Immune-mediated mechanisms are increasingly recognised as a cause of epilepsy even in the absence of an immune response against a specifical neuronal antigen. In some cases, these autoimmune processes are clearly pathogenic, for example acute seizures in autoimmune encephalitis, whereas in others this is less clear, for example autoimmune-associated epilepsy. Recent research has provided novel insights into the clinical, paraclinical and immunopathogenetic mechanisms in these conditions. I will provide an overview of clinical and paraclinical features of immune-associated seizures. Furthermore, I will describe specific immunopathogenic examples implicating lymphoid follicular autoimmunisation and intrathecal B cells in these conditions. These insights into immunopathogenesis may help to explain the role of current and immunotherapies in these conditions.

Genome-wide association studies and functional genomics studies have linked specific cell types, genes, and pathways to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk. In particular, AD risk alleles primarily affect the abundance or structure, and thus the activity, of genes expressed in macrophages, strongly implicating microglia (the brain-resident macrophages) in the etiology of AD. These genes converge on pathways (endocytosis/phagocytosis, cholesterol metabolism, and immune response) with critical roles in core macrophage functions such as efferocytosis. Here, we review these pathways, highlighting relevant genes identified in the latest AD genetics and genomics studies, and describe how they may contribute to AD pathogenesis. Investigating the functional impact of AD-associated variants and genes in microglia is essential for elucidating disease risk mechanisms and developing effective therapeutic approaches." https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.10.015

Thoughts and emotions can impact physiology. This connection is evident by the emergence of disease following stress, psychosomatic disorders, or recovery in response to placebo treatment. Nevertheless, this fundamental aspect of physiology remains largely unexplored. In this talk, I will focus on the brain’s involvement in regulating the peripheral immune response and explore the question of how the brain evaluates and represents the state of the immune system it regulates.

Inflammation is a key component of the innate immune response. Primarily designed to remove noxious agents and limit their detrimental effects, the prolonged and/or inappropriately scaled innate immune response may be detrimental to the host and lead to a chronic disease. Indeed, there is increasing evidence suggesting that a chronic deregulation of immunity may represent one of the key elements in the pathobiology of many brain disorders. Microglia are the principal immune cells of the brain. The consensus today is that once activated microglia/macrophages can acquire a wide repertoire of profiles ranging from the classical pro-inflammatory to alternative and protective phenotypes. Recently, we described a novel ribosome-based regulatory mechanism/checkpoint that controls innate immune gene translation and microglial activation involving RNA binding protein SRSF3. Here we will discuss the implications of SRSF3 and other endogenous immune regulators in deregulation of immunity observed in different models of brain pathologies. Furthermore, we will discuss whether targeting SRSF3 and mRNA translation may open novel avenues for therapeutic modulation of immune response in the brain.

Carnosine is a natural dipeptide widely distributed in mammalian tissues and exists at particularly high concentrations in skeletal and cardiac muscles and brain. A growing body of evidence shows that carnosine is involved in many cellular defense mechanisms against oxidative stress, including inhibition of amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation, modulation of nitric oxide (NO) metabolism, and scavenging both reactive nitrogen and oxygen species. Different types of cells are involved in the innate immune response, with macrophage cells representing those primarily activated, especially under different diseases characterized by oxidative stress and systemic inflammation such as depression and cardiovascular disorders. Microglia, the tissue-resident macrophages of the brain, are emerging as a central player in regulating key pathways in central nervous system inflammation; with specific regard to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) these cells exert a dual role: on one hand promoting the clearance of Aβ via phagocytosis, on the other hand increasing neuroinflammation through the secretion of inflammatory mediators and free radicals. The activity of carnosine was tested in an in vitro model of macrophage activation (M1) (RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with LPS + IFN-γ) and in a well-validated model of Aβ-induced neuroinflammation (BV-2 microglia treated with Aβ oligomers). An ample set of techniques/assays including MTT assay, trypan blue exclusion test, high performance liquid chromatography, high-throughput real-time PCR, western blot, atomic force microscopy, microchip electrophoresis coupled to laser-induced fluorescence, and ELISA aimed to evaluate the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of carnosine was employed. In our experimental model of macrophage activation (M1), therapeutic concentrations of carnosine exerted the following effects: 1) an increased degradation rate of NO into its non-toxic end-products nitrite and nitrate; 2) the amelioration of the macrophage energy state, by restoring nucleoside triphosphates and counterbalancing the changes in ATP/ADP, NAD+/NADH and NADP+/NADPH ratio obtained by LPS + IFN-γ induction; 3) a reduced expression of pro-oxidant enzymes (NADPH oxidase, Cyclooxygenase-2) and of the lipid peroxidation product malondialdehyde; 4) the rescue of antioxidant enzymes expression (Glutathione peroxidase 1, Superoxide dismutase 2, Catalase); 5) an increased synthesis of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) combined with the negative modulation of interleukines 1β and 6 (IL-1β and IL-6), and 6) the induction of nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). In our experimental model of Aβ-induced neuroinflammation, carnosine: 1) prevented cell death in BV-2 cells challenged with Aβ oligomers; 2) lowered oxidative stress by decreasing the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and NADPH oxidase, and the concentrations of nitric oxide and superoxide anion; 3) decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β simultaneously rescuing IL-10 levels and increasing the expression and the release of TGF-β1; 4) prevented Aβ-induced neurodegeneration in primary mixed neuronal cultures challenged with Aβ oligomers and these neuroprotective effects was completely abolished by SB431542, a selective inhibitor of type-1 TGF-β receptor. Overall, our data suggest a novel multimodal mechanism of action of carnosine underlying its protective effects in macrophages and microglia and the therapeutic potential of this dipeptide in counteracting pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory phenomena observed in different disorders characterized by elevated levels of oxidative stress and inflammation such as depression, cardiovascular disorders, and Alzheimer’s disease.

We have developed a robotic platform allowing us to monitor cytokines dynamics (including IL-2, IFN-g, TNF, IL-6) of immune cells in vitro, with unprecedented resolution. To understand the complex emerging dynamics, we use interpretable machine learning techniques to build a generative model of cytokine response. We discover that, surprisingly, immune activity is encoded into one global parameter, encoding ligand antigenic properties and to a less extent ligand quantity. Based on this we build a simple interpretable model which can fully explain the broad variability of cytokines dynamics. We validate our approach using different lines of cells and different ligands. Two processes are identified, connected to timing and intensity of cytokine response, which we successfully modulate using drugs or by changing conditions such as initial T cell numbers. Our work reveals a simple "cytokine code", which can be used to better understand immune response in different contexts including immunotherapy. More generally, it reveals how robotic platforms and machine learning can be leveraged to build and validate systems biology models.