Prediction Models for Brains and Machines
Humans and animals learn and plan with flexibility and efficiency well beyond that of modern Machine Learning methods. This is hypothesized to owe in part to the ability of animals to build structured representations of their environments, and modulate these representations to rapidly adapt to new settings. In the first part of this talk, I will discuss theoretical work describing how learned representations in hippocampus enable rapid adaptation to new goals by learning predictive representations. I will also cover work extending this account, in which we show how the predictive model can be adapted to the probabilistic setting to describe a broader array of generalization results in humans and animals, and how entorhinal representations can be modulated to support sample generation optimized for different behavioral states. I will also talk about work applying this perspective to the deep RL setting, where we can study the effect of predictive learning on representations that form in a deep neural network and how these results compare to neural data. In the second part of the talk, I will overview some of the ways in which we have combined many of the same mathematical concepts with state-of-the-art deep learning methods to improve efficiency and performance in machine learning applications like physical simulation, relational reasoning, and design. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2023-11-01. Recording duration: 00:50:44.
NMC4 Short Talk: What can deep reinforcement learning tell us about human motor learning and vice-versa ?
In the deep reinforcement learning (RL) community, motor control problems are usually approached from a reward-based learning perspective. However, humans are often believed to learn motor control through directed error-based learning. Within this learning setting, the control system is assumed to have access to exact error signals and their gradients with respect to the control signal. This is unlike reward-based learning, in which errors are assumed to be unsigned, encoding relative successes and failures. Here, we try to understand the relation between these two approaches, reward- and error- based learning, and ballistic arm reaches. To do so, we test canonical (deep) RL algorithms on a well-known sensorimotor perturbation in neuroscience: mirror-reversal of visual feedback during arm reaching. This test leads us to propose a potentially novel RL algorithm, denoted as model-based deterministic policy gradient (MB-DPG). This RL algorithm draws inspiration from error-based learning to qualitatively reproduce human reaching performance under mirror-reversal. Next, we show MB-DPG outperforms the other canonical (deep) RL algorithms on a single- and a multi- target ballistic reaching task, based on a biomechanical model of the human arm. Finally, we propose MB-DPG may provide an efficient computational framework to help explain error-based learning in neuroscience.
Deep reinforcement learning and its neuroscientific implications
The last few years have seen some dramatic developments in artificial intelligence research. What implications might these have for neuroscience? Investigations of this question have, to date, focused largely on deep neural networks trained using supervised learning, in tasks such as image classification. However, there is another area of recent AI work which has so far received less attention from neuroscientists, but which may have more profound neuroscientific implications: Deep reinforcement learning. Deep RL offers a rich framework for studying the interplay among learning, representation and decision-making, offering to the brain sciences a new set of research tools and a wide range of novel hypotheses. I’ll provide a high level introduction to deep RL, discuss some recent neuroscience-oriented investigations from my group at DeepMind, and survey some wider implications for research on brain and behavior.