← Back

Experimental Psychology

Topic spotlight
TopicWorld Wide

experimental psychology

Discover seminars, jobs, and research tagged with experimental psychology across World Wide.
10 curated items7 Seminars3 Positions
Updated 1 day ago
10 items · experimental psychology
10 results
Position

Virginie van Wassenhove

CEA
Gif sur Yvette
Dec 5, 2025

https://brainthemind.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/syg-postdoc-positions.pdf

SeminarNeuroscience

Feedback-induced dispositional changes in risk preferences

Stefano Palmintieri
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale & École Normale Supérieure, Paris
Oct 28, 2024

Contrary to the original normative decision-making standpoint, empirical studies have repeatedly reported that risk preferences are affected by the disclosure of choice outcomes (feedback). Although no consensus has yet emerged regarding the properties and mechanisms of this effect, a widespread and intuitive hypothesis is that repeated feedback affects risk preferences by means of a learning effect, which alters the representation of subjective probabilities. Here, we ran a series of seven experiments (N= 538), tailored to decipher the effects of feedback on risk preferences. Our results indicate that the presence of feedback consistently increases risk-taking, even when the risky option is economically less advantageous. Crucially, risk-taking increases just after the instructions, before participants experience any feedback. These results challenge the learning account, and advocate for a dispositional effect, induced by the mere anticipation of feedback information. Epistemic curiosity and regret avoidance may drive this effect in partial and complete feedback conditions, respectively.

SeminarNeuroscience

Understanding the Assessment of Spatial Neglect and its Treatment Using Prism Adaptation Training

Matthew Checketts
Division of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology and Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
Oct 4, 2021

Spatial neglect is a syndrome that is most frequently associated with damage to the right hemisphere, although damage to the left hemisphere can also result in signs of spatial neglect. It is characterised by absent or deficient awareness of the contralesional side of space. The screening and diagnosis of spatial neglect lacks a universal gold standard, but is usually achieved by using various modes of assessment. Spatial neglect is also difficult to treat, although prism adaptation training (PAT) has in the past reportedly showed some promise. This seminar will include highlights from a series of studies designed to identify knowledge gaps, and will suggest ways in which these can be bridged. The first study was conducted to identify and quantify clinicians’ use of assessment tools for spatial neglect, finding that several different tools are in use, but that there is an emerging consensus and appetite for harmonisation. The second study included PAT, and sought to uncover whether PAT can improve engagement in recommended therapy in order to improve the outcomes of stroke survivors with spatial neglect. The final study, a systematic review and meta-analysis, sought to investigate the scientific efficacy (rather than clinical effectiveness) of PAT, identifying several knowledge gaps in the existing literature and a need for a new approach in the study of PAT in the clinical setting.

SeminarPsychology

Algorithmic advances in face matching: Stability of tests in atypical groups

Mirta Stantic
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
Feb 17, 2021

Face matching tests have traditionally been developed to assess human face perception in the neurotypical range, but methods that underlie their development often make it difficult for these measures to be applied in atypical populations (developmental prosopagnosics, super recognizers) due to unadjusted difficulty. We have recently presented the development of the Oxford Face Matching Test, a measure that bases individual item-difficulty on algorithmically derived similarity of presented stimuli. The measure seems useful as it can be given online or in-laboratory, has good discriminability and high test-retest reliability in the neurotypical groups. In addition, it has good validity in separating atypical groups at either of the spectrum ends. In this talk, I examine the stability of the OFMT and other traditionally used measures in atypical groups. On top of the theoretical significance of determining whether reliability of tests is equivalent in atypical population, this is an important question because of the practical concerns of retesting the same participants across different lab groups. Theoretical and practical implications for further test development and data sharing are discussed.

SeminarNeuroscience

Multimodal brain imaging to predict progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Karl Herholz
University of Manchester, Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology
Dec 6, 2020

Cross-sectional and longitudinal multimodal brain imaging studies using positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have provided detailed insight into the pathophysiological progression of Alzheimer’s disease. It starts at an asymptomatic stage with widespread gradual accumulation of beta-amyloid and spread of pathological tau deposits. Subsequently changes of functional connectivity and glucose metabolism associated with mild cognitive impairment and brain atrophy may develop. However, the rate of progression to a symptomatic stage and ultimately dementia varies considerably between individuals. Mathematical models have been developed to describe disease progression, which may be used to identify markers that determine the current stage and likely rate of progression. Both are very important to improve the efficacy of clinical trials. In this lecture, I will provide an overview on current research and future perspectives in this area.

SeminarNeuroscience

Unsupervised deep learning identifies semantic disentanglement in single inferotemporal neurons

Irina Higgins
Google Deepmind
Jul 14, 2020

Irina is a research scientist at DeepMind, where she works in the Froniers team. Her work aims to bring together insights from the fields of neuroscience and physics to advance general artificial intelligence through improved representation learning. Before joining DeepMind, Irina was a British Psychological Society Undergraduate Award winner for her achievements as an undergraduate student in Experimental Psychology at Westminster University, followed by a DPhil at the Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, where she focused on understanding the computational principles underlying speech processing in the auditory brain. During her DPhil, Irina also worked on developing poker AI, applying machine learning in the finance sector, and working on speech recognition at Google Research."" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.14304.pdf