Topic: Biological function

New prospects in shape morphing sheets: unexplored pathways, 4D printing, and autonomous actuation

Living organisms have mastered the dynamic control of stresses within sheets to induce shape transformation and locomotion. For instance, the spatiotemporal pattern of action potential in a heart yields a dynamical stress field leading to shape changes and biological function. Such structures inspired the development of theoretical tools and responsive materials alike. Yet, present attempts to mimic their rich dynamics and phenomenology in autonomous synthetic matter are still very limited. In this talk, I will present several complementing innovations toward this goal: novel shaping mechanisms that were overlooked by previous research, new fabrication techniques for programmable matter via 4D printing of gel structures, and most prominently, the first autonomous shape morphing membranes. The dynamical control over the geometry of the material is a prevalent theme in all of these achievements. In particular, the latter system demonstrates localized deformations, induced by a pattern-forming chemical reaction, that prescribe the patterns of curvature, leading to global shape evolution. Together, these developments present a route for modeling and producing fully autonomous soft membranes mimicking some of the locomotive capabilities of living organisms.

Towards a More Authentic Vision of the (multi)Coding Potential of RNA

Ten of thousands of open reading frames (ORFs) are hidden within transcripts. They have eluded annotations because they are either small or within unsuspected locations. These are named alternative ORFs (altORFs) or small ORFs and have recently been highlighted by innovative proteogenomic approaches, such as our OpenProt resource, revealing their existence and implications in biological functions. Due to the absence of altORFs from annotations, pathogenic mutations within these are being ignored. I will discuss our latest progress on the re-analysis of large-scale proteomics datasets to improve our knowledge of proteomic diversity, and the functional characterization of a second protein coded by the FUS gene. Finally, I will explain the need to map the coding potential of the transcriptome using artificial intelligence rather than with conventional annotations that do not capture the full translational activity of ribosomes.

Mechano-adaptation in a large protein complex

Macromolecular protein complexes perform essential biological functions across life forms. A fundamental, though yet unsolved question in biology is how the function of such complexes is regulated by intracellular or extracellular signals. For instance, we have little understanding of how forces affect multi-protein machines whose function is often mechanical in nature. We address this question by studying the bacterial flagellar motor, a large complex that powers swimming motility in many bacteria. This rotary motor autonomously adapts to changes in mechanical load by adding or removing force-generating ‘stator’ units that power rotation. In the bacterium Escherichia coli, up to 11 units drive the motor at high load while all the units are released at low load. We manipulate motor load using electrorotation, a technique in which a rapidly rotating electric field applies an external torque on the motor. This allows us to change motor load at will and measure the resulting stator dynamics at single-unit resolution. We found that the force generated by the stator units controls their unbinding, forming a feedback loop that leads to autoregulation of the assembly. We complemented our experiments with theoretical models that provide insight into the underlying molecular interactions. Torque-dependent remodeling takes place within seconds, making it a highly responsive control mechanism, one that is mediated by the mechano-chemical tuning of protein interactions.

Language, learning and networks

Chromosomes, condensates and transcriptional control

Evolutionary Dynamics

(What) can soft matter physics teach us about biological function?

The “soft, active, and living matter” community has grown tremendously in recent years, conducting exciting research at the interface between soft matter and biological systems. But are all living systems also soft matter systems? Do the ideas of function (or purpose) in biological systems require us to introduce deep new ideas into the framework of soft matter theories? Does the (often) qualitatively different character of data in biological experiments require us to change the types of experiments we conduct and the goals of our theoretical treatments? Eight speakers will anchor the workshop, exploring these questions across a range of biological system scales. Each speaker will deliver a 10-minute talk with another 10 minutes set aside for moderated questions/discussion. We expect the talks to be broad, bold, and provocative, discussing both the nature of the theoretical tools and experimental techniques we have at present and also those we think we will ultimately need to answer deep questions at the interface of soft matter and biology.