Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Internal model

10 results

Newest first

A Feedback Mechanism in Generative Networks to Remove Visual Degradation

Bahareh Tolooshams, Yuelin Shi, Anima Anandkumar, Doris Tsao · COSYNE 2025

…posterior inference based on an internal model to construct representations that explain the stimulus. Indeed, there is support for this hypothesis in vision. Vision is not a passive process; rather, it actively recovers the features of an object from the signal cast on the retina. Even when faced with a cluttered scene of overlapping objects, the visual system quickly parses positional relationship

ePoster · Neuroscience

Understanding sensory-motor integration in the PIVC through ensemble analysis

Adam Charles, Lex Gomez, Noga Mudrik, Kathleen Cullen · COSYNE 2025

…inputs from the body with an internal model of expected movement. When these signals match, vestibular signals---which would otherwise stabilize the head against movements---are suppressed, allowing voluntary movement to occur. This mechanism implies that integrating proprioceptive and vestibular inputs is crucial for effective coordination. While previous studies indicate the involvement of multiple brain areas, with the PIVC at the forefront, the mechanisms

ePoster · Neuroscience

Building internal models during periods of rest and sleep

Helen Barron · Bernstein Conference 2024

Every day we make decisions critical for adaptation and survival. We repeat actions with known consequences. But we can also infer associations between loosely related events to infer and imagine the outcome of entirely novel choices. In the first part of the talk I will show that during successful inference, the mammalian brain uses a hippocampal prospective code to forecast temporally structured learned associations. Moreover, during periods of rest, co-activation of hippocampal cells in sharp-wave/ripples represent inferred relationships that include reward, thereby “joining-the-dots” betwe

ePoster · Behavioral Neuroscience

How cerebellar architecture facilitates rapid online learning

Adriana Perez Rotondo, Dhruva Raman, Timothy O'Leary · COSYNE 2022

The cerebellum is critically involved in motor control, refining trajectories as movements are being executed. This requires fast, online learning. What features of cerebellar circuit structure make it particularly suited to online learning? The cerebellum has a distinctive circuit architecture in which each mossy fibre input typically projects to 250 granule cells, a population that comprises more than half of the neurons in the brain. Each granule cell forms ~4 synapses with mossy fibres. The main hypotheses for this sparse input expansion are that it facilitates pattern separation1 and smoo

ePoster · Neuroscience

Neural optimal feedback control with local learning rules

Johannes Friedrich, Siavash Golkar, Shiva Farashahi et al. · COSYNE 2022

…stimuli and the predictions of an internal model using the Kalman filter or its extensions. However, a satisfactory neural model of Kalman filtering and control is lacking because existing proposals have the follo

ePoster · Computational Neuroscience

…develop and characterise a biological model system with layer 5 pyramidal cells in the centre. We aim to gain access to prediction and internal model generating processes by controlling, understanding or monitoring everything else: the sensory environment, feed-forward and feed-back inputs, integrative properties, their spiking activity and output. I’ll show recent work from the lab establishing such a model system both in term

Thu, Feb 24, 2022 · 15:00 UTC

Seminar · Neuroscience

Human voluntary action: from thought to movement

Patrick Haggard · Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London

The ability to decide and act autonomously is a distinctive feature of human cognition. From a motor neurophysiology viewpoint, these 'voluntary' actions can be distinguished by the lack of an obvious triggering sensory stimulus: the action is considered to be a product of thought, rather than a reflex result of a specific input. A reverse engineering approach shows that such actions are caused by neurons of the primary cortex, which in turn depend on medial frontal areas, and finally a combination of prefrontal cortical connections and subcortical drive from basal ganglia loops. One tradit

Mon, Nov 2, 2020 · 11:00 UTC

Seminar · Cognition