Genetic Engineering seminars

Irene Rombel discusses how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address bottlenecks, quality issues, and production costs in cell, gene, and RNA therapy manufacturing. The seminar focuses on real-world process-development applications that improve reproducibility, speed, and cost effectiveness.

Jennifer Brophy presents two methods for programming when and where genes are expressed in plants and their associated microbes. One creates a chemical signal using the noncanonical amino acid O-methyl-L-tyrosine. Engineered Arabidopsis, tomato and poplar produce the signal, while engineered Bacillus subtilis and soil bacteria respond by activating gene expression. Restricting signal production to selected plant tissues allows local control of microbial activity. The second approach builds a genetic circuit that counts successive branching events in roots. It produces different expression patterns at different branch orders, helping researchers distinguish the contributions of roots that otherwise have similar molecular identities. Together, the approaches support experiments on plant development and the engineering of plant–microbe partnerships.

UC Berkeley Molecular & Cell Biology seminar (Divisions of Biochemistry, Biophysics & Structural Biology; Cell Biology, Development & Physiology; and Genetics, Genomics, Evolution & Development) by Luke Gilbert of UCSF on repurposing CRISPR systems to activate and silence genes.

David Baker presents recent advances in designing proteins for functions that natural evolution has not been required to solve. The approach begins with a desired structure or activity and uses deep learning to propose amino acid sequences expected to realise it. The resulting designs are translated into synthetic genes, produced as proteins and tested experimentally. The lecture connects computational design with laboratory characterisation, explaining how the combination can create new molecular functions relevant to medicine, technology and sustainability. Its focus is the construction and evaluation of proteins from scratch, extending the protein-design research recognised by the 2024 chemistry prize.

The development of the iPS cell technology has revolutionized our ability to study development and diseases in defined in vitro cell culture systems. The talk will focus on Rett Syndrome and discuss two topics: (i) the use of gene editing as an approach to therapy and (ii) the role of MECP2 in gene expression (i) The mutation of the X-linked MECP2 gene is causative for the disease. In a female patient, every cell has a wt copy that is, however, in 50% of the cells located on the inactive X chromosome. We have used epigenetic gene editing tools to activate the wt MECP2 allele on the inactive X chromosome. (ii) MECP2 is thought to act as repressor of gene expression. I will present data which show that MECP2 binds to Pol II and acts as an activator for thousands of genes. The target genes are significantly enriched for Autism related genes. Our data challenge the established model of MECP2’s role in gene expression and suggest novel therapeutic approaches.

SCN8A encodes a major voltage-gated sodium channel expressed in CNS and PNS neurons. Gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutations contribute to human disorders, most notably Developmental and Epileptic Encephalophy (DEE). More than 600 affected individuals have been reported, with the most common mechanism of de novo, gain-of-function mutations. We have developed constitutive and conditional models of gain- and loss- of function mutations in the mouse and characterized the effects of on neuronal firing and neurological phenotypes. Using CRE lines with cellular and developmental specificity, we have probed the effects of activating mutant alleles in various classes of neurons in the developing and adult mouse. Most recently, we are testing genetic therapies that reduce the expression of gain-of-function mutant alleles. We are comparing the effectiveness of allele specific oligos (ASOs), viral delivery of shRNAs, and allele-specific targeting of mutant alleles using Crispr/Cas9 in mouse models of DEE.

The cerebral cortex contains an extraordinary diversity of excitatory projection neuron (PN) and inhibitory interneurons (IN), wired together to form complex circuits. Spatiotemporally coordinated execution of intrinsic molecular programs by PNs and INs and activity-dependent processes, contribute to cortical development and cortical microcircuits formation. Alterations of these delicate processes have often been associated to neurological/neurodevelopmental disorders. However, despite the groundbreaking discovery that spontaneous activity in the embryonic brain can shape regional identities of distinct cortical territories, it is still unclear whether this early activity contributes to define subtype-specific neuronal fate as well as circuit assembly. In this study, we combined in utero genetic perturbations via CRISPR/Cas9 system and pharmacological inhibition of selected ion channels with RNA-sequencing and live imaging technologies to identify the activity-regulated processes controlling the development of different cortical PN classes, their wiring and the acquisition of subtype specific features. Moreover, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) form patients affected by a severe, rare and untreatable form of developmental epileptic encephalopathy. By differentiating cortical organoids form patient-derived iPSCs we create human models of early electrical alterations for studying molecular, structural and functional consequences of the genetic mutations during cortical development. Our ultimate goal is to define the activity-conditioned processes that physiologically occur during the development of cortical circuits, to identify novel therapeutical paths to address the pathological consequences of neonatal epilepsies.

My research uses electrophysiological techniques to evaluate normal retinal function, dysfunction caused by blinding retinal diseases and the restoration of function using a variety of therapeutic strategies. We can use our understanding or normal retinal function and disease-related changes to construct optimal therapeutic strategies and evaluate how they ameliorate the effects of disease. Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a family of blinding eye diseases caused by photoreceptor degeneration. The absence of the cells that for this primary signal leads to blindness. My interest in RP involves the evaluation of therapies to restore vision: replacing degenerated photoreceptors either with: (1) new stem or other embryonic cells, manipulated to become photoreceptors or (2) prosthetics devices that replace the photoreceptor signal with an electronic signal to light. Glaucoma is caused by increased intraocular pressure and leads to ganglion cell death, which eliminates the link between the retinal output and central visual processing. We are parsing out of the effects of increased intraocular pressure and aging on ganglion cells. Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) is a family of diseases in which signaling is eliminated between rod photoreceptors and their postsynaptic targets, rod bipolar cells. This deafferents the retinal circuit that is responsible for vision under dim lighting. My interest in CSNB involves understanding the basic interplay between excitation and inhibition in the retinal circuit and its normal development. Because of the targeted nature of this disease, we are hopeful that a gene therapy approach can be developed to restore night vision. My work utilizes rodent disease models whose mutations mimic those found in human patients. While molecular manipulation of rodents is a fairly common approach, we have recently developed a mutant NIH miniature swine model of a common form of autosomal dominant RP (Pro23His rhodopsin mutation) in collaboration with the National Swine Resource Research Center at University of Missouri. More genetically modified mini-swine models are in the pipeline to examine other retinal diseases.

Expression of Gi-coupled designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) on excitatory hippocampal neurons in the hippocampus represents a potential new therapeutic strategy for drug-resistant epilepsy. During my talk I will demonstrate that we obtained potent suppression of spontaneous epileptic seizures in mouse and a rat models for temporal lobe epilepsy using different DREADD ligands, up to one year after viral vector expression. The chemogenetic approach clearly outperforms the seizure-suppressing efficacy of currently existing anti-epileptic drugs. Besides the promises, I will also present some of the challenges associated with a potential chemogenetic therapy, including constitutive DREADD activity, tolerance effects, risk for toxicity, paradoxical excitatory effects in non-epileptic hippocampal tissue.

Dr. Looger will present updates on a variety of molecular tools for studying & manipulating neural circuits & other preparations. Topics include genetically encoded calcium indicators (including the new ultra-fast jGCaMP8 variants), neurotransmitter sensors (improved versions for following glutamate, GABA, acetylcholine, serotonin), optogenetic effectors including the new “enhanced Magnets” dimerizers, AAV serotypes for retrograde labeling & altered tropism, probes for correlative light-electron microscopy, chemical gene switches, etc. He will make all his slides freely available - so don’t worry about hurriedly taking notes; instead focus on questions and ideas for collaboration. Please bring your suggestions for molecular tools that would be transformative for the field.

Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. But what is the ethical thing to do? Should researchers be allowed or encouraged to self-experiment? Should institutions support or hinder them? Where do you think that this process of self-experimentation could take us? This presentation by Dr Matt Lennon and Professor Zoltan Molnar of the University of Oxford, will explore the history, future and ethics of self-experimentation. It will explore notable examples of self-experimenters including Isaac Newton, Angelo Ruffini and Oliver Sacks and how a number of these pivotal experiments created paradigm shifts in neuroscience. The presentation will open up a forum for all participants to be involved asking key ethical questions around what should and should not be allowed in self-experimentation research.