Topic: neuromodulators

Andrew Huberman explains how key neuromodulators shape motivation, energy, focus and mood, with science-supported behavioral, nutritional and supplement strategies.

To survive in the wild small rodents evolved specialized retinas. To escape predators, looming shadows need to be detected with speed and precision. To evade starvation, small seeds, grass, nuts and insects need to also be detected quickly. Some of these succulent seeds and insects may be camouflaged offering only low contrast targets.Moreover, these challenging tasks need to be accomplished continuously at dusk, night, dawn and daytime. Crossover inhibition is thought to be involved in enhancing contrast detectionin the microcircuits of the inner plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. The A

Neuromodulators control information processing in cortical microcircuits by regulating the cellular and synaptic physiology of neurons. Computational models and detailed simulations of neocortical microcircuitry offer a unifying framework to analyze the role of neuromodulators on network activity. In the present study, to get a deeper insight in the organization of the cortical neuropil for modeling purposes, we quantify the fiber length per cortical volume and the density of varicosities for catecholaminergic, serotonergic and cholinergic systems using immunocytochemical staining and stereolo

Spontaneous and sensory-evoked cortical activity is highly state-dependent, promoting the functional flexibility of cortical circuits underlying perception and cognition. Using neural recordings in combination with behavioral state monitoring, we find that arousal and motor activity have complementary roles in regulating local cortical operations, providing dynamic control of sensory encoding. These changes in encoding are linked to altered performance on perceptual tasks. Neuromodulators, such as acetylcholine, may regulate this state-dependent flexibility of cortical network function. We the

Behavioral states such as arousal and attention can have profound effects on sensory processing, determining how – sometimes whether – a stimulus is processed. This state-dependence is believed to arise, at least in part, as a result of inputs to cortex from subcortical structures that release neuromodulators such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and serotonin, often non-synaptically. The mechanisms that underlie the interaction between these “wireless” non-synaptic signals and the “wired” cortical circuit are not well understood. Furthermore, neuromodulatory signaling is traditionally conside

Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly through the development of artificial neural networks (ANNs), has significantly benefited from insights gained from neuroscience. This progress has enhanced the replication of complex cognitive tasks such as vision and natural language processing (1,2). However, ANNs still struggle with continual learning, adaptable knowledge transfer, robustness, and resource efficiency - capabilities that biological systems handle seamlessly (3–8). Neuromodulators, the chemical messengers that target neurons and synapses in specific brain regions,

Across species, neurons possess numerous ion channel types, with a single cell typically expressing tens of channel genes, which translate to hundreds or even thousands of channel protein types, each with different kinetics [1]. Moreover, maximal conductance densities across individuals are also highly variable and subject to neuromodulators which are essential for enabling the nervous system to switch between behaviorally relevant modes [2,3]. This raises the question of how neuromodulators can reliably induce changes in intrinsic neuronal properties across a heterogeneous population. At th