Domains featuring this topic
Explore the domains where this topic appears.
Do we measure what we think we are measuring?
Tests used in the empirical sciences are often (implicitly) assumed to be representative of a target mechanism in the sense that similar tests should lead to similar results. In this talk, using resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) as an example, I will argue that this assumption does not necessarily hold true. Typically EEG studies are conducted selecting one analysis method thought to be representative of the research question asked. Using multiple methods, we extracted a variety of features from a single resting-state EEG dataset and conducted correlational and case-control analyses. We found that many EEG features revealed a significant effect in the case-control analyses. Similarly, EEG features correlated significantly with cognitive tasks. However, when we compared these features pairwise, we did not find strong correlations. A number of explanations to these results will be discussed.
Differential working memory functioning
The integrated conflict monitoring theory of Botvinick introduced cognitive demand into conflict monitoring research. We investigated effects of individual differences of cognitive demand and another determinant of conflict monitoring entitled reinforcement sensitivity on conflict monitoring. We showed evidence of differential variability of conflict monitoring intensity using the electroencephalogram (EEG), functional magnet resonance imaging (fMRI) and behavioral data. Our data suggest that individual differences of anxiety and reasoning ability are differentially related to the recruitment of proactive and reactive cognitive control (cf. Braver). Based on previous findings, the team of the Leue-Lab investigated new psychometric data on conflict monitoring and proactive-reactive cognitive control. Moreover, data of the Leue-Lab suggest the relevance of individual differences of conflict monitoring for the context of deception. In this respect, we plan new studies highlighting individual differences of the functioning of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC). Disentangling the role of individual differences in working memory-related cognitive demand, mental effort, and reinforcement-related processes opens new insights for cognitive-motivational approaches of information processing (Passcode to rewatch: 0R8v&m59).
Tapping the beat of four subdivisions: Neural entrainment, musical training and the binary advantage
The subdivision benefit refers to the positive effect of subdividing a beat on sensorimotor synchronization. We recorded electroencephalograms of musicians and non-musicians to study how they listened or finger-tapped to a beat, subdivided into four distinct subdivisions. Musicians showed more consistent tapping responses than non-musicians, and enhanced neural entrainment during the tapping task than in the listening task. In both groups, there was a neural enhancement of the beat frequency and its first harmonic (related to duplets) after listening to the four subdivisions. Furthermore, non-musicians tapped more consistently to the beat of duplets than other subdivisions. Altogether, this suggests a neural and behavioral advantage for binary subdivisions, that can be modulated with formal training in music.