Visual perception is perceived as continuous despite frequent disruptions in our visual environment. For example, internal events, such as saccadic eye-movements, and external events, such as object occlusion temporarily prevent visual information from reaching the brain. Combining evidence from these two models of visual disruption (occlusion and saccades), we will describe what information is maintained and how it is updated across the sensory interruption.   Lina Teichmann will focus on dynamic occlusion and demonstrate how object motion is processed through perceptual gaps. Grace Edwards will then describe what pre-saccadic information is maintained across a saccade and how it interacts with post-saccadic processing in retinotopically relevant areas of the early visual cortex. Both occlusion and saccades provide a window into how the brain bridges perceptual disruptions. Our evidence thus far suggests a role for extrapolation, integration, and potentially suppression in both models. Combining evidence from these typically separate fields enables us to determine if there is a set of mechanisms which support visual processing during visual disruptions in general.

Visual perception is perceived as continuous despite frequent disruptions in our visual environment. For example, internal events, such as saccadic eye-movements, and external events, such as object occlusion temporarily prevent visual information from reaching the brain. Combining evidence from these two models of visual disruption (occlusion and saccades), we will describe what information is maintained and how it is updated across the sensory interruption. Lina Teichmann will focus on dynamic occlusion and demonstrate how object motion is processed through perceptual gaps. Grace Edwards will then describe what pre-saccadic information is maintained across a saccade and how it interacts with post-saccadic processing in retinotopically relevant areas of the early visual cortex. Both occlusion and saccades provide a window into how the brain bridges perceptual disruptions. Our evidence thus far suggests a role for extrapolation, integration, and potentially suppression in both models. Combining evidence from these typically separate fields enables us to determine if there is a set of mechanisms which support visual processing during visual disruptions in general.

Perception of object motion is fundamentally multisensory, yet little is known about similarities and differences in the computations that give rise to our experience across senses. Insight can be provided by examining auditory motion processing in early blind individuals. In those who become blind early in life, the ‘visual’ motion area hMT+ responds to auditory motion. Meanwhile, the planum temporale, associated with auditory motion in sighted individuals, shows reduced selectivity for auditory motion, suggesting competition between cortical areas for functional role. According to the metamodal hypothesis of cross-modal plasticity developed by Pascual-Leone, the recruitment of hMT+ is driven by it being a metamodal structure containing “operators that execute a given function or computation regardless of sensory input modality”. Thus, the metamodal hypothesis predicts that the computations underlying auditory motion processing in early blind individuals should be analogous to visual motion processing in sighted individuals - relying on non-separable spatiotemporal filters. Inconsistent with the metamodal hypothesis, evidence suggests that the computational algorithms underlying auditory motion processing in early blind individuals fail to undergo a qualitative shift as a result of cross-modal plasticity. Auditory motion filters, in both blind and sighted subjects, are separable in space and time, suggesting that the recruitment of hMT+ to extract motion information from auditory input includes a significant modification of its normal computational operations.

Detection of motion is essential for survival, but how the visual system processes moving stimuli is not fully understood. Here, based on a detailed analysis of glutamate release from bipolar cells, we outline the rules that govern the representation of object motion in the early processing stages. Our main findings are as follows: (1) Motion processing begins already at the first retinal synapse. (2) The shape and the amplitude of motion responses cannot be reliably predicted from bipolar cell responses to stationary objects. (3) Enhanced representation of novel objects - particularly in bipolar cells with transient dynamics. (4) Response amplitude in bipolar cells matches visual salience reported in humans: suddenly appearing objects > novel motion > existing motion. These findings can be explained by antagonistic interactions in the center-surround receptive field, demonstrate that despite their simple operational concepts, classical center-surround receptive fields enable sophisticated visual computations.