A NIH-funded postdoctoral position is immediately available in Dr. Stéphane Maison’s laboratory in the Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery at the Massachusetts Eye & Ear – Harvard Medical School. Our research interests focus on identifying biomarkers of a large range of etiologies and their associated disorders including difficulties hearing and communicating in noisy environments, reduced sound level tolerance and tinnitus using a test battery based on behavioral, electrophysiologic, and psychophysical measures. Salary and benefits are consistent with NIH guidelines and institution policies based on applicant’s experience. Highly motivated candidates who recently graduated with a PhD in biomedical engineering, computational biology, hearing science, neuroscience, or other related fields are welcome to apply. The applicant should have strong programming skills (e.g., Matlab, Python), independent and productive. Experience with human testing is preferred but not required. The fellow will receive an appointment at Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School. Interested applicants should apply using the following link: https://partners.taleo.net/careersection/mee/jobdetail.ftl?job=3299643&tz=GMT-04%3A00&tzname=America%2FNew_York

Comprehending speech under acoustically challenging conditions is an everyday task that we can often execute with ease. However, accomplishing this requires the engagement of cognitive resources, such as auditory attention and working memory. The mechanisms that contribute to the robustness of speech comprehension are of substantial interest in the context of hearing mild to moderate hearing impairment, in which affected individuals typically report specific difficulties in understanding speech in background noise. Although hearing aids can help to mitigate this, they do not represent a universal solution, thus, finding alternative interventions is necessary. Given that age-related hearing loss (“presbycusis”) is inevitable, developing new approaches is all the more important in the context of aging populations. Moreover, untreated hearing loss in middle age has been identified as the most significant potentially modifiable predictor of dementia in later life. I will present research that has used a multi-methodological approach (fMRI, EEG, MEG and non-invasive brain stimulation) to try to elucidate the mechanisms that comprise the cognitive “last mile” in speech acousticallychallenging speech comprehension and to find ways to enhance them.

Research into pitch perception and time perception has typically treated the two as independent processes. However, previous studies of music and speech perception have suggested that pitch and timing information may be processed in an integrated manner, such that the pitch of an auditory stimulus can influence a person’s perception, expectation, and memory of its duration and tempo. Typically, higher-pitched sounds are perceived as faster and longer in duration than lower-pitched sounds with identical timing. We conducted a series of experiments to better understand the limits of this pitch-time integrality. Across several experiments, we tested whether the higher-equals-faster illusion generalizes across the broader frequency range of human hearing by asking participants to compare the tempo of a repeating tone played in one of six octaves to a metronomic standard. When participants heard tones from all six octaves, we consistently found an inverted U-shaped effect of the tone’s pitch height, such that perceived tempo peaked between A4 (440 Hz) and A5 (880 Hz) and decreased at lower and higher octaves. However, we found that the decrease in perceived tempo at extremely high octaves could be abolished by exposing participants to high-pitched tones only, suggesting that pitch-induced timing biases are context sensitive. We additionally tested how the timing of an auditory stimulus influences the perception of its pitch, using a pitch discrimination task in which probe tones occurred early, late, or on the beat within a rhythmic context. Probe timing strongly biased participants to rate later tones as lower in pitch than earlier tones. Together, these results suggest that pitch and time exert a bidirectional influence on one another, providing evidence for integrated processing of pitch and timing information in auditory perception. Identifying the mechanisms behind this pitch-time interaction will be critical for integrating current models of pitch and tempo processing.

In order for animals to thrive in their complex environments, their sensory systems must form representations of objects that are invariant to changes in some dimensions of their physical cues. For example, we can recognize a friend’s speech in a forest, a small office, and a cathedral, even though the sound reaching our ears will be very different in these three environments. I will discuss our recent experiments into how neurons in auditory cortex can form stable representations of sounds in this acoustically varied world. We began by using a normative computational model of hearing to examine how the brain may recognize a sound source across rooms with different levels of reverberation. The model predicted that reverberations can be removed from the original sound by delaying the inhibitory component of spectrotemporal receptive fields in the presence of stronger reverberation. Our electrophysiological recordings then confirmed that neurons in ferret auditory cortex apply this algorithm to adapt to different room sizes. Our results demonstrate that this neural process is dynamic and adaptive. These studies provide new insights into how we can recognize auditory objects even in highly reverberant environments, and direct further research questions about how reverb adaptation is implemented in the cortical circuit.

In this talk I’ll discuss our recent work on how visual and auditory cues to space are integrated as we move. There are at least 3 reasons why this turns out to be a difficult problem for the brain to solve (and us to understand!). First, vision and hearing start off in different coordinates (eye-centred vs head-centred), so they need a common reference frame in which to communicate. By preventing eye and head movements, this problem has been neatly sidestepped in the literature, yet self-movement is the norm. Second, self-movement creates visual and auditory image motion. Correct interpretation therefore requires some form of compensation. Third, vision and hearing encode motion in very different ways: vision contains dedicated motion detectors sensitive to speed, whereas hearing does not. We propose that some (all?) of these problems could be solved by considering the perception of audiovisual space as the integration of separate body-centred visual and auditory cues, the latter formed by integrating image motion with motor system signals and vestibular information. To test this claim, we use a classic cue integration framework, modified to account for cues that are biased and partially correlated. We find good evidence for the model based on simple judgements of audiovisual motion within a circular array of speakers and LEDs that surround the participant while they execute self-controlled head movement.

In this talk, Dr. Quandt will share results from behavioral and cognitive neuroscience studies from the past few years of her work in the Action & Brain Lab, an EEG lab at Gallaudet University, the world's premiere university for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. These results will center upon the question of how extensive knowledge of signed language changes, and in some cases enhances, people's perception and cognition. Evidence for this effect comes from studies of human biological motion using point light displays, self-report, and studies of action perception. Dr. Quandt will also discuss some of the lab's efforts in designing and testing a virtual reality environment in which users can learn American Sign Language from signing avatars (virtual humans).

The processing of temporal sound features is fundamental to hearing, and the auditory system displays a plethora of specializations, at many levels, to enable such processing. Octopus neurons are the most extreme temporally-specialized cells in the auditory (and perhaps entire) brain, which make them intriguing but also difficult to study. Notwithstanding the scant physiological data, these neurons have been a favorite cell type of modeling studies which have proposed that octopus cells have critical roles in pitch and speech perception. We used a range of in vivo recording and labeling methods to examine the hypothesis that tonotopic ordering of cochlear afferents combines with dendritic delays to compensate for cochlear delay - which would explain the highly entrained responses of octopus cells to sound transients. Unexpectedly, the experiments revealed that these neurons have marked selectivity to the direction of fast frequency glides, which is tied in a surprising way to intrinsic membrane properties and subthreshold events. The data suggest that octopus cells have a role in temporal comparisons across frequency and may play a role in auditory scene analysis.

In this talk I’ll discuss translation of findings of multisensory facilitation of learning to cognitive training. I’ll first review some early findings of multisensory facilitation of learning and then discuss how we have been translating these basic science approaches into gamified training interventions to improve cognitive functions. I’ll touch on approaches to training vision, hearing and working memory that we are developing at the UCR Brain Game Center for Mental Fitness and Well-being. I look forward to discussing both the basic science but also the complexities of how to translate approaches from basic science into the more complex frameworks often used in interventions.

Understanding speech in noisy backgrounds requires selective attention to a particular speaker. Humans excel at this challenging task, while current speech recognition technology still struggles when background noise is loud. The neural mechanisms by which we process speech remain, however, poorly understood, not least due to the complexity of natural speech. Here we describe recent progress obtained through applying machine-learning to neuroimaging data of humans listening to speech in different types of background noise. In particular, we develop statistical models to relate characteristic features of speech such as pitch, amplitude fluctuations and linguistic surprisal to neural measurements. We find neural correlates of speech processing both at the subcortical level, related to the pitch, as well as at the cortical level, related to amplitude fluctuations and linguistic structures. We also show that some of these measures allow to diagnose disorders of consciousness. Our findings may be applied in smart hearing aids that automatically adjust speech processing to assist a user, as well as in the diagnosis of brain disorders.

Have you ever wondered what your advisor struggled with as a graduate student? What they struggle with now? Growing up in science is a conversation series featuring personal narratives of becoming and being a scientist, with a focus on the unspoken challenges of a life in science. Growing up in Science was started in 2014 at New York University and is now worldwide. This article describes the origin and impact of the series. At a typical Growing up in Science event, one faculty member shares their life story, with a focus on struggles, failures, doubts, detours, and weaknesses. Common topics include dealing with expectations, impostor syndrome, procrastination, luck, rejection, conflicts with advisors, and work-life balance, life outside academia but these topics are always embedded in the speaker’s broader narrative. Cortex Club is hosting its first Growing up in science event! Join us on Friday the 31st July at 4pm for hearing the unofficial story of Dr André Marques-Smith, computational neuroscientist at CoMind (read his official and unofficial story at https://cortexclub.com/event/growing-up-in-science-oxford/). Details to join the talk will be circulated via the mailing list (to join our mailing list, follow the instructions at https://cortexclub.com/join-us/).

The dominant view of perception right now is that information travels from the environment to the sensory system, then to the nervous systems which processes it to generate a percept and behaviour. Ongoing behaviour is thought to occur largely through simple iterations of this process. However, this linear view, where information flows only in one direction and the properties of the environment and the sensory system remain static and unaffected by behaviour, is slowly fading. Many of us are beginning to appreciate that perception is largely active, i.e. that information flows back and forth between the three systems modulating their respective properties. In other words, in the real world, the environment and sensorimotor loop is pretty much always closed. I study the loop; in particular I study how the reverse arm of the loop affects sound and vibration perception. I will present two examples of motor modulation of perception at two very different temporal and spatial scales. First, in crickets, I will present data on how high-speed molecular motor activity enhances hearing via the well-studied phenomenon of active amplification. Second, in spiders I will present data on how body posture, a slow macroscopic feature, which can barely be called ‘active’, can nonetheless modulate vibration perception. I hope these results will motivate a conversation about whether ‘active’ perception is an optional feature observed in some sensory systems, or something that is ultimately necessitated by both evolution and physics.