← Back

Max Planck Institute

Topic spotlight
TopicWorld Wide

Max Planck Institute

Discover seminars, jobs, and research tagged with Max Planck Institute across World Wide.
64 curated items60 Seminars4 Positions
Updated about 19 hours ago
64 items · Max Planck Institute
64 results
Position

N/A

International Max Planck Research School for Intelligent Systems
Tübingen and Stuttgart, Germany
Dec 5, 2025

The Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems and the Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen collaborate to offer an interdisciplinary doctoral program, the International Max Planck Research School for Intelligent Systems (IMPRS-IS). This doctoral program will accept its ninth generation of Ph.D. students in spring of 2024. This school is a key element of Baden-Württemberg’s Cyber Valley initiative to accelerate basic research and commercial development in artificial intelligence and robotics. We seek students who want to earn a doctorate while contributing to world-leading research in areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Technology, Computational Cognitive Science, Computer Vision and Graphics, Control Systems and Optimization, Data Science & Visualization, Haptics and Human-Computer Interaction, Machine Learning, Micro- and Nano-Robotics, Natural Language Processing, Neuroscience, Perceptual Inference, Robotics and Human-Robot Interaction, Soft Robotics and Materials. Admitted students can join our program starting in spring of 2025. You will be mentored by our internationally renowned faculty. You will register as a university doctoral student and conduct research. IMPRS-IS offers a wide variety of scientific seminars, workshops, and social activities. All aspects of our program are in English. Your doctoral degree will be conferred when you successfully complete your doctoral project. Our dedicated staff members will assist you throughout your time as a doctoral student.

PositionMachine Learning

Carl Rasmussen, Bernhard Schölkopf

University of Cambridge, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
University of Cambridge, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Dec 5, 2025

The University of Cambridge Machine Learning Group and the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems Empirical Inference Department in Tübingen are two of the world’s leading centres for machine learning research. In 2014, we launched a new and exciting initiative whereby a small group of select PhD candidates are jointly supervised at both institutions. The principal supervisors are Carl Rasmussen, Neil Lawrence, Ferenc Huszar, Jose Miguel Hernandez-Lobato, David Krueger, Adrian Weller and Rika Antonova at Cambridge University, and Bernhard Schölkopf and other research group leaders at the Max Planck Institute in Tübingen. This program is specific for candidates whose research interests are well-matched to both the principal supervisors in Cambridge and the MPI for Intelligent Systems in Tuebingen. The overall duration of the PhD will be four years, with roughly three years spent at one location, and one year spent at the other location, including initial coursework at the University of Cambridge. Successful PhDs will be officially granted by the University of Cambridge.

Position

N/A

Saarland University, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
Saarbrücken, Germany
Dec 5, 2025

The Research Training Group 2853 “Neuroexplicit Models of Language, Vision, and Action” is looking for 12 PhD Students - Fall 2025. Neuroexplicit models combine neural and human-interpretable (“explicit”) models in order to overcome the limitations that each model class has separately. They include neurosymbolic models, which combine neural and symbolic models, but also e.g. combinations of neural and physics-based models. In the RTG, we will improve the state of the art in natural language processing (“Language”), computer vision (“Vision”), and planning and reinforcement learning (“Action”). We also develop novel machine learning techniques for neuroexplicit models (“Foundations”). Our overarching aim is to contribute to a better understanding of the cross-cutting design principles of effective neuroexplicit models through interdisciplinary collaboration. The RTG is scheduled to grow to a total of 24 PhD students by 2025. An excellent and international group of twelve PhD students and one postdoc have already joined the RTG. Through the inclusion of ~20 associated PhD students and postdocs funded from other sources, it will be one of the largest research centers on neuroexplicit or neurosymbolic models in the world. The RTG brings together researchers at Saarland University, the Max Planck Institute for Informatics, the Max Planck Institute for Software Systems, the CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, and the German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI). All of these institutions are collocated on the same campus in Saarbrücken, Germany. The positions will be funded for four years at the TV-L E13 100% pay scale. They are intended to start in September 2025, but could start a little earlier or later depending on the student’s availability.

SeminarNeuroscience

Cognitive maps as expectations learned across episodes – a model of the two dentate gyrus blades

Andrej Bicanski
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Mar 11, 2025

How can the hippocampal system transition from episodic one-shot learning to a multi-shot learning regime and what is the utility of the resultant neural representations? This talk will explore the role of the dentate gyrus (DG) anatomy in this context. The canonical DG model suggests it performs pattern separation. More recent experimental results challenge this standard model, suggesting DG function is more complex and also supports the precise binding of objects and events to space and the integration of information across episodes. Very recent studies attribute pattern separation and pattern integration to anatomically distinct parts of the DG (the suprapyramidal blade vs the infrapyramidal blade). We propose a computational model that investigates this distinction. In the model the two processing streams (potentially localized in separate blades) contribute to the storage of distinct episodic memories, and the integration of information across episodes, respectively. The latter forms generalized expectations across episodes, eventually forming a cognitive map. We train the model with two data sets, MNIST and plausible entorhinal cortex inputs. The comparison between the two streams allows for the calculation of a prediction error, which can drive the storage of poorly predicted memories and the forgetting of well-predicted memories. We suggest that differential processing across the DG aids in the iterative construction of spatial cognitive maps to serve the generation of location-dependent expectations, while at the same time preserving episodic memory traces of idiosyncratic events.

SeminarNeuroscience

The neural basis of exploration and decision-making in individuals and groups

Iain Couzin
Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Konstanz
Jan 8, 2025
SeminarNeuroscience

LLMs and Human Language Processing

Maryia Toneva, Ariel Goldstein, Jean-Remi King
Max Planck Institute of Software Systems; Hebrew University; École Normale Supérieure
Nov 28, 2024

This webinar convened researchers at the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience to investigate how large language models (LLMs) can serve as valuable “model organisms” for understanding human language processing. Presenters showcased evidence that brain recordings (fMRI, MEG, ECoG) acquired while participants read or listened to unconstrained speech can be predicted by representations extracted from state-of-the-art text- and speech-based LLMs. In particular, text-based LLMs tend to align better with higher-level language regions, capturing more semantic aspects, while speech-based LLMs excel at explaining early auditory cortical responses. However, purely low-level features can drive part of these alignments, complicating interpretations. New methods, including perturbation analyses, highlight which linguistic variables matter for each cortical area and time scale. Further, “brain tuning” of LLMs—fine-tuning on measured neural signals—can improve semantic representations and downstream language tasks. Despite open questions about interpretability and exact neural mechanisms, these results demonstrate that LLMs provide a promising framework for probing the computations underlying human language comprehension and production at multiple spatiotemporal scales.

SeminarNeuroscience

Introducing the 'Cognitive Neuroscience & Neurotechnolog' group: From real-time fMRI to layer-fMRI & back

Romy Lorenz
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
Nov 27, 2024
SeminarNeuroscience

Neural Circuits that connect Body and Mind

Ivan de Araujo
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
Feb 7, 2024
SeminarNeuroscience

Using Adversarial Collaboration to Harness Collective Intelligence

Lucia Melloni
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics
Jan 24, 2024

There are many mysteries in the universe. One of the most significant, often considered the final frontier in science, is understanding how our subjective experience, or consciousness, emerges from the collective action of neurons in biological systems. While substantial progress has been made over the past decades, a unified and widely accepted explanation of the neural mechanisms underpinning consciousness remains elusive. The field is rife with theories that frequently provide contradictory explanations of the phenomenon. To accelerate progress, we have adopted a new model of science: adversarial collaboration in team science. Our goal is to test theories of consciousness in an adversarial setting. Adversarial collaboration offers a unique way to bolster creativity and rigor in scientific research by merging the expertise of teams with diverse viewpoints. Ideally, we aim to harness collective intelligence, embracing various perspectives, to expedite the uncovering of scientific truths. In this talk, I will highlight the effectiveness (and challenges) of this approach using selected case studies, showcasing its potential to counter biases, challenge traditional viewpoints, and foster innovative thought. Through the joint design of experiments, teams incorporate a competitive aspect, ensuring comprehensive exploration of problems. This method underscores the importance of structured conflict and diversity in propelling scientific advancement and innovation.

SeminarNeuroscience

The Brain Prize winner's webinar

Michael Greenberg, Erin Schuman, Christine Holt
Harvard University, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, University of Cambridge
Oct 24, 2023

In 2023, Michael Greenberg (Harvard, USA), Erin Schuman (Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany) and Christine Holt (University of Cambridge, UK) were awarded The Brain Prize for their pioneering work on activity-dependent gene transcription and local mRNA translation. In this webinar, all 3 Brain Prize winners will present their work. Each speaker will present for 25 minutes and the webinar will conclude with an open discussion. The webinar will be moderated by Kelsey Martin from the Simons Foundation.

SeminarNeuroscience

Cellular crosstalk in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Silvia Cappello
Max Planck Institute
Sep 26, 2023

Cellular crosstalk is an essential process during brain development and it is influenced by numerous factors, including the morphology of the cells, their adhesion molecules, the local extracellular matrix and the secreted vesicles. Inspired by mutations associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, we focus on understanding the role of extracellular mechanisms essential for the correct development of the human brain. Hence, we combine the in vivo mouse model and the in vitro human-derived neurons, cerebral organoids, and dorso-ventral assembloids in order to better comprehend the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in ventral progenitors’ proliferation and fate as well as migration and maturation of inhibitory neurons during human brain development and tackle the causes of neurodevelopmental disorders. We particularly focus on mutations in genes influencing cell-cell contacts, extracellular matrix, and secretion of vesicles and therefore study intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms contributing to the formation of the brain. Our data reveal an important contribution of cell non-autonomous mechanisms in the development of neurodevelopmental disorders.

SeminarNeuroscience

Bernstein Student Workshop Series

Lílian de Sardenberg Schmid
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
May 3, 2023

The Bernstein Student Workshop Series is an initiative of the student members of the Bernstein Network. It provides a unique opportunity to enhance the technical exchange on a peer-to-peer basis. The series is motivated by the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental neuroscience by bringing together methodological expertise in the network. Unlike conventional workshops, a talented junior scientist will first give a tutorial about a specific theoretical or experimental technique, and then give a talk about their own research to demonstrate how the technique helps to address neuroscience questions. The workshop series is designed to cover a wide range of theoretical and experimental techniques and to elucidate how different techniques can be applied to answer different types of neuroscience questions. Combining the technical tutorial and the research talk, the workshop series aims to promote knowledge sharing in the community and enhance in-depth discussions among students from diverse backgrounds.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Behavioural Basis of Subjective Time Distortions

Franklenin Sierra
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Germany
Mar 28, 2023

Precisely estimating event timing is essential for survival, yet temporal distortions are ubiquitous in our daily sensory experience. Here, we tested whether the relative position, duration, and distance in time of two sequentially-organized events—standard S, with constant duration, and comparison C, with duration varying trial-by-trial—are causal factors in generating temporal distortions. We found that temporal distortions emerge when the first event is shorter than the second event. Importantly, a significant interaction suggests that a longer inter-stimulus interval (ISI) helps to counteract such serial distortion effect only when the constant S is in the first position, but not if the unpredictable C is in the first position. These results imply the existence of a perceptual bias in perceiving ordered event durations, mechanistically contributing to distortion in time perception. Our results clarify the mechanisms generating time distortions by identifying a hitherto unknown duration-dependent encoding inefficiency in human serial temporal perception, something akin to a strong prior that can be overridden for highly predictable sensory events but unfolds for unpredictable ones.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

All for one? Consequences and challenges of group foraging

Sasha Dall & Damien Farine
University of Exeter & Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior
Mar 20, 2023
SeminarNeuroscience

Two sides of emotion expressions: Readouts and Regulators

Nadine Gogolla
Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Munich
Dec 14, 2022
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Active vision in Drosophila

Lisa Fenk
Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Munich
Dec 11, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

How fly neurons compute the direction of visual motion

Alexander Borst
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology - Martinsried
Nov 6, 2022

Detecting the direction of image motion is important for visual navigation, predator avoidance and prey capture, and thus essential for the survival of all animals that have eyes. However, the direction of motion is not explicitly represented at the level of the photoreceptors: it rather needs to be computed by subsequent neural circuits. The exact nature of this process represents a classic example of neural computation and has been a longstanding question in the field. Our results obtained in the fruit fly Drosophila demonstrate that the local direction of motion is computed in two parallel ON and OFF pathways. Within each pathway, a retinotopic array of four direction-selective T4 (ON) and T5 (OFF) cells represents the four Cartesian components of local motion vectors (leftward, rightward, upward, downward). Since none of the presynaptic neurons is directionally selective, direction selectivity first emerges within T4 and T5 cells. Our present research focuses on the cellular and biophysical mechanisms by which the direction of image motion is computed in these neurons.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

A mind set in stone: fossil traces of human brain evolution

Philipp Gunz
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig
Jul 4, 2022

Brains do not fossilise, but as they grow and expand during fetal and infant development, they leave an imprint in the bony braincase. Such imprints of fossilised braincases provide direct evidence of brain evolution, but the underlying biological changes have remained elusive. Combining data from fossil skulls, ancient genomes, brain imaging and gene expression helps shed light on the evolutionary changes shaping the human brain. I will highlight two examples separated by more than 3 million years: the evolution of brain growth in Lucy and her kind, and differences between modern humans and Neanderthals.

SeminarNeuroscience

Studying genetic overlap between ASD risk and related traits: From polygenic pleiotropy to disorder-specific profiles

Beate St Pourcain
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Jun 14, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Translation at the Synapse

Erin Schuman
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany
Jun 7, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Re-vision: inspirations from the early attentional selection by the primary visual cortex

Zhaoping Li
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
Jun 1, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Translation at the Synapse

Erin Schuman
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Germany
May 31, 2022

The complex morphology of neurons, with synapses located hundreds of microns from the cell body, necessitates the localization of important cell biological machines, including ribosomes, within dendrites and axons. Local translation of mRNAs is important for the function and plasticity of synapses. Using advanced sequencing and imaging techniques we have updated our understanding of the local transcriptome and identified the local translatome- identifying over 800 transcripts for which local translation is the dominant source of protein. In addition, we have explored the unique mechanisms neurons use to meet protein demands at synapses, identifying surprising features of neuronal and synaptic protein synthesis.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

On the Hunt: Ingenious Foraging Strategies in Bats & Spiders

Holger Goerlitz & Abel Corver
Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence & Johns Hopkins
Apr 11, 2022
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Do Capuchin Monkeys, Chimpanzees and Children form Overhypotheses from Minimal Input? A Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling Approach

Elisa Felsche
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Mar 9, 2022

Abstract concepts are a powerful tool to store information efficiently and to make wide-ranging predictions in new situations based on sparse data. Whereas looking-time studies point towards an early emergence of this ability in human infancy, other paradigms like the relational match to sample task often show a failure to detect abstract concepts like same and different until the late preschool years. Similarly, non-human animals have difficulties solving those tasks and often succeed only after long training regimes. Given the huge influence of small task modifications, there is an ongoing debate about the conclusiveness of these findings for the development and phylogenetic distribution of abstract reasoning abilities. Here, we applied the concept of “overhypotheses” which is well known in the infant and cognitive modeling literature to study the capabilities of 3 to 5-year-old children, chimpanzees, and capuchin monkeys in a unified and more ecologically valid task design. In a series of studies, participants themselves sampled reward items from multiple containers or witnessed the sampling process. Only when they detected the abstract pattern governing the reward distributions within and across containers, they could optimally guide their behavior and maximize the reward outcome in a novel test situation. We compared each species’ performance to the predictions of a probabilistic hierarchical Bayesian model capable of forming overhypotheses at a first and second level of abstraction and adapted to their species-specific reward preferences.

SeminarNeuroscience

Neural stem cells, human-specific genes, and neocortex expansion in development and human evolution

Wieland Huttner
Max Planck Institute in Dresden, Germany
Mar 6, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Untitled Seminar

Anna Schröder
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Feb 27, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Keeping the balance- A role for the insular cortex in emotion homeostasis

Nadine Gogolla
Max Planck Institute, Munich, Germany
Jan 30, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Neural oscillatory models of auditory-motor interactions

Johanna Rimmele
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main
Jan 16, 2022
SeminarNeuroscience

Single-cell delineation of lineage and genetic identity in the mouse forebrain

Christian Mayer
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried
Dec 15, 2021
SeminarNeuroscience

Brain circuit dynamics in Action and Sleep

Gilles Laurent
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
Dec 2, 2021

Our group focuses on brain computation, physiology and evolution, with a particular focus on network dynamics, sleep (evolution and mechanistic underpinnings), cortical computation (through the study of ancestral cortices), and sensorimotor processing. This talk will describe our recent results on the remarkable camouflage behavior of cuttlefish (action) and on brain activity in REM and NonREM in lizards (sleep). Both topics will focus on aspects of circuit dynamics.

SeminarNeuroscience

Neurocognitive mechanisms of proactive temporal attention: challenging oscillatory and cortico-centered models

Assaf Breska
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
Dec 1, 2021

To survive in a rapidly dynamic world, the brain predicts the future state of the world and proactively adjusts perception, attention and action. A key to efficient interaction is to predict and prepare to not only “where” and “what” things will happen, but also to “when”. I will present studies in healthy and neurological populations that investigated the cognitive architecture and neural basis of temporal anticipation. First, influential ‘entrainment’ models suggest that anticipation in rhythmic contexts, e.g. music or biological motion, uniquely relies on alignment of attentional oscillations to external rhythms. Using computational modeling and EEG, I will show that cortical neural patterns previously associated with entrainment in fact overlap with interval timing mechanisms that are used in aperiodic contexts. Second, temporal prediction and attention have commonly been associated with cortical circuits. Studying neurological populations with subcortical degeneration, I will present data that point to a double dissociation between rhythm- and interval-based prediction in the cerebellum and basal ganglia, respectively, and will demonstrate a role for the cerebellum in attentional control of perceptual sensitivity in time. Finally, using EEG in neurodegenerative patients, I will demonstrate that the cerebellum controls temporal adjustment of cortico-striatal neural dynamics, and use computational modeling to identify cerebellar-controlled neural parameters. Altogether, these findings reveal functionally and neural context-specificity and subcortical contributions to temporal anticipation, revising our understanding of dynamic cognition.

SeminarNeuroscience

Brain circuit dynamics in Action and Sleep

Gilles Laurent
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
Dec 1, 2021

Our group focuses on brain computation, physiology and evolution, with a particular focus on network dynamics, sleep (evolution and mechanistic underpinnings), cortical computation (through the study of ancestral cortices), and sensorimotor processing. This talk will describe our recent results on the remarkable camouflage behavior of cuttlefish (action) and on brain activity in REM and NonREM in lizards (sleep). Both topics will focus on aspects of circuit dynamics.

SeminarNeuroscience

NeurotechEU Summit

Ms Vanessa Debiais Sainton, Prof. Staffan Holmin, Dr Mohsen Kaboli and Prof. Peter Hagoort
European Commission, Karolinska Institutet, BMW Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Donders Institute
Nov 21, 2021

Our first NeurotechEU Summit will be fully digital and will take place on November 22th from 09:00 to 17:00 (CET). The final programme can be downloaded here. Hosted by the Karolinska Institutet, the summit will provide you an overview of our actions and achievements from the last year and introduce the priorities for the next year. You will also have the opportunity to attend the finals of the 3 minute thesis competition (3MT) organized by the Synapses Student Society, the student charter of NeurotechEU. Good luck to all the finalists: Lynn Le, Robin Noordhof, Adriana Gea González, Juan Carranza Valencia, Lea van Husen, Guoming (Tony) Man, Lilly Pitshaporn Leelaarporn, Cemre Su, Kaya Keleş, Ramazan Tarık Türksoy, Cristiana Tisca, Sara Bandiera, Irina Maria Vlad, Iulia Vadan, Borbála László, and David Papp! Don’t miss our keynote lecture, success stories and interactive discussions with Ms Vanessa Debiais Sainton (Head of Higher Education Unit, European Commission), Prof. Staffan Holmin (Karolinska Institutet), Dr Mohsen Kaboli (BMW Group, member of the NeurotechEU Associates Advisory Committee), and Prof. Peter Hagoort (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Donders Institute). Would you like to use this opportunity to network? Please join our informal breakout sessions on Wonder.me at 11:40 CET. You will be able to move from one discussion group to another within 3 sessions: NeurotechEU ecosystem - The Associates Advisory Committee: Synergies in cross-sectoral initiatives Education next: Trans-European education and the European Universities Initiatives - Lessons learned thus far. Equality, diversity and inclusion at NeurotechEU: removing access barriers to education and developing a working, learning, and social environment where everyone is respected and valued. You can register for this free event at www.crowdcast.io/e/neurotecheu-summit

SeminarNeuroscience

Reinforcement Learning

Pater Dayan & Jonathan Rubin
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics resp. University of Pittsburgh
Nov 18, 2021
SeminarNeuroscience

Organization and Computation in Neural Circuits

Julijana Gjorgjieva
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
Nov 7, 2021
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Deriving local synaptic learning rules for efficient representations in networks of spiking neurons

Viola Priesemann
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization
Nov 1, 2021

How can neural networks learn to efficiently represent complex and high-dimensional inputs via local plasticity mechanisms? Classical models of representation learning assume that input weights are learned via pairwise Hebbian-like plasticity. Here, we show that pairwise Hebbian-like plasticity only works under specific requirements on neural dynamics and input statistics. To overcome these limitations, we derive from first principles a learning scheme based on voltage-dependent synaptic plasticity rules. Here, inhibition learns to locally balance excitatory input in individual dendritic compartments, and thereby can modulate excitatory synaptic plasticity to learn efficient representations. We demonstrate in simulations that this learning scheme works robustly even for complex, high-dimensional and correlated inputs. It also works in the presence of inhibitory transmission delays, where Hebbian-like plasticity typically fails. Our results draw a direct connection between dendritic excitatory-inhibitory balance and voltage-dependent synaptic plasticity as observed in vivo, and suggest that both are crucial for representation learning.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Tuning dumb neurons to task processing - via homeostasis

Viola Priesemann
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-organization
Oct 7, 2021

Homeostatic plasticity plays a key role in stabilizing neural network activity. But what is its role in neural information processing? We showed analytically how homeostasis changes collective dynamics and consequently information flow - depending on the input to the network. We then studied how input and homeostasis on a recurrent network of LIF neurons impacts information flow and task performance. We showed how we can tune the working point of the network, and found that, contrary to previous assumptions, there is not one optimal working point for a family of tasks, but each task may require its own working point.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

The Geometry of Decision-Making

Iain Couzin
Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior & University of Konstanz
Oct 7, 2021

Choosing among spatially distributed options is a central challenge for animals, from deciding among alternative potential food sources or refuges, to choosing with whom to associate. Here, using an integrated theoretical and experimental approach (employing immersive Virtual Reality), with both invertebrate and vertebrate models—the fruit fly, desert locust and zebrafish—we consider the recursive interplay between movement and collective vectorial integration in the brain during decision-making regarding options (potential ‘targets’) in space. We reveal that the brain repeatedly breaks multi-choice decisions into a series of abrupt (critical) binary decisions in space-time where organisms switch, spontaneously, from averaging vectorial information among, to suddenly excluding one of, the remaining options. This bifurcation process repeats until only one option—the one ultimately selected—remains. Close to each bifurcation the ‘susceptibility’ of the system exhibits a sharp increase, inevitably causing small differences among the remaining options to become amplified; a property that both comes ‘for free’ and is highly desirable for decision-making. This mechanism facilitates highly effective decision-making, and is shown to be robust both to the number of options available, and to context, such as whether options are static (e.g. refuges) or mobile (e.g. other animals). In addition, we find evidence that the same geometric principles of decision-making occur across scales of biological organisation, from neural dynamics to animal collectives, suggesting they are fundamental features of spatiotemporal computation.

SeminarNeuroscience

Exploring the neurogenetic basis of speech, language, and vocal communication

Sonja Vernes
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Sep 15, 2021
SeminarNeuroscience

Using extra-hippocampal cognitive maps for goal-directed spatial navigation

Hiroshi Ito
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Jul 6, 2021

Goal-directed navigation requires precise estimates of spatial relationships between current position and future goal, as well as planning of an associated route or action. While neurons in the hippocampal formation can represent the animal’s position and nearby trajectories, their role in determining the animal’s destination or action has been questioned. We thus hypothesize that brain regions outside the hippocampal formation may play complementary roles in navigation, particularly for guiding goal-directed behaviours based on the brain’s internal cognitive map. In this seminar, I will first describe a subpopulation of neurons in the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) that increase their firing when the animal approaches environmental boundaries, such as walls or edges. This boundary coding is independent of direct visual or tactile sensation but instead depends on inputs from the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) that contains spatial tuning cells, such as grid cells or border cells. However, unlike MEC border cells, we found that RSC border cells encode environmental boundaries in a self-centred egocentric coordinate frame, which may allow an animal for efficient avoidance from approaching walls or edges during navigation. I will then discuss whether the brain can possess a precise estimate of remote target location during active environmental exploration. Such a spatial code has not been described in the hippocampal formation. However, we found that neurons in the rat orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) form spatial representations that persistently point to the animal’s subsequent goal destination throughout navigation. This destination coding emerges before navigation onset without direct sensory access to a distal goal, and are maintained via destination-specific neural ensemble dynamics. These findings together suggest key roles for extra-hippocampal regions in spatial navigation, enabling animals to choose appropriate actions toward a desired destination by avoiding possible dangers.

SeminarPhysics of Life

Feeling for functional changes in cells

Jochen Guck
Max Planck Institute for Science of Light
Jun 10, 2021
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

A theory for Hebbian learning in recurrent E-I networks

Samuel Eckmann
Gjorgjieva lab, Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt, Germany
May 19, 2021

The Stabilized Supralinear Network is a model of recurrently connected excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurons with a supralinear input-output relation. It can explain cortical computations such as response normalization and inhibitory stabilization. However, the network's connectivity is designed by hand, based on experimental measurements. How the recurrent synaptic weights can be learned from the sensory input statistics in a biologically plausible way is unknown. Earlier theoretical work on plasticity focused on single neurons and the balance of excitation and inhibition but did not consider the simultaneous plasticity of recurrent synapses and the formation of receptive fields. Here we present a recurrent E-I network model where all synaptic connections are simultaneously plastic, and E neurons self-stabilize by recruiting co-tuned inhibition. Motivated by experimental results, we employ a local Hebbian plasticity rule with multiplicative normalization for E and I synapses. We develop a theoretical framework that explains how plasticity enables inhibition balanced excitatory receptive fields that match experimental results. We show analytically that sufficiently strong inhibition allows neurons' receptive fields to decorrelate and distribute themselves across the stimulus space. For strong recurrent excitation, the network becomes stabilized by inhibition, which prevents unconstrained self-excitation. In this regime, external inputs integrate sublinearly. As in the Stabilized Supralinear Network, this results in response normalization and winner-takes-all dynamics: when two competing stimuli are presented, the network response is dominated by the stronger stimulus while the weaker stimulus is suppressed. In summary, we present a biologically plausible theoretical framework to model plasticity in fully plastic recurrent E-I networks. While the connectivity is derived from the sensory input statistics, the circuit performs meaningful computations. Our work provides a mathematical framework of plasticity in recurrent networks, which has previously only been studied numerically and can serve as the basis for a new generation of brain-inspired unsupervised machine learning algorithms.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

A Changing View of Vision: From Molecules to Behavior in Zebrafish

Herwig Baier
Max PLanck Institute
May 2, 2021

All sensory perception and every coordinated movement, as well as feelings, memories and motivation, arise from the bustling activity of many millions of interconnected cells in the brain. The ultimate function of this elaborate network is to generate behavior. We use zebrafish as our experimental model, employing a diverse array of molecular, genetic, optical, connectomic, behavioral and computational approaches. The goal of our research is to understand how neuronal circuits integrate sensory inputs and internal state and convert this information into behavioral responses.

SeminarNeuroscience

Spreading dynamics and homeostatic regulation in neural networks

Viola Priesemann
Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Goettingen, Germany
Apr 25, 2021
SeminarPhysics of LifeRecording

Self-organization of chemically active colloids with non-reciprocal interactions

Ramin Golestanian
Max Planck Institute
Apr 6, 2021

Cells and microorganisms produce and consume all sorts of chemicals, from nutrients to signalling molecules. The same happens at the nanoscale inside cells themselves, where enzymes catalyse the production and consumption of the chemicals needed for life. In this work, we have found a generic mechanism by which such chemically-active particles, be it cells or enzymes or engineered synthetic colloids, can "sense" each other and ultimately self- organize in a multitude of ways. A peculiarity of these chemical-mediated interactions is that they break action-reaction symmetry : for example, one particle may be repelled from a second particle, which is in turn attracted to the first one, so that it ends up "chasing" it. Such chasing interactions allow for the formation of large clusters of particles that "swim" autonomously. Regarding enzymes, we find that they can spontaneously aggregate into clusters with precisely the right composition, so that the product of one enzyme is passed on, without lack or excess, to the next enzyme in the metabolic cascade.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Keeping the balance: a role for the insular cortex in emotion homeostasis

Nadine Gogolla
Max Planck Institute
Mar 17, 2021
SeminarNeuroscience

Learning hierarchical sequence representations across human cortex and hippocampus

Lucia Melloni
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt, Germany
Mar 7, 2021
SeminarNeuroscience

Feedforward and feedback computations in the olfactory bulb and olfactory cortex: computational model and experimental data

Zhaoping Li
Max Planck Institute of Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, germany
Dec 6, 2020
SeminarNeuroscience

Bridging scales – combining functional ultrasound imaging, optogenetics, and electrophysiology to study neuronal networks underlying behavior

Emilie Macé
Max Planck Institute, Munich, Germany
Dec 6, 2020
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

The emergence of contrast invariance in cortical circuits

Tatjana Tchumatchenko
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Nov 12, 2020

Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) encode the orientation and contrast of visual stimuli through changes in firing rate (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962). Their activity typically peaks at a preferred orientation and decays to zero at the orientations that are orthogonal to the preferred. This activity pattern is re-scaled by contrast but its shape is preserved, a phenomenon known as contrast invariance. Contrast-invariant selectivity is also observed at the population level in V1 (Carandini and Sengpiel, 2004). The mechanisms supporting the emergence of contrast-invariance at the population level remain unclear. How does the activity of different neurons with diverse orientation selectivity and non-linear contrast sensitivity combine to give rise to contrast-invariant population selectivity? Theoretical studies have shown that in the balance limit, the properties of single-neurons do not determine the population activity (van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky, 1996). Instead, the synaptic dynamics (Mongillo et al., 2012) as well as the intracortical connectivity (Rosenbaum and Doiron, 2014) shape the population activity in balanced networks. We report that short-term plasticity can change the synaptic strength between neurons as a function of the presynaptic activity, which in turns modifies the population response to a stimulus. Thus, the same circuit can process a stimulus in different ways –linearly, sublinearly, supralinearly – depending on the properties of the synapses. We found that balanced networks with excitatory to excitatory short-term synaptic plasticity cannot be contrast-invariant. Instead, short-term plasticity modifies the network selectivity such that the tuning curves are narrower (broader) for increasing contrast if synapses are facilitating (depressing). Based on these results, we wondered whether balanced networks with plastic synapses (other than short-term) can support the emergence of contrast-invariant selectivity. Mathematically, we found that the only synaptic transformation that supports perfect contrast invariance in balanced networks is a power-law release of neurotransmitter as a function of the presynaptic firing rate (in the excitatory to excitatory and in the excitatory to inhibitory neurons). We validate this finding using spiking network simulations, where we report contrast-invariant tuning curves when synapses release the neurotransmitter following a power- law function of the presynaptic firing rate. In summary, we show that synaptic plasticity controls the type of non-linear network response to stimulus contrast and that it can be a potential mechanism mediating the emergence of contrast invariance in balanced networks with orientation-dependent connectivity. Our results therefore connect the physiology of individual synapses to the network level and may help understand the establishment of contrast-invariant selectivity.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Inter-cellular interactions during neural circuit development

Ruediger Klein
Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence
Nov 11, 2020
SeminarNeuroscience

Neurocircuits in control of integrative physiology

Jens Brüning
Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
Oct 28, 2020

This open colloquia session is part of the special workshop entitled "Obesity at the Interface of Neuroscience and Physiology II". Abstract: Proopiomelanocortin (POMC)- and agouti related peptide (AgRP)-expressing neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARH) are critical regulators of food intake and energy homeostasis. They rapidly integrate the energy state of the organism through sensing fuel availability via hormones, nutrient components and even rapidly upon sensory food perception. Importantly, they not only regulate feeding responses, but numerous autonomic responses including glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammation and blood pressure. More recently, we could demonstrate that sensory food cue-dependent regulation of POMC neurons primes the hepatic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response to prime liver metabolism for the postpramndial state. The presentation will focus on the regulation of these neurons in control of integrative physiology, the identification of distinct neuronal circuitries targeted by these cells and finally on the broad range implications resulting from dysregulation of these circuits as a consequence of altered maternal metabolism.

SeminarNeuroscience

Protein Synthesis at Neuronal Synapses

Erin Schuman
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Oct 26, 2020

The complex morphology of neurons, with synapses located 100’s of microns from the cell body, necessitates the localization of important cell biological machines and processes within dendrites and axons. Using expansion microscopy together with metabolic labeling we have discovered that both postsynaptic spines and presynaptic terminals exhibit rapid translation, which exhibits differential sensitivity to different neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. In addition, we have explored the unique mechanisms neurons use to meet protein demands at synapses, identifying the transcriptome and translatome in the neuropil.

SeminarNeuroscience

Stress and the developing brain - molecular mechanisms of risk and resilience

Elisabeth Binder
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
Sep 21, 2020
SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Local and global organization of synaptic inputs on cortical dendrites

Julijana Gjorgjieva
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research, Technical University of Munich
Sep 17, 2020

Synaptic inputs on cortical dendrites are organized with remarkable subcellular precision at the micron level. This organization emerges during early postnatal development through patterned spontaneous activity and manifests both locally where synapses with similar functional properties are clustered, and globally along the axis from dendrite to soma. Recent experiments reveal species-specific differences in the local and global synaptic organization in mouse, ferret and macaque visual cortex. I will present a computational framework that implements functional and structural plasticity from spontaneous activity patterns to generate these different types of organization across species and scales. Within this framework, a single anatomical factor - the size of the visual cortex and the resulting magnification of visual space - can explain the observed differences. This allows us to make predictions about the organization of synapses also in other species and indicates that the proximal-distal axis of a dendrite might be central in endowing a neuron with powerful computational capabilities.

SeminarNeuroscience

Why We Need a Lifespan Approach to Developmental Change

Ulman Lindenberger
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Aug 5, 2020
SeminarPhysics of LifeRecording

Chromatin transcription: cryo-EM structures of Pol II-nucleosome and nucleosome-CHD complexes

Lucas Farnung
Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry
Jul 28, 2020
SeminarNeuroscience

Machine behavior: A Research Agenda for a Society Permeated by Artificial Intelligence

Iyad Rahwan
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Jul 22, 2020
SeminarNeuroscience

A new computational framework for understanding vision in our brain

Zhaoping Li
University of Tuebingen and Max Planck Institute
Jul 18, 2020

Visual attention selects only a tiny fraction of visual input information for further processing. Selection starts in the primary visual cortex (V1), which creates a bottom-up saliency map to guide the fovea to selected visual locations via gaze shifts. This motivates a new framework that views vision as consisting of encoding, selection, and decoding stages, placing selection on center stage. It suggests a massive loss of non-selected information from V1 downstream along the visual pathway. Hence, feedback from downstream visual cortical areas to V1 for better decoding (recognition), through analysis-by- synthesis, should query for additional information and be mainly directed at the foveal region. Accordingly, non-foveal vision is not only poorer in spatial resolution, but also more susceptible to many illusions.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Cerebral Cortex Connectomics

Moritz Helmstaedter
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Jul 2, 2020

Densely mapping neuronal circuits at synaptic resolution is providing unprecedented insight into the formation and structure of the cerebral cortex. I’ll present recent advances and discuss what we can learn about precision, plasticity and possible patterns in mammalian neuronal circuits.

SeminarNeuroscience

Dragons, Sleep, and the Claustrum

Lorenz Fenk
Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
May 20, 2020

The mammalian claustrum, by virtue of its dense interconnectivity with cortex and other brain structures, has been hypothesized to mediate functions ranging from decision making to consciousness. I will be presenting experimental evidence for the existence of a claustrum in reptiles, its role in generating brain dynamics characteristic of sleep, and discuss our neuroetholgical approach towards understanding fundamental aspects of sleep and claustrum function.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Neural control of vocal interactions in songbirds

Daniela Vallentin
Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
May 14, 2020

During conversations we rapidly switch between listening and speaking which often requires withholding or delaying our speech in order to hear others and avoid overlapping. This capacity for vocal turn-taking is exhibited by non-linguistic species as well, however the neural circuit mechanisms that enable us to regulate the precise timing of our vocalizations during interactions are unknown. We aim to identify the neural mechanisms underlying the coordination of vocal interactions. Therefore, we paired zebra finches with a vocal robot (1Hz call playback) and measured the bird’s call response times. We found that individual birds called with a stereotyped delay in respect to the robot call. Pharmacological inactivation of the premotor nucleus HVC revealed its necessity for the temporal coordination of calls. We further investigated the contributing neural activity within HVC by performing intracellular recordings from premotor neurons and inhibitory interneurons in calling zebra finches. We found that inhibition is preceding excitation before and during call onset. To test whether inhibition guides call timing we pharmacologically limited the impact of inhibition on premotor neurons. As a result zebra finches converged on a similar delay time i.e. birds called more rapidly after the vocal robot call suggesting that HVC inhibitory interneurons regulate the coordination of social contact calls. In addition, we aim to investigate the vocal turn-taking capabilities of the common nightingale. Male nightingales learn over 100 different song motifs which are being used in order to attract mates or defend territories. Previously, it has been shown that nightingales counter-sing with each other following a similar temporal structure to human vocal turn-taking. These animals are also able to spontaneously imitate a motif of another nightingale. The neural mechanisms underlying this behaviour are not yet understood. In my lab, we further probe the capabilities of these animals in order to access the dynamic range of their vocal turn taking flexibility.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Following neuronal trajectories

Silvia Cappello
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry
May 13, 2020

Malformations of the human cerebral cortex represent a major cause of developmental disabilities. To date, animal models carrying mutations of genes so far identified in human patients with brain malformations only partially recapitulate the expected phenotypes and therefore do not provide reliable models to entirely understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for these disorders. Hence, we combine the in vivo mouse model and the human brain organoids in order to better comprehend the mechanisms involved in the migration of neurons during human development and tackle the causes of neurodevelopmental disorders. Our results show that we can model human brain development and disorders using human brain organoids and contribute to open new avenues to bridge the gap of knowledge between human brain malformations and existing animal models.