The neural correlates of decision-making have been investigated extensively, and recent work aims to identify under what conditions cortex is actually necessary for making accurate decisions. We discovered that mice with distinct cognitive experiences, beyond sensory and motor learning, use different cortical areas and neural activity patterns to solve the same task, revealing past learning as a critical determinant of whether cortex is necessary for decision tasks. We used optogenetics and calcium imaging to study the necessity and neural activity of multiple cortical areas in mice with different training histories. Posterior parietal cortex and retrosplenial cortex were mostly dispensable for accurate performance of a simple navigation-based visual discrimination task. In contrast, these areas were essential for the same simple task when mice were previously trained on complex tasks with delay periods or association switches. Multi-area calcium imaging showed that, in mice with complex-task experience, single-neuron activity had higher selectivity and neuron-neuron correlations were weaker, leading to codes with higher task information. Therefore, past experience is a key factor in determining whether cortical areas have a causal role in decision tasks.

Restoring hand function is a top priority for individuals with tetraplegia. This challenge motivates considerable research on brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), which bypass damaged neural pathways to control paralyzed or prosthetic limbs. Here, we demonstrate the BCI control of a prosthetic hand using intracortical recordings from the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). As part of an ongoing clinical trial, two participants with cervical spinal cord injury were each implanted with a 96-channel array in the left PPC. Across four sessions each, we recorded neural activity while they attempted to press individual fingers of the contralateral (right) hand. Single neurons modulated selectively for different finger movements. Offline, we accurately classified finger movements from neural firing rates using linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with cross-validation (accuracy = 90%; chance = 17%). Finally, the participants used the neural classifier online to control all five fingers of a BCI hand. Online control accuracy (86%; chance = 17%) exceeded previous state-of-the-art finger BCIs. Furthermore, offline, we could classify both flexion and extension of the right fingers, as well as flexion of all ten fingers. Our results indicate that neural recordings from PPC can be used to control prosthetic fingers, which may help contribute to a hand restoration strategy for people with tetraplegia.