Biological systems can self-organize in complex structures, able to evolve and adapt to widely varying environmental conditions. Despite the importance of fluid flow for transporting and organizing populations, few laboratory systems exist to systematically investigate the impact of advection on their spatial evolutionary dynamics. In this talk, I will discuss how we can address this problem by studying the morphology and genetic spatial structure of microbial colonies growing on the surface of a viscous substrate. When grown on a liquid, I will show that S. cerevisiae (baker’s yeast) can behave like “active matter” and collectively generate a fluid flow many times larger than the unperturbed colony expansion speed, which in turn produces mechanical stresses and fragmentation of the initial colony. Combining laboratory experiments with numerical modeling, I will demonstrate that the coupling between metabolic activity and hydrodynamic flows can produce positive feedbacks and drive preferential growth phenomena leading to the formation of microbial jets. Our work provides rich opportunities to explore the interplay between hydrodynamics, growth and competition within a versatile system.

Active matter systems are composed of constituents, each one in nonequilibrium, that consume energy in order to move [1]. A characteristic feature of active matter is collective motion leading to nonequilibrium phase transitions or large scale directed motion [2]. A number of recent works have featured active particles interacting with obstacles, either moving or fixed [3,4,5]. When an active particle encounters an asymmetric obstacle, different behaviours are detected depending on the nature of its active motion. On the one side, rectification effects arise in a suspension of run-and-tumble particles interacting with a wall of funnelled-shaped openings, caused by particles persistence length [6]. The same trapping mechanism could be responsible for the intake of microorganisms in the underground leaves [7] of Carnivorous plants [8]. On the other side, for aligning particles [9] interacting with a wall of funnelled-shaped openings, trapping happens on the (opposite) wider opening side of the funnels [10,11]. Interestingly, when funnels are located on a circular array, trapping is more localised and depends on the nature of the Vicsek model. Active particles can be synthetic (such as synthetic active colloids) or alive (such as living bacteria). A prototypical model to study living microswimmers is P. fluorescens, a rod shaped and biofilm forming bacterium. Biofilms are microbial communities self-assembled onto external interfaces. Biofilms can be described within the Soft Matter physics framework [12] as a viscoelastic material consisting of colloids (bacterial cells) embedded in a cross-linked polymer gel (polysaccharides cross-linked via proteins/multivalent cations), whose water content vary depending on the environmental conditions. Bacteria embedded in the polymeric matrix control biofilm structure and mechanical properties by regulating its matrix composition. We have recently monitored structural features of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms grown with and without hydrodynamic stress [13,14]. We have demonstrated that bacteria are capable of self-adapting to hostile hydrodynamic stress by tailoring the biofilm chemical composition, thus affecting both the mesoscale structure of the matrix and its viscoelastic properties that ultimately regulate the bacteria-polymer interactions. REFERENCES [1] C. Bechinger et al. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016); [2] T. Vicsek, A. Zafeiris Phys. Rep. 517, 71 (2012); [3] C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Lowen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 045006 (2016); [4] R Martinez, F Alarcon, DR Rodriguez, JL Aragones, C Valeriani The European Physical Journal E 41, 1 (2018); [5] DR Rodriguez, F Alarcon, R Martinez, J Ramírez, C Valeriani, Soft matter 16 (5), 1162 (2020); [6] C. O. Reichhardt and C. Reichhardt, Annual Review of Condensed Matter
Physics 8, 51 (2017); [7] W Barthlott, S Porembski, E Fischer, B Gemmel Nature 392, 447 (1998); [8] C B. Giuliano, R Zhang, R.Martinez Fernandez, C.Valeriani and L.Wilson (in preparation, 2021); [9] R Martinez, F Alarcon, JL Aragones, C Valeriani Soft matter 16 (20), 4739 (2020); [10] P. Galajada, J. Keymer, P. Chaikin and R.Austin, Journal of bacteriology, 189, 8704 (2007); [11] M. Wan, C.O. Reichhardt, Z. Nussinov, and C. Reichhardt, Physical Review Letters 101, 018102 (2008); [12] J N. Wilking , T E. Angelini , A Seminara , M P. Brenner , and D A. Weitz MRS Bulletin 36, 385 (2011); [13]J Jara, F Alarcón, A K Monnappa, J Ignacio Santos, V Bianco, P Nie, M Pica Ciamarra, A Canales, L Dinis, I López-Montero, C Valeriani, B Orgaz, Frontiers in microbiology 11, 3460 (2021); [14] P Nie, F Alarcon, I López-Montero, B Orgaz, C Valeriani, M Pica Ciamarra

Collective behaviour operates without central control, through interactions among individuals. The collective behaviour of ant colonies is based on simple olfactory interactions. Ant species differ enormously in the algorithms that regulate collective behaviour, reflecting diversity in ecology. I will contrast two species in very different ecological situations. Harvester ant colonies in the desert, where water is scarce but conditions are stable, regulate foraging to conserve water. Response to positive feedback from olfactory interactions depends on the risk of water loss, mediated by dopamine neurophysiology. For arboreal turtle ants in the tropical forest, life is easy but unpredictable, and a highly modular system uses negative feedback to sustain activity. In all natural systems, from ant colonies to brains, collective behaviour evolves in relation with changing conditions. Similar dynamics in environmental conditions may lead to the evolution of similar processes to regulate collective behaviour.