NeuroLeman Network

We all have a sense of time. Yet it is a particularly intangible sensation. So how is our “sense” of time represented in the brain? Functional neuroimaging studies have consistently identified a network of regions, including Supplementary Motor Area and basal ganglia, that are activated when participants make judgements about the duration of currently unfolding events. In parallel, left parietal cortex and cerebellum are activated when participants predict when future events are likely to occur. These structures are activated by temporal processing even when task goals are purely perceptual. So why should the perception of time be represented in regions of the brain that have more traditionally been implicated in motor function? One possibility is that we learn about time through action. In other words, action could provide the functional scaffolding for learning about time in childhood, explaining why it has come to be represented in motor circuits of the adult brain.

Early in development the nervous system is constructed with far too many neurons that make an excessive number of synaptic connections. Later, a wave of neuronal remodeling radically reshapes nervous system wiring and cell numbers through the selective elimination of excess synapses, axons and dendrites, and even whole neurons. This remodeling is widespread across the nervous system, extensive in terms of how much individual brain regions can change (e.g. in some cases 50% of neurons integrated into a brain circuit are eliminated), and thought to be essential for optimizing nervous system function. Perturbations of neuronal remodeling are thought to underlie devastating neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and epilepsy. This seminar will discuss our efforts to use the relatively simple nervous system of Drosophila to understand the mechanistic basis by which cells, or parts of cells, are specified for removal and eliminated from the nervous system.

Alterations in sleep are hallmarks of the ageing process and emerges as risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While the fine-tuned coalescence of sleep microstructure elements may influence age-related cognitive trajectories, its association with AD-related processes is not fully established. We investigated whether sleep arousals and the coupling of spindles and slow waves, key elements of sleep microstructure, are associated with early amyloid-beta (Aβ) brain burden, hallmark of AD neuropathology, and cognitive change at 2 years in 100 late-midlife healthy individuals. We first found that arousals interrupting sleep continuity were positively linked to Aβ burden, while, by contrast, the more prevalent arousals upholding sleep continuity were associated with lower Aβ burden and better cognition. We further found that young-like co-occurrence of spindles and slow-depolarisation slow waves is associated to lower burden of Aβ over the medial prefrontal cortex and is predictive of memory decline at 2-year follow-up. We provide empirical evidence that arousals are diverse and differently associated with early AD-related neuropathology and cognition. We further show the altered coupling of sleep microstructure elements that are key to its mnesic functions may contribute to poorer brain and cognitive trajectories. The presentation will end with preliminary data show that activity of the locus coeruleus, essential to sleep and showing some of the earliest signs of AD-related pathological processes, is associated with sleep quality. These preliminary findings are the first of a project ailed at link sleep and AD through the locus coeruleus.

n the ‘orthodox’ view, cognition has been seen as manipulation of symbolic, mental representations, separate from the body. This dualist Cartesian approach characterised much of twentieth-century thought and is still taken for granted by many people today. Language, too, has for a long time been treated across scientific domains as a system operating largely independently from perception, action, and the body (articulatory-perceptual organs notwithstanding). This could lead one into believing that to emulate linguistic behaviour, it would suffice to develop ‘software’ operating on abstract representations that would work on any computational machine. Yet the brain is not the sole problem-solving resource we have at our disposal. The disembodied picture is inaccurate for numerous reasons, which will be presented addressing the issue of the indissoluble link between cognition, language, body, and environment in understanding and learning. The talk will conclude with implications and suggestions for pedagogy, relevant for disciplines as diverse as instruction in language, mathematics, and sports.

Even if major depression is now the most common of psychiatric disorders, successful antidepressant treatments are still difficult to achieve. Therefore, a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of current antidepressant treatments is needed to ultimately identify new targets and enhance beneficial effects. Given the intimate relationships between astrocytes and neurons at synapses and the ability of astrocytes to "sense" neuronal communication and release gliotransmitters, an attractive hypothesis is emerging stating that the effects of antidepressants on brain function could be, at least in part, modulated by direct influences of astrocytes on neuronal networks. We will present two preclinical studies revealing a permissive role of glia in the antidepressant response: i) Control of the antidepressant-like effects of rat prefrontal cortex Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) by astroglia, ii) Modulation of antidepressant efficacy of Bright Light Stimulation (BLS) by lateral habenula astroglia. Therefore, it is proposed that an unaltered neuronal-glial system constitutes a major prerequisite to optimize antidepressant efficacy of DBS or BLS. Collectively, these results pave also the way to the development of safer and more effective antidepressant strategies.

Inter-individual variability refers to differences in the expression of behaviors between members of a population. For instance, some individuals take greater risks, are more attracted to immediate gains or are more susceptible to drugs of abuse than others. To probe the neural bases of inter-individual variability we study reward seeking and decision-making in mice, and dissect the specific role of dopamine in the modulation of these behaviors. Using a spatial version of the multi-armed bandit task, in which mice are faced with consecutive binary choices, we could link modifications of midbrain dopamine cell dynamics with modulation of exploratory behaviors, a major component of individual characteristics in mice. By analyzing mouse behaviors in semi-naturalistic environments, we then explored the role of social relationships in the shaping of dopamine activity and associated beahviors. I will present recent data from the laboratory suggesting that changes in the activity of dopaminergic networks link social influences with variations in the expression of non-social behaviors: by acting on the dopamine system, the social context may indeed affect the capacity of individuals to make decisions, as well as their vulnerability to drugs of abuse, in particular nicotine.

Language production is a form of behavior and as such involves executive control and the prefrontal function. The cognitive architecture of prefrontal executive function thus certainly plays an important role in shaping language production. In this talk, I will review the main features of the prefrontal executive function we have uncovered during the last two decades and I will discuss how these features may help understanding language production.

Neuronal plasticity has for a long time been considered important for the recovery from depression and for the antidepressant drug action, but how the drug action is translated to plasticity has remained unclear. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor TRKB are critical regulators of neuronal plasticity and have been implicated in the antidepressant action. We have recently found that many, if not all, different antidepressants, including serotonin selective SSRIs, tricyclic as well as fast-acting ketamine, directly bind to TRKB, thereby promoting TRKB translocation to synaptic membranes, which increases BDNF signaling. We have previously shown that antidepressant treatment induces a juvenile-like state of activity in the cortex that facilitates beneficial rewiring of abnormal networks. We recently showed that activation of TRKB receptors in parvalbumin-containing interneurons orchestrates cortical activation states and is both necessary and sufficient for the antidepressantinduced cortical plasticity. Our findings open a new framework how the action of antidepressants act: rather than regulating brain monoamine concentrations, antidepressants directly bind to TRKB and allosterically promote BDNF signaling, thereby inducing a state of plasticity that allows re-wiring of abnormal networks for better functionality.

The ability to effectively regulate emotions is a fundamental skill related to physical and psychological health. In this talk, I will present behavioral and fMRI data from several different studies that examined cognitive reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression emotion regulation strategies in healthy controls participants and in the context of randomized trials of cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness- based stress reduction, and aerobic exercise as interventions for adults with anxiety disorders. We will also examine the implementation of different types of functional connectivity analytic approaches to probe intervention-related brain mechanism changes.