Understanding communication and information processing in nervous systems is a central goal of neuroscience. Over the past two decades, advances in connectomics and network neuroscience have opened new avenues for investigating polysynaptic communication in complex brain networks. Recent work has brought into question the mainstay assumption that connectome signalling occurs exclusively via shortest paths, resulting in a sprawling constellation of alternative network communication models. This Review surveys the latest developments in models of brain network communication. We begin by drawing a conceptual link between the mathematics of graph theory and biological aspects of neural signalling such as transmission delays and metabolic cost. We organize key network communication models and measures into a taxonomy, aimed at helping researchers navigate the growing number of concepts and methods in the literature. The taxonomy highlights the pros, cons and interpretations of different conceptualizations of connectome signalling. We showcase the utility of network communication models as a flexible, interpretable and tractable framework to study brain function by reviewing prominent applications in basic, cognitive and clinical neurosciences. Finally, we provide recommendations to guide the future development, application and validation of network communication models.

The goal of neuroscience is to understand how the nervous system controls behaviour, not only in the simplified environments of the lab, but also in the natural environments for which nervous systems evolved. In pursuing this goal, neuroscience research is supported by an ever-larger toolbox, ranging from optogenetics to connectomics. However, often these tools are coupled with reductionist approaches for linking nervous systems and behaviour. This course will introduce advanced techniques for measuring and analysing behaviour, as well as three fundamental principles as necessary to understanding biological behaviour: (1) morphology and environment; (2) action-perception closed loops and purpose; and (3) individuality and historical contingencies [1]. [1] Gomez-Marin, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2019). The life of behavior. Neuron, 104(1), 25-36

It was long hypothesized that natural systems might take advantage of the extended temporal and spatial correlations close to the critical point to improve their computational capabilities. However, on the other side, different distances to criticality were inferred from the recordings of nervous systems. In my talk, I discuss how including additional constraints on the processing time can shift the optimal operating point of the recurrent networks. Moreover, the data from the visual cortex of the monkeys during the attentional task indicate that they flexibly change the closeness to the critical point of the local activity. Overall it suggests that, as we would expect from common sense, the optimal state depends on the task at hand, and the brain adapts to it in a local and fast manner.

Three intimately related dimensions of the mammalian genome—linear DNA sequence, gene transcription, and 3D genome architecture—are crucial for the development of nervous systems. Changes in the linear genome (e.g., de novo mutations), transcriptome, and 3D genome structure lead to debilitating neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia. However, current technologies and data are severely limited: (1) 3D genome structures of single brain cells have not been solved; (2) little is known about the dynamics of single-cell transcriptome and 3D genome after birth; (3) true de novo mutations are extremely difficult to distinguish from false positives (DNA damage and/or amplification errors). Here, I filled in this longstanding technological and knowledge gap. I recently developed a high-resolution method—diploid chromatin conformation capture (Dip-C)—which resolved the first 3D structure of the human genome, tackling a longstanding problem dating back to the 1880s. Using Dip-C, I obtained the first 3D genome structure of a single brain cell, and created the first transcriptome and 3D genome atlas of the mouse brain during postnatal development. I found that in adults, 3D genome “structure types” delineate all major cell types, with high correlation between chromatin A/B compartments and gene expression. During development, both transcriptome and 3D genome are extensively transformed in the first month of life. In neurons, 3D genome is rewired across scales, correlated with gene expression modules, and independent of sensory experience. Finally, I examined allele-specific structure of imprinted genes, revealing local and chromosome-wide differences. More recently, I expanded my 3D genome atlas to the human and mouse cerebellum—the most consistently affected brain region in autism. I uncovered unique 3D genome rewiring throughout life, providing a structural basis for the cerebellum’s unique mode of development and aging. In addition, to accurately measure de novo mutations in a single cell, I developed a new method—multiplex end-tagging amplification of complementary strands (META-CS), which eliminates nearly all false positives by virtue of DNA complementarity. Using META-CS, I determined the true mutation spectrum of single human brain cells, free from chemical artifacts. Together, my findings uncovered an unknown dimension of neurodevelopment, and open up opportunities for new treatments for autism and other developmental disorders.

Animals possess the ability to effortlessly and precisely time their actions even though information received from the world is often ambiguous and is inadvertently transformed as it passes through the nervous system. With such uncertainty pervading through our nervous systems, we could expect that much of human and animal behavior relies on inference that incorporates an important additional source of information, prior knowledge of the environment. These concepts have long been studied under the framework of Bayesian inference with substantial corroboration over the last decade that human time perception is consistent with such models. We, however, know little about the neural mechanisms that enable Bayesian signatures to emerge in temporal perception. I will present our work on three facets of this problem, how Bayesian estimates are encoded in neural populations, how these estimates are used to generate time intervals, and how prior knowledge for these tasks is acquired and optimized by neural circuits. We trained monkeys to perform an interval reproduction task and found their behavior to be consistent with Bayesian inference. Using insights from electrophysiology and in silico models, we propose a mechanism by which cortical populations encode Bayesian estimates and utilize them to generate time intervals. Thereafter, I will present a circuit model for how temporal priors can be acquired by cerebellar machinery leading to estimates consistent with Bayesian theory. Based on electrophysiology and anatomy experiments in rodents, I will provide some support for this model. Overall, these findings attempt to bridge insights from normative frameworks of Bayesian inference with potential neural implementations for the acquisition, estimation, and production of timing behaviors.

Dr. Rajan and her lab design neural network models based on experimental data, and reverse-engineer them to figure out how brain circuits function in health and disease. They recently developed a powerful framework for tracing neural paths across multiple brain regions— called Current-Based Decomposition (CURBD). This new approach enables the computation of excitatory and inhibitory input currents that drive a given neuron, aiding in the discovery of how entire populations of neurons behave across multiple interacting brain regions. Dr. Rajan’s team has applied this method to studying the neural underpinnings of behavior. As an example, when CURBD was applied to data gathered from an animal model often used to study depression- and anxiety-like behaviors (i.e., learned helplessness) the underlying biology driving adaptive and maladaptive behaviors in the face of stress was revealed. With this framework Dr. Rajan's team probes for mechanisms at work across brain regions that support both healthy and disease states-- as well as identify key divergences from multiple different nervous systems, including zebrafish, mice, non-human primates, and humans.

We are interested in understanding how microbes impact the behavior of host animals. Animal nervous systems likely evolved in environments richly surrounded by microbes, yet the impact of bacteria on nervous system function has been relatively under-studied. A challenge has been to identify systems in which both host and microbe are amenable to genetic manipulation, and which enable high-throughput behavioral screening in response to defined and naturalistic conditions. To accomplish these goals, we use an animal host — the roundworm C. elegans, which feeds on bacteria — in combination with its natural gut microbiome to identify inter-organismal signals driving host-microbe interactions and decision-making. C. elegans has some of the most extensive molecular, neurobiological and genetic tools of any multicellular eukaryote, and, coupled with the ease of gnotobiotic culture in these worms, represents a highly attractive system in which to study microbial influence on host behavior. Using this system, we discovered that commensal bacterial metabolites directly modulate nervous system function of their host. Beneficial gut microbes of the genus Providencia produce the neuromodulator tyramine in the C. elegans intestine. Using a combination of behavioral analysis, neurogenetics, metabolomics and bacterial genetics we established that bacterially produced tyramine is converted to octopamine in C. elegans, which acts directly in sensory neurons to reduce odor aversion and increase sensory preference for Providencia. We think that this type of sensory modulation may increase association of C. elegans with these microbes, increasing availability of this nutrient-rich food source for the worm and its progeny, while facilitating dispersal of the bacteria.

The dominant view of perception right now is that information travels from the environment to the sensory system, then to the nervous systems which processes it to generate a percept and behaviour. Ongoing behaviour is thought to occur largely through simple iterations of this process. However, this linear view, where information flows only in one direction and the properties of the environment and the sensory system remain static and unaffected by behaviour, is slowly fading. Many of us are beginning to appreciate that perception is largely active, i.e. that information flows back and forth between the three systems modulating their respective properties. In other words, in the real world, the environment and sensorimotor loop is pretty much always closed. I study the loop; in particular I study how the reverse arm of the loop affects sound and vibration perception. I will present two examples of motor modulation of perception at two very different temporal and spatial scales. First, in crickets, I will present data on how high-speed molecular motor activity enhances hearing via the well-studied phenomenon of active amplification. Second, in spiders I will present data on how body posture, a slow macroscopic feature, which can barely be called ‘active’, can nonetheless modulate vibration perception. I hope these results will motivate a conversation about whether ‘active’ perception is an optional feature observed in some sensory systems, or something that is ultimately necessitated by both evolution and physics.

How nervous systems control behaviour is the main question we seek to answer in neuroscience. Although visual systems have been a popular entry point into the brain, we don’t understand—in any deep sense—how visual perception guides navigation in flies (or any organism). I will present recent progress towards this goal from our lab. We are using anatomical insights from connectomics, genetic methods for labelling and manipulating identified cell types, neurophysiology, behaviour, and computational modeling to explain how the fly brain processes visual motion to regulate behaviour.