Cognition seminars
March 2022
Implementing structure mapping as a prior in deep learning models for abstract reasoning
Shashank Shekhar· University of Guelph
Thu, Mar 3 · 04:00 UTC
Building conceptual abstractions from sensory information and then reasoning about them is central to human intelligence. Abstract reasoning both relies on, and is facilitated by, our ability to make analogies about concepts from known domains to novel domains. Structure Mapping Theory of human analogical reasoning posits that analogical mappings rely on (higher-order) relations and not on the sensory content of the domain. This enables humans to reason systematically about novel domains, a problem with which machine learning (ML) models tend to struggle. We introduce a two-stage neural net framework, which we label Neural Structure Mapping (NSM), to learn visual analogies from Raven's Progressive Matrices, an abstract visual reasoning test of fluid intelligence. Our framework uses (1) a multi-task visual relationship encoder to extract constituent concepts from raw visual input in the source domain, and (2) a neural module net analogy inference engine to reason compositionally about the inferred relation in the target domain. Our NSM approach (a) isolates the relational structure from the source domain with high accuracy, and (b) successfully utilizes this structure for analogical reasoning in the target domain.
The accumulation and storage of information in memory is a fundamental computation underlying animal behavior. In many brain regions and task paradigms, ranging from motor control to navigation to decision-making, such accumulation is accomplished through neural integrator circuits that enable external inputs to move a system’s population-wide patterns of neural activity along a continuous attractor. In the first portion of the talk, I will discuss our efforts to dissect the circuit mechanisms underlying a neural integrator from a rich array of anatomical, physiological, and perturbation experiments. In the second portion of the talk, I will show how the accumulation and storage of information in long-term memory may also be described by attractor dynamics, but now within the space of synaptic weights rather than neural activity. Altogether, this work suggests a conceptual unification of seemingly distinct short- and long-term memory processes.
Cross-modality imaging of the neural systems that support executive functions
Yaara Erez· Affiliate MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge
Tue, Mar 1 · 15:00 UTC
Executive functions refer to a collection of mental processes such as attention, planning and problem solving, supported by a frontoparietal distributed brain network. These functions are essential for everyday life. Specifically in the context of patients with brain tumours there is a need to preserve them in order to enable good quality of life for patients. During surgeries for the removal of a brain tumour, the aim is to remove as much as possible of the tumour and at the same time prevent damage to the areas around it to preserve function and enable good quality of life for patients. In many cases, functional mapping is conducted during an awake surgery in order to identify areas critical for certain functions and avoid their surgical resection. While mapping is routinely done for functions such as movement and language, mapping executive functions is more challenging. Despite growing recognition in the importance of these functions for patient well-being in recent years, only a handful of studies addressed their intraoperative mapping. In the talk, I will present our new approach for mapping executive function areas using electrocorticography during awake brain surgery. These results will be complemented by neuroimaging data from healthy volunteers, directed at reliably localizing executive function regions in individuals using fMRI. I will also discuss more broadly challenges ofß using neuroimaging for neurosurgical applications. We aim to advance cross-modality neuroimaging of cognitive function which is pivotal to patient-tailored surgical interventions, and will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes.
Dynamic structural neuroplasticity in the bilingual brain
Christos Pliatsikas· University of Reading, UK
Tue, Mar 1 · 12:15 UTC
Research on the effects of bilingualism on the structure of the brain has so far yielded variable patterns. Although it cannot be disputed that learning and using additional languages restructures the brain, the reported effects vary considerably, including both increases and reductions in grey matter volume and white matter diffusivity. This presentation reviews the available evidence and compares it to patterns from other domains of skill acquisition, culminating in the Dynamic Restructuring Model, a theory which synthesises the available evidence from the perspective of experience-based neuroplasticity. New corroborating evidence is also presented from healthy young and older bilinguals, and the presentation concludes with the implications of these effects for the ageing brain.
February 2022
Social learning about rewards. How do rodents learn about the world from their peers?
Ewelina Knapska· Nencki Institute, Warsaw, Poland
Mon, Feb 28 · 11:00 UTC
How does the brain analyse sensory information and learns from it?
Sonja Hofer· Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour
Thu, Feb 24 · 15:00 UTC · Online
Introducing exciting methods that enable neuroscientists to look deep into the living brain, allowing us to study how the brain's neural networks learn and process sensory information.
What is Cognitive Neuropsychology Good For? An Unauthorized Biography
Alfonso Caramazza· Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, Harvard University, USA; Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Italy
Wed, Feb 23 · 15:00 UTC
Abstract: There is no doubt that the study of brain damaged individuals has contributed greatly to our understanding of the mind/brain. Within this broad approach, cognitive neuropsychology accentuates the cognitive dimension: it investigates the structure and organization of perceptual, motor, cognitive, and language systems – prerequisites for understanding the functional organization of the brain – through the analysis of their dysfunction following brain damage. Significant insights have come specifically from this paradigm. But progress has been slow and enthusiasm for this approach has waned somewhat in recent years, and the use of existing findings to constrain new theories has also waned. What explains the current diminished status of cognitive neuropsychology? One reason may be failure to calibrate expectations about the effective contribution of different subfields of the study of the mind/brain as these are determined by their natural peculiarities – such factors as the types of available observations and their complexity, opportunity of access to such observations, the possibility of controlled experimentation, and the like. Here, I also explore the merits and limitations of cognitive neuropsychology, with particular focus on the role of intellectual, pragmatic, and societal factors that determine scientific practice within the broader domains of cognitive science/neuroscience. I conclude on an optimistic note about the continuing unique importance of cognitive neuropsychology: although limited to the study of experiments of nature, it offers a privileged window into significant aspects of the mind/brain that are not easily accessible through other approaches. Biography: Alfonso Caramazza's research has focussed extensively on how words and their meanings are represented in the brain. His early pioneering studies helped to reformulate our thinking about Broca's aphasia (not limited to production) and formalised the logic of patient-based neuropsychology. More recently he has been instrumental in reconsidering popular claims about embodied cognition.
The Role of Cerebrovascular Pathology in Aging and Neurodegenerative Disease Populations
Mahsa Dadar· Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada
Wed, Feb 23 · 10:00 UTC
Late-life cognitive impairment and dementia are heterogeneous and multifactorial conditions driven by a combination of genetic, vascular, and lifestyle-related factors. More than 75% of patients with dementia have evidence of cerebrovascular pathology at autopsy. Cerebrovascular disease lesions can be detected on structural MRI and used as biomarkers to determine the extent of cerebrovascular pathology. These biomarkers are associated with cognitive difficulties and increase the risk of dementia for the same level of neurodegenerative pathology. Given that some of the risk factors for cerebrovascular disease are potentially modifiable, identifying the role of cerebrovascular pathology in aging and neurodegenerative disease populations opens a window for prevention of cognitive decline and dementia.
Neurocognitive mechanisms of enhanced implicit temporal processing in action video game players
Francois R. Foerster· Giersch Lab, INSERM U1114
Wed, Feb 23 · 04:00 UTC
Playing action video games involves both explicit (conscious) and implicit (non-conscious) expectations of timed events, such as the appearance of foes. While studies revealed that explicit attention skills are improved in action video game players (VGPs), their implicit skills remained untested. To this end, we investigated explicit and implicit temporal processing in VGPs and non-VGPs (control participants). In our variable foreperiod task, participants were immersed in a virtual reality and instructed to respond to a visual target appearing at variable delays after a cue. I will present behavioral, oculomotor and EEG data and discuss possible markers of the implicit passage of time and explicit temporal attention processing. All evidence indicates that VGPs have enhanced implicit skills to track the passage of time, which does not require conscious attention. Thus, action video game play may improve a temporal processing found altered in psychopathologies, such as schizophrenia. Could digital (game-based) interventions help remediate temporal processing deficits in psychiatric populations?
Dynamic dopaminergic signaling probabilistically controls the timing of self-timed movements
Allison Hamilos· Assad Lab, Harvard University
Wed, Feb 23 · 04:00 UTC
Human movement disorders and pharmacological studies have long suggested molecular dopamine modulates the pace of the internal clock. But how does the endogenous dopaminergic system influence the timing of our movements? We examined the relationship between dopaminergic signaling and the timing of reward-related, self-timed movements in mice. Animals were trained to initiate licking after a self-timed interval following a start cue; reward was delivered if the animal’s first lick fell within a rewarded window (3.3-7 s). The first-lick timing distributions exhibited the scalar property, and we leveraged the considerable variability in these distributions to determine how the activity of the dopaminergic system related to the animals’ timing. Surprisingly, dopaminergic signals ramped-up over seconds between the start-timing cue and the self-timed movement, with variable dynamics that predicted the movement/reward time, even on single trials. Steeply rising signals preceded early initiation, whereas slowly rising signals preceded later initiation. Higher baseline signals also predicted earlier self-timed movement. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons during self-timing did not trigger immediate movements, but rather caused systematic early-shifting of the timing distribution, whereas inhibition caused late-shifting, as if dopaminergic manipulation modulated the moment-to-moment probability of unleashing the planned movement. Consistent with this view, the dynamics of the endogenous dopaminergic signals quantitatively predicted the moment-by-moment probability of movement initiation. We conclude that ramping dopaminergic signals, potentially encoding dynamic reward expectation, probabilistically modulate the moment-by-moment decision of when to move. (Based on work from Hamilos et al., eLife, 2021).
Do heart rate oscillations enhance function of emotion networks in the brain
Mara Mather· USC Davis School of Gerontology
Tue, Feb 22 · 17:00 UTC
Keeping visual cortex in the back of your mind: From visual inputs to behavior and memory
Sharon Gilaie-Dotan· Bar Ilan University
Tue, Feb 22 · 16:00 UTC
Attention to visual motion: shaping sensation into perception
Stefan Treue· German Primate Center - Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, Germany
Mon, Feb 21 · 15:00 UTC
Evolution has endowed primates, including humans, with a powerful visual system, seemingly providing us with a detailed perception of our surroundings. But in reality the underlying process is one of active filtering, enhancement and reshaping. For visual motion perception, the dorsal pathway in primate visual cortex and in particular area MT/V5 is considered to be of critical importance. Combining physiological and psychophysical approaches we have used the processing and perception of visual motion and area MT/V5 as a model for the interaction of sensory (bottom-up) signals with cognitive (top-down) modulatory influences that characterizes visual perception. Our findings document how this interaction enables visual cortex to actively generate a neural representation of the environment that combines the high-performance sensory periphery with selective modulatory influences for producing an “integrated saliency map’ of the environment.
Vision ScienceNeuroscience
Rhythms in perception: action planning and behavioral oscillations
Maria Concetta Morrone· University of Pisa - Italy
Thu, Feb 17 · 16:00 UTC
Towards a recipe for physical reasoning in humans and machines
Kelsey Allen· DeepMind
Wed, Feb 16 · 13:00 UTC
Reasoning Ability: Neural Mechanisms, Development, and Plasticity
Silvia A. Bunge, PhD· Professor, Department of Psychology & Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Un ...
Wed, Feb 16 · 10:00 UTC
Relational thinking, or the process of identifying and integrating relations between mental representations, is regularly invoked during reasoning. This mental capacity enables us to draw higher-order abstractions and generalize across situations and contexts, and we have argued that it should be included in the pantheon of executive functions. In this talk, I will briefly review our lab's work characterizing the roles of lateral prefrontal and parietal regions in relational thinking. I will then discuss structural and functional predictors of individual differences and developmental changes in reasoning.
Modeling Visual Attention in Neuroscience, Psychology, and Machine Learning
Grace Lindsay· University College London
Tue, Feb 15 · 22:00 UTC
Free will beyond spontaneous volition: Conscious control processes of inhibition and attention in self-control and free will
Timothy Bayne/Polaris Koi/Jake Gavenas· Monash University/University of Turku/Chapman University
Tue, Feb 15 · 02:00 UTC
Polaris Koi (Philosophy) and Jake Gavenas (Neuroscience) begin the seminar by arguing that agentive control is the key requirement for free will, drawing on folk-philosophy findings to support this claim (Gavenas et al., in prep). They explore how two executive control processes that functionally involve consciousness—inhibition and top-down control of attention—connect self-control and free will.
Electrophysiological investigations of natural speech and language processing
Edmund Lalor· University of Rochester, USA
Mon, Feb 14 · 13:00 UTC
Acting on our instincts: understanding emotional decision-making
Cornelius Gross· Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Rome, Italy
Mon, Feb 14 · 12:15 UTC