It has long been established that the hippocampus plays a crucial role for episodic memory. As opposed to the modular approach, now it is generally assumed that being a complex structure, the HC performs multiplex interconnected functions, whose hierarchical organization provides basis for the higher cognitive functions such as semantics-based encoding and retrieval. However, the «where, when and how» properties of distinct memory aspects within and outside the HC are still under debate. Here we used a visual associative memory task as a probe to test the hypothesis about the differential involvement of the rostral and caudal portions of the human hippocampus in memory encoding, recognition and associative recall. In epilepsy patients implanted with stereo-EEG, we show that at retrieval the rostral HC is selectively active for recognition memory, whereas the caudal HC is selectively active for the associative memory. Low frequency desynchronization and high frequency synchronization characterize the temporal dynamic in encoding and retrieval. Therefore, we describe here anatomical segregation in the hippocampal contributions to associative and recognition memory.

Visual knowledge obtained from our lifelong experience of the world plays a critical role in our ability to build short-term memories. We propose a mechanistic explanation of how working memory (WM) representations are built from the latent representations of visual knowledge and can then be reconstructed. The proposed model, Memory for Latent Representations (MLR), features a variational autoencoder with an architecture that corresponds broadly to the human visual system and an activation-based binding pool of neurons that binds items’ attributes to tokenized representations. The simulation results revealed that shape information for stimuli that the model was trained on, can be encoded and retrieved efficiently from latents in higher levels of the visual hierarchy. On the other hand, novel patterns that are completely outside the training set can be stored from a single exposure using only latents from early layers of the visual system. Moreover, the representation of a given stimulus can have multiple codes, representing specific visual features such as shape or color, in addition to categorical information. Finally, we validated our model by testing a series of predictions against behavioral results acquired from WM tasks. The model provides a compelling demonstration of visual knowledge yielding the formation of compact visual representation for efficient memory encoding.

There is a surprising consistency in the images we remember and forget – across observers, certain images are intrinsically more memorable than others in spite of our diverse individual experiences. The perception of images at different memorability levels also results in stereotyped patterns in visual and mnemonic regions in the brain, regardless of an individual’s actual memory for that item. In this talk, Dr. Bainbridge will discuss our current neuroscientific understanding of how memorability is represented in patterns in the brain, potentially serving as a signal for how stimulus information is prioritized for eventual memory encoding.