Build stochastic computational/mathematical models of gene expression in dendritic neurons to try to understand how or if synapses can store information stably. Perform data analysis on longitudinal in vivo and in vitro imaging and electron microscopy data of synapse dynamics to compare to the models.

Nervous system function relies on the polarized architecture of neurons, established by directional transport of pre- and postsynaptic cargoes. While delivery of postsynaptic components depends on the secretory pathway, the identity of the membrane compartment(s) that supply presynaptic active zone (AZ) and synaptic vesicle (SV) proteins is largely unknown. I will discuss our recent advances in our understanding of how key components of the presynaptic machinery for neurotransmitter release are transported and assembled focussing on our studies in genome-engineered human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. Specifically, I will focus on the composition and cell biological identity of the axonal transport vesicles that shuttle key components of neurotransmission to nascent synapses and on machinery for axonal transport and its control by signaling lipids. Our studies identify a crucial mechanism mediating the delivery of SV and active zone proteins to developing synapses and reveal connections to neurological disorders. In the second part of my talk, I will discuss how exocytosis and endocytosis are coupled to maintain presynaptic membrane homeostasis. I will present unpublished data regarding the role of membrane tension in the coupling of exocytosis and endocytosis at synapses. We have identified an endocytic BAR domain protein that is capable of sensing alterations in membrane tension caused by the exocytotic fusion of SVs to initiate compensatory endocytosis to restore plasma membrane area. Interference with this mechanism results in defects in the coupling of presynaptic exocytosis and SV recycling at human synapses.

n the neurosciences the need for some 'overarching' theory is sometimes expressed, but it is not always obvious what is meant by this. One can perhaps agree that in modern science observation and experimentation is normally complemented by 'theory', i.e. the development of theoretical concepts that help guiding and evaluating experiments and measurements. A deeper discussion of 'brain theory' will require the clarification of some further distictions, in particular: theory vs. model and brain research (and its theory) vs. neuroscience. Other questions are: Does a theory require mathematics? Or even differential equations? Today it is often taken for granted that the whole universe including everything in it, for example humans, animals, and plants, can be adequately treated by physics and therefore theoretical physics is the overarching theory. Even if this is the case, it has turned out that in some particular parts of physics (the historical example is thermodynamics) it may be useful to simplify the theory by introducing additional theoretical concepts that can in principle be 'reduced' to more complex descriptions on the 'microscopic' level of basic physical particals and forces. In this sense, brain theory may be regarded as part of theoretical neuroscience, which is inside biophysics and therefore inside physics, or theoretical physics. Still, in neuroscience and brain research, additional concepts are typically used to describe results and help guiding experimentation that are 'outside' physics, beginning with neurons and synapses, names of brain parts and areas, up to concepts like 'learning', 'motivation', 'attention'. Certainly, we do not yet have one theory that includes all these concepts. So 'brain theory' is still in a 'pre-newtonian' state. However, it may still be useful to understand in general the relations between a larger theory and its 'parts', or between microscopic and macroscopic theories, or between theories at different 'levels' of description. This is what I plan to do.

Understanding how brains learn requires bridging evidence across scales—from behaviour and neural circuits to cells, synapses, and molecules. In our work, we use computational modelling and data analysis to explore how the physical properties of neurons and neural circuits constrain learning. These include limits imposed by brain wiring, energy availability, molecular noise, and the 3D structure of dendritic spines. In this talk I will describe one such project testing if wiring motifs from fly brain connectomes can improve performance of reservoir computers, a type of recurrent neural network. The hope is that these insights into brain learning will lead to improved learning algorithms for artificial systems.

Join Us for the Memory Decoding Journal Club! A collaboration of the Carboncopies Foundation and BPF Aspirational Neuroscience. This time, we’re diving into a groundbreaking paper: "Motor learning selectively strengthens cortical and striatal synapses of motor engram neurons

Remembering events in the past is crucial to intelligent behaviour. Flexible memory retrieval, beyond simple recall, requires a model of how events relate to one another. Two key brain systems are implicated in this process: the hippocampal episodic memory (EM) system and the prefrontal working memory (WM) system. While an understanding of the hippocampal system, from computation to algorithm and representation, is emerging, less is understood about how the prefrontal WM system can give rise to flexible computations beyond simple memory retrieval, and even less is understood about how the two systems relate to each other. Here we develop a mathematical theory relating the algorithms and representations of EM and WM by showing a duality between storing memories in synapses versus neural activity. In doing so, we develop a formal theory of the algorithm and representation of prefrontal WM as structured, and controllable, neural subspaces (termed activity slots). By building models using this formalism, we elucidate the differences, similarities, and trade-offs between the hippocampal and prefrontal algorithms. Lastly, we show that several prefrontal representations in tasks ranging from list learning to cue dependent recall are unified as controllable activity slots. Our results unify frontal and temporal representations of memory, and offer a new basis for understanding the prefrontal representation of WM

Recent studies identified memory engram neurons, a neuronal population that is recruited by initial learning and is reactivated during memory recall.  Memory engram neurons are connected to one another through memory engram synapses in a distributed network of brain areas.  Our central hypothesis is that an associative memory is encoded and consolidated by selective strengthening of engram synapses.  We are testing this hypothesis, using a combination of engram cell labeling, optogenetic/chemogenetic, electrophysiological, and virus tracing approaches in rodent models of contextual fear conditioning.  In this talk, I will discuss our findings on how synaptic plasticity in memory engram synapses contributes to the acquisition and consolidation of contextual fear memory in a distributed network of the amygdala, hippocampus, and neocortex.

The size and structure of the dendritic arbor play important roles in determining how synaptic inputs of neurons are converted to action potential output and how neurons are integrated in the surrounding neuronal network. Accordingly, neurons with aberrant morphology have been associated with neurological disorders. Dysmorphic, enlarged neurons are, for example, a hallmark of focal epileptogenic lesions like focal cortical dysplasia (FCDIIb) and gangliogliomas (GG). However, the regulatory mechanisms governing the development of dendrites are insufficiently understood. The evolutionary conserved Ste20/Hippo kinase pathway has been proposed to play an important role in regulating the formation and maintenance of dendritic architecture. A key element of this pathway, Ste20-like kinase (SLK), regulates cytoskeletal dynamics in non-neuronal cells and is strongly expressed throughout neuronal development. Nevertheless, its function in neurons is unknown. We found that during development of mouse cortical neurons, SLK has a surprisingly specific role for proper elaboration of higher, ≥ 3rd, order dendrites both in cultured neurons and living mice. Moreover, SLK is required to maintain excitation-inhibition balance. Specifically, SLK knockdown causes a selective loss of inhibitory synapses and functional inhibition after postnatal day 15, while excitatory neurotransmission is unaffected. This mechanism may be relevant for human disease, as dysmorphic neurons within human cortical malformations exhibit significant loss of SLK expression. To uncover the signaling cascades underlying the action of SLK, we combined phosphoproteomics, protein interaction screens and single cell RNA seq. Overall, our data identifies SLK as a key regulator of both dendritic complexity during development and of inhibitory synapse maintenance.

Coordination between excitatory and inhibitory synapses (providing positive and negative signals respectively) is required to ensure proper information processing in the brain. Many brain disorders, especially neurodevelopental disorders, are rooted in a specific disturbance of this coordination. In my research group we use a combination of two-photon microscopy and electrophisiology to examine how inhibitory synapses are fromed and how this formation is coordinated with nearby excitatroy synapses.

In the central nervous system, neuronal activity is a critical regulator of development and plasticity. Activity-dependent proliferation of healthy glial progenitors, oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), and the consequent generation of new oligodendrocytes contributes to adaptive myelination. This plasticity of myelin tunes neural circuit function and contributes to healthy cognition. The robust mitogenic effect of neuronal activity on normal oligodendroglial precursor cells, a putative cellular origin for many forms of glioma, suggests that dysregulated or “hijacked” mechanisms of myelin plasticity might similarly promote malignant cell proliferation in this devastating group of brain cancers. Indeed, neuronal activity promotes progression of both high-grade and low-grade glioma subtypes in preclinical models. Crucial mechanisms mediating activity-regulated glioma growth include paracrine secretion of BDNF and the synaptic protein neuroligin-3 (NLGN3). NLGN3 induces multiple oncogenic signaling pathways in the cancer cell, and also promotes glutamatergic synapse formation between neurons and glioma cells. Glioma cells integrate into neural circuits synaptically through neuron-to-glioma synapses, and electrically through potassium-evoked currents that are amplified through gap-junctional coupling between tumor cells This synaptic and electrical integration of glioma into neural circuits is central to tumor progression in preclinical models. Thus, neuron-glial interactions not only modulate neural circuit structure and function in the healthy brain, but paracrine and synaptic neuron-glioma interactions also play important roles in the pathogenesis of glial cancers. The mechanistic parallels between normal and malignant neuron-glial interactions underscores the extent to which mechanisms of neurodevelopment and plasticity are subverted by malignant gliomas, and the importance of understanding the neuroscience of cancer.

Although bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity are hallmark motor defects in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, they also experience motor learning impairments and non-motor symptoms such as depression. The neural basis for these different PD symptoms are not well understood. While current treatments are effective for locomotion deficits in PD, therapeutic strategies targeting motor learning deficits and non-motor symptoms are lacking. We found that distinct parafascicular (PF) thalamic subpopulations project to caudate putamen (CPu), subthalamic nucleus (STN), and nucleus accumbens (NAc). While PF-->CPu and PF-->STN circuits are critical for locomotion and motor learning respectively, inhibition of the PF-->NAc circuit induced a depression-like state. While chemogenetically manipulating CPu-projecting PF neurons led to a long-term restoration of locomotion, optogenetic long-term potentiation at PF-->STN synapses restored motor learning behavior in PD model mice. Furthermore, activation of NAc-projecting PF neurons rescued depression-like PD phenotypes. Importantly, we identified nicotinic acetylcholine receptors capable of modulating PF circuits to rescue different PD phenotypes. Thus, targeting PF thalamic circuits may be an effective strategy for treating motor and non-motor deficits in PD.

A signature feature of cortical circuits is the irregularity of neuronal firing, which manifests itself in the high temporal variability of spiking and the broad distribution of rates. Theoretical works have shown that this feature emerges dynamically in network models if coupling between cells is strong, i.e. if the mean number of synapses per neuron K is large and synaptic efficacy is of order 1/\sqrt{K}. However, the degree to which these models capture the mechanisms underlying neuronal firing in cortical circuits is not fully understood. Results have been derived using neuron models with current-based synapses, i.e. neglecting the dependence of synaptic current on the membrane potential, and an understanding of how irregular firing emerges in models with conductance-based synapses is still lacking. Moreover, at odds with the nonlinear responses to multiple stimuli observed in cortex, network models with strongly coupled cells respond linearly to inputs. In this talk, I will discuss the emergence of irregular firing and nonlinear response in networks of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons. First, I will show that, when synapses are conductance-based, irregular firing emerges if synaptic efficacy is of order 1/\log(K) and, unlike in current-based models, persists even under the large heterogeneity of connections which has been reported experimentally. I will then describe an analysis of neural responses as a function of coupling strength and show that, while a linear input-output relation is ubiquitous at strong coupling, nonlinear responses are prominent at moderate coupling. I will conclude by discussing experimental evidence of moderate coupling and loose balance in the mouse cortex.

Synaptic plasticity is known to be a key player in the brain’s life-long learning abilities. However, due to experimental limitations, the nature of the local changes at individual synapses and their link with emerging network-level computations remain unclear. I will present a numerical, meta-learning approach to deduce plasticity rules from either neuronal activity data and/or prior knowledge about the network's computation. I will first show how to recover known rules, given a human-designed loss function in rate networks, or directly from data, using an adversarial approach. Then I will present how to scale-up this approach to recurrent spiking networks using simulation-based inference.

Physiological experiments have highlighted how the dendrites of biological neurons can nonlinearly process distributed synaptic inputs. However, it is unclear how qualitative aspects of a dendritic tree, such as its branched morphology, its repetition of presynaptic inputs, voltage-gated ion channels, electrical properties and complex synapses, determine neural computation beyond this apparent nonlinearity. While it has been speculated that the dendritic tree of a neuron can be seen as a multi-layer neural network and it has been shown that such an architecture could be computationally strong, we do not know if that computational strength is preserved under these qualitative biological constraints. Here we simulate multi-layer neural network models of dendritic computation with and without these constraints. We find that dendritic model performance on interesting machine learning tasks is not hurt by most of these constraints and may synergistically benefit from all of them combined. Our results suggest that single real dendritic trees may be able to learn a surprisingly broad range of tasks through the emergent capabilities afforded by their properties.

Memory consolidation is the process by which recent experiences are assimilated into long-term memory. In animals, this process requires the offline replay of sequences observed during online exploration in the hippocampus. Recent experimental work has found that salient but task-irrelevant stimuli are systematically excluded from these replay epochs, suggesting that replay samples from an abstracted model of the world, rather than verbatim previous experiences. We find that this phenomenon can be explained parsimoniously and biologically plausibly by a Hebbian spike time-dependent plasticity rule at inhibitory synapses. Using spiking networks at three levels of abstraction–leaky integrate-and-fire, biophysically detailed, and abstract binary–we show that this rule enables efficient inference of a model of the structure of the world. While plasticity has previously mainly been studied at excitatory synapses, we find that plasticity at excitatory synapses alone is insufficient to accomplish this type of structural learning. We present theoretical results in a simplified model showing that in the presence of Hebbian excitatory and inhibitory plasticity, the replayed sequences form a statistical estimator of a latent sequence, which converges asymptotically to the ground truth. Our work outlines a direct link between the synaptic and cognitive levels of memory consolidation, and highlights a potential conceptually distinct role for inhibition in computing with SNNs.

The brain efficiently performs nonlinear computations through its intricate networks of spiking neurons, but how this is done remains elusive. While recurrent spiking networks implementing linear computations can be directly derived and easily understood (e.g., in the spike coding network (SCN) framework), the connectivity required for nonlinear computations can be harder to interpret, as they require additional non-linearities (e.g., dendritic or synaptic) weighted through supervised training. Here we extend the SCN framework to directly implement any polynomial dynamical system. This results in networks requiring multiplicative synapses, which we term the multiplicative spike coding network (mSCN). We demonstrate how the required connectivity for several nonlinear dynamical systems can be directly derived and implemented in mSCNs, without training. We also show how to precisely carry out higher-order polynomials with coupled networks that use only pair-wise multiplicative synapses, and provide expected numbers of connections for each synapse type. Overall, our work provides an alternative method for implementing nonlinear computations in spiking neural networks, while keeping all the attractive features of standard SCNs such as robustness, irregular and sparse firing, and interpretable connectivity. Finally, we discuss the biological plausibility of mSCNs, and how the high accuracy and robustness of the approach may be of interest for neuromorphic computing.

GABAergic interneurons are chiefly responsible for controlling the activity of local circuits in the cortex. Chandelier cells (ChCs) are a type of GABAergic interneuron that control the output of hundreds of neighbouring pyramidal cells through axo-axonic synapses which target the axon initial segment (AIS). Despite their importance in modulating circuit activity, our knowledge of the development and function of axo-axonic synapses remains elusive. We have investigated the emergence and plasticity of axo-axonic synapses in layer 2/3 of the somatosensory cortex (S1) and found that ChCs follow what appear to be homeostatic rules when forming synapses with pyramidal neurons. We are currently implementing in vivo techniques to image the process of axo-axonic synapse formation during development and uncover the dynamics of synaptogenesis and pruning at the AIS. In addition, we are using an all-optical approach to both activate and measure the activity of chandelier cells and their postsynaptic partners in the primary visual cortex (V1) and somatosensory cortex (S1) in mice, also during development. We aim to provide a structural and functional description of the emergence and plasticity of a GABAergic synapse type in the cortex.

Change is ubiquitous in living beings. In particular, the connectome and neural representations can change. Nevertheless behaviors and memories often persist over long times. In a standard model, associative memories are represented by assemblies of strongly interconnected neurons. For faithful storage these assemblies are assumed to consist of the same neurons over time. We propose a contrasting memory model with complete temporal remodeling of assemblies, based on experimentally observed changes of synapses and neural representations. The assemblies drift freely as noisy autonomous network activity or spontaneous synaptic turnover induce neuron exchange. The exchange can be described analytically by reduced, random walk models derived from spiking neural network dynamics or from first principles. The gradual exchange allows activity-dependent and homeostatic plasticity to conserve the representational structure and keep inputs, outputs and assemblies consistent. This leads to persistent memory. Our findings explain recent experimental results on temporal evolution of fear memory representations and suggest that memory systems need to be understood in their completeness as individual parts may constantly change.

Efficient coding has served as a guiding principle in understanding the neural code. To date, however, it has been explored mainly in the context of peripheral sensory cells with simple tuning curves. By contrast, ‘deeper’ neurons such as grid cells come with more complex tuning properties which imply a different, yet highly efficient, strategy for representing information. I will show that a highly efficient code is not specific to a population of neurons with finely tuned response properties: it emerges robustly in a shallow network with random synapses. Here, the geometry of population responses implies that optimality obtains from a tradeoff between two qualitatively different types of error: ‘local’ errors (common to classical neural population codes) and ‘global’ (or ‘catastrophic’) errors. This tradeoff leads to efficient compression of information from a high-dimensional representation to a low-dimensional one. After describing the theoretical framework, I will use it to re-interpret recordings of motor cortex in behaving monkey. Our framework addresses the encoding of (sensory) information; if time allows, I will comment on ongoing work that focuses on decoding from the perspective of efficient coding.

The retina is probably the most accessible part of the vertebrate central nervous system. Its computational logic can be interrogated in a dish, from patterns of lights as the natural input, to spike trains on the optic nerve as the natural output. Consequently, retinal circuits include some of the best understood computational networks in neuroscience. The retina is also ancient, and central to the emergence of neurally complex life on our planet. Alongside new locomotor strategies, the parallel evolution of image forming vision in vertebrate and invertebrate lineages is thought to have driven speciation during the Cambrian. This early investment in sophisticated vision is evident in the fossil record and from comparing the retina’s structural make up in extant species. Animals as diverse as eagles and lampreys share the same retinal make up of five classes of neurons, arranged into three nuclear layers flanking two synaptic layers. Some retina neuron types can be linked across the entire vertebrate tree of life. And yet, the functions that homologous neurons serve in different species, and the circuits that they innervate to do so, are often distinct to acknowledge the vast differences in species-specific visuo-behavioural demands. In the lab, we aim to leverage the vertebrate retina as a discovery platform for understanding the evolution of computation in the nervous system. Working on zebrafish alongside birds, frogs and sharks, we ask: How do synapses, neurons and networks enable ‘function’, and how can they rearrange to meet new sensory and behavioural demands on evolutionary timescales?

The complex morphology of neurons, with synapses located hundreds of microns from the cell body, necessitates the localization of important cell biological machines, including ribosomes, within dendrites and axons. Local translation of mRNAs is important for the function and plasticity of synapses. Using advanced sequencing and imaging techniques we have updated our understanding of the local transcriptome and identified the local translatome- identifying over 800 transcripts for which local translation is the dominant source of protein. In addition, we have explored the unique mechanisms neurons use to meet protein demands at synapses, identifying surprising features of neuronal and synaptic protein synthesis.

The ability to discriminate different sensory patterns by disentangling their neural representations is an important property of neural networks. While a variety of learning rules are known to be highly effective at fine-tuning synapses to achieve this, less is known about how different cell types in the brain can facilitate this process by providing architectural priors that bias the network towards sparse, selective, and discriminable representations. We studied this by simulating a neuronal network modelled on the dentate gyrus—an area characterised by sparse activity associated with pattern separation in spatial memory tasks. To test the contribution of different cell types to these functions, we presented the model with a wide dynamic range of input patterns and systematically added or removed different circuit elements. We found that recruiting feedback inhibition indirectly via recurrent excitatory neurons proved particularly helpful in disentangling patterns, and show that simple alignment principles for excitatory and inhibitory connections are a highly effective strategy.

Connections between nerve cells called synapses are the fundamental units of communication and information processing in the brain. The accurate wiring of neurons through synapses into neural networks or circuits is essential for brain organization. Neuronal networks are sculpted and refined throughout life by constant adjustment of the strength of synaptic communication by neuronal activity, a process known as synaptic plasticity. Deficits in the development or plasticity of synapses underlie various neuropsychiatric disorders, including autism, schizophrenia and intellectual disability. The Siddiqui lab research program comprises three major themes. One, to assess how biochemical switches control the activity of synapse organizing proteins, how these switches act through their binding partners and how these processes are regulated to correct impaired synaptic function in disease. Two, to investigate how synapse organizers regulate the specificity of neuronal circuit development and how defined circuits contribute to cognition and behaviour. Three, to address how synapses are formed in the developing brain and maintained in the mature brain and how microcircuits formed by synapses are refined to fine-tune information processing in the brain. Together, these studies have generated fundamental new knowledge about neuronal circuit development and plasticity and enabled us to identify targets for therapeutic intervention.

Synaptic transmission provides the basis for neuronal communication. When an action-potential propagates through the axonal arbour, it activates voltage-gated Ca2+ channels located in the vicinity of release-ready synaptic vesicles docked at the presynaptic active zone. Ca2+ ions enter the presynaptic terminal and activate the vesicular Ca2+ sensor, thereby triggering neurotransmitter release. This whole process occurs on a timescale of a few milliseconds. In addition to fast, synchronous release, which keeps pace with action potentials, many synapses also exhibit delayed asynchronous release that persists for tens to hundreds of milliseconds. In this talk I will demonstrate how experimentally constrained computational modelling of underlying biological processes can complement laboratory studies (using electrophysiology and imaging techniques) and provide insights into the mechanisms of synaptic transmission.

Early in development the nervous system is constructed with far too many neurons that make an excessive number of synaptic connections.  Later, a wave of neuronal remodeling radically reshapes nervous system wiring and cell numbers through the selective elimination of excess synapses, axons and dendrites, and even whole neurons.  This remodeling is widespread across the nervous system, extensive in terms of how much individual brain regions can change (e.g. in some cases 50% of neurons integrated into a brain circuit are eliminated), and thought to be essential for optimizing nervous system function.  Perturbations of neuronal remodeling are thought to underlie devastating neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy.  This seminar will discuss our efforts to use the relatively simple nervous system of Drosophila to understand the mechanistic basis by which cells, or parts of cells, are specified for removal and eliminated from the nervous system.

MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that provide a critical layer of gene expression control. Individual microRNAs variably exert effects across networks of genes via sequence-specific binding to mRNAs, fine-tuning protein levels. This helps coordinate the timing and specification of cell fate transitions during brain development and maintains neural circuit function and plasticity by activity-dependent (re)shaping of synapses and the levels of neurotransmitter components. MicroRNA levels have been found to be altered in tissue from the epileptogenic zone resected from adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy and this has driven efforts to explore their therapeutic potential, in particular using antisense oligonucleotide (ASOs) inhibitors termed antimirs. Here, we review the molecular mechanisms by which microRNAs control brain excitability and the latest progress towards a microRNA-based treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy. We also look at whether microRNA-based approaches could be used to treat genetic epilepsies, correcting individual genes or dysregulated pathways. Finally, we look at how cells have evolved to maximise the efficiency of the microRNA system via RNA editing, where single base changes is capable of altering the repertoire of genes under the control of a single microRNA. The findings improve our understanding of the molecular landscape of the epileptic brain and may lead to new therapies.

Intelligent behavior depends on the brain’s ability to anticipate future events. However, the learning rules that enable neurons to predict and fire ahead of sensory inputs remain largely unknown. We propose a plasticity rule based on pre-dictive processing, where the neuron learns a low-rank model of the synaptic input dynamics in its membrane potential. Neurons thereby amplify those synapses that maximally predict other synaptic inputs based on their temporal relations, which provide a solution to an optimization problem that can be implemented at the single-neuron level using only local information. Consequently, neurons learn sequences over long timescales and shift their spikes towards the first inputs in a sequence. We show that this mechanism can explain the development of anticipatory motion signaling and recall in the visual system. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the learning rule gives rise to several experimentally observed STDP (spike-timing-dependent plasticity) mechanisms. These findings suggest prediction as a guiding principle to orchestrate learning and synaptic plasticity in single neurons.

The overall aim of my research is to understand how the organisation of the synapse, with particular reference to the postsynaptic proteome (PSP) of excitatory synapses in the brain, informs the fundamental mechanisms of learning, memory and behaviour and how these mechanisms go awry in neurological dysfunction. The PSP indeed bears a remarkable burden of disease, with components being disrupted in disorders (synaptopathies) including schizophrenia, depression, autism and intellectual disability. Our work has been fundamental in revealing and then characterising the unprecedented complexity (>1000 highly conserved proteins) of the PSP in terms of the subsynaptic architecture of postsynaptic proteins such as PSD95 and how these proteins assemble into complexes and supercomplexes in different neurons and regions of the brain. Characterising the PSPs in multiple species, including human and mouse, has revealed differences in key sets of functionally important proteins, correlates with brain imaging and connectome data, and a differential distribution of disease-relevant proteins and pathways. Such studies have also provided important insight into synapse evolution, establishing that vertebrate behavioural complexity is a product of the evolutionary expansion in synapse proteomes that occurred ~500 million years ago. My lab has identified many mutations causing cognitive impairments in mice before they were found to cause human disorders. Our proteomic studies revealed that >130 brain diseases are caused by mutations affecting postsynaptic proteins. We uncovered mechanisms that explain the polygenic basis and age of onset of schizophrenia, with postsynaptic proteins, including PSD95 supercomplexes, carrying much of the polygenic burden. We discovered the “Genetic Lifespan Calendar”, a genomic programme controlling when genes are regulated. We showed that this could explain how schizophrenia susceptibility genes are timed to exert their effects in young adults. The Genes to Cognition programme is the largest genetic study so far undertaken into the synaptic molecular mechanisms underlying behaviour and physiology. We made important conceptual advances that inform how the repertoire of both innate and learned behaviours is built from unique combinations of postsynaptic proteins that either amplify or attenuate the behavioural response. This constitutes a key advance in understanding how the brain decodes information inherent in patterns of nerve impulses, and provides insight into why the PSP has evolved to be so complex, and consequently why the phenotypes of synaptopathies are so diverse. Our most recent work has opened a new phase, and scale, in understanding synapses with the first synaptome maps of the brain. We have developed next-generation methods (SYNMAP) that enable single-synapse resolution molecular mapping across the whole mouse brain and extensive regions of the human brain, revealing the molecular and morphological features of a billion synapses. This has already uncovered unprecedented spatiotemporal synapse diversity organised into an architecture that correlates with the structural and functional connectomes, and shown how mutations that cause cognitive disorders reorganise these synaptome maps; for example, by detecting vulnerable synapse subtypes and synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease. This innovative synaptome mapping technology has huge potential to help characterise how the brain changes during normal development, including in specific cell types, and with degeneration, facilitating novel pathways to diagnosis and therapy.

Even if major depression is now the most common of psychiatric disorders, successful antidepressant treatments are still difficult to achieve. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of current antidepressant treatments is needed to ultimately identify new targets and enhance beneficial effects. Given the intimate relationships between astrocytes and neurons at synapses and the ability of astrocytes to "sense" neuronal communication and release gliotransmitters, an attractive hypothesis is emerging stating that the effects of antidepressants on brain function could be, at least in part, modulated by direct influences of astrocytes on neuronal networks. We will present two preclinical studies revealing a permissive role of glia in the antidepressant response: i) Control of the antidepressant-like effects of rat prefrontal cortex Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) by astroglia, ii) Modulation of antidepressant efficacy of Bright Light Stimulation (BLS) by lateral habenula astroglia. Therefore, it is proposed that an unaltered neuronal-glial system constitutes a major prerequisite to optimize antidepressant efficacy of DBS or BLS. Collectively, these results pave also the way to the development of safer and more effective antidepressant strategies.

Dr. Davis will present a summary regarding the identification and characterization of mechanisms of homeostatic plasticity as they relate to the control of synaptic transmission. He will then provide evidence of translation to the mammalian neuromuscular junction and central synapses, and provide tangible links to the etiology of neurological disease.

Experience-dependent transcription is a key molecular mechanisms for regulating the development and plasticity of synapses and neural circuits and is thought to underlie cognitive functions such as perception, learning and memory. After two years of COVID-pandemic, the goal of this online conference is to allow investigators in the field to reconnect and to discuss their recent scientific findings.

Neurons in the brain communicate through action potentials (spikes) that are transmitted through chemical synapses. Throughout the last decades, the question how networks of spiking neurons represent and process information has remained an important challenge. Some progress has resulted from a recent family of supervised learning rules (tempotrons) for models of spiking neurons. However, these studies have viewed synaptic transmission as static and characterized synaptic efficacies as scalar quantities that change only on slow time scales of learning across trials but remain fixed on the fast time scales of information processing within a trial. By contrast, signal transduction at chemical synapses in the brain results from complex molecular interactions between multiple biochemical processes whose dynamics result in substantial short-term plasticity of most connections. Here we study the computational capabilities of spiking neurons whose synapses are dynamic and plastic, such that each individual synapse can learn its own dynamics. We derive tempotron learning rules for current-based leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons with different types of dynamic synapses. Introducing ordinal synapses whose efficacies depend only on the order of input spikes, we establish an upper capacity bound for spiking neurons with dynamic synapses. We compare this bound to independent synapses, static synapses and to the well established phenomenological Tsodyks-Markram model. We show that synaptic dynamics in principle allow the storage capacity of spiking neurons to scale with the number of input spikes and that this increase in capacity can be traded for greater robustness to input noise, such as spike time jitter. Our work highlights the feasibility of a novel computational paradigm for spiking neural circuits with plastic synaptic dynamics: Rather than being determined by the fixed number of afferents, the dimensionality of a neuron's decision space can be scaled flexibly through the number of input spikes emitted by its input layer.

Precise synaptic connectivity is a prerequisite for the function of neural circuits, yet individual neurons, taken out of their developmental context, readily form unspecific synapses. How does genetically encoded brain wiring deal with this apparent contradiction? Brain wiring is a developmental growth process that is not only characterized by precision, but also flexibility and robustness. As in any other growth process, cellular interactions are restricted in space and time. Correspondingly, molecular and cellular interactions are restricted to those that 'get to see' each other during development. This seminar will explore the question how neurons decide when and where to make synapses using the Drosophila visual system as a model. New findings reveal that pattern formation during growth and the kinetics of live neuronal interactions restrict synapse formation and partner choice for neurons that are not otherwise prevented from making incorrect synapses in this system. For example, cell biological mechanisms like autophagy as well as developmental temperature restrict inappropriate partner choice through a process of kinetic exclusion that critically contributes to wiring specificity. The seminar will explore these and other neuronal strategies when and where to make synapses during developmental growth that contribute to precise, flexible and robust outcomes in brain wiring.

The oligodendrocyte generates CNS myelin, which is essential for normal nervous system function. Thus, investigating the regulatory and signaling mechanisms that control its differentiation and the production of myelin is relevant to our understanding of brain development and of adult pathologies such as multiple sclerosis. We have recently established that the activity of voltage-gated Ca++ channels is crucial for the adequate migration, proliferation and maturation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs). Furthermore, we have found that voltage-gated Ca++ channels that function in synaptic communication between neurons also mediate synaptic signaling between neurons and OPCs. Thus, we hypothesize that voltage-gated Ca++ channels are central components of OPC-neuronal synapses and are the principal ion channels mediating activity-dependent myelination.

In the adult brain, synapses are tightly enwrapped by lattices of extracellular matrix that consist of extremely long-lived molecules. These lattices are deemed to stabilize synapses, restrict the reorganization of their transmission machinery, and prevent them from undergoing structural or morphological changes. At the same time, they are expected to retain some degree of flexibility to permit occasional events of synaptic plasticity. The recent understanding that structural changes to synapses are significantly more frequent than previously assumed (occurring even on a timescale of minutes) has called for a mechanism that allows continual and energy-efficient remodeling of the ECM at synapses. I review in the talk our recent work showcasing such a process, based on the constitutive recycling of synaptic ECM molecules. I discuss the key characteristics of this mechanism, focusing on its roles in mediating synaptic transmission and plasticity, and speculate on additional potential functions in neuronal signaling.

Behavioral experience shapes neural circuits, adding and subtracting connections between neurons that will ultimately control sensation and perception. We are using natural sensory experience to uncover basic principles of information processing in the cerebral cortex, with a focus on how sensory learning can selectively alter synaptic strength. I will discuss recent findings that differentiate reinforcement learning from sensory experience, showing rapid and selective plasticity of thalamic and inhibitory synapses within primary sensory cortex.

To survive in the wild small rodents evolved specialized retinas. To escape predators, looming shadows need to be detected with speed and precision. To evade starvation, small seeds, grass, nuts and insects need to also be detected quickly. Some of these succulent seeds and insects may be camouflaged offering only low contrast targets.Moreover, these challenging tasks need to be accomplished continuously at dusk, night, dawn and daytime. Crossover inhibition is thought to be involved in enhancing contrast detectionin the microcircuits of the inner plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. The AII amacrine cells are narrow field cells that play a key role in crossover inhibition. Our lab studies the synaptic physiology that regulates glycine release from AII amacrine cellsin mouse retina. These interneurons receive excitation from rod and conebipolar cells and transmit excitation to ON-type bipolar cell terminals via gap junctions. They also transmit inhibition via multiple glycinergic synapses onto OFF bipolar cell terminals.AII amacrine cells are thus a central hub of synaptic information processing that cross links the ON and the OFF pathways. What are the functions of crossover inhibition? How does it enhance contrast detection at different ambient light levels? How is the dynamicrange, frequency response and synaptic gain of glycine release modulated by luminance levels and circadian rhythms? How is synaptic gain changed by different extracellular neuromodulators, like dopamine, and by intracellular messengers like cAMP, phosphateand Ca2+ ions from Ca2+ channels and Ca2+ stores? My talk will try to answer some of these questions and will pose additional ones. It will end with further hypothesis and speculations on the multiple roles of crossover inhibition.

Learning entails self-modification of a system under closed-loop dynamics with its environment. Not only the system's components may change, but also the way they interact with one another - like synapses during learning in the brain, that modify interactions between neurons. Such processes, however, are not limited to the brain but can be found also in other areas of biology. I will describe a framework for a primitive form of learning that takes place within the single cell. This type of learning is composed of random modifications guided by global feedback. The capacity to utilize exploratory dynamics, improvisational in nature, provide cells with the plasticity required to overcome extreme challenges and to develop novel phenotypes.

In many butterflies, the ancestral trichromatic insect colour vision, based on UV-, blue- and green-sensitive photoreceptors, is extended with red-sensitive cells. Physiological evidence for red receptors has been missing in nymphalid butterflies, although some species can discriminate red hues well. In eight species from genera Archaeoprepona, Argynnis, Charaxes, Danaus, Melitaea, Morpho, Heliconius and Speyeria, we found a novel class of green-sensitive photoreceptors that have hyperpolarizing responses to stimulation with red light. These green-positive, red-negative (G+R–) cells are allocated to positions R1/2, normally occupied by UV and blue-sensitive cells. Spectral sensitivity, polarization sensitivity and temporal dynamics suggest that the red opponent units (R–) are the basal photoreceptors R9, interacting with R1/2 in the same ommatidia via direct inhibitory synapses. We found the G+R– cells exclusively in butterflies with red-shining ommatidia, which contain longitudinal screening pigments. The implementation of the red colour channel with R9 is different from pierid and papilionid butterflies, where cells R5–8 are the red receptors. The nymphalid red-green opponent channel and the potential for tetrachromacy seem to have been switched on several times during evolution, balancing between the cost of neural processing and the value of extended colour information.

Activity dependent synaptic plasticity is considered to be a primary mechanism underlying learning and memory. Yet it is unclear whether plasticity rules such as STDP measured in vitro apply in vivo. Network models with STDP predict that activity patterns (e.g., place-cell spatial selectivity) should change much faster than observed experimentally. We address this gap by investigating a nonlinear calcium-based plasticity rule fit to experiments done in physiological conditions. In this model, LTP and LTD result from intracellular calcium transients arising almost exclusively from synchronous coactivation of pre- and postsynaptic neurons. We analytically approximate the full distribution of nonlinear calcium transients as a function of pre- and postsynaptic firing rates, and temporal correlations. This analysis directly relates activity statistics that can be measured in vivo to the changes in synaptic efficacy they cause. Our results highlight that both high-firing rates and temporal correlations can lead to significant changes to synaptic efficacy. Using a mean-field theory, we show that the nonlinear plasticity rule, without any fine-tuning, gives a stable, unimodal synaptic weight distribution characterized by many strong synapses which remain stable over long periods of time, consistent with electrophysiological and behavioral studies. Moreover, our theory explains how memories encoded by strong synapses can be preferentially stabilized by the plasticity rule. We confirmed our analytical results in a spiking recurrent network. Interestingly, although most synapses are weak and undergo rapid turnover, the fraction of strong synapses are sufficient for supporting realistic spiking dynamics and serve to maintain the network’s cluster structure. Our results provide a mechanistic understanding of how stable memories may emerge on the behavioral level from an STDP rule measured in physiological conditions. Furthermore, the plasticity rule we investigate is mathematically equivalent to other learning rules which rely on the statistics of coincidences, so we expect that our formalism will be useful to study other learning processes beyond the calcium-based plasticity rule.

Survival is predicated on the ability of an organism to respond to stress. The reliability of this response is ensured by a synaptic architecture that is relatively inflexible (i.e. hard-wired). Our work has shown that in naive animals, synapses on CRH neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus are very reluctant to modification. If animals are stressed, however, these synapses become willing to learn. This seminar will focus on mechanisms linking acute stress to metaplastic changes at glutamate synapses, and also show how stress, and these synaptic changes can be transmitted from one individual to another.

Our first NeurotechEU Summit will be fully digital and will take place on November 22th from 09:00 to 17:00 (CET). The final programme can be downloaded here. Hosted by the Karolinska Institutet, the summit will provide you an overview of our actions and achievements from the last year and introduce the priorities for the next year. You will also have the opportunity to attend the finals of the 3 minute thesis competition (3MT) organized by the Synapses Student Society, the student charter of NeurotechEU. Good luck to all the finalists: Lynn Le, Robin Noordhof, Adriana Gea González, Juan Carranza Valencia, Lea van Husen, Guoming (Tony) Man, Lilly Pitshaporn Leelaarporn, Cemre Su, Kaya Keleş, Ramazan Tarık Türksoy, Cristiana Tisca, Sara Bandiera, Irina Maria Vlad, Iulia Vadan, Borbála László, and David Papp! Don’t miss our keynote lecture, success stories and interactive discussions with Ms Vanessa Debiais Sainton (Head of Higher Education Unit, European Commission), Prof. Staffan Holmin (Karolinska Institutet), Dr Mohsen Kaboli (BMW Group, member of the NeurotechEU Associates Advisory Committee), and Prof. Peter Hagoort (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Donders Institute). Would you like to use this opportunity to network? Please join our informal breakout sessions on Wonder.me at 11:40 CET. You will be able to move from one discussion group to another within 3 sessions: NeurotechEU ecosystem - The Associates Advisory Committee: Synergies in cross-sectoral initiatives Education next: Trans-European education and the European Universities Initiatives - Lessons learned thus far. Equality, diversity and inclusion at NeurotechEU: removing access barriers to education and developing a working, learning, and social environment where everyone is respected and valued. You can register for this free event at www.crowdcast.io/e/neurotecheu-summit

The intensity and features of sensory stimuli are encoded in the activity of neurons in the cortex. In the visual and piriform cortices, the stimulus intensity re-scales the activity of the population without changing its selectivity for the stimulus features. The cortical representation of the stimulus is therefore intensity-invariant. This emergence of network invariant representations appears robust to local changes in synaptic strength induced by synaptic plasticity, even though: i) synaptic plasticity can potentiate or depress connections between neurons in a feature-dependent manner, and ii) in networks with balanced excitation and inhibition, synaptic plasticity determines the non-linear network behavior. In this study, we investigate the consistency of invariant representations with a variety of synaptic states in balanced networks. By using mean-field models and spiking network simulations, we show how the synaptic state controls the emergence of intensity-invariant or intensity-dependent selectivity by inducing changes in the network response to intensity. In particular, we demonstrate how facilitating synaptic states can sharpen the network selectivity while depressing states broaden it. We also show how power-law-type synapses permit the emergence of invariant network selectivity and how this plasticity can be generated by a mix of different plasticity rules. Our results explain how the physiology of individual synapses is linked to the emergence of invariant representations of sensory stimuli at the network level.

Animals depend on fast and reliable detection of novel stimuli in their environment. Neurons in multiple sensory areas respond more strongly to novel in comparison to familiar stimuli. Yet, it remains unclear which circuit, cellular, and synaptic mechanisms underlie those responses. Here, we show that spike-timing-dependent plasticity of inhibitory-to-excitatory synapses generates novelty responses in a recurrent spiking network model. Inhibitory plasticity increases the inhibition onto excitatory neurons tuned to familiar stimuli, while inhibition for novel stimuli remains low, leading to a network novelty response. The generation of novelty responses does not depend on the periodicity but rather on the distribution of presented stimuli. By including tuning of inhibitory neurons, the network further captures stimulus-specific adaptation. Finally, we suggest that disinhibition can control the amplification of novelty responses. Therefore, inhibitory plasticity provides a flexible, biologically plausible mechanism to detect the novelty of bottom-up stimuli, enabling us to make experimentally testable predictions.

Establishment of precise neuronal connectivity in the neocortex relies on activity-dependent circuit reorganization during postnatal development. In the mouse somatosensory cortex layer 4, barrels are arranged in one-to-one correspondence to whiskers on the face. Thalamocortical axon termini are clustered in the center of each barrel. The layer 4 spiny stellate neurons are located around the barrel edge, extend their dendrites primarily toward the barrel center, and make synapses with thalamocortical axons corresponding to a single whisker. These organized circuits are established during the first postnatal week through activity-dependent refinement processes. However, activity pattern regulating the circuit formation is still elusive. Using two-photon calcium imaging in living neonatal mice, we found that layer 4 neurons within the same barrel fire synchronously in the absence of peripheral stimulation, creating a ''patchwork'' pattern of spontaneous activity corresponding to the barrel map. We also found that disruption of GluN1, an obligatory subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, in a sparse population of layer 4 neurons reduced activity correlation between GluN1 knockout neuron pairs within a barrel. Our results provide evidence for the involvement of layer 4 neuron NMDA receptors in spatial organization of the spontaneous firing activity of layer 4 neurons in the neonatal barrel cortex. In the talk I will introduce our strategy to analyze the role of NMDA receptor-dependent correlated activity in the layer 4 circuit formation.

The CNS is responsive to an ever-changing environment. Until recently, studies of neural plasticity focused almost exclusively on functional and structural changes of neuronal synapses. In recent years, myelin plasticity has emerged as a potential modulator of neural networks. Myelination of previously unmyelinated axons, and changes in the structure on already-myelinated axons, can have large effects on network function. The heterogeneity of the extent of how axons in the CNS are myelinated offers diverse scope for dynamic myelin changes to fine-tune neural circuits. The traditionally held view of myelin as a passive insulator of axons is now changing to one of lifelong changes in myelin, modulated by neuronal activity and experience. Myelin, produced by oligodendrocytes (OLs), is essential for normal brain function, as it provides fast signal transmission, promotes synchronization of neuronal signals and helps to maintain neuronal function. OLs differentiate from oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), which are distributed throughout the adult brain, and myelination continues into late adulthood. OPCs can sense neuronal activity as they receive synaptic inputs from neurons and express voltage-gated ion channels and neurotransmitter receptors, and differentiate into myelinating OLs in response to changes in neuronal activity. This lecture will explore to what extent myelin plasticity occurs in adult animals, whether myelin changes occur in non-motor learning tasks, especially in learning and memory, and questions whether myelin plasticity and myelin regeneration are two sides of the same coin.

The CA1 pyramidal neurons are embedded in an intricate local circuitry that contains a variety of interneurons. The roles these interneurons play in the regulation of the excitatory synaptic plasticity remains largely understudied. Recent experiments showed that repeated cholinergic activation of 𝛼7 nACh receptors expressed in oriens-lacunosum-moleculare (OLM𝛼2) interneurons could induce LTP in SC-CA1 synapses. We used a biophysically realistic computational model to examine mechanistically how cholinergic activation of OLMa2 interneurons increases SC to CA1 transmission. Our results suggest that, when properly timed, activation of OLMa2 interneurons cancels the feedforward inhibition onto CA1 pyramidal cells by inhibiting fast-spiking interneurons that synapse on the same dendritic compartment as the SC, i.e., by disinhibiting the pyramidal cell dendritic compartment. Our work further describes the pairing of disinhibition with SC stimulation as a general mechanism for the induction of synaptic plasticity. We found that locally-reduced GABA release (disinhibition) paired with SC stimulation could lead to increased NMDAR activation and intracellular calcium concentration sufficient to upregulate AMPAR permeability and potentiate the excitatory synapse. Our work suggests that inhibitory synapses critically modulate excitatory neurotransmission and induction of plasticity at excitatory synapses. Our work also shows how cholinergic action on OLM interneurons, a mechanism whose disruption is associated with memory impairment, can down-regulate the GABAergic signaling into CA1 pyramidal cells and facilitate potentiation of the SC-CA1 synapse.

CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus are the initial locus of episodic memory. The action of acetylcholine alters cellular excitability, modifies neuronal networks, and triggers secondary signaling that directly affects long-term plasticity (LTP) (the cellular underpinning of memory). It is therefore considered a critical regulator of learning and memory in the brain. Its action via M4 metabotropic receptors in the presynaptic terminal of the CA3 neurons and M1 metabotropic receptors in the postsynaptic spines of CA1 neurons produce rich dynamics across multiple timescales. We developed a model to describe the activation of postsynaptic M1 receptors that leads to IP3 production from membrane PIP2 molecules. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ultimately causes calcium release. This calcium release from the ER activates potassium channels like the calcium-activated SK channels and alters different aspects of synaptic signaling. In an independent signaling cascade, M1 receptors also directly suppress SK channels and the voltage-activated KCNQ2/3 channels, enhancing post-synaptic excitability. In the CA3 presynaptic terminal, we model the reduction of the voltage sensitivity of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and the resulting suppression of neurotransmitter release by the action of the M4 receptors. Our results show that the reduced initial release probability because of acetylcholine alters short-term plasticity (STP) dynamics. We characterize the dichotomy of suppressing neurotransmitter release from CA3 neurons and the enhanced excitability of the postsynaptic CA1 spine. Mechanisms underlying STP operate over a few seconds, while those responsible for LTP last for hours, and both forms of plasticity have been linked with very distinct functions in the brain. We show that the concurrent suppression of neurotransmitter release and increased sensitivity conserves neurotransmitter vesicles and enhances the reliability in plasticity. Our work establishes a relationship between STP and LTP coordinated by neuromodulation with acetylcholine.

Dysregulation of emotional processing and its integration with cognitive functions are central features of many mental/emotional disorders associated both with externalizing problems (aggressive, antisocial behaviors) and internalizing problems (anxiety, depression). As Dr. Joseph LeDoux, our invited speaker of this program, wrote in his famous book “Synaptic self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are”—the brain’s synapses—are the channels through which we think, act, imagine, feel, and remember. Synapses encode the essence of personality, enabling each of us to function as a distinctive, integrated individual from moment to moment. Thus, exploring the functioning of synapses leads to the understanding of the mechanism of (patho)physiological function of our brain. In this context, we have investigated the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, with particular emphasis on the synaptic function of model mice of various psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, depression, and PTSD. Our current interest is how synaptic inputs are integrated to generate the action potential. Because the spatiotemporal organization of neuronal firing is crucial for information processing, but how thousands of inputs to the dendritic spines drive the firing remains a central question in neuroscience. We identified a distinct pattern of synaptic integration in the disease-related models, in which extra-large (XL) spines generate NMDA spikes within these spines, which was sufficient to drive neuronal firing. We experimentally and theoretically observed that XL spines negatively correlated with working memory. Our work offers a whole new concept for dendritic computation and network dynamics, and the understanding of psychiatric research will be greatly reconsidered. The second half of my talk is the development of a novel synaptic tool. Because, no matter how beautifully we can illuminate the spine morphology and how accurately we can quantify the synaptic integration, the links between synapse and brain function remain correlational. In order to challenge the causal relationship between synapse and brain function, we established AS-PaRac1, which is unique not only because it can specifically label and manipulate the recently potentiated dendritic spine (Hayashi-Takagi et al, 2015, Nature). With use of AS-PaRac1, we developed an activity-dependent simultaneous labeling of the presynaptic bouton and the potentiated spines to establish “functional connectomics” in a synaptic resolution. When we apply this new imaging method for PTSD model mice, we identified a completely new functional neural circuit of brain region A→B→C with a very strong S/N in the PTSD model mice. This novel tool of “functional connectomics” and its photo-manipulation could open up new areas of emotional/psychiatric research, and by extension, shed light on the neural networks that determine who we are.

Neuromodulators control information processing in cortical microcircuits by regulating the cellular and synaptic physiology of neurons. Computational models and detailed simulations of neocortical microcircuitry offer a unifying framework to analyze the role of neuromodulators on network activity. In the present study, to get a deeper insight in the organization of the cortical neuropil for modeling purposes, we quantify the fiber length per cortical volume and the density of varicosities for catecholaminergic, serotonergic and cholinergic systems using immunocytochemical staining and stereological techniques. The data obtained are integrated into a biologically detailed digital reconstruction of the rodent neocortex (Markram et al, 2015) in order to model the influence of modulatory systems on the activity of the somatosensory cortex neocortical column. Simulations of ascending modulation of network activity in our model predict the effects of increasing levels of neuromodulators on diverse neuron types and synapses and reveal a spectrum of activity states. Low levels of neuromodulation drive microcircuit activity into slow oscillations and network synchrony, whereas high neuromodulator concentrations govern fast oscillations and network asynchrony. The models and simulations thus provide a unifying in silico framework to study the role of neuromodulators in reconfiguring network activity.

In this lecture, Dr Stevens will discuss recent work that implicates brain immune cells, called microglia, in sculpting of synaptic connections during development and their relevance to autism, schizophrenia and other brain disorders. Her recent work revealed a key role for microglia and a group of immune related molecules called complement in normal developmental synaptic pruning, a normal process required to establish precise brain wiring. Emerging evidence suggests aberrant regulation of this pruning pathway may contribute to synaptic and cognitive dysfunction in a host of brain disorders, including schizophrenia. Recent research has revealed that a person’s risk of schizophrenia is increased if they inherit specific variants in complement C4, gene plays a well-known role in the immune system but also helps sculpt developing synapses in the mouse visual system (Sekar et al., 2016). Together these findings may help explain known features of schizophrenia, including reduced numbers of synapses in key cortical regions and an adolescent age of onset that corresponds with developmentally timed waves of synaptic pruning in these regions. Stevens will discuss this and ongoing work to understand the mechanisms by which complement and microglia prune specific synapses in the brain. A deeper understanding of how these immune mechanisms mediate synaptic pruning may provide novel insight into how to protect synapses in autism and other brain disorders, including Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Disease.

There is little consensus on the level of spatial complexity at which dendrites operate. On the one hand, emergent evidence indicates that synapses cluster at micrometer spatial scales. On the other hand, most modelling and network studies ignore dendrites altogether. This dichotomy raises an urgent question: what is the smallest relevant spatial scale for understanding dendritic computation? We have developed a method to construct compartmental models at any level of spatial complexity. Through carefully chosen parameter fits, solvable in the least-squares sense, we obtain accurate reduced compartmental models. Thus, we are able to systematically construct passive as well as active dendrite models at varying degrees of spatial complexity. We evaluate which elements of the dendritic computational repertoire are captured by these models. We show that many canonical elements of the dendritic computational repertoire can be reproduced with few compartments. For instance, for a model to behave as a two-layer network, it is sufficient to fit a reduced model at the soma and at locations at the dendritic tips. In the basal dendrites of an L2/3 pyramidal model, we reproduce the backpropagation of somatic action potentials (APs) with a single dendritic compartment at the tip. Further, we obtain the well-known Ca-spike coincidence detection mechanism in L5 Pyramidal cells with as few as eleven compartments, the requirement being that their spacing along the apical trunk supports AP backpropagation. We also investigate whether afferent spatial connectivity motifs admit simplification by ablating targeted branches and grouping affected synapses onto the next proximal dendrite. We find that voltage in the remaining branches is reproduced if temporal conductance fluctuations stay below a limit that depends on the average difference in input resistance between the ablated branches and the next proximal dendrite. Consequently, when the average conductance load on distal synapses is constant, the dendritic tree can be simplified while appropriately decreasing synaptic weights. When the conductance level fluctuates strongly, for instance through a-priori unpredictable fluctuations in NMDA activation, a constant weight rescale factor cannot be found, and the dendrite cannot be simplified. We have created an open source Python toolbox (NEAT - https://neatdend.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) that automatises the simplification process. A NEST implementation of the reduced models, currently under construction, will enable the simulation of few-compartment models in large-scale networks, thus bridging the gap between cellular and network level neuroscience.

I am working on the vertebrate retina, with a main focus on the mouse and bird retina. Currently my work is focused on three major topics: Functional and molecular analysis of electrical synapses in the retina Circuitry and functional role of retinal interneurons: horizontal cells Circuitry for light-dependent magnetoreception in the bird retina Electrical synapses Electrical synapses (gap junctions) permit fast transmission of electrical signals and passage of metabolites by means of channels, which directly connect the cytoplasm of adjoining cells. A functional gap junction channel consists of two hemichannels (one provided by each of the cells), each comprised of a set of six protein subunits, termed connexins. These building blocks exist in a variety of different subtypes, and the connexin composition determines permeability and gating properties of a gap junction channel, thereby enabling electrical synapses to meet a diversity of physiological requirements. In the retina, various connexins are expressed in different cell types. We study the cellular distribution of different connexins as well as the modulation induced by transmitter action or change of ambient light levels, which leads to altered electrical coupling properties. We are also interested in exploiting them as therapeutic avenue for retinal degeneration diseases. Horizontal cells Horizontal cells receive excitatory input from photoreceptors and provide feedback inhibition to photoreceptors and feedforward inhibition to bipolar cells. Because of strong electrical coupling horizontal cells integrate the photoreceptor input over a wide area and are thought to contribute to the antagonistic organization of bipolar cell and ganglion cell receptive fields and to tune the photoreceptor–bipolar cell synapse with respect to the ambient light conditions. However, the extent to which this influence shapes retinal output is unclear, and we aim to elucidate the functional importance of horizontal cells for retinal signal processing by studying various transgenic mouse models. Retinal circuitry for light-dependent magnetoreception in the bird We are studying which neuronal cell types and pathways in the bird retina are involved in the processing of magnetic signals. Likely, magnetic information is detected in cryptochrome-expressing photoreceptors and leaves the retina through ganglion cell axons that project via the thalamofugal pathway to Cluster N, a part of the visual wulst essential for the avian magnetic compass. Thus, we aim to elucidate the synaptic connections and retinal signaling pathways from putatively magnetosensitive photoreceptors to thalamus-projecting ganglion cells in migratory birds using neuroanatomical and electrophysiological techniques.

The regions of the insect brain devoted to spatial navigation are beautifully orderly, with a remarkably precise pattern of synaptic connections. Thus, we can learn much about the neural mechanisms of spatial navigation by targeting identifiable neurons in these networks for in vivo patch clamp recording and calcium imaging. Our lab has recently discovered that the "compass system" in the Drosophila brain is anchored to not only visual landmarks, but also the prevailing wind direction. Moreover, we found that the compass system can re-learn the relationship between these external sensory cues and internal self-motion cues, via rapid associative synaptic plasticity. Postsynaptic to compass neurons, we found neurons that conjunctively encode heading direction and body-centric translational velocity. We then showed how this representation of travel velocity is transformed from body- to world-centric coordinates at the subsequent layer of the network, two synapses downstream from compass neurons. By integrating this world-centric vector-velocity representation over time, it should be possible for the brain to form a stored representation of the body's path through the environment.

The Stabilized Supralinear Network is a model of recurrently connected excitatory (E) and inhibitory (I) neurons with a supralinear input-output relation. It can explain cortical computations such as response normalization and inhibitory stabilization. However, the network's connectivity is designed by hand, based on experimental measurements. How the recurrent synaptic weights can be learned from the sensory input statistics in a biologically plausible way is unknown. Earlier theoretical work on plasticity focused on single neurons and the balance of excitation and inhibition but did not consider the simultaneous plasticity of recurrent synapses and the formation of receptive fields. Here we present a recurrent E-I network model where all synaptic connections are simultaneously plastic, and E neurons self-stabilize by recruiting co-tuned inhibition. Motivated by experimental results, we employ a local Hebbian plasticity rule with multiplicative normalization for E and I synapses. We develop a theoretical framework that explains how plasticity enables inhibition balanced excitatory receptive fields that match experimental results. We show analytically that sufficiently strong inhibition allows neurons' receptive fields to decorrelate and distribute themselves across the stimulus space. For strong recurrent excitation, the network becomes stabilized by inhibition, which prevents unconstrained self-excitation. In this regime, external inputs integrate sublinearly. As in the Stabilized Supralinear Network, this results in response normalization and winner-takes-all dynamics: when two competing stimuli are presented, the network response is dominated by the stronger stimulus while the weaker stimulus is suppressed. In summary, we present a biologically plausible theoretical framework to model plasticity in fully plastic recurrent E-I networks. While the connectivity is derived from the sensory input statistics, the circuit performs meaningful computations. Our work provides a mathematical framework of plasticity in recurrent networks, which has previously only been studied numerically and can serve as the basis for a new generation of brain-inspired unsupervised machine learning algorithms.

Biological neural networks can represent information in the collective action potential discharge of neurons, and store that information amongst the synaptic connections between the neurons that both comprise the network and govern its function. The strength and organization of synaptic connections adjust during learning, but many cognitive neural systems are multifunctional, making it unclear how continuous activity alternates between the transient and discrete cognitive functions like encoding current information and recollecting past information, without changing the connections amongst the neurons. This lecture will first summarize our investigations of the molecular and biochemical mechanisms that change synaptic function to persistently store spatial memory in the rodent hippocampus. I will then report on how entorhinal cortex-hippocampus circuit function changes during cognitive training that creates memory, as well as learning to learn in mice. I will then describe how the hippocampus system operates like a competitive winner-take-all network, that, based on the dominance of its current inputs, self organizes into either the encoding or recollection information processing modes. We find no evidence that distinct cells are dedicated to those two distinct functions, rather activation of the hippocampus information processing mode is controlled by a subset of dentate spike events within the network of learning-modified, entorhinal-hippocampus excitatory and inhibitory synapses.