ePoster

CONCENTRIC AND ECCENTRIC KINEMATIC RECOVERY OF STROKE SURVIVORS AFTER A SINGLE TRAINING SESSION

Trinidad Brunaand 3 co-authors

Physiotherapy in Motion, Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, 46010, Valencia, Spain

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain
Board PS04-08PM-426

Presentation

Date TBA

Board: PS04-08PM-426

Poster preview

CONCENTRIC AND ECCENTRIC KINEMATIC RECOVERY OF STROKE SURVIVORS AFTER A SINGLE TRAINING SESSION poster preview

Event Information

Poster Board

PS04-08PM-426

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke impairs arm kinematic motor control. Recovery of kinematic properties (e.g., smoothness) is crucial for achieving true recovery and occurs mostly during the first 5 weeks after the stroke. It is unknown whether this recovery is possible in later stages.
Methods: 37 stroke survivors performed a 70-trial single-training session with the paretic shoulder flexo-extension movement following sinusoid patterns on a computer using a motion sensor. We evaluated the training effect in smoothness of movement via SPARC, comparing the change between the initial (block 1; B1) and final (block 7; B7) data within each group and differences between groups in the magnitude of change (B7-B1), at three stroke stages: Early subacute within the first month (ESA1, n=12), Early subacute within the third month (ESA3, n=12), and Chronic stage (CHR, n=13). Concentric and eccentric phases of the task were analyzed separately due to differences in movement control.
Results: The mean age of the sample was 63 (13.64) years. 43% were female. The sample characteristics were similar across groups. There were no changes in SPARC in the concentric phase during the training; ESA1:W=42,p>0.05; ESA3:W=49,p>0.05; CHR:W=39,p>0.05 (Fig.1A). For the eccentric, all groups improve their smoothness; ESA1:t=-2,38,p<0.05; ESA3: t=-2.53,p<0.05; CHR:t=-3.12,p<0.01 (Fig.1B). Considering the magnitude of change, all groups have similarly variations (concentric: F=0.146,p>0.05; eccentric: F=0.251,p>0.05).
Discussion: The recovery of kinematic control in the trained task is different depending on the control phase. Improvements in the eccentric phase were possible at all post-stroke stages. This could lead to a new training framework to improve kinematics.
Figure with two panels (A and B) showing boxplots of SPARC values for the three groups (ESA1, ESA3, and CHR), comparing Block 1 (initial) and Block 7 (final). Panel A “Sinusoid: concentric part” displays SPARC values during the concentric phase of movement. The vertical axis represents SPARC values ranging approximately from 0 to −10, with individual outliers shown below the main distributions. For the three groups, Block 1 and Block 7 show similar distributions and no indicated statistically significant differences. Panel B “Sinusoid: eccentric part” displays SPARC values during the eccentric phase. In this panel, Block 7 shows higher (less negative) SPARC values than Block 1 for ESA1, ESA3, and CHR groups. Statistical significance is indicated with brackets and asterisks beneath each condition (one asterisk for ESA1 and ESA3, two asterisks for CHR). . Note that for the SPARC variable, values close to 0 indicate smoother movement than more negative values.

Recommended posters

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.