In the central nervous system, neuronal activity is a critical regulator of development and plasticity. Activity-dependent proliferation of healthy glial progenitors, oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), and the consequent generation of new oligodendrocytes contributes to adaptive myelination. This plasticity of myelin tunes neural circuit function and contributes to healthy cognition. The robust mitogenic effect of neuronal activity on normal oligodendroglial precursor cells, a putative cellular origin for many forms of glioma, suggests that dysregulated or “hijacked” mechanisms of myelin plasticity might similarly promote malignant cell proliferation in this devastating group of brain cancers. Indeed, neuronal activity promotes progression of both high-grade and low-grade glioma subtypes in preclinical models. Crucial mechanisms mediating activity-regulated glioma growth include paracrine secretion of BDNF and the synaptic protein neuroligin-3 (NLGN3). NLGN3 induces multiple oncogenic signaling pathways in the cancer cell, and also promotes glutamatergic synapse formation between neurons and glioma cells. Glioma cells integrate into neural circuits synaptically through neuron-to-glioma synapses, and electrically through potassium-evoked currents that are amplified through gap-junctional coupling between tumor cells This synaptic and electrical integration of glioma into neural circuits is central to tumor progression in preclinical models. Thus, neuron-glial interactions not only modulate neural circuit structure and function in the healthy brain, but paracrine and synaptic neuron-glioma interactions also play important roles in the pathogenesis of glial cancers. The mechanistic parallels between normal and malignant neuron-glial interactions underscores the extent to which mechanisms of neurodevelopment and plasticity are subverted by malignant gliomas, and the importance of understanding the neuroscience of cancer.

GABAergic interneurons are chiefly responsible for controlling the activity of local circuits in the cortex. Chandelier cells (ChCs) are a type of GABAergic interneuron that control the output of hundreds of neighbouring pyramidal cells through axo-axonic synapses which target the axon initial segment (AIS). Despite their importance in modulating circuit activity, our knowledge of the development and function of axo-axonic synapses remains elusive. We have investigated the emergence and plasticity of axo-axonic synapses in layer 2/3 of the somatosensory cortex (S1) and found that ChCs follow what appear to be homeostatic rules when forming synapses with pyramidal neurons. We are currently implementing in vivo techniques to image the process of axo-axonic synapse formation during development and uncover the dynamics of synaptogenesis and pruning at the AIS. In addition, we are using an all-optical approach to both activate and measure the activity of chandelier cells and their postsynaptic partners in the primary visual cortex (V1) and somatosensory cortex (S1) in mice, also during development. We aim to provide a structural and functional description of the emergence and plasticity of a GABAergic synapse type in the cortex.

Precise synaptic connectivity is a prerequisite for the function of neural circuits, yet individual neurons, taken out of their developmental context, readily form unspecific synapses. How does genetically encoded brain wiring deal with this apparent contradiction? Brain wiring is a developmental growth process that is not only characterized by precision, but also flexibility and robustness. As in any other growth process, cellular interactions are restricted in space and time. Correspondingly, molecular and cellular interactions are restricted to those that 'get to see' each other during development. This seminar will explore the question how neurons decide when and where to make synapses using the Drosophila visual system as a model. New findings reveal that pattern formation during growth and the kinetics of live neuronal interactions restrict synapse formation and partner choice for neurons that are not otherwise prevented from making incorrect synapses in this system. For example, cell biological mechanisms like autophagy as well as developmental temperature restrict inappropriate partner choice through a process of kinetic exclusion that critically contributes to wiring specificity. The seminar will explore these and other neuronal strategies when and where to make synapses during developmental growth that contribute to precise, flexible and robust outcomes in brain wiring.

Almost everybody that has seen neurons under a microscope for the first time is fascinated by their beauty and their complex shape. Early on during development, however, there are hardly any signs of their future complexity, but the neurons look round and simple. How do neurons develop their sophisticated structure? How do they initially generate domains that later have distinct function within neuronal circuits, such as the axon? And, can a better understanding of the underlying developmental mechanisms help us in pathological conditions, such as a spinal cord injury, to induce axons to regenerate? Here, I will talk about the cytoskeleton as a driving force for neuronal polarization. We will then explore how cytoskeletal changes help to reactivate the growth program of injured CNS axons to elicit axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury. Finally, we will discuss whether axon growth and synapse formation may be processes in neurons that might exclude each other. Following this developmental hypothesis, it will help us to generate a novel perspective on regeneration failure in the adult CNS, and how we can overcome this failure to induce axon regeneration. Thus, this talk will describe how we can exploit developmental mechanisms to induce axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury.

The synapse is the core component of the nervous system and synapse formation is the critical step in the assembly of neuronal circuits. The assembly and maturation of synapses requires the contribution of secreted and membrane-associated proteins, with neuronal activity playing crucial roles in regulating synaptic strength, neuronal membrane properties, and neural circuit refinement. The molecular mechanisms of synapse assembly and refinement have been so far largely examined on a gene-by-gene basis and with a perspective fully centered on neuronal cells. However, in the last years, the involvement of non-neuronal cells has emerged. Among these, microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, have been shown to play a key role in synapse formation and elimination. Contacts of microglia with dendrites in the somatosensory cortex were found to induce filopodia and dendritic spines via Ca2+ and actin-dependent processes, while microglia-derived BDNF was shown to promote learning-dependent synapse formation. Microglia is also recognized to have a central role in the widespread elimination (or pruning) of exuberant synaptic connections during development. Clarifying the processes by which microglia control synapse homeostasis is essential to advance our current understanding of brain functions. Clear answers to these questions will have important implications for our understanding of brain diseases, as the fact that many psychiatric and neurological disorders are synaptopathies (i.e. diseases of the synapse) is now widely recognized. In the last years, my group has identified TREM2, an innate immune receptor with phagocytic and antiinflammatory properties expressed in brain exclusively by microglia, as essential for microglia-mediated synaptic refinement during the early stages of brain development. The talk will describe the role of TREM2 in synapse elimination and introduce the molecular actors involved. I will also describe additional pathways by which the immune system may affect the formation and homeostasis of synaptic contacts.

Microglia are the immune cells of the brain, and play increasingly appreciated roles in synapse formation, brain plasticity, and cognition. A growing appreciation that the immune system involved in diseases like schizophrenia, epilepsy, and neurodegenerative diseases has led to renewed interest in how microglia regulate synaptic connectivity. Our group previously identified the IL-1 family cytokine Interleukin-33 (IL-33) as a novel regulator of microglial activation and function. I will discuss a mechanism by which microglia regulate synaptic plasticity and long-term memories by engulfing brain extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. These studies raise the question of how these pathways may be altered or could be modified in the context of disease.

Synapse formation during neuronal development is critical to establish neural circuits and a nervous system1. Every presynapse builds a core active zone structure where ion channels are clustered and synaptic vesicles are released2. While the composition of active zones is well characterized2,3, how active zone proteins assemble together and recruit synaptic release machinery during development is not clear. Here, we find core active zone scaffold proteins SYD-2/Liprin-α and ELKS-1 phase separate during an early stage of synapse development, and later mature into a solid structure. We directly test the in vivo function of phase separation with mutants specifically lacking this activity. These mutant SYD-2 and ELKS-1 proteins remain enriched at synapses, but are defective in active zone assembly and synapse function. The defects are rescued with the introduction of a phase separation motif from an unrelated protein. In vitro, we reconstitute the SYD-2 and ELKS-1 liquid phase scaffold and find it is competent to bind and incorporate downstream active zone components. The fluidity of SYD-2 and ELKS-1 condensates is critical for efficient mixing and incorporation of active zone components. These data reveal that a developmental liquid phase of scaffold molecules is essential for synaptic active zone assembly before maturation into a stable final structure.