associated with neurological disorders. Dysmorphic, enlarged neurons are, for example, a hallmark of focal epileptogenic lesions like focal cortical dysplasia (FCDIIb) and gangliogliomas (GG). However, the regulatory mechanisms governing the development of dendrites are insufficiently understood. The evolutionary conserved Ste20/Hippo kinase pathway has been proposed to play an important role in regulating the formation and maintenance of dendritic architecture. A key element of this pathway, Ste20-like kinase (SLK), regulates cytoskeletal dynamics in non-neuronal cells and is strongly expressed throughout neuronal development. Nevertheless, its function in neurons is unknown. We found that during development of mouse cortical neurons, SLK has a surprisingly specific role for proper elaboration of higher, ≥ 3rd, order dendrites both in cultured neurons and living mice. Moreover, SLK is required to maintain excitation-inhibition balance. Specifically, SLK knockdown causes a selective loss of inhibitory synapses and functional inhibition after postnatal day 15, while excitatory neurotransmission is unaffected. This mechanism may be relevant for human disease, as dysmorphic neurons within human cortical malformations exhibit significant loss of SLK expression. To uncover the signaling cascades underlying the action of SLK, we combined phosphoproteomics, protein interaction screens and single cell RNA seq. Overall, our data identifies SLK as a key regulator of both dendritic complexity during development and of inhibitory synapse maintenance.

Schizophrenia is a neuropsychiatric disorder characterized by positive symptoms (such as hallucinations and delusions), negative symptoms (such as avolition and withdrawal) and cognitive dysfunction1. Schizophrenia is highly heritable, and genetic studies are playing a pivotal role in identifying potential biomarkers and causal disease mechanisms with the hope of informing new treatments. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified nearly 270 loci with a high statistical association with schizophrenia risk; however each locus confers only a small increase in risk therefore it is difficult to translate these findings into understanding disease biology that can lead to treatments. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models are a tractable system to translate genetic findings and interrogate mechanisms of pathogenesis. Mounting research with patient-derived iPSCs has proposed several neurodevelopmental pathways altered in SCZ, such as neural progenitor cell (NPC) proliferation, imbalanced differentiation of excitatory and inhibitory cortical neurons. However, it is unclear what exactly these iPS models recapitulate, how potential perturbations of early brain development translates into illness in adults and how iPS models that represent fetal stages can be utilized to further drug development efforts to treat adult illness. I will present the largest transcriptome analysis of post-mortem caudate nucleus in schizophrenia where we discovered that decreased presynaptic DRD2 autoregulation is the causal dopamine risk factor for schizophrenia (Benjamin et al, Nature Neuroscience 2022 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01182-7). We developed stem cell models from a subset of the postmortem cohort to better understand the molecular underpinnings of human psychiatric disorders (Sawada et al, Stem Cell Research 2020). We established a method for the differentiation of iPS cells into ventral forebrain organoids and performed single cell RNAseq and cellular phenotyping. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate iPSC models of SZ from the same individuals with postmortem tissue. Our study establishes that striatal neurons in the patients with SCZ carry abnormalities that originated during early brain development. Differentiation of inhibitory neurons is accelerated whereas excitatory neuronal development is delayed, implicating an excitation and inhibition (E-I) imbalance during early brain development in SCZ. We found a significant overlap of genes upregulated in the inhibitory neurons in SCZ organoids with upregulated genes in postmortem caudate tissues from patients with SCZ compared with control individuals, including the donors of our iPS cell cohort. Altogether, we demonstrate that ventral forebrain organoids derived from postmortem tissue of individuals with schizophrenia recapitulate perturbed striatal gene expression dynamics of the donors’ brains (Sawada et al, biorxiv 2022 https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.26.493589).

We hardly notice when there is a speck on our glasses, the obstructed visual information seems to be magically filled in. The mechanistic basis for this fundamental perceptual phenomenon has, however, remained obscure. What enables neurons in the visual system to respond to context when the stimulus is not available? While feedforward information drives the activity in cortex, feedback information is thought to provide contextual signals that are merely modulatory. We have made the discovery that mouse primary visual cortical neurons are strongly driven by feedback projections from higher visual areas when their feedforward sensory input from the retina is missing. This drive is so strong that it makes visual cortical neurons fire as much as if they were receiving a direct sensory input. These signals are likely used to predict input from the feedforward pathway. Preliminary results show that these feedback projections are strongly influenced by experience and learning.

We hardly notice when there is a speck on our glasses, the obstructed visual information seems to be magically filled in. The visual system uses visual context to predict the content of the stimulus. What enables neurons in the visual system to respond to context when the stimulus is not available? In cortex, sensory processing is based on a combination of feedforward information arriving from sensory organs, and feedback information that originates in higher-order areas. Whereas feedforward information drives the activity in cortex, feedback information is thought to provide contextual signals that are merely modulatory. We have made the exciting discovery that mouse primary visual cortical neurons are strongly driven by feedback projections from higher visual areas, in particular when their feedforward sensory input from the retina is missing. This drive is so strong that it makes visual cortical neurons fire as much as if they were receiving a direct sensory input.

Timescales characterize how fast the observables change in time. In neuroscience, they can be estimated from the measured activity and can be used, for example, as a signature of the memory trace in the network. I will first discuss the inference of the timescales from the neuroscience data comprised of the short trials and introduce a new unbiased method. Then, I will apply the method to the data recorded from a local population of cortical neurons from the visual area V4. I will demonstrate that the ongoing spiking activity unfolds across at least two distinct timescales - fast and slow - and the slow timescale increases when monkeys attend to the location of the receptive field. Which models can give rise to such behavior? Random balanced networks are known for their fast timescales; thus, a change in the neurons or network properties is required to mimic the data. I will propose a set of models that can control effective timescales and demonstrate that only the model with strong recurrent interactions fits the neural data. Finally, I will discuss the timescales' relevance for behavior and cortical computations.

Excitatory and inhibitory (E & I) inputs to cortical neurons remain balanced across different conditions. The balanced network model provides a self-consistent account of this observation: population rates dynamically adjust to yield a state in which all neurons are active at biological levels, with their E & I inputs tightly balanced. But global tight E/I balance predicts population responses with linear stimulus-dependence and does not account for systematic cortical response nonlinearities such as divisive normalization, a canonical brain computation. However, when necessary connectivity conditions for global balance fail, states arise in which only a localized subset of neurons are active and have balanced inputs. We analytically show that in networks of neurons with different stimulus selectivities, the emergence of such localized balance states robustly leads to normalization, including sublinear integration and winner-take-all behavior. An alternative model that exhibits normalization is the Stabilized Supralinear Network (SSN), which predicts a regime of loose, rather than tight, E/I balance. However, an understanding of the causal relationship between E/I balance and normalization in SSN and conditions under which SSN yields significant sublinear integration are lacking. For weak inputs, SSN integrates inputs supralinearly, while for very strong inputs it approaches a regime of tight balance. We show that when this latter regime is globally balanced, SSN cannot exhibit strong normalization for any input strength; thus, in SSN too, significant normalization requires localized balance. In summary, we causally and quantitatively connect a fundamental feature of cortical dynamics with a canonical brain computation. Time allowing I will also cover our work extending a normative theoretical account of normalization which explains it as an example of efficient coding of natural stimuli. We show that when biological noise is accounted for, this theory makes the same prediction as the SSN: a transition to supralinear integration for weak stimuli.

A central goal of vision science is to understand the principles underlying the perception and neural coding of the complex visual environment of our everyday experience. In the visual cortex, foundational work with artificial stimuli, and more recent work combining natural images and deep convolutional neural networks, have revealed much about the tuning of cortical neurons to specific image features. However, a major limitation of this existing work is its focus on single-neuron response strength to isolated images. First, during natural vision, the inputs to cortical neurons are not isolated but rather embedded in a rich spatial and temporal context. Second, the full structure of population activity—including the substantial trial-to-trial variability that is shared among neurons—determines encoded information and, ultimately, perception. In the first part of this talk, I will argue for a normative approach to study encoding of natural images in primary visual cortex (V1), which combines a detailed understanding of the sensory inputs with a theory of how those inputs should be represented. Specifically, we hypothesize that V1 response structure serves to approximate a probabilistic representation optimized to the statistics of natural visual inputs, and that contextual modulation is an integral aspect of achieving this goal. I will present a concrete computational framework that instantiates this hypothesis, and data recorded using multielectrode arrays in macaque V1 to test its predictions. In the second part, I will discuss how we are leveraging this framework to develop deep probabilistic algorithms for natural image and video segmentation.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have afforded paralysed users “mental control” of computer cursors and robots, and even of electrical stimulators that reanimate their own limbs. Most existing BCIs map the activity of hundreds of motor cortical neurons recorded with implanted electrodes into control signals to drive these devices. Despite these impressive advances, the field is facing a number of challenges that need to be overcome in order for BCIs to become widely used during daily living. In this talk, I will focus on two such challenges: 1) having BCIs that allow performing a broad range of actions; and 2) having BCIs whose performance is robust over long time periods. I will present recent studies from our group in which we apply neuroscientific findings to address both issues. This research is based on an emerging view about how the brain works. Our proposal is that brain function is not based on the independent modulation of the activity of single neurons, but rather on specific population-wide activity patters —which mathematically define a “neural manifold”. I will provide evidence in favour of such a neural manifold view of brain function, and illustrate how advances in systems neuroscience may be critical for the clinical success of BCIs.

Leanne Godinho (Germany): Probing the mechanisms underlying cell fate in vivo in the developing retina; Gabriele Ciceri (USA): Directing the timing of maturation in human pluripotent stem cell-derived cortical neurons; Daniel Poppe (Australia): Conserved and divergent features of DNA methylation in embryonic stem cell-derived neurons

The ability to reach, grasp, and manipulate objects is a remarkable expression of motor skill, and the loss of this ability in injury, stroke, or disease can be devastating. These behaviors are controlled by the coordinated activity of tens of millions of neurons distributed across many CNS regions, including the primary motor cortex. While many studies have characterized the activity of single cortical neurons during reaching, the principles governing the dynamics of large, distributed neural populations remain largely unknown. Recent work in primates has suggested that during the execution of reaching, motor cortex may autonomously generate the neural pattern controlling the movement, much like the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion. In this seminar, I will describe recent work that tests this hypothesis using large-scale neural recording, high-resolution behavioral measurements, dynamical systems approaches to data analysis, and optogenetic perturbations in mice. We find, by contrast, that motor cortex requires strong, continuous, and time-varying thalamic input to generate the neural pattern driving reaching. In a second line of work, we demonstrate that the cortico-cerebellar loop is not critical for driving the arm towards the target, but instead fine-tunes movement parameters to enable precise and accurate behavior. Finally, I will describe my future plans to apply these experimental and analytical approaches to the adaptive control of locomotion in complex environments.

Working memory is the sketchpad of consciousness, the fundamental mechanism the brain uses to gain volitional control over its thoughts and actions. For the past 50 years, working memory has been thought to rely on cortical neurons that fire continuous impulses that keep thoughts “online”. However, new work from our lab has revealed more complex dynamics. The impulses fire sparsely and interact with brain rhythms of different frequencies. Higher frequency gamma (>35 Hz) rhythms help carry the contents of working memory while lower frequency alpha/beta (~8-30 Hz) rhythms act as control signals that gate access to and clear out working memory. In other words, a rhythmic dance between brain rhythms may underlie your ability to control your own thoughts.

In the past several years, I have been involved in building a biologically realistic model of the monkey visual cortex. Work on one of the input layers (4Ca) of the primary visual cortex (V1) is now nearly complete, and I would like to share some of what I have learned with the community. After a brief overview of the model and its capabilities, I would like to focus on three sets of results that represent three different aspects of the modeling. They are: (i) emergent E-I dynamics in local circuits; (ii) how visual cortical neurons acquire their ability to detect edges and directions of motion, and (iii) a view across the cortical surface: nonequilibrium steady states (in analogy with statistical mechanics) and beyond.

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and focal cortical dysplasia type II (FCDII) are caused by mutations in mTOR pathway genes leading to mTOR hyperactivity, focal malformations of cortical development (fMCD), and seizures in 80-90% of the patients. The current definitive treatments for epilepsy are surgical resection or treatment with everolimus, which inhibits mTOR activity (only approved for TSC). Because both options have severe limitations, there is a major need to better understand the mechanisms leading to seizures to improve life-long epilepsy treatment in TSC and FCDII. To investigate such mechanisms, we recently developed a murine model of fMCD-associated epilepsy that recapitulates the human TSC and FCDII disorders. fMCD are defined by the presence of misplaced, dysmorphic cortical neurons expressing hyperactive mTOR – for simplicity we will refer to these as “mutant” neurons. In our model and in human TSC tissue, we made a surprising finding that mutant neurons express HCN4 channels, which are not normally functionally expressed in cortical neurons, and increased levels of filamin A (FLNA). FLNA is an actin-crossing linking molecule that has also multiple binding partners inside cells. These data led us to ask several important questions: (1) As HCN4 channels are responsible for the pacemaking activity of the heart, can HCN4 channel expression lead to repetitive firing of mutant neurons resulting in seizures? (2) HCN4 is the most cAMP-sensitive of the four HCN isoforms. Does increase in cAMP lead to the firing of mutant neurons? (3) Does increase in FLNA contribute to neuronal alterations and seizures? (4) Is the abnormal HCN4 and FLNA expression in mutant neurons due to mTOR? These questions will be discussed and addressed in the lecture.

Neural codes, such as temporal codes (precisely timed spikes) and rate codes (instantaneous spike firing rates), are believed to be used in encoding sensory information into spike trains of cortical neurons. Temporal and rate codes co-exist in the spike train and such multiplexed neural code-carrying spike trains have been shown to be spatially synchronized in multiple neurons across different cortical layers during sensory information processing. Inhibition is suggested to promote such synchronization, but it is unclear whether distinct subtypes of interneurons make different contributions in the synchronization of multiplexed neural codes. To test this, in vivo single-unit recordings from barrel cortex were combined with optogenetic manipulations to determine the contributions of parvalbumin (PV)- and somatostatin (SST)-positive interneurons to synchronization of precisely timed spike sequences. We found that PV interneurons preferentially promote the synchronization of spike times when instantaneous firing rates are low (<12 Hz), whereas SST interneurons preferentially promote the synchronization of spike times when instantaneous firing rates are high (>12 Hz). Furthermore, using a computational model, we demonstrate that these effects can be explained by PV and SST interneurons having preferential contribution to feedforward and feedback inhibition, respectively. Overall, these results show that PV and SST interneurons have distinct frequency (rate code)-selective roles in dynamically gating the synchronization of spike times (temporal code) through preferentially recruiting feedforward and feedback inhibitory circuit motifs. The inhibitory neural circuit mechanisms we uncovered here his may have critical roles in regulating neural code-based somatosensory information processing in the neocortex.

Spike trains recorded from the cortex of behaving animals can be complex, highly variable from trial to trial, and therefore challenging to interpret. A fraction of cells exhibit trial-averaged responses with obvious task-related features such as pure tone frequency tuning in auditory cortex. However, a substantial number of cells (including cells in primary sensory cortex) do not appear to fire in a task-related manner and are often neglected from analysis. We recently used a novel single-trial, spike-timing-based analysis to show that both classically responsive and non-classically responsive cortical neurons contain significant information about sensory stimuli and behavioral decisions suggesting that non-classically responsive cells may play an underappreciated role in perception and behavior. We now expand this investigation to explore the synaptic origins and potential contribution of these cells to network function. To do so, we trained a novel spiking recurrent neural network model that incorporates spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) mechanisms to perform the same task as behaving animals. By leveraging excitatory and inhibitory plasticity rules this model reproduces neurons with response profiles that are consistent with previously published experimental data, including classically responsive and non-classically responsive neurons. We found that both classically responsive and non-classically responsive neurons encode behavioral variables in their spike times as seen in vivo. Interestingly, plasticity in excitatory-to-excitatory synapses increased the proportion of non-classically responsive neurons and may play a significant role in determining response profiles. Finally, our model also makes predictions about the synaptic origins of classically and non-classically responsive neurons which we can compare to in vivo whole-cell recordings taken from the auditory cortex of behaving animals. This approach successfully recapitulates heterogeneous response profiles measured from behaving animals and provides a powerful lens for exploring large-scale neuronal dynamics and the plasticity rules that shape them.

Narratives of human evolution have focused on cortical expansion and increases in brain size relative to body size, but considered that changes in life history, such as in age at sexual maturity and thus the extent of childhood and maternal dependence, or maximal longevity, are evolved features that appeared as consequences of selection for increased brain size, or increased cognitive abilities that decrease mortality rates, or due to selection for grandmotherly contribution to feeding the young. Here I build on my recent finding that slower life histories universally accompany increased numbers of cortical neurons across warm-blooded species to propose a simpler framework for human evolution: that slower development to sexual maturity and increased post-maturity longevity are features that do not require selection, but rather inevitably and immediately accompany evolutionary increases in numbers of cortical neurons, thus fostering human social interactions and cultural and technological evolution as generational overlap increases.

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have afforded paralysed users “mental control” of computer cursors and robots, and even of electrical stimulators that reanimate their own limbs. Most existing BCIs map the activity of hundreds of motor cortical neurons recorded with implanted electrodes into control signals to drive these devices. Despite these impressive advances, the field is facing a number of challenges that need to be overcome in order for BCIs to become widely used during daily living. In this talk, I will focus on two such challenges: 1) having BCIs that allow performing a broad range of actions; and 2) having BCIs whose performance is robust over long time periods. I will present recent studies from our group in which we apply neuroscientific findings to address both issues. This research is based on an emerging view about how the brain works. Our proposal is that brain function is not based on the independent modulation of the activity of single neurons, but rather on specific population-wide activity patters —which mathematically define a “neural manifold”. I will provide evidence in favour of such a neural manifold view of brain function, and illustrate how advances in systems neuroscience may be critical for the clinical success of BCIs.

In the olfactory system, cholinergic modulation has been associated with contrast modulation and changes in receptive fields in the olfactory bulb, as well the learning of odor associations in the olfactory cortex. Computational modeling and behavioral studies suggest that cholinergic modulation could improve sensory processing and learning while preventing pro-active interference when task demands are high. However, how sensory inputs and/or learning regulate incoming modulation has not yet been elucidated. We here use a computational model of the olfactory bulb, piriform cortex (PC) and horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca (HDB) to explore how olfactory learning could regulate cholinergic inputs to the system in a closed feedback loop. In our model, the novelty of an odor is reflected in firing rates and sparseness of cortical neurons in response to that odor and these firing rates can directly regulate learning in the system by modifying cholinergic inputs to the system.

Working memory is the sketchpad of consciousness, the fundamental mechanism the brain uses to gain volitional control over its thoughts and actions. For the past 50 years, working memory has been thought to rely on cortical neurons that fire continuous impulses that keep thoughts “online”. However, new work from our lab has revealed more complex dynamics. The impulses fire sparsely and interact with brain rhythms of different frequencies. Higher frequency gamma (> 35 Hz) rhythms help carry the contents of working memory while lower frequency alpha/beta (~8-30 Hz) rhythms act as control signals that gate access to and clear out working memory. In other words, a rhythmic dance between brain rhythms may underlie your ability to control your own thoughts.