The Nature versus Nurture debate has generally been considered from the lens of genome versus experience dichotomy and has dominated our thinking about behavioral individuality and personality traits. In contrast, the role of nonheritable noise during brain development in behavioral variation is understudied. Using the Drosophila melanogaster visual system, I will discuss our efforts to dissect how individuality in circuit wiring emerges during development, and how that helps generate individual behavioral variation.

Through recent advances in microscopy, we now have an unprecedented view of the brain and body of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. We now know the connectivity at single neuron resolution across the whole brain. How do we translate these new measurements into a deeper understanding of how the brain processes sensory information and produces behavior? I will describe two computational efforts to model the brain and the body of the fruit fly. First, I will describe a new modeling method which makes highly accurate predictions of neural activity in the fly visual system as measured in the living brain, using only measurements of its connectivity from a dead brain [1], joint work with Jakob Macke. Second, I will describe a whole body physics simulation of the fruit fly which can accurately reproduce its locomotion behaviors, both flight and walking [2], joint work with Google DeepMind.

Detecting the direction of image motion is important for visual navigation, predator avoidance and prey capture, and thus essential for the survival of all animals that have eyes. However, the direction of motion is not explicitly represented at the level of the photoreceptors: it rather needs to be computed by subsequent neural circuits, involving a comparison of the signals from neighboring photoreceptors over time. The exact nature of this process represents a classic example of neural computation and has been a longstanding question in the field. Much progress has been made in recent years in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster by genetically targeting individual neuron types to block, activate or record from them. Our results obtained this way demonstrate that the local direction of motion is computed in two parallel ON and OFF pathways. Within each pathway, a retinotopic array of four direction-selective T4 (ON) and T5 (OFF) cells represents the four Cartesian components of local motion vectors (leftward, rightward, upward, downward). Since none of the presynaptic neurons is directionally selective, direction selectivity first emerges within T4 and T5 cells. Our present research focuses on the cellular and biophysical mechanisms by which the direction of image motion is computed in these neurons.

The brain is a prediction machine. Yet the world is never entirely predictable, for any animal. Unexpected events are surprising and this typically evokes prediction error signatures in animal brains. In humans such mismatched expectations are often associated with an emotional response as well. Appropriate emotional responses are understood to be important for memory consolidation, suggesting that valence cues more generally constitute an ancient mechanism designed to potently refine and generalize internal models of the world and thereby minimize prediction errors. On the other hand, abolishing error detection and surprise entirely is probably also maladaptive, as this might undermine the very mechanism that brains use to become better prediction machines. This paradoxical view of brain functions as an ongoing tug-of-war between prediction and surprise suggests a compelling new way to study and understand the evolution of consciousness in animals. I will present approaches to studying attention and prediction in the tiny brain of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. I will discuss how an ‘active’ sleep stage (termed rapid eye movement – REM – sleep in mammals) may have evolved in the first animal brains as a mechanism for optimizing prediction in motile creatures confronted with constantly changing environments. A role for REM sleep in emotional regulation could thus be better understood as an ancient sleep function that evolved alongside selective attention to maintain an adaptive balance between prediction and surprise. This view of active sleep has some interesting implications for the evolution of subjective awareness and consciousness.

How does the brain decode the meaning of sound signals, such as music and courtship songs? We believe that the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal model for answering this question, as it offers a comprehensive range of tools and assays which allow us to dissect the mechanisms underlying sound perception and evaluation in the brain. During the courtship behavior, male fruit flies emit “courtship songs” by vibrating their wings. Interestingly, the fly song has a species-specific rhythm, which indeed increases the female’s receptivity for copulation as well as male’s courtship behavior itself. How song signals, especially the species-specific sound rhythm, are evaluated in the fly brain? To tackle this question, we are exploring the features of the fly auditory system systematically. In this lecture, I will talk about our recent findings on the neural basis for song evaluation in fruit flies.

Animals produce behavior by responding to a mixture of cues that arise both externally (sensory) and internally (neural dynamics and states). These cues are continuously produced and can be combined in different ways depending on the needs of the animal. However, the integration of these external and internal cues remains difficult to understand in natural behaviors. To address this gap, we have developed an unsupervised method to identify internal states from behavioral data, and have applied it to the study of a dynamic social interaction. During courtship, Drosophila melanogaster males pattern their songs using cues from their partner. This sensory-driven behavior dynamically modulates courtship directed at their partner. We use our unsupervised method to identify how the animal integrates sensory information into distinct underlying states. We then use this to identify the role of courtship neurons in either integrating incoming information or directing the production of the song, roles that were previously hidden. Our results reveal how animals compose behavior from previously unidentified internal states, a necessary step for quantitative descriptions of animal behavior that link environmental cues, internal needs, neuronal activity, and motor outputs.

The development and maintenance of many tissues are fueled by stem cells. Many studies have addressed how intrinsic factors and local signals from neighboring niche cells maintain stem cell identity and proliferative potential. In contrast, it is poorly understood how stem cell activity is controlled by systemic, tissue-extrinsic signals in response to environmental cues and changes in physiological status. Our laboratory has been focusing on female germline stem cells (fGSCs) in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as a model system and studying neuroendocrine control of fGSC increase. The increase of fGSCs is induced by mating stimuli. We have previously reported that mating-induced fGSC increase is regulated by the ovarian steroid hormone and the enteroendocrine peptide hormone [Ameku & Niwa, PLOS Genetics 2016; Ameku et al. PLOS Biology 2018]. In this presentation, we report our recent finding showing a neuronal mechanism of mating-induced fGSC increase. We first found that the ovarian somatic cell-specific RNAi for Oamb, a G protein-coupled receptor for the neurotransmitter octopamine, failed to induce fGSC proliferation after mating. Both ex vivo and in vivo experiments revealed that octopamine and Oamb positively regulated mating-induced fGSC increase via intracellular Ca 2+ signaling. We also found that a small subset of octopaminergic neurons directly projected to the ovary, and neuronal activity of these neurons was required for mating-induced fGSC increase. This study provides a mechanism describing how the neuronal system controls stem cell behavior through stem cell niche signaling [Yoshinari et al. eLife 2020]. Here I will also present our recent data showing how the neuroendocrine system couples fGSC behavior to multiple environmental cues, such as mating and nutrition.

My research at the interface of neurobiology, biomechanics, and behavior seeks to understand how the timing precision of sensory input structures locomotor output. My lab studies the flight behavior of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, combining powerful genetic tools available for labeling and manipulating neural circuits with cutting-edge imaging in awake, behaving animals. This work has the potential to fundamentally reshape understanding of the evolution of insect flight, as well as highlight the tremendous importance of timing in the context of locomotion. Timing is crucial to the nervous system. The ability to rapidly detect and process subtle disturbances in the environment determines whether an animal can attain its next meal or successfully navigate complex, unpredictable terrain. While previous work on various animals has made tremendous strides uncovering the specialized neural circuits used to resolve timing differences with sub-microsecond resolution, it has focused on the detection of timing differences in sensory systems. Understanding of how the timing of motor output is structured by precise sensory input remains poor. My research focuses on an organ unique to fruit flies, called the haltere, that serves as a bridge for detecting and acting on subtle timing differences, helping flies execute rapid maneuvers. Understanding how this relatively simple insect canperform such impressive aerial feats demands an integrative approach that combines physics, muscle mechanics, neuroscience, and behavior. This unique, powerful approach will reveal the general principles that govern sensorimotor processing.

In the last decades, the post-transcriptional control of gene expression has become an area of intense investigation, delineating a complex scenario where several factors (e.g. RNA-binding proteins, coding and non-coding RNAs) orchestrate the fate of a given transcript. An intriguing hypothesis suggests that loss of RNA homeostasis is a central feature of many pathological states, including eye diseases. Since the elav (embryonic lethal, abnormal visual system) gene discovery in the Drosophila melanogaster, the mammalian ELAV-like family has confirmed its leading role in controlling the RNA metabolism (from splicing to translation) of genes with a key function in many physio-pathological contexts. Some relevant findings suggest the involvement of the HuR/ELAV-like1 member and its potential as a therapeutic target in age-related ocular pathologies.