Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Topic: brain activity

Seminar
9 seminars
ePoster
2 ePosters

In Neuroscience and Brain Imaging

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Trends in NeuroAI - Meta's MEG-to-image reconstruction

Reese Kneeland

Fri, Jan 5, 2024 · 05:00 UTC

Trends in NeuroAI is a reading group hosted by the MedARC Neuroimaging & AI lab (https://medarc.ai/fmri). Title: Brain-optimized inference improves reconstructions of fMRI brain activity Abstract: The release of large datasets and developments in AI have led to dramatic improvements in decoding methods that reconstruct seen images from human brain activity. We evaluate the prospect of further improving recent decoding methods by optimizing for consistency between reconstructions and brain activity during inference. We sample seed reconstructions from a base decoding method, then iteratively re

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Inducing short to medium neuroplastic effects with Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation

Elsa Fouragnan · Brain Research and Imaging Centre, University of Plymouth

Thu, Nov 30, 2023 · 12:00 UTC

Sound waves can be used to modify brain activity safely and transiently with unprecedented precision even deep in the brain - unlike traditional brain stimulation methods. In a series of studies in humans and non-human primates, I will show that Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation (TUS) can have medium- to long-lasting effects. Multiple read-outs allow us to conclude that TUS can perturb neuronal tissues up to 2h after intervention, including changes in local and distributed brain network configurations, behavioural changes, task-related neuronal changes and chemical changes in the sonicated f

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Algonauts 2023 winning paper journal club (fMRI encoding models)

Huzheng Yang, Paul Scotti

Fri, Aug 18, 2023 · 03:00 UTC

Algonauts 2023 was a challenge to create the best model that predicts fMRI brain activity given a seen image. Huze team dominated the competition and released a preprint detailing their process. This journal club meeting will involve open discussion of the paper with Q/A with Huze. Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01175.pdf Related paper also from Huze that we can discuss: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2307.14021.pdf

Neurofeedback provides a feedback display which is linked with on-going brain activity and thus allows self-regulation of neural activity in specific brain regions associated with certain cognitive functions and is considered a promising tool for clinical interventions. Recent reviews of neurofeedback have stressed the importance of applying the “double-blind” experimental design where critically the patient is unaware of the neurofeedback treatment condition. An important question then becomes; is double-blind even possible? Or are subjects aware of the purposes of the neurofeedback experimen

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Estimating repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state brain activity data

Yusuke Takeda · Computational Brain Dynamics Team, RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project, Japan; Department of Computational Brain Imaging, ATR Neural Information Analysis Laboratories, Japan

Fri, Apr 28, 2023 · 17:00 UTC

Repetitive spatiotemporal patterns in resting-state brain activities have been widely observed in various species and regions, such as rat and cat visual cortices. Since they resemble the preceding brain activities during tasks, they are assumed to reflect past experiences embedded in neuronal circuits. Moreover, spatiotemporal patterns involving whole-brain activities may also reflect a process that integrates information distributed over the entire brain, such as motor and visual information. Therefore, revealing such patterns may elucidate how the information is integrated to generate consc

ePoster · Neuroscience

Moving from phenomenological to predictive modelling: Pitfalls of modeling brain stimulation in-silico

Danielle Kurtin · Neuromatch 5

Wed, Sep 28, 2022

Brain stimulation is an increasingly popular tool for both research and clinical use. However, the effects of brain stimulation are not entirely known, and neither are the mechanisms by which brain stimulation changes brain activity. One way to efficiently study the relationship between the brain and neuromodulation is to use computational models. Computational models allow researchers to run realistic simulations that show how the brain is influenced by neuromodulation or predict what brain stimulation will change in brain activity and/or behaviour. This talk will introduce how Wilson Cowan,

Seminar · Brain Imaging

The functional connectome across temporal scales

Sepideh Sadaghiani · Assistant Professor, University of Illinois, USA

Wed, Mar 30, 2022 · 10:00 UTC

The view of human brain function has drastically shifted over the last decade, owing to the observation that the majority of brain activity is intrinsic rather than driven by external stimuli or cognitive demands. Specifically, all brain regions continuously communicate in spatiotemporally organized patterns that constitute the functional connectome, with consequences for cognition and behavior. In this talk, I will argue that another shift is underway, driven by new insights from synergistic interrogation of the functional connectome using different acquisition methods. The human functional c

Seminar · Cognition

Do we reason differently about affectively charged analogies? Insights from EEG research

Yanick Leblanc-Sirois · Université Laval

Thu, Feb 10, 2022 · 04:00 UTC

Affectively charged analogies are commonly used in literature and art, but also in politics and argumentation. There are reasons to think we may process these analogies differently. Notably, analogical reasoning is a complex process that requires the use of cognitive resources, which are limited. In the presence of affectively charged content, some of these resources might be directed towards affective processing and away from analogical reasoning. To investigate this idea, I investigated effects of affective charge on differences in brain activity evoked by sound versus unsound analogies. The

Seminar · Brain Imaging

“Mind reading” with brain scanners: Facts versus science fiction

John-Dylan Haynes · Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin; Center for Advanced Neuroimaging; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience

Mon, Nov 22, 2021 · 15:00 UTC

Every thought is associated with a unique pattern of brain activity. Thus, in principle, it should be possible to use these activity patterns as "brain fingerprints" for different thoughts and to read out what a person is thinking based on their brain activity alone. Indeed, using machine learning considerable progress has been made in such "brainreading" in recent years. It is now possible to decode which image a person is viewing, which film sequence they are watching, which emotional state they are in or which intentions they hold in mind. This talk will provide an overview of the current s

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Do deep learning latent spaces resemble human brain representations?

Rufin VanRullen · Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CERCO)

Sat, Mar 13, 2021 · 02:00 UTC

In recent years, artificial neural networks have demonstrated human-like or super-human performance in many tasks including image or speech recognition, natural language processing (NLP), playing Go, chess, poker and video-games. One remarkable feature of the resulting models is that they can develop very intuitive latent representations of their inputs. In these latent spaces, simple linear operations tend to give meaningful results, as in the well-known analogy QUEEN-WOMAN+MAN=KING. We postulate that human brain representations share essential properties with these deep learning latent space

ePoster · Neuroscience

cuBNM: GPU-Accelerated Biophysical Network Modeling

Amin Saberi, Kevin Wischnewski, Kyesam Jung, Leonard Sasse, Felix Hoffstaedter, Oleksandr Popovych, Boris Bernhardt, Simon Eickhoff, Sofie Valk · Bernstein Conference 2024

Background: Biophysical network modeling (BNM) of the brain is a promising technique for bridging macro- and microscale levels of investigation, enabling inferences about latent features of brain activity such as excitation-inhibition balance. This approach allows personalized models of the brain to be fitted to individual subjects’ imaging data through parameter optimization [1, 2]. However, the process typically requires several thousand simulations per subject, making it computationally expensive and limiting its scalability to larger subject pools and more complex models. To address this,