Clinical Pharmacology seminars

Sara Nowakowski and Helena Hachul examine the psychological and physiological mechanisms of sleep disturbance during menopause. The session considers vasomotor symptoms, declining estrogen and progesterone, altered melatonin secretion and changes in circadian timing, alongside mood, anxiety and psychosocial contributors. It evaluates non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches to sleep complaints, weighing potential benefits and risks. Fiona Baker moderates the two presentations and audience discussion.

Digital health technologies generate continuous real-world observations that complement traditional clinical endpoints. This discussion introduces their use throughout drug research, development and commercialization from a clinical pharmacology perspective. It considers how digital observations differ from conventional data, how clinical pharmacology methods help interpret them, common limitations and pitfalls, and their role in regulatory interactions. Examples examine the conversion of wearable and sensor measurements into validated outcomes and the resulting insights into disease and treatment response. The panel also discusses future directions and the potential advantages of adopting these technologies early. ASCPT members attend free. Nonmember registration remains pending until the US$55 fee is arranged by requesting an invoice from ASCPT. Registration closes 15 minutes before the webinar.

Basic research, technological advances and clinical observations can converge to produce major therapeutic breakthroughs. Examples from lung cancer, spinal muscular atrophy and hemophilia illustrate how curiosity-driven science contributed to medicines including osimertinib, risdiplam and emicizumab. The lecture follows discoveries across the decades between initial biological insights and effective treatments, examining the persistence, unexpected findings and collaboration across disciplines that made these advances possible. It considers how biological, clinical and technological research connect in the development of new medicines.

Guy Goodwin examines psychedelic pharmacology and its developing clinical applications, including the emerging profile of COMP360. The webinar considers unmet treatment needs in resistant depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and evolving models of care during psychedelic administration. It distinguishes administration with psychotherapy from administration without it and discusses how these approaches might translate research into clinical practice.

Pharmacokinetics in the eye is an important factor for the success of ocular drug delivery and treatment. Pharmacokinetic features determine the feasible routes of drug administration, dosing levels and intervals, and it has impact on eventual drug responses. Several physical, biochemical, and flow-related barriers limit drug exposure of anterior and posterior ocular target tissues during treatment during local (topical, subconjunctival, intravitreal) and systemic administration (intravenous, per oral). Mathematical models integrate joint impact of various barriers on ocular pharmacokinetics (PKs) thereby helping drug development. The models are useful in describing (top-down) and predicting (bottom-up) pharmacokinetics of ocular drugs. This is useful also in the design and development of new drug molecules and drug delivery systems. Furthermore, the models can be used for interspecies translation and probing of disease effects on pharmacokinetics. In this lecture, ocular pharmacokinetics and current modelling methods (noncompartmental analyses, compartmental, physiologically based, and finite element models) are introduced. Future challenges are also highlighted (e.g. intra-tissue distribution, prediction of drug responses, active transport).

Many psychoactive substances are used with the aim of altering experience, e.g. as analgesics, antidepressants or antipsychotics. These drugs act on specific receptor systems in the brain, including the opioid, serotonergic and dopaminergic systems. In this talk, I will summarise human drug studies targeting opioid receptors and their role for human experience, with focus on the experience of pain, stress, mood, and social connection. Opioids are only indicated for analgesia, due to their potential to cause addiction. When these regulations occurred, other known effects were relegated to side effects. This may be the cause of the prevalent myth that opioids are the most potent painkillers, despite evidence from head-to-head trials, Cochrane reviews and network meta-analyses that opioids are not superior to non-opioid analgesics in the treatment of acute or chronic non-cancer pain. However, due to the variability and diversity of opioid effects across contexts and experiences, some people under some circumstances may indeed benefit from prolonged treatment. I will present data on individual differences in opioid effects due to participant sex and stress induction. Understanding the effects of these commonly used medications on other aspects of the human experience is important to ensure correct use and to prevent unnecessary pain and addiction risk.

The use of molecular imaging, particularly PET and SPECT, has significantly transformed the treatment of schizophrenia with antipsychotic drugs since the late 1980s. It has offered insights into the links between drug target engagement, clinical effects, and side effects. A therapeutic window for receptor occupancy is established for antipsychotics, yet there is a divergence of opinions regarding the importance of blood levels, with many downplaying their significance. As a result, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a personalized therapy tool is often underrated. Since molecular imaging of antipsychotics has focused almost entirely on D2-like dopamine receptors and their potential to control positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive deficits are hardly or not at all investigated. Alternative methods have been introduced, i.e. to investigate the correlation between approximated receptor occupancies from blood levels and cognitive measures. Within the domain of antidepressants, and specifically regarding ketamine's efficacy in depression treatment, there is limited comprehension of the association between plasma concentrations and target engagement. The measurement of AMPA receptors in the human brain has added a new level of comprehension regarding ketamine's antidepressant effects. To ensure precise prescription of psychotropic drugs, it is vital to have a nuanced understanding of how molecular and clinical effects interact. Clinician scientists are assigned with the task of integrating these indispensable pharmacological insights into practice, thereby ensuring a rational and effective approach to the treatment of mental health disorders, signaling a new era of personalized drug therapy mechanisms that promote neuronal plasticity not only under pathological conditions, but also in the healthy aging brain.

Caroline Williams-Gray is a Principal Research Associate in the Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, and an honorary consultant neurologist specializing in Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. She leads a translational research group investigating the clinical and biological heterogeneity of PD, with the ultimate goal of developing more targeted therapies for different Parkinson’s subtypes. Her recent work has focused on the theory that the immune system plays a significant role in mediating the heterogeneity of PD and its progression. Her lab is investigating this using blood and CSF -based immune markers, PET neuroimaging and neuropathology in stratified PD cohorts; and she is leading the first randomized controlled trial repurposing a peripheral immunosuppressive drug (azathioprine) to slow the progression of PD.

Observational data have become a popular source of evidence for causal effects when no randomized controlled trial exists, or to supplement information provided by those. In practice, a wide range of designs and analytical choices exist, and one recent approach relies on the target trial emulation framework. This framework is particularly well suited to mimic what could be obtained in a specific randomized controlled trial, while avoiding time-related selection biases. In this abstract, we present how this framework could be useful to emulate trials in malignant melanoma, and the challenges faced when planning such a study using longitudinal observational data from a cohort study. More specifically, two questions are envisaged: duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and trials comparing treatment strategies for BRAF V600-mutant patients (targeted therapy as 1st line, followed by immunotherapy as 2nd line, vs. immunotherapy as 2nd line followed by targeted therapy as 1st line). Using data from 1027 participants to the MELBASE cohort, we detail the results for the emulation of a trial where immune checkpoint inhibitor would be stopped at 6 months vs. continued, in patients in response or with stable disease.

Chronic pain is a leading cause of morbidity, common to patients with gastrointestinal diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Most pain killers are largely ineffective against this type of pain or restricted for use in these patients due to gut related complications and risk of addition. A significant unmet clinical need therefore exists to develop novel non-opioid based visceral analgesics.

Development of new medications for mental health conditions is a pressing need given the high proportion of people not responding to available treatments. We hope that presenting ebselen to a wider audience will inspire further studies on this promising agent with a benign side-effects profile. Laboratory research, animal research and human studies suggest that ebselen shares many features with the mood stabilising drug lithium, creating a promise of a drug that would have a similar clinical effect but without lithium’s troublesome side-effect profile and toxicity. Both drugs have a common biological target, inositol monophosphatase, whose inhibition is thought key to lithium’s therapeutic effect. Both drugs have neuroprotective action and reduce oxidative stress. In animal studies, ebselen affected neurotransmitters involved in the development of mental health symptoms, and in particular, produced effects of serotonin function very similar to lithium. Both ebselen and lithium share behavioural effects: antidepressant-like effects in rodent models of depression and decrease in behavioural impulsivity, a property associated with lithium's anti-suicidal action. Human neuropsychological studies support an antidepressant profile for ebselen based on its positive impact on emotional processing and reward seeking. Our group currently is exploring ebselen’s effects in patients with mood disorders. A completed ‘add-on’ clinical trial in mania showed ebselen’s superiority over placebo after three weeks of treatment. Our ongoing experimental research explores ebselen’s antidepressant profile in patients with treatment resistant depression. If successful, this will lead to a clinical trial of ebselen as an antidepressant augmentation agent, similar to lithium.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that untreated mental disorders accountfor 13% of the total global burden of disease, and by 2030, depression alone will be the leadingcause of disability around the world – outpacing heart disease, cancer, and HIV. This grim pictureis further compounded by the mental health burden delivered by the coronavirus pandemic.The lack of novel treatment options in psychiatry is restricted by a limited understanding in theneuroscience basis of mental disorders, availability of relevant biomarkers, poor predictability inanimal models, and high failure rates in psychiatric drug development. However, theannouncement in 2019 from the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for approvals of newinterventions for treatment-resistant depression (intranasal esketamine) and postpartumdepression (i.v. brexanolone), demand critical attention. Novel public-private partnerships indrug discovery, new translational data on co-morbid biology, in particular the ascendance ofpsycho-immunology, have highlighted the arrival of a new frontier in biological psychiatryresearch for depressive disorders.

Daily caffeine consumption and chronic sleep restriction are highly prevalent in society. It is well established that acute caffeine intake under controlled conditions enhances vigilance and promotes wakefulness but can also delay sleep initiation and reduce electroencephalographic (EEG) markers of sleep intensity, particularly in susceptible individuals. To investigate whether these effects are also present during chronic consumption of coffee/caffeine, we recently conducted several complementary studies. We examined whether repeated coffee intake in dose and timing mimicking ‘real world’ habits maintains simple and complex attentional processes during chronic sleep restriction, such as during a busy work week. We found in genetically caffeine-sensitive individuals that regular coffee (300 mg caffeine/day) benefits most attentional tasks for 3-4 days when compared to decaffeinated coffee. Genetic variants were also used in the population-based HypnoLaus cohort, to investigate whether habitual caffeine consumption causally affects time to fall asleep, number of awakenings during sleep, and EEG-derived sleep intensity. The multi-level statistical analyses consistently showed that sleep quality was virtually unaffected when >3 caffeine-containing beverages/day were compared to 0-3 beverages/day. This conclusion was further corroborated by quantifying the sleep EEG in the laboratory in habitual caffeine consumers. Compared to placebo, daily intake of 3 x 150 mg caffeine over 10 days did not strongly impair nocturnal sleep nor subjective sleep quality in good sleepers. Finally, we tested whether an engineered delayed, pulsatile-release caffeine formula can improve the quality of morning awakening in sleep-restricted volunteers. We found that 160 mg caffeine taken at bedtime ameliorated the quality of awakening, increased positive and reduced negative affect scores, and promoted sustained attention immediately upon scheduled wake-up. Such an approach could prevent over-night caffeine withdrawal and provide a proactive strategy to attenuate disabling sleep inertia. Taken together, the studies suggest that common coffee/caffeine intake habits can transiently attenuate detrimental consequences of reduced sleep virtually without disturbing subjective and objective markers of sleep quality. Nevertheless, coffee/caffeine consumption cannot compensate for chronic sleep restriction.

Cluster headache is a brain disorder dominated clinically by dreadful episodes of excruciating pain with a circadian pattern and most often focused in bouts with circannual periodicity. As we have understood its neurobiology new therapies, including those directed at calcitonin gene-related peptide, are helpful improve the lives of sufferers.

Time and again we are faced with the question at what point in the treatment of schizophrenia a depot formulation should be used. The data on the so-called LAIs (Long-Acting Injectables) has steadily increased in recent years. Today, we have very good evidence for the early use of depot therapies. However, the willingness and consent of the patient for this form of pharmacotherapy remains central to the successful use of LAIs. In his lecture, Prof. Correll will talk about the current evidence for the use of LAIs summarizing the latest studies.

Large scale genetic studies and associated functional investigations have tremendously augmented our knowledge about the mechanisms underlying epileptic seizures, and sometimes also accompanying developmental problems. Pharmacotherapy of the epilepsies is routinely guided by trial and error, since predictors for a response to specific antiepileptic drugs are largely missing. The recent advances in the field of genetic epilepsies now offer an increasing amount of either well fitting established or new re-purposing therapies for genetic epilepsy syndromes based on understanding of the pathophysiological principles. Examples are provided by variants in ion channel or transporter encoding genes which cause a broad spectrum of epilepsy syndromes of variable severity and onset, (1) the ketogenic diet for glucose transporter defects of the blood-brain barrier, (2) Na+ channel blockers (e.g. carbamazepine) for gain-of-function Na+ channel mutations and avoidance of those drugs for loss-of-function mutations, and (3) specific K+ channel blockers for mutations with a gain-of-function defect in respective K+ channels. I will focus in my talk on the latter two including the underlying mechanisms, their relation to clinical phenotypes and possible therapeutic implications. In conclusion, genetic and mechanistic studies offer promising tools to predict therapeutic effects in rare epilepsies.

In this presentation I will describe how the CGRP project started and culminated in the development of gepants and mAbs for successful therapy. The outstanding question regarding the preponderance of female migraineurs also remains. I will present views on the reason behind this and suggest that understanding the hormonal influence will pave the way to alleviating hormone related migraine.