← Back

Optogenetic Stimulation

Topic spotlight
TopicWorld Wide

optogenetic stimulation

Discover seminars, jobs, and research tagged with optogenetic stimulation across World Wide.
25 curated items14 Seminars9 ePosters2 Positions
Updated 1 day ago
25 items · optogenetic stimulation
25 results
Position

Pascal Fries

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society
Frankfurt, Germany
Dec 5, 2025

The Fries Lab at the Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) in Frankfurt is looking for an enthusiastic post-doctoral fellow, who is interested in studying the functional roles of brain rhythms and their synchronization in awake behaving marmosets. Behavior and the underlying cognitive functions rely on the dynamic communication between brain areas, a central topic of the lab (e.g. Bastos et al., Neuron, 2015; Rohenkohl et al., Neuron, 2018; Vezoli et al., Neuron, 2021). The postdoc will study this using electrophysiological recordings, potentially combined with functional Ultrasound (fUSI) and/or optogenetic stimulation. The postdoc will be able to use an outstanding infrastructure, and will join an existing international team with expertise in non-human primate research, including marmosets (Jendritza et al., eNeuro, 2021; Jendritza et al., bioRxiv, 2021). For details on the institute and the lab, see: https://www.esi-frankfurt.de/people/pascalfries/ The position is for three years initially, with the possibility of extension, and can start at any time in 2022 or 2023. This call will remain open until 15 September 2022.

PositionComputational Neuroscience

Christopher Rozell

Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA, USA
Dec 5, 2025

A postdoctoral position in computational neuroscience is available in the lab of Christopher Rozell at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, GA). This BRAIN Initiative research project seeks to advance the field of closed-loop computational neuroscience by pioneering the use of real-time feedback stimulation during experiments to decouple recurrently connected circuit elements and make stronger causal inferences about circuit interactions. This position will have a broad opportunity to develop models and algorithms that are implemented in novel experiments using closed-loop optogenetic stimulation. We aim to provide both new scientific insight about computation in neural circuits (especially sensory coding in the thalamo-cortical circuit) as well as new approaches and algorithmic tools for the community to use in novel electrophysiology experiments. This position will work as part of a team and in close collaboration with the experimental lab of Garrett Stanley (also at Georgia Tech), and it is expected that the computational and algorithmic approaches will be implemented experimentally through close partnership with experimentalists in the Stanley Laboratory. Applicants should hold a PhD in a related discipline with a strong record of research impact, quantitative thinking and collaborative work. Experience in computational neuroscience, machine learning, feedback control, and causal inference is all advantageous. The lab is committed to providing a diverse and inclusive environment for all scholars, and applications are especially encouraged from all underrepresented groups. Additionally, the lab is committed to the professional development of the members, making it valuable preparation for people who are interested in academic, industrial or entrepreneurial careers. The position has no mandatory teaching or administrative duties. Excellent (written and oral) communication skills in English are required. This particular project is part of the Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience program (CRCNS), providing access to a community of researchers across the country who are focused on similar types of collaborations between computational and experimental labs. Georgia Tech's campus in the heart of midtown Atlanta, which has a thriving and collaborative neuroscience community that has a particular emphasis on computational and systems neuroscience. Atlanta is also one of the fastest-growing metropolitan areas in the United States, boasting a wide range of opportunities for recreation and culture. Georgia Tech has competitive benefits (including comprehensive medical insurance) and is an equal opportunity employer. The position would ideally start as soon as possible (spring 2021). The appointment is initially for 12 months with the expectation of renewal. Compensation will be commensurate with relevant experience. Candidates should send a CV, a statement of research experience and interests, expected date of availability, and the contact information for three references to crozell@gatech.edu with the subject line "CRCNS postdoc". Application review will proceed until the position is filled and should be received by December 1 for full consideration.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Learning static and dynamic mappings with local self-supervised plasticity

Pantelis Vafeidis
California Institute of Technology
Sep 6, 2022

Animals exhibit remarkable learning capabilities with little direct supervision. Likewise, self-supervised learning is an emergent paradigm in artificial intelligence, closing the performance gap to supervised learning. In the context of biology, self-supervised learning corresponds to a setting where one sense or specific stimulus may serve as a supervisory signal for another. After learning, the latter can be used to predict the former. On the implementation level, it has been demonstrated that such predictive learning can occur at the single neuron level, in compartmentalized neurons that separate and associate information from different streams. We demonstrate the power such self-supervised learning over unsupervised (Hebb-like) learning rules, which depend heavily on stimulus statistics, in two examples: First, in the context of animal navigation where predictive learning can associate internal self-motion information always available to the animal with external visual landmark information, leading to accurate path-integration in the dark. We focus on the well-characterized fly head direction system and show that our setting learns a connectivity strikingly similar to the one reported in experiments. The mature network is a quasi-continuous attractor and reproduces key experiments in which optogenetic stimulation controls the internal representation of heading, and where the network remaps to integrate with different gains. Second, we show that incorporating global gating by reward prediction errors allows the same setting to learn conditioning at the neuronal level with mixed selectivity. At its core, conditioning entails associating a neural activity pattern induced by an unconditioned stimulus (US) with the pattern arising in response to a conditioned stimulus (CS). Solving the generic problem of pattern-to-pattern associations naturally leads to emergent cognitive phenomena like blocking, overshadowing, saliency effects, extinction, interstimulus interval effects etc. Surprisingly, we find that the same network offers a reductionist mechanism for causal inference by resolving the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

Response of cortical networks to optogenetic stimulation: Experiment vs. theory

Nicolas Brunel
Duke University
Jan 18, 2022

Optogenetics is a powerful tool that allows experimentalists to perturb neural circuits. What can we learn about a network from observing its response to perturbations? I will first describe the results of optogenetic activation of inhibitory neurons in mice cortex, and show that the results are consistent with inhibition stabilization. I will then move to experiments in which excitatory neurons are activated optogenetically, with or without visual inputs, in mice and monkeys. In some conditions, these experiments show a surprising result that the distribution of firing rates is not significantly changed by stimulation, even though firing rates of individual neurons are strongly modified. I will show in which conditions a network model of excitatory and inhibitory neurons can reproduce this feature.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

NMC4 Short Talk: An optogenetic theory of stimulation near criticality

Brandon Benson
Stanford University
Dec 1, 2021

Recent advances in optogenetics allow for stimulation of neurons with sub-millisecond spike jitter and single neuron selectivity. Already this precision has revealed new levels of cortical sensitivity: stimulating tens of neurons can yield changes in the mean firing rate of thousands of similarly tuned neurons. This extreme sensitivity suggests that cortical dynamics are near criticality. Criticality is often studied in neural systems as a non-equilibrium thermodynamic process in which scale-free patterns of activity, called avalanches, emerge between distinct states of spontaneous activity. While criticality is well studied, it is still unclear what these distinct states of spontaneous activity are and what responses we expect from stimulation of this activity. By answering these questions, optogenetic stimulation will become a new avenue for approaching criticality and understanding cortical dynamics. Here, for the first time, we study the effects of optogenetic-like stimulation on a model near criticality. We study a model of Inhibitory/Excitatory (I/E) Leaky Integrate and Fire (LIF) spiking neurons which display a region of high sensitivity as seen in experiments. We find that this region of sensitivity is, indeed, near criticality. We derive the Dynamic Mean Field Theory of this model and find that the distinct states of activity are asynchrony and synchrony. We use our theory to characterize response to various types and strengths of optogenetic stimulation. Our model and theory predict that asynchronous, near-critical dynamics can have two qualitatively different responses to stimulation: one characterized by high sensitivity, discrete event responses, and high trial-to-trial variability, and another characterized by low sensitivity, continuous responses with characteristic frequencies, and low trial-to-trial variability. While both response types may be considered near-critical in model space, networks which are closest to criticality show a hybrid of these response effects.

SeminarOpen SourceRecording

The Open-Source UCLA Miniscope Project

Daniel Aharoni
University of California, Los Angeles
Oct 26, 2021

The Miniscope Project -- an open-source collaborative effort—was created to accelerate innovation of miniature microscope technology and to increase global access to this technology. Currently, we are working on advancements ranging from optogenetic stimulation and wire-free operation to simultaneous optical and electrophysiological recording. Using these systems, we have uncovered mechanisms underlying temporal memory linking and investigated causes of cognitive deficits in temporal lobe epilepsy. Through innovation and optimization, this work aims to extend the reach of neuroscience research and create new avenues of scientific inquiry.

SeminarNeuroscience

Workshop: Spatial Brain Dynamics

Kenneth Harris, György Buzsáki, Terrence Sejnowski
May 12, 2021

Traditionally, the term dynamics means changes in a system evolving over time. However, in the brain action potentials propagate along axons to induce postsynaptic currents with different delays at many sites simultaneously. This fundamental computational mechanism evolves spatially to engage the neuron populations involved in brain functions. To identify and understand the spatial processing in brains, this workshop will focus on the spatial principles of brain dynamics that determine how action potentials and membrane currents propagate in the networks of neurons that brains are made of. We will focus on non-artificial dynamics, which excludes in vitro dynamics, interference, electrical and optogenetic stimulations of brains in vivo. Recent non-artificial studies of spatial brain dynamics can actually explain how sensory, motor and internal brain functions evolve. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss these recent results and identify common principles of spatial brain dynamics.

SeminarNeuroscience

Workshop: Spatial Brain Dynamics

Carl Petersen, Bruce McNaughton, Sonja Grün
May 11, 2021

Traditionally, the term dynamics means changes in a system evolving over time. However, in the brain action potentials propagate along axons to induce postsynaptic currents with different delays at many sites simultaneously. This fundamental computational mechanism evolves spatially to engage the neuron populations involved in brain functions. To identify and understand the spatial processing in brains, this workshop will focus on the spatial principles of brain dynamics that determine how action potentials and membrane currents propagate in the networks of neurons that brains are made of. We will focus on non-artificial dynamics, which excludes in vitro dynamics, interference, electrical and optogenetic stimulations of brains in vivo. Recent non-artificial studies of spatial brain dynamics can actually explain how sensory, motor and internal brain functions evolve. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss these recent results and identify common principles of spatial brain dynamics.

SeminarNeuroscience

Workshop: Spatial Brain Dynamics

Jennifer Li and Drew Robson, Thomas Mrsic-Flogel, David McCormick
May 10, 2021

Traditionally, the term dynamics means changes in a system evolving over time. However, in the brain action potentials propagate along axons to induce postsynaptic currents with different delays at many sites simultaneously. This fundamental computational mechanism evolves spatially to engage the neuron populations involved in brain functions. To identify and understand the spatial processing in brains, this workshop will focus on the spatial principles of brain dynamics that determine how action potentials and membrane currents propagate in the networks of neurons that brains are made of. We will focus on non-artificial dynamics, which excludes in vitro dynamics, interference, electrical and optogenetic stimulations of brains in vivo. Recent non-artificial studies of spatial brain dynamics can actually explain how sensory, motor and internal brain functions evolve. The purpose of this workshop is to discuss these recent results and identify common principles of spatial brain dynamics.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

A Cortical Circuit for Audio-Visual Predictions

Aleena Garner
Keller lab, FMI
Mar 9, 2021

Team work makes sensory streams work: our senses work together, learn from each other, and stand in for one another, the result of which is perception and understanding. Learned associations between stimuli in different sensory modalities can shape the way we perceive these stimuli (Mcgurk and Macdonald, 1976). During audio-visual associative learning, auditory cortex is thought to underlie multi-modal plasticity in visual cortex (McIntosh et al., 1998; Mishra et al., 2007; Zangenehpour and Zatorre, 2010). However, it is not well understood how processing in visual cortex is altered by an auditory stimulus that is predictive of a visual stimulus and what the mechanisms are that mediate such experience-dependent, audio-visual associations in sensory cortex. Here we describe a neural mechanism by which an auditory input can shape visual representations of behaviorally relevant stimuli through direct interactions between auditory and visual cortices. We show that the association of an auditory stimulus with a visual stimulus in a behaviorally relevant context leads to an experience-dependent suppression of visual responses in primary visual cortex (V1). Auditory cortex axons carry a mixture of auditory and retinotopically-matched visual input to V1, and optogenetic stimulation of these axons selectively suppresses V1 neurons responsive to the associated visual stimulus after, but not before, learning. Our results suggest that cross-modal associations can be stored in long-range cortical connections and that with learning these cross-modal connections function to suppress the responses to predictable input.

SeminarNeuroscience

Positive and negative feedback in seizure initiation

Andrew Trevelyan
Newcastle University
Sep 1, 2020

Seizure onset is a critically important brain state transition that has proved very difficult to predict accurately from recordings of brain activity. I will present new data acquired using a range of optogenetic and imaging tools to characterize exactly how cortical networks change in the build-up to a seizure. I will show how intermittent optogenetic stimulation ("active probing") reveals a latent change in dendritic excitability that is tightly correlated to the onset of seizure activity. This data relates back to old work from the 1980s suggesting a critical role in epileptic pathophysiology for dendritic plateau potentials. Our data show how the precipitous nature of the transition can be understood in terms of multiple, synergistic positive feedback mechanisms.

SeminarNeuroscience

Reward foraging task, and model-based analysis reveal how fruit flies learn the value of available options

Duda Kvitsiani
Aarhus University
Jul 28, 2020

Understanding what drives foraging decisions in animals requires careful manipulation of the value of available options while monitoring animal choices. Value-based decision-making tasks, in combination with formal learning models, have provided both an experimental and theoretical framework to study foraging decisions in lab settings. While these approaches were successfully used in the past to understand what drives choices in mammals, very little work has been done on fruit flies. This is even though fruit flies have served as a model organism for many complex behavioural paradigms. To fill this gap we developed a single-animal, trial-based decision-making task, where freely walking flies experienced optogenetic sugar-receptor neuron stimulation. We controlled the value of available options by manipulating the probabilities of optogenetic stimulation. We show that flies integrate a reward history of chosen options and forget value of unchosen options. We further discover that flies assign higher values to rewards experienced early in the behavioural session, consistent with formal reinforcement learning models. Finally, we show that the probabilistic rewards affect walking trajectories of flies, suggesting that accumulated value is controlling the navigation vector of flies in a graded fashion. These findings establish the fruit fly as a model organism to explore the genetic and circuit basis of value-based decisions.

ePoster

Chronic optogenetic stimulation has the potential to shape the collective activity of neuronal cell cultures

Cyprian Adler, Friedrich Schwarz, Julian Vogel, Christine Stadelmann, Fred Wolf, Manuel Schottdorf, Andreas Neef

Bernstein Conference 2024

ePoster

Electrical but not optogenetic stimulation drives nonlinear contraction of neural states

COSYNE 2022

ePoster

40-Hz optogenetic stimulation rescues functional synaptic plasticity after stroke

Cong Wang, Montana Samantzis, Matilde Balbi

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

Cell-specific simultaneous optogenetic stimulation and inhibition utilizing dual-color striped organic LEDs

Jens Weber, Giuseppe Ciccone, Ilenia Meloni, Hans Kleemann, Karl Leo, Caroline Murawski

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

Development and testing of a novel, wirelessly powered telemeter for simultaneous optogenetic stimulation and EEG recording in adult Wistar rats

Bethan Rees, Stuart Greenhill, Phil Griffiths

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

Neuronal morphology impacts optogenetic stimulation precision

David Berling, Luca Baroni, Antoine Chaffiol, Gregory Gauvain, Serge Picaud, Jan Antolik

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

OPTOGENETIC STIMULATION OF SHSY-5Y CELLS AND ITS EFFECTS ON NEURONAL DEVELOPMENT IN 3D HYDROGEL SYSTEM

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

Optogenetic stimulation in the visual thalamus for future brain vision prostheses

Florian Fallegger, Fabrice Arcizet, Chris Klink, Rafik Arab, Valérie Fradot, Eunah Ko, Eusik Yoon, Romina Badin, Serge Picaud, Pieter Roelfsema

FENS Forum 2024

ePoster

Irregular optogenetic stimulation waveforms can induce naturalistic patterns of hippocampal spectral activity

Eric Cole

Neuromatch 5