Change is ubiquitous in living beings. In particular, the connectome and neural representations can change. Nevertheless behaviors and memories often persist over long times. In a standard model, associative memories are represented by assemblies of strongly interconnected neurons. For faithful storage these assemblies are assumed to consist of the same neurons over time. We propose a contrasting memory model with complete temporal remodeling of assemblies, based on experimentally observed changes of synapses and neural representations. The assemblies drift freely as noisy autonomous network activity or spontaneous synaptic turnover induce neuron exchange. The exchange can be described analytically by reduced, random walk models derived from spiking neural network dynamics or from first principles. The gradual exchange allows activity-dependent and homeostatic plasticity to conserve the representational structure and keep inputs, outputs and assemblies consistent. This leads to persistent memory. Our findings explain recent experimental results on temporal evolution of fear memory representations and suggest that memory systems need to be understood in their completeness as individual parts may constantly change.

Nuo Li (Baylor College of Medicine, USA) shares novel insights into coordinated interhemispheric large-scale neural network activity underpinning short-term memory in mice. Relevant techniques covered include: simultaneous multi-regional recordings using multiple 64-channel H probes during head-fixed behavior in mice. simultaneous optogenetics and population recording. analysis of population recordings to infer interactions between brain regions. Reference: Chen G, Kang B, Lindsey J, Druckmann S, Li N, (2021). Modularity and robustness of frontal cortex networks. Cell, 184(14):3717-3730.

Neural circuits exhibit complex activity patterns, both spontaneously and in response to external stimuli. Information encoding and learning in neural circuits depend on the ability of time-varying stimuli to control spontaneous network activity. In particular, variability arising from the sensitivity to initial conditions of recurrent cortical circuits can limit the information conveyed about the sensory input. Spiking and firing rate network models can exhibit such sensitivity to initial conditions that are reflected in their dynamic entropy rate and attractor dimensionality computed from their full Lyapunov spectrum. I will show how chaos in both spiking and rate networks depends on biophysical properties of neurons and the statistics of time-varying stimuli. In spiking networks, increasing the input rate or coupling strength aids in controlling the driven target circuit, which is reflected in both a reduced trial-to-trial variability and a decreased dynamic entropy rate. With sufficiently strong input, a transition towards complete network state control occurs. Surprisingly, this transition does not coincide with the transition from chaos to stability but occurs at even larger values of external input strength. Controllability of spiking activity is facilitated when neurons in the target circuit have a sharp spike onset, thus a high speed by which neurons launch into the action potential. I will also discuss chaos and controllability in firing-rate networks in the balanced state. For these, external control of recurrent dynamics strongly depends on correlations in the input. This phenomenon was studied with a non-stationary dynamic mean-field theory that determines how the activity statistics and the largest Lyapunov exponent depend on frequency and amplitude of the input, recurrent coupling strength, and network size. This shows that uncorrelated inputs facilitate learning in balanced networks. The results highlight the potential of Lyapunov spectrum analysis as a diagnostic for machine learning applications of recurrent networks. They are also relevant in light of recent advances in optogenetics that allow for time-dependent stimulation of a select population of neurons.

Homeostatic plasticity plays a key role in stabilizing neural network activity. But what is its role in neural information processing? We showed analytically how homeostasis changes collective dynamics and consequently information flow - depending on the input to the network. We then studied how input and homeostasis on a recurrent network of LIF neurons impacts information flow and task performance. We showed how we can tune the working point of the network, and found that, contrary to previous assumptions, there is not one optimal working point for a family of tasks, but each task may require its own working point.

Neuromodulators control information processing in cortical microcircuits by regulating the cellular and synaptic physiology of neurons. Computational models and detailed simulations of neocortical microcircuitry offer a unifying framework to analyze the role of neuromodulators on network activity. In the present study, to get a deeper insight in the organization of the cortical neuropil for modeling purposes, we quantify the fiber length per cortical volume and the density of varicosities for catecholaminergic, serotonergic and cholinergic systems using immunocytochemical staining and stereological techniques. The data obtained are integrated into a biologically detailed digital reconstruction of the rodent neocortex (Markram et al, 2015) in order to model the influence of modulatory systems on the activity of the somatosensory cortex neocortical column. Simulations of ascending modulation of network activity in our model predict the effects of increasing levels of neuromodulators on diverse neuron types and synapses and reveal a spectrum of activity states. Low levels of neuromodulation drive microcircuit activity into slow oscillations and network synchrony, whereas high neuromodulator concentrations govern fast oscillations and network asynchrony. The models and simulations thus provide a unifying in silico framework to study the role of neuromodulators in reconfiguring network activity.

In addition to its role in the learning and expression of conditioned behavior, the amygdala has long been implicated in the regulation of persistent states, such as anxiety and drive. Yet, it is not evident what projections of the neuronal activity capture the functional role of the network across such different timescales, specifically when behavior and neuronal space are complex and high-dimensional. We applied a data-driven dynamical approach for the analysis of calcium imaging data from the basolateral amygdala, collected while mice performed complex, self-paced behaviors, including spatial exploration, free social interaction, and goal directed actions. The seemingly complex network dynamics was effectively described by a hierarchical, modular structure, that corresponded to behavior on multiple timescales. Our results describe the response of the network activity to perturbations along different dimensions and the interplay between slow, state-like representation and the fast processing of specific events and actions schemes. We suggest hierarchical dynamical models offer a unified framework to capture the involvement of the amygdala in transitions between persistent states underlying such different functions as sensory associative learning, action selection and emotional processing. * Work done in collaboration with Jan Gründemann, Sol Fustinana, Alejandro Tsai and Julien Courtin (@theLüthiLab)

To understand how the brain can perform complex tasks such as perception, we have to understand how information enters the brain, how it is transformed and how it is transferred. But, how do we measure information transfer in the brain? This presentation will start with a general introduction of what mutual information is and how to measure it in an experimental setup. Next, the talk will focus on how this can be used to develop brain models at different (spatial) levels, from the microscopic single neuron level to the macroscopic network and behavioural level. How can we incorporate the knowledge about single neurons, that already show complex dynamics, into network activity and link this to behaviour?

Cognitive control involves the flexible allocation of mental resources during goal-directed behaviour and comprises three correlated but distinct domains—inhibition, task shifting, and working memory. Healthy ageing is characterised by reduced cognitive control. Professor Cheryl Grady and her team have been studying the influence of age differences in large-scale brain networks on the three control processes in a sample of adults from 20 to 86 years of age. In this webinar, Professor Cheryl Grady will describe three aspects of this work: 1) age-related dedifferentiation and reconfiguration of brain networks across the sub-domains 2) individual differences in the relation of task-related activity to age, structural integrity and task performance for each sub-domain 3) modulation of brain signal variability as a function of cognitive load and age during working memory. This research highlights the reduction in dynamic range of network activity that occurs with ageing and how this contributes to age differences in cognitive control. Cheryl Grady is a senior scientist at the Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest, and Professor in the departments of Psychiatry and Psychology at the University of Toronto. She held the Canada Research Chair in Neurocognitive Aging from 2005-2018 and was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada in 2019. Her research uses MRI to determine the role of brain network connectivity in cognitive ageing.

An emerging hypothesis in the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is that neuronal hyperexcitability and other forms of aberrant network activity play an important role in shaping the clinical course of AD. In this talk, Dr. Lam will highlight the close and bi-directional relationships between epilepsy and AD, noting recent advances in our understanding of this topic spanning from animal models to humans. She will describe recent intracranial electrode recordings in humans that have revealed silent hippocampal epileptiform activity occurring in early stages of AD. Finally, she will discuss machine learning approaches that her laboratory has been developing to non-invasively diagnose and quantify silent hippocampal epileptiform activity from scalp EEG recordings.

The symposium will start with Prof Cooper who will present “From neural tube to neocortex: the role of adhesion in maintaining stem cell morphology and function”. Then, Dr Tsai will talk about “In the search for new genes involved in brain development and disorders”. Dr Del Pino will deal with the “Regulation of intrinsic network activity during area patterning in the cerebral cortex”, and Dr Wang will present “Modelling Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Flies”.

Neural and behavioral responses to sensory stimuli are notoriously variable from trial to trial. Does this mean the brain is inherently noisy or that we don’t completely understand the nature of the brain and behavior? Here we monitor the state of activity of the animal through videography of the face, including pupil and whisker movements, as well as walking, while also monitoring the ability of the animal to perform a difficult auditory or visual task. We find that the state of the animal is continuously changing and is never stable. The animal is constantly becoming more or less activated (aroused) on a second and subsecond scale. These changes in state are reflected in all of the neural systems we have measured, including cortical, thalamic, and neuromodulatory activity. Rapid changes in cortical activity are highly correlated with changes in neural responses to sensory stimuli and the ability of the animal to perform auditory or visual detection tasks. On the intracellular level, these changes in forebrain activity are associated with large changes in neuronal membrane potential and the nature of network activity (e.g. from slow rhythm generation to sustained activation and depolarization). Monitoring cholinergic and noradrenergic axonal activity reveals widespread correlations across the cortex. However, we suggest that a significant component of these rapid state changes arise from glutamatergic pathways (e.g. corticocortical or thalamocortical), owing to their rapidity. Understanding the neural mechanisms of state-dependent variations in brain and behavior promises to significantly “denoise” our understanding of the brain.

Synaptic scaling is a homeostatic normalization mechanism that preserves relative synaptic strengths by adjusting them with a common factor. This multiplicative change is believed to be critical, since synaptic strengths are involved in learning and memory retention. Further, this homeostatic process is thought to be crucial for neuronal stability, playing a stabilizing role in otherwise runaway Hebbian plasticity [1-3]. Synaptic scaling requires a mechanism to sense total neuron activity and globally adjust synapses to achieve some activity set-point [4]. This process is relatively slow, which places limits on its ability to stabilize network activity [5]. Here we show that this slow response is inevitable in realistic neuronal morphologies. Furthermore, we reveal that global scaling can in fact be a source of instability unless responsiveness or scaling accuracy are sacrificed." "A neuron with tens of thousands of synapses must regulate its own excitability to compensate for changes in input. The time requirement for global feedback can introduce critical phase lags in a neuron’s response to perturbation. The severity of phase lag increases with neuron size. Further, a more expansive morphology worsens cell responsiveness and scaling accuracy, especially in distal regions of the neuron. Local pools of reserve receptors improve efficiency, potentiation, and scaling, but this comes at a cost. Trafficking large quantities of receptors requires time, exacerbating the phase lag and instability. Local homeostatic feedback mitigates instability, but this too comes at the cost of reducing scaling accuracy." "Realization of the phase lag instability requires a unified model of synaptic scaling, regulation, and transport. We present such a model with global and local feedback in realistic neuron morphologies (Fig. 1). This combined model shows that neurons face a tradeoff between stability, accuracy, and efficiency. Global feedback is required for synaptic scaling but favors either system stability or efficiency. Large receptor pools improve scaling accuracy in large morphologies but worsen both stability and efficiency. Local feedback improves the stability-efficiency tradeoff at the cost of scaling accuracy. This project introduces unexplored constraints on neuron size, morphology, and synaptic scaling that are weakened by an interplay between global and local feedback.