The Nature versus Nurture debate has generally been considered from the lens of genome versus experience dichotomy and has dominated our thinking about behavioral individuality and personality traits. In contrast, the role of nonheritable noise during brain development in behavioral variation is understudied. Using the Drosophila melanogaster visual system, I will discuss our efforts to dissect how individuality in circuit wiring emerges during development, and how that helps generate individual behavioral variation.

Functional connectomics reveals general wiring rule in mouse visual cortex

Understanding how brains learn requires bridging evidence across scales—from behaviour and neural circuits to cells, synapses, and molecules. In our work, we use computational modelling and data analysis to explore how the physical properties of neurons and neural circuits constrain learning. These include limits imposed by brain wiring, energy availability, molecular noise, and the 3D structure of dendritic spines. In this talk I will describe one such project testing if wiring motifs from fly brain connectomes can improve performance of reservoir computers, a type of recurrent neural network. The hope is that these insights into brain learning will lead to improved learning algorithms for artificial systems.

The brain has a highly complex structure in terms of cell types and wiring between different regions. What is it for, if anything? I'll start this talk by asking what might an answer to this question even look like given that we can't run an alternative universe where our brains are structured differently. (Preview: we can do this with models!) I'll then talk about some of our work in two areas: (1) does the modular structure of the brain contribute to specialisation of function? (2) how do different cell types and architectures contribute to multimodal sensory processing?

The visual system faces a dual challenge. On the one hand, features of the natural visual environment should be stably processed - irrespective of ongoing wiring changes, representational drift, and behavior. On the other hand, eye, head, and body motion require a robust integration of pose and gaze shifts in visual computations for a stable perception of the world. We address these dimensions of stable visual processing by studying the circuit mechanism of long-term representational stability, focusing on the role of plasticity, network structure, experience, and behavioral state while recording large-scale neuronal activity with miniature two-photon microscopy.

The cerebral cortex contains an extraordinary diversity of excitatory projection neuron (PN) and inhibitory interneurons (IN), wired together to form complex circuits. Spatiotemporally coordinated execution of intrinsic molecular programs by PNs and INs and activity-dependent processes, contribute to cortical development and cortical microcircuits formation. Alterations of these delicate processes have often been associated to neurological/neurodevelopmental disorders. However, despite the groundbreaking discovery that spontaneous activity in the embryonic brain can shape regional identities of distinct cortical territories, it is still unclear whether this early activity contributes to define subtype-specific neuronal fate as well as circuit assembly. In this study, we combined in utero genetic perturbations via CRISPR/Cas9 system and pharmacological inhibition of selected ion channels with RNA-sequencing and live imaging technologies to identify the activity-regulated processes controlling the development of different cortical PN classes, their wiring and the acquisition of subtype specific features. Moreover, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) form patients affected by a severe, rare and untreatable form of developmental epileptic encephalopathy. By differentiating cortical organoids form patient-derived iPSCs we create human models of early electrical alterations for studying molecular, structural and functional consequences of the genetic mutations during cortical development. Our ultimate goal is to define the activity-conditioned processes that physiologically occur during the development of cortical circuits, to identify novel therapeutical paths to address the pathological consequences of neonatal epilepsies.

G. Lopez-Bendito, Spain: “Spontaneous Activity in the Specification and Plasticity of Sensory Circuits”; R. Suarez , Australia: “Marsupials illuminate brain wiring”

Connections between nerve cells called synapses are the fundamental units of communication and information processing in the brain. The accurate wiring of neurons through synapses into neural networks or circuits is essential for brain organization. Neuronal networks are sculpted and refined throughout life by constant adjustment of the strength of synaptic communication by neuronal activity, a process known as synaptic plasticity. Deficits in the development or plasticity of synapses underlie various neuropsychiatric disorders, including autism, schizophrenia and intellectual disability. The Siddiqui lab research program comprises three major themes. One, to assess how biochemical switches control the activity of synapse organizing proteins, how these switches act through their binding partners and how these processes are regulated to correct impaired synaptic function in disease. Two, to investigate how synapse organizers regulate the specificity of neuronal circuit development and how defined circuits contribute to cognition and behaviour. Three, to address how synapses are formed in the developing brain and maintained in the mature brain and how microcircuits formed by synapses are refined to fine-tune information processing in the brain. Together, these studies have generated fundamental new knowledge about neuronal circuit development and plasticity and enabled us to identify targets for therapeutic intervention.

Inhibitory interneurons govern the sparse activation of principal cells that permits appropriate behaviors, but they among the most vulnerable to brain damage. Our recent work has demonstrated important roles for inhibitory neurons in disorders of brain development, injury and epilepsy. These studies have motivated our ongoing efforts to understand how these cells operate at the synaptic, circuit and behavioral levels and in designing new technologies targeting specific populations of interneurons for therapy. I will discuss our recent efforts examining the role of interneurons in traumatic brain injury and in designing cell transplantation strategies - based on the generation of new inhibitory interneurons - that enable precise manipulation of inhibitory circuits in the injured brain. I will also discuss our ongoing efforts using monosynaptic virus tracing and whole-brain clearing methods to generate brain-wide maps of inhibitory circuits in the rodent brain. By comprehensively mapping the wiring of individual cell types on a global scale, we have uncovered a fundamental strategy to sustain and optimize inhibition following traumatic brain injury that involves spatial reorganization of local and long-range inputs to inhibitory neurons. These recent findings suggest that brain damage, even when focally restricted, likely has a far broader affect on brain-wide neural function than previously appreciated.

Early in development the nervous system is constructed with far too many neurons that make an excessive number of synaptic connections.  Later, a wave of neuronal remodeling radically reshapes nervous system wiring and cell numbers through the selective elimination of excess synapses, axons and dendrites, and even whole neurons.  This remodeling is widespread across the nervous system, extensive in terms of how much individual brain regions can change (e.g. in some cases 50% of neurons integrated into a brain circuit are eliminated), and thought to be essential for optimizing nervous system function.  Perturbations of neuronal remodeling are thought to underlie devastating neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy.  This seminar will discuss our efforts to use the relatively simple nervous system of Drosophila to understand the mechanistic basis by which cells, or parts of cells, are specified for removal and eliminated from the nervous system.

Emilia Favuzzi (USA): Artisans of Brain Wiring: GABA-Receptive Microglia Selectively Sculpt Inhibitory Circuits; Ewoud Schmidt (USA): Humanizing the mouse brain: reorganizing cortical circuits through modified synaptic development; Tracy Bale (USA): Trophoblast mechanisms key in regulating neurodevelopment Anastassia Voronova (Canada): Regulation of neural stem cell fates by neuronal ligands

Neuronal plasticity has for a long time been considered important for the recovery from depression and for the antidepressant drug action, but how the drug action is translated to plasticity has remained unclear. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor TRKB are critical regulators of neuronal plasticity and have been implicated in the antidepressant action. We have recently found that many, if not all, different antidepressants, including serotonin selective SSRIs, tricyclic as well as fast-acting ketamine, directly bind to TRKB, thereby promoting TRKB translocation to synaptic membranes, which increases BDNF signaling. We have previously shown that antidepressant treatment induces a juvenile-like state of activity in the cortex that facilitates beneficial rewiring of abnormal networks. We recently showed that activation of TRKB receptors in parvalbumin-containing interneurons orchestrates cortical activation states and is both necessary and sufficient for the antidepressantinduced cortical plasticity. Our findings open a new framework how the action of antidepressants act: rather than regulating brain monoamine concentrations, antidepressants directly bind to TRKB and allosterically promote BDNF signaling, thereby inducing a state of plasticity that allows re-wiring of abnormal networks for better functionality.

Precise synaptic connectivity is a prerequisite for the function of neural circuits, yet individual neurons, taken out of their developmental context, readily form unspecific synapses. How does genetically encoded brain wiring deal with this apparent contradiction? Brain wiring is a developmental growth process that is not only characterized by precision, but also flexibility and robustness. As in any other growth process, cellular interactions are restricted in space and time. Correspondingly, molecular and cellular interactions are restricted to those that 'get to see' each other during development. This seminar will explore the question how neurons decide when and where to make synapses using the Drosophila visual system as a model. New findings reveal that pattern formation during growth and the kinetics of live neuronal interactions restrict synapse formation and partner choice for neurons that are not otherwise prevented from making incorrect synapses in this system. For example, cell biological mechanisms like autophagy as well as developmental temperature restrict inappropriate partner choice through a process of kinetic exclusion that critically contributes to wiring specificity. The seminar will explore these and other neuronal strategies when and where to make synapses during developmental growth that contribute to precise, flexible and robust outcomes in brain wiring.

Topographic maps are a prominent feature of brain organization, reflecting local and large-scale representation of the sensory surface. ​​Traditionally, such representations in early visual areas are conceived as retinotopic maps preserving ego-centric retinal spatial location while ensuring that other features of visual input are uniformly represented for every location in space. I will discuss our recent findings of a striking departure from this simple mapping in the secondary visual area (V2) of the tree shrew that is best described as a sinusoidal transformation of the visual field. This sinusoidal topography is ideal for achieving uniform coverage in an elongated area like V2 as predicted by mathematical models designed for wiring minimization, and provides a novel explanation for stripe-like patterns of intra-cortical connections and functional response properties in V2. Our findings suggest that cortical circuits flexibly implement solutions to sensory surface representation, with dramatic consequences for large-scale cortical organization. Furthermore our work challenges the framework of relatively independent encoding of location and features in the visual system, showing instead location-dependent feature sensitivity produced by specialized processing of different features in different spatial locations. In the second part of the talk, I will propose that location-dependent feature sensitivity is a fundamental organizing principle of the visual system that achieves efficient representation of positional regularities in visual input, and reflects the evolutionary selection of sensory and motor circuits to optimally represent behaviorally relevant information. The relevant papers can be found here: V2 retinotopy (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Neuron, 2021) Location-dependent feature sensitivity (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Under Review, 2022)

Predictive coding represents a promising framework for understanding brain function, postulating that the brain continuously inhibits predictable sensory input, ensuring a preferential processing of surprising elements. A central aspect of this view on cortical computation is its hierarchical connectivity, involving recurrent message passing between excitatory bottom-up signals and inhibitory top-down feedback. Here we use computational modelling to demonstrate that such architectural hard-wiring is not necessary. Rather, predictive coding is shown to emerge as a consequence of energy efficiency, a fundamental requirement of neural processing. When training recurrent neural networks to minimise their energy consumption while operating in predictive environments, the networks self-organise into prediction and error units with appropriate inhibitory and excitatory interconnections and learn to inhibit predictable sensory input. We demonstrate that prediction units can reliably be identified through biases in their median preactivation, pointing towards a fundamental property of prediction units in the predictive coding framework. Moving beyond the view of purely top-down driven predictions, we demonstrate via virtual lesioning experiments that networks perform predictions on two timescales: fast lateral predictions among sensory units and slower prediction cycles that integrate evidence over time. Our results, which replicate across two separate data sets, suggest that predictive coding can be interpreted as a natural consequence of energy efficiency. More generally, they raise the question which other computational principles of brain function can be understood as a result of physical constraints posed by the brain, opening up a new area of bio-inspired, machine learning-powered neuroscience research.

Brains must integrate complex sensory information and compare to past events to generate appropriate behavioral responses. The neural circuit basis of these computations is unclear and the underlying structure unknown. Here, we mapped the comprehensive synaptic wiring diagram of the fruit fly larva brain, which contains 3,013 neurons and 544K synaptic sites. It is the most complete insect connectome to date: 1) Both brain hemispheres are reconstructed, allowing investigation of neural pathways that include contralateral axons, which we found in 37% of brain neurons. 2) All sensory neurons and descending neurons are reconstructed, allowing one to follow signals in an uninterrupted chain—from the sensory periphery, through the brain, to motor neurons in the nerve cord. We developed novel computational tools, allowing us to cluster the brain and investigate how information flows through it. We discovered that feedforward pathways from sensory to descending neurons are multilayered and highly multimodal. Robust feedback was observed at almost all levels of the brain, including descending neurons. We investigated how the brain hemispheres communicate with each other and the nerve cord, leading to identification of novel circuit motifs. This work provides the complete blueprint of a brain and a strong foundation to study the structure-function relationship of neural circuits.

Neuroscientists have many questions about connectomes that revolve around the ability to compare networks. For example, comparing connectomes could help explain how neural wiring is related to individual differences, genetics, disease, development, or learning. One such question is that of bilateral symmetry: are the left and right sides of a connectome the same? Here, we investigate the bilateral symmetry of a recently presented connectome of an insect brain, the Drosophila larva. We approach this question from the perspective of two-sample testing for networks. First, we show how this question of “sameness” can be framed as a variety of different statistical hypotheses, each with different assumptions. Then, we describe test procedures for each of these hypotheses. We show how these different test procedures perform on both the observed connectome as well as a suite of synthetic perturbations to the connectome. We also point out that these tests require careful attention to parameter alignment and differences in network density in order to provide biologically meaningful results. Taken together, these results provide the first statistical characterization of bilateral symmetry for an entire brain at the single-neuron level, while also giving practical recommendations for future comparisons of connectome networks.

Macroscopic brain organisation emerges early in life, even prenatally, and continues to develop through adolescence and into early adulthood. The emergence and continual refinement of large-scale brain networks, connecting neuronal populations across anatomical distance, allows for increasing functional integration and specialisation. This process is thought crucial for the emergence of complex cognitive processes. But how and why is this process so diverse? We used structural neuroimaging collected from a large diverse cohort, to explore how different features of macroscopic brain organisation are associated with diverse cognitive trajectories. We used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to construct whole-brain white-matter connectomes. A simulated attack on each child's connectome revealed that some brain networks were strongly organized around highly connected 'hubs'. The more children's brains were critically dependent on hubs, the better their cognitive skills. Conversely, having poorly integrated hubs was a very strong risk factor for cognitive and learning difficulties across the sample. We subsequently developed a computational framework, using generative network modelling (GNM), to model the emergence of this kind of connectome organisation. Relatively subtle changes within the wiring rules of this computational framework give rise to differential developmental trajectories, because of small biases in the preferential wiring properties of different nodes within the network. Finally, we were able to use this GNM to implicate the molecular and cellular processes that govern these different growth patterns.

Laura Fenlon (Australia): Time shapes all brains: timing of a conserved transcriptional network underlies divergent cortical connectivity routes in mammalian brain development and evolution; Laurent Nguyen (Belgium): Regulation of cerebral cortex morphogenesis by migrating cells; Carol Ann Mason (USA): Wiring the eye to brain for binocular vision: lessons from the albino visual system. Thomas Perlmann (Sweden): Interrogating dopamine neuron development at the single cell level

In this lecture, Dr Stevens will discuss recent work that implicates brain immune cells, called microglia, in sculpting of synaptic connections during development and their relevance to autism, schizophrenia and other brain disorders. Her recent work revealed a key role for microglia and a group of immune related molecules called complement in normal developmental synaptic pruning, a normal process required to establish precise brain wiring. Emerging evidence suggests aberrant regulation of this pruning pathway may contribute to synaptic and cognitive dysfunction in a host of brain disorders, including schizophrenia. Recent research has revealed that a person’s risk of schizophrenia is increased if they inherit specific variants in complement C4, gene plays a well-known role in the immune system but also helps sculpt developing synapses in the mouse visual system (Sekar et al., 2016). Together these findings may help explain known features of schizophrenia, including reduced numbers of synapses in key cortical regions and an adolescent age of onset that corresponds with developmentally timed waves of synaptic pruning in these regions. Stevens will discuss this and ongoing work to understand the mechanisms by which complement and microglia prune specific synapses in the brain. A deeper understanding of how these immune mechanisms mediate synaptic pruning may provide novel insight into how to protect synapses in autism and other brain disorders, including Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Disease.

The human brain is a complex organ characterized by heterogeneous patterns of interconnections. Non-invasive imaging techniques now allow for these patterns to be carefully and comprehensively mapped in individual humans, paving the way for a better understanding of how wiring supports cognitive processes. While a large body of work now focuses on descriptive statistics to characterize these wiring patterns, a critical open question lies in how the organization of these networks constrains the potential repertoire of brain dynamics. In this talk, I will describe an approach for understanding how perturbations to brain dynamics propagate through complex wiring patterns, driving the brain into new states of activity. Drawing on a range of disciplinary tools – from graph theory to network control theory and optimization – I will identify control points in brain networks and characterize trajectories of brain activity states following perturbation to those points. Finally, I will describe how these computational tools and approaches can be used to better understand the brain's intrinsic control mechanisms and their alterations in psychiatric conditions.

The human brain is a complex network of neuronal connections. The precise arrangement of these connections, otherwise known as the topology of the network, is crucial to its functioning. Recent efforts to understand how the complex topology of the brain has emerged have used generative mathematical models, which grow synthetic networks according to specific wiring rules. Evidence suggests that a wiring rule which emulates a trade-off between connection costs and functional benefits can produce networks that capture essential topological properties of brain networks. In this webinar, Professor Alex Fornito and Dr Stuart Oldham will discuss these previous findings, as well as their own efforts in creating more physiologically constrained generative models. Professor Alex Fornito is Head of the Brain Mapping and Modelling Research Program at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health. His research focuses on developing new imaging techniques for mapping human brain connectivity and applying these methods to shed light on brain function in health and disease. Dr Stuart Oldham is a Research Fellow at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health and a Research Officer at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute. He is interested in characterising the organisation of human brain networks, with particular focus on how this organisation develops, using neuroimaging and computational tools.

Sean Miller will present "From brain wiring to synaptic physiology - reuse of a cell recognition molecule to carry out higher order nervous system functions". Then, Patricia Jusuf will talk about " Visual vertebrate pipeline for assessing novel human GWAS gene candidates". Victor Borrell with deal with the "Genetic evolution of cerebral cortex size determinants" and Louise Cheng will present

Neuronal variability is a reflection of recurrent circuitry and cellular physiology. The modulation of neuronal variability is a reliable signature of cognitive and processing state. A pervasive yet puzzling feature of cortical circuits is that despite their complex wiring, population-wide shared spiking variability is low dimensional with all neurons fluctuating en masse. We show that the spatiotemporal dynamics in a spatially structured network produce large population-wide shared variability. When the spatial and temporal scales of inhibitory coupling match known physiology, model spiking neurons naturally generate low dimensional shared variability that captures in vivo population recordings along the visual pathway. Further, we show that firing rate models with spatial coupling can also generate chaotic and low-dimensional rate dynamics. The chaotic parameter region expands when the network is driven by correlated noisy inputs, while being insensitive to the intensity of independent noise.

Using a combination of in vivo imaging of neuronal circuit functional and structural dynamics, we have investigated the mechanisms by which patterned neural activity and sensory experience alter connectivity in the developing brain. We have identified, in addition to the long-hypothesized Hebbian structural plasticity mechanisms, a kind of plasticity induced by the absence of correlated firing that we dubbed “Stentian plasticity”. In the talk I will discuss the phenomenology and some mechanistic insights regarding Stentian mechanisms in brain development. Further, I will show how glia may have a key role in circuit remodeling during development. These studies have led us to an appreciation of the importance of neuron-glia interactions in early development and the ability of patterned activity to guide circuit wiring.

The human brain network architecture can reveal crucial aspects of brain function and dysfunction. The topology of this network (known as the connectome) is shaped by a trade-off between wiring cost and network efficiency, and it has highly connected hub regions playing a prominent role in many brain disorders. By studying a landscape of plausible brain networks that preserve the wiring cost, fragile and resilient hubs can be identified. In this webinar, Dr Leonardo Gollo and Dr James Pang from Monash University will discuss this approach across the lifespan and some of its implications for neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Dr Leonardo Gollo is a Senior Research Fellow at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University. He holds an ARC Future Fellowship and his research interests include brain modelling, systems neuroscience, and connectomics. Dr James Pang is a Research Fellow at the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University. His research interests are on combining neuroimaging and biophysical modelling to better understand the mechanisms of brain function in health and disease.

The developmental journey of cortical interneurons encounters several activity-dependent milestones. During the early postnatal period in developing mice, GABAergic neurons are transient preferential recipients of thalamic inputs and undergo activity-dependent migration arrest, wiring and programmed cell-death. But cortical GABAergic neurons are also specified by very early developmental programs. For example, the earliest born GABAergic neurons develop into hub cells coordinating spontaneous activity in hippocampal slices. Despite their importance for the emergence of sensory experience, their role in coordinating network dynamics, and the role of activity in their integration into cortical networks, the collective in vivo dynamics of GABAergic neurons during the neonatal postnatal period remain unknown. Here, I will present data related to the coordinated activity between GABAergic cells of the mouse barrel cortex and hippocampus in non-anesthetized pups using the recent development of all optical methods to record and manipulate neuronal activity in vivo. I will show that the functional structure of developing GABAergic circuits is remarkably patterned, with segregated assemblies of prospective parvalbumin neurons and highly connected hub cells, both shaped by sensory-dependent processes.

The emergence of large-scale brain networks, and their continual refinement, represent crucial developmental processes that can drive individual differences in cognition and which are associated with multiple neurodevelopmental conditions. But how does this organization arise, and what mechanisms govern the diversity of these developmental processes? There are many existing descriptive theories, but to date none are computationally formalized. We provide a mathematical framework that specifies the growth of a brain network over developmental time. Within this framework macroscopic brain organization, complete with spatial embedding of its organization, is an emergent property of a generative wiring equation that optimizes its connectivity by renegotiating its biological costs and topological values continuously over development. The rules that govern these iterative wiring properties are controlled by a set of tightly framed parameters, with subtle differences in these parameters steering network growth towards different neurodiverse outcomes. Regional expression of genes associated with the developmental simulations converge on biological processes and cellular components predominantly involved in synaptic signaling, neuronal projection, catabolic intracellular processes and protein transport. Together, this provides a unifying computational framework for conceptualizing the mechanisms and diversity of childhood brain development, capable of integrating different levels of analysis – from genes to cognition. (Pre-print: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.13.249391v1)

To understand the function of the brain and how its dysfunction leads to brain diseases, it is essential to have a deep understanding of the cell type composition of the brain, how the cell types are connected with each other and what their roles are in circuit function. At the Allen Institute, we have built multiple platforms, including single-cell transcriptomics, single and multi-patching electrophysiology, 3D reconstruction of neuronal morphology, high throughput brain-wide connectivity mapping, and large-scale neuronal activity imaging, to characterize the transcriptomic, physiological, morphological, and connectional properties of different types of neurons in a standardized way, towards a taxonomy of cell types and a description of their wiring diagram for the mouse brain, with a focus on the visual cortico-thalamic system. Building such knowledge base lays the foundation towards the understanding of the computational mechanisms of brain circuit function.

The "mind of the worm", the first electron microscopy-based connectome of C. elegans, was an early sign of where connectomics is headed, followed by a long time of little progress in a field held back by the immense manual effort required for data acquisition and analysis. This changed over the last few years with several technological breakthroughs, which allowed increases in data set sizes by several orders of magnitude. Brain tissue can now be imaged in 3D up to a millimeter in size at nanometer resolution, revealing tissue features from synapses to the mitochondria of all contained cells. These breakthroughs in acquisition technology were paralleled by a revolution in deep-learning segmentation techniques, that equally reduced manual analysis times by several orders of magnitude, to the point where fully automated reconstructions are becoming useful. Taken together, this gives neuroscientists now access to the first wiring diagrams of thousands of automatically reconstructed neurons connected by millions of synapses, just one line of program code away. In this talk, I will cover these developments by describing the past few years' technological breakthroughs and discuss remaining challenges. Finally, I will show the potential of automated connectomics for neuroscience by demonstrating how hypotheses in reinforcement learning can now be tackled through virtual experiments in synaptic wiring diagrams of the songbird basal ganglia.

The corpus callosum is the largest fibre tract in the brain of placental mammals and connects the two cerebral hemispheres. Corpus callosum dysgenesis is a developmental brain disorder that is commonly genetic and occurs in approximately 1:4000 live births. It is easily diagnosed by MRI or prenatal ultrasound and is found in isolation or together with other brain anomalies, or with other organ system defects in a large number of different congenital syndromes. Callosal dysgenesis is a structural brain wiring disorder that can impact brain function and cognition in heterogeneous ways. We aim to understand how early developmental mechanisms lead to circuit alterations that ultimately impact behaviour and cognition. Translated to Spanish by MD and Medical interpreter Trinidad Ott. El cuerpo calloso es el tracto de fibras más grande del cerebro de los mamíferos placentarios y conecta los dos hemisferios cerebrales. La disgenesia del cuerpo calloso es un trastorno del desarrollo del cerebro que comunmente es genético y ocurre en aproximadamente 1: 4000 nacidos vivos. Se diagnostica fácilmente mediante resonancia magnética o ecografía prenatal y se encuentra aislado o junto con otras anomalías cerebrales, o con otros defectos del sistema de órganos en un gran número de síndromes congénitos diferentes. La disgenesia callosa es un trastorno estructural del cableado cerebral que puede afectar la función cerebral y la cognición de formas heterogéneas. Nuestro objetivo es comprender cómo los primeros mecanismos del desarrollo conducen a alteraciones en los circuitos que, en última instancia, afectan el comportamiento y la cognición. Traducción al español por la Doctora e Intérprete Médica Trinidad Ott.

Behavior varies even among genetically identical animals raised in the same environment. However, little is known about the circuit or anatomical underpinnings of this individuality, though previous work implicates sensory periphery. Drosophila olfaction presents an ideal model to study the biological basis of behavioral individuality, because while the neural circuit underlying olfactory behavior is well-described and highly stereotyped, persistent idiosyncrasy in behavior, neural coding, and neural wiring have also been described. Projection neurons (PNs), which relay odor signals sensed by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to deeper brain structures, exhibit variable calcium responses to identical odor stimuli across individuals, but how these idiosyncrasies relate to individual behavioral responses remains unknown. Here, using paired behavior and two-photon imaging measurements, we show that idiosyncratic calcium dynamics in both ORNs and PNs predict individual preferences for an aversive monomolecular odorant versus air, suggesting that variation at the periphery of the olfactory system determines individual preference for an odor’s presence. In contrast, PN, but not ORN, calcium responses predict individual preferences in a two-odor choice assay. Furthermore, paired behavior and immunohistochemistry measurements reveal that variation in ORN presynaptic density also predicts two-odor preference, suggesting this site is a locus of individuality where microscale circuit variation gives rise to idiosyncrasy in behavior. Our results demonstrate how a neural circuit may vary functionally and structurally to produce variable behavior among individuals.

Genome-wide association studies implicate microglia in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis, but how microglia contribute to cognitive decline in AD is unclear. Emerging research suggests microglia, the resident macrophages of the central nervous system, to be active participants in brain wiring. One mechanism by which microglia help eliminate synapses is through the classical complement pathway (C1q, CR3/C3). Data from multiple laboratories collectively suggest that there may be an aberrant reactivation of the complement-dependent pruning pathway in multiple models of neurologic diseases including AD. These data altogether suggest that microglia participate in synaptic pathology. However, how and which synapses are targeted are unknown. Furthermore, whether microglia directly impair synaptic function is unknown. Primary goals of my laboratory are to understand how higher cognitive functions such as learning and memory involve microglial biology in the healthy adult brain and dissect immune mechanisms behind the region-specific vulnerability of synapse loss and neuronal dysfunction during disease. Mechanistic insight into local signals that regulate neuroglia interactions will be key to developing potential therapeutic avenues to target in disease.

behaviour varies even among genetically identical animals raised in the same environment. However, little is known about the circuit or anatomical underpinnings of this individuality, though previous work implicates sensory periphery. Drosophila olfaction presents an ideal model to study the biological basis of behavioural individuality, because while the neural circuit underlying olfactory behaviour is well-described and highly stereotyped, persistent idiosyncrasy in behaviour, neural coding, and neural wiring have also been described. Projection neurons (PNs), which relay odor signals sensed by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to deeper brain structures, exhibit variable calcium responses to identical odor stimuli across individuals, but how these idiosyncrasies relate to individual behavioural responses remains unknown. Here, using paired behaviour and two-photon imaging measurements, we show that idiosyncratic calcium dynamics in both ORNs and PNs predict individual preferences for an aversive monomolecular odorant versus air, suggesting that variation at the periphery of the olfactory system determines individual preference for an odor’s presence. In contrast, PN, but not ORN, calcium responses predict individual preferences in a two-odor choice assay. Furthermore, paired behaviour and immunohistochemistry measurements reveal that variation in ORN presynaptic density also predicts two-odor preference, suggesting this site is a locus of individuality where microscale circuit variation gives rise to idiosyncrasy in behaviour. Our results demonstrate how a neural circuit may vary functionally and structurally to produce variable behaviour among individuals.

Our research team runs several related projects studying the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the development of axonal connections in the brain. In particular, our aim is to uncover the principles underlying thalamocortical axonal wiring, maintenance and ultimately the rewiring of connections, through an integrated and innovative experimental programme. The development of the thalamocortical wiring requires a precise topographical sorting of its connections. Each thalamic nucleus receives specific sensory information from the environment and projects topographically to its corresponding cortical. A second level of organization is achieved within each area, where thalamocortical connections display an intra-areal topographical organization, allowing the generation of accurate spatial representations within each cortical area. Therefore, the level of organization and specificity of the thalamocortical projections is much more complex than other projection systems in the CNS. The central hypothesis of our laboratory is that thalamocortical input influences and maintains the functional architecture of the sensory cortices. We also believe that rewiring and plasticity events can be triggered by activity-dependent mechanisms in the thalamus. Three major questions are been focused in the laboratory: i) the role of spontaneous patterns of activity in thalamocortical wiring and cortical development, ii) the role of the thalamus and its connectivity in the neuroplastic cortical changes following sensory deprivation, and iii) reprogramming thalamic cells for sensory circuit restoration. Within these projects we are using several experimental programmes, these include: optical imaging, manipulation of gene expression in vivo, cell and molecular biology, biochemistry, cell culture, sensory deprivation paradigms and electrophysiology. The results derived from our investigations will contribute to our understating of how reprogramming of cortical wiring takes place following brain damage and how cortical structure is maintained.