Timescales characterize how fast the observables change in time. In neuroscience, they can be estimated from the measured activity and can be used, for example, as a signature of the memory trace in the network. I will first discuss the inference of the timescales from the neuroscience data comprised of the short trials and introduce a new unbiased method. Then, I will apply the method to the data recorded from a local population of cortical neurons from the visual area V4. I will demonstrate that the ongoing spiking activity unfolds across at least two distinct timescales - fast and slow - and the slow timescale increases when monkeys attend to the location of the receptive field. Which models can give rise to such behavior? Random balanced networks are known for their fast timescales; thus, a change in the neurons or network properties is required to mimic the data. I will propose a set of models that can control effective timescales and demonstrate that only the model with strong recurrent interactions fits the neural data. Finally, I will discuss the timescales' relevance for behavior and cortical computations.

Historically, retinotopic organisation (the spatial mapping of the retina across the cortical surface) was considered the purview of early regions of visual cortex (V1-V4) only and that anterior, more cognitively involved regions abstracted this information away. The contemporary view is quite different. Here, with Advancing technologies and analysis methods, we see that retinotopic information is not simply thrown away by these regions but rather is maintained to the potential benefit of our broader cognition. This maintenance of visuospatial coding extends not only through visual cortex, but is present in parietal, frontal, medial and subcortical structures involved with coordinating-movements, mind-wandering and even memory. In this talk, I will outline some of the key empirical findings from my own work and the work of others that shaped this contemporary perspective.

A recent approach to understanding the mammalian visual system is to show correspondence between the sequential stages of processing in the ventral stream with layers in a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), providing evidence that visual information is processed hierarchically, with successive stages containing ever higher-level information. However, correspondence is usually defined as shared variance between brain region and model layer. We propose that task-relevant variance is a stricter test: If a DCNN layer corresponds to a brain region, then substituting the model’s activity with brain activity should successfully drive the model’s object recognition decision. Using this approach on three datasets (human fMRI and macaque neuron firing rates) we found that in contrast to the hierarchical view, all ventral stream regions corresponded best to later model layers. That is, all regions contain high-level information about object category. We hypothesised that this is due to recurrent connections propagating high-level visual information from later regions back to early regions, in contrast to the exclusively feed-forward connectivity of DCNNs. Using task-relevant correspondence with a late DCNN layer akin to a tracer, we used Granger causal modelling to show late-DCNN correspondence in IT drives correspondence in V4. Our analysis suggests, effectively, that no ventral stream region can be appropriately characterised as ‘early’ beyond 70ms after stimulus presentation, challenging hierarchical models. More broadly, we ask what it means for a model component and brain region to correspond: beyond quantifying shared variance, we must consider the functional role in the computation. We also demonstrate that using a DCNN to decode high-level conceptual information from ventral stream produces a general mapping from brain to model activation space, which generalises to novel classes held-out from training data. This suggests future possibilities for brain-machine interface with high-level conceptual information, beyond current designs that interface with the sensorimotor periphery.

A recent formulation of predictive coding theory proposes that a subset of neurons in each cortical area encodes sensory prediction errors, the difference between predictions relayed from higher cortex and the sensory input. Here, we test for evidence of prediction error responses in spiking responses and local field potentials (LFP) recorded in primary visual cortex and area V4 of macaque monkeys, and in complementary electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp recordings in human participants. We presented a fixed sequence of visual stimuli on most trials, and violated the expected ordering on a small subset of trials. Under predictive coding theory, pattern-violating stimuli should trigger robust prediction errors, but we found that spiking, LFP and EEG responses to expected and pattern-violating stimuli were nearly identical. Our results challenge the assertion that a fundamental computational motif in sensory cortex is to signal prediction errors, at least those based on predictions derived from temporal patterns of visual stimulation.

Cortical circuits receive multiple inputs from upstream populations with non-overlapping stimulus tuning preferences. Both the feedforward and recurrent architectures of the receiving cortical layer will reflect this diverse input tuning. We study how population-wide neuronal variability propagates through a hierarchical cortical network receiving multiple, independent, tuned inputs. We present new analysis of in vivo neural data from the primate visual system showing that the number of latent variables (dimension) needed to describe population shared variability is smaller in V4 populations compared to those of its downstream visual area PFC. We successfully reproduce this dimensionality expansion from our V4 to PFC neural data using a multi-layer spiking network with structured, feedforward projections and recurrent assemblies of multiple, tuned neuron populations. We show that tuning-structured connectivity generates attractor dynamics within the recurrent PFC current, where attractor competition is reflected in the high dimensional shared variability across the population. Indeed, restricting the dimensionality analysis to activity from one attractor state recovers the low-dimensional structure inherited from each of our tuned inputs. Our model thus introduces a framework where high-dimensional cortical variability is understood as ``time-sharing’’ between distinct low-dimensional, tuning-specific circuit dynamics.