The head direction (HD) system is classically modeled as a ring attractor network which ensures a stable representation of the animal’s head direction. This unidimensional description popularized the view of the HD system as the brain’s internal compass. However, unlike a globally consistent magnetic compass, the orientation of the HD system is dynamic, depends on local cues and exhibits remapping across familiar environments5. Such a system requires mechanisms to remember and align to familiar landmarks, which may not be well described within the classic 1-dimensional framework. To search for these mechanisms, we performed large population recordings of mouse thalamic HD cells using calcium imaging, during controlled manipulations of a visual landmark in a familiar environment. First, we find that realignment of the system was associated with a continuous rotation of the HD network representation. The speed and angular distance of this rotation was predicted by a 2nd dimension to the ring attractor which we refer to as network gain, i.e. the instantaneous population firing rate. Moreover, the 360-degree azimuthal profile of network gain, during darkness, maintained a ‘memory trace’ of a previously displayed visual landmark. In a 2nd experiment, brief presentations of a rotated landmark revealed an attraction of the network back to its initial orientation, suggesting a time-dependent mechanism underlying the formation of these network gain memory traces. Finally, in a 3rd experiment, continuous rotation of a visual landmark induced a similar rotation of the HD representation which persisted following removal of the landmark, demonstrating that HD network orientation is subject to experience-dependent recalibration. Together, these results provide new mechanistic insights into how the neural compass flexibly adapts to environmental cues to maintain a reliable representation of the head direction.

Animals produce behavior by responding to a mixture of cues that arise both externally (sensory) and internally (neural dynamics and states). These cues are continuously produced and can be combined in different ways depending on the needs of the animal. However, the integration of these external and internal cues remains difficult to understand in natural behaviors. To address this gap, we have developed an unsupervised method to identify internal states from behavioral data, and have applied it to the study of a dynamic social interaction. During courtship, Drosophila melanogaster males pattern their songs using cues from their partner. This sensory-driven behavior dynamically modulates courtship directed at their partner. We use our unsupervised method to identify how the animal integrates sensory information into distinct underlying states. We then use this to identify the role of courtship neurons in either integrating incoming information or directing the production of the song, roles that were previously hidden. Our results reveal how animals compose behavior from previously unidentified internal states, a necessary step for quantitative descriptions of animal behavior that link environmental cues, internal needs, neuronal activity, and motor outputs.

Collective behavior of organisms creates environmental micro-niches that buffer them from environmental fluctuations e.g., temperature, humidity, mechanical perturbations, etc., thus coupling organismal physiology, environmental physics, and population ecology. This talk will focus on a combination of biological experiments, theory, and computation to understand how a collective of bees can integrate physical and behavioral cues to attain a non-equilibrium steady state that allows them to resist and respond to environmental fluctuations of forces and flows. We analyze how bee clusters change their shape and connectivity and gain stability by spread-eagling themselves in response to mechanical perturbations. Similarly, we study how bees in a colony respond to environmental thermal perturbations by deploying a fanning strategy at the entrance that they use to create a forced ventilation stream that allows the bees to collectively maintain a constant hive temperature. When combined with quantitative analysis and computations in both systems, we integrate the sensing of the environmental cues (acceleration, temperature, flow) and convert them to behavioral outputs that allow the swarms to achieve a dynamic homeostasis.

The development and maintenance of many tissues are fueled by stem cells. Many studies have addressed how intrinsic factors and local signals from neighboring niche cells maintain stem cell identity and proliferative potential. In contrast, it is poorly understood how stem cell activity is controlled by systemic, tissue-extrinsic signals in response to environmental cues and changes in physiological status. Our laboratory has been focusing on female germline stem cells (fGSCs) in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as a model system and studying neuroendocrine control of fGSC increase. The increase of fGSCs is induced by mating stimuli. We have previously reported that mating-induced fGSC increase is regulated by the ovarian steroid hormone and the enteroendocrine peptide hormone [Ameku & Niwa, PLOS Genetics 2016; Ameku et al. PLOS Biology 2018]. In this presentation, we report our recent finding showing a neuronal mechanism of mating-induced fGSC increase. We first found that the ovarian somatic cell-specific RNAi for Oamb, a G protein-coupled receptor for the neurotransmitter octopamine, failed to induce fGSC proliferation after mating. Both ex vivo and in vivo experiments revealed that octopamine and Oamb positively regulated mating-induced fGSC increase via intracellular Ca 2+ signaling. We also found that a small subset of octopaminergic neurons directly projected to the ovary, and neuronal activity of these neurons was required for mating-induced fGSC increase. This study provides a mechanism describing how the neuronal system controls stem cell behavior through stem cell niche signaling [Yoshinari et al. eLife 2020]. Here I will also present our recent data showing how the neuroendocrine system couples fGSC behavior to multiple environmental cues, such as mating and nutrition.

During brain development, neurons are born in specialized niches and migrate to target regions where they assemble to form the circuits that underlie mammalian behaviour. During their journey, neurons follow cell-intrinsic, genetic programs transmitted by their mother cells but also environmental cues, which together drive their maturation. Here, focusing on the neocortex, I will discuss recent findings from our laboratory in which we untangle and manipulate the programs at play in progenitors and their daughter neurons to better understand the emergence of cellular diversity in the developing brain.