Our group is looking for a curious and motivated PhD student for a project aiming to understand the mechanisms regulating the function of neuronal circuits controlling stress. Neuronal circuits eliciting stress responses evolved to help animals to cope with adverse environmental conditions. Responses to mild short-term stress are beneficial, since adverse physical and psychological events activate adaptive reactions essential for survival, such as avoidance of potential threats. The same circuits, when not functioning properly, can also induce emergence of maladaptive behaviors. In humans, dysregulation of stress circuits leads to several debilitating psychiatric conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, and occupational burnout. Therefore, investigating the neuronal substrate of stress is not only a fascinating endeavor to understand the basic functioning of neuromodulatory circuits, but it is also important for developing better treatments for psychiatric diseases. We are exploiting the small size and translucency of the zebrafish central nervous system to study in vivo dynamic interactions between neurons involved in regulating stress. The work in our group aims to link basic circuit neuroscience to pathology by focusing on the following questions: • How do discrete neuronal circuits modulate stress-related behavior? • How does stress lead to adaptive changes modulating brain activity and behavior? • What are the cellular, synaptic, and circuit alterations leading to maladaptive responses to stress? We use a range of techniques in zebrafish genetics, molecular biology, advanced microscopy, and behavioral analysis. For more information and for applying follow this link:https://www.mdc-berlin.de/career/jobs/phd-student-0

The MSc in Computational Cognitive Neuroscience at Goldsmiths, University of London is designed for students with a good degree in the biological/life sciences (psychology, neuroscience, biology, medicine, etc.) or physical sciences (computer science, mathematics, physics, engineering). The course provides a solid theoretical basis and experimental techniques in computational cognitive neuroscience. It includes the opportunity to apply knowledge in a practical research project, potentially in collaboration with industry partners. The programme covers fundamentals of cognitive neuroscience, computational modelling of biological neurons, neuronal circuits, higher brain functions, and includes the study of biologically constrained models of cognitive processes.

The nervous system orchestrates adaptive behaviors by intricately coordinating responses to internal cues and environmental stimuli. This involves integrating sensory input, managing competing motivational states, and drawing on past experiences to anticipate future outcomes. While traditional models attribute this complexity to interactions between the mesocorticolimbic system and hypothalamic centers, the specific nodes of integration have remained elusive. Recent research, including our own, sheds light on the midline thalamus's overlooked role in this process. We propose that the midline thalamus integrates internal states with memory and emotional signals to guide adaptive behaviors. Our investigations into midline thalamic neuronal circuits have provided crucial insights into the neural mechanisms behind flexibility and adaptability. Understanding these processes is essential for deciphering human behavior and conditions marked by impaired motivation and emotional processing. Our research aims to contribute to this understanding, paving the way for targeted interventions and therapies to address such impairments.

We build upon and expand the efficient coding and predictive information models of neurons, presenting a novel perspective that neurons not only predict but also actively influence their future inputs through their outputs. We introduce the concept of neurons as feedback controllers of their environments, a role traditionally considered computationally demanding, particularly when the dynamical system characterizing the environment is unknown. By harnessing a novel data-driven control framework, we illustrate the feasibility of biological neurons functioning as effective feedback controllers. This innovative approach enables us to coherently explain various experimental findings that previously seemed unrelated. Our research has profound implications, potentially revolutionizing the modeling of neuronal circuits and paving the way for the creation of alternative, biologically inspired artificial neural networks.

To effectively move in complex and changing environments, animals must control locomotor speed and gait, while precisely coordinating and adapting limb movements to the terrain. The underlying neuronal control is facilitated by circuits in the spinal cord, which integrate supraspinal commands and afferent feedback signals to produce coordinated rhythmic muscle activations necessary for stable locomotion. I will present a series of computational models investigating dynamics of central neuronal interactions as well as a neuromechanical model that integrates neuronal circuits with a model of the musculoskeletal system. These models closely reproduce speed-dependent gait expression and experimentally observed changes following manipulation of multiple classes of genetically-identified neuronal populations. I will discuss the utility of these models in providing experimentally testable predictions for future studies.

Repetitive spatiotemporal patterns in resting-state brain activities have been widely observed in various species and regions, such as rat and cat visual cortices. Since they resemble the preceding brain activities during tasks, they are assumed to reflect past experiences embedded in neuronal circuits. Moreover, spatiotemporal patterns involving whole-brain activities may also reflect a process that integrates information distributed over the entire brain, such as motor and visual information. Therefore, revealing such patterns may elucidate how the information is integrated to generate consciousness. In this talk, I will introduce our proposed method to estimate repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state brain activity data and show the spatiotemporal patterns estimated from human resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) data. Our analyses suggest that the patterns involved whole-brain propagating activities that reflected a process to integrate the information distributed over frequencies and networks. I will also introduce our current attempt to reveal signal flows and their roles in the spatiotemporal patterns using a big dataset. - Takeda et al., Estimating repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state brain activity data. NeuroImage (2016); 133:251-65. - Takeda et al., Whole-brain propagating patterns in human resting-state brain activities. NeuroImage (2021); 245:118711.

During development, the complex neuronal circuitry of the brain arises from limited information contained in the genome. After the genetic code instructs the birth of neurons, the emergence of brain regions, and the formation of axon tracts, it is believed that neuronal activity plays a critical role in shaping circuits for behavior. Current AI technologies are modeled after the same principle: connections in an initial weight matrix are pruned and strengthened by activity-dependent signals until the network can sufficiently generalize a set of inputs into outputs. Here, we challenge these learning-dominated assumptions by quantifying the contribution of neuronal activity to the development of visually guided swimming behavior in larval zebrafish. Intriguingly, dark-rearing zebrafish revealed that visual experience has no effect on the emergence of the optomotor response (OMR). We then raised animals under conditions where neuronal activity was pharmacologically silenced from organogenesis onward using the sodium-channel blocker tricaine. Strikingly, after washout of the anesthetic, animals performed swim bouts and responded to visual stimuli with 75% accuracy in the OMR paradigm. After shorter periods of silenced activity OMR performance stayed above 90% accuracy, calling into question the importance and impact of classical critical periods for visual development. Detailed quantification of the emergence of functional circuit properties by brain-wide imaging experiments confirmed that neuronal circuits came ‘online’ fully tuned and without the requirement for activity-dependent plasticity. Thus, contrary to what you learned on your mother's knee, complex sensory guided behaviors can be wired up innately by activity-independent developmental mechanisms.

A long standing challenge in biological and artificial intelligence is to understand how new knowledge can be constructed from known building blocks in a way that is amenable for computation by neuronal circuits. Here we focus on the task of storage and recall of structured knowledge in long-term memory. Specifically, we ask how recurrent neuronal networks can store and retrieve multiple knowledge structures. We model each structure as a set of binary relations between events and attributes (attributes may represent e.g., temporal order, spatial location, role in semantic structure), and map each structure to a distributed neuronal activity pattern using a vector symbolic architecture (VSA) scheme. We then use associative memory plasticity rules to store the binarized patterns as fixed points in a recurrent network. By a combination of signal-to-noise analysis and numerical simulations, we demonstrate that our model allows for efficient storage of these knowledge structures, such that the memorized structures as well as their individual building blocks (e.g., events and attributes) can be subsequently retrieved from partial retrieving cues. We show that long-term memory of structured knowledge relies on a new principle of computation beyond the memory basins. Finally, we show that our model can be extended to store sequences of memories as single attractors.

A central goal in neuroscience is to understand how orchestrated computations in the brain arise from the properties of single neurons and networks of such neurons. Answering this question requires theoretical advances that shine light into the ‘black box’ of representations in neural circuits. In this talk, we will demonstrate theoretical approaches that help describe how cognitive and behavioral task implementations emerge from the structure in neural populations and from biologically plausible neural networks. First, we will introduce an analytic theory that connects geometric structures that arise from neural responses (i.e., neural manifolds) to the neural population’s efficiency in implementing a task. In particular, this theory describes a perceptron’s capacity for linearly classifying object categories based on the underlying neural manifolds’ structural properties. Next, we will describe how such methods can, in fact, open the ‘black box’ of distributed neuronal circuits in a range of experimental neural datasets. In particular, our method overcomes the limitations of traditional dimensionality reduction techniques, as it operates directly on the high-dimensional representations, rather than relying on low-dimensionality assumptions for visualization. Furthermore, this method allows for simultaneous multi-level analysis, by measuring geometric properties in neural population data, and estimating the amount of task information embedded in the same population. These geometric frameworks are general and can be used across different brain areas and task modalities, as demonstrated in the work of ours and others, ranging from the visual cortex to parietal cortex to hippocampus, and from calcium imaging to electrophysiology to fMRI datasets. Finally, we will discuss our recent efforts to fully extend this multi-level description of neural populations, by (1) investigating how single neuron properties shape the representation geometry in early sensory areas, and by (2) understanding how task-efficient neural manifolds emerge in biologically-constrained neural networks. By extending our mathematical toolkit for analyzing representations underlying complex neuronal networks, we hope to contribute to the long-term challenge of understanding the neuronal basis of tasks and behaviors.

The David Smith Lectures in Anatomical Neuropharmacology, Part of the 'Pharmacology, Anatomical Neuropharmacology and Drug Discovery Seminars Series', Department of Pharmacology, University of Oxford. The 15th David Smith Award Lecture in Anatomical Neuropharmacology will be delivered by Professor Tim Bliss, Visiting Professor at UCL and the Frontier Institutes of Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, and is hosted by Professor Nigel Emptage. This award lecture was set up to celebrate the vision of Professor A David Smith, namely, that explanations of the action of drugs on the brain requires the definition of neuronal circuits, the location and interactions of molecules. Tim Bliss gained his PhD at McGill University in Canada. He joined the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London in 1967, where he remained throughout his career. His work with Terje Lømo in the late 1960’s established the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP) as the dominant synaptic model of how the mammalian brain stores memories. He was elected as a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1994 and is a founding fellow of the Academy of Medical Sciences. He shared the Bristol Myers Squibb award for Neuroscience with Eric Kandel in 1991, the Ipsen Prize for Neural Plasticity with Richard Morris and Yadin Dudai in 2013. In May 2012 he gave the annual Croonian Lecture at the Royal Society on ‘The Mechanics of Memory’. In 2016 Tim, with Graham Collingridge and Richard Morris shared the Brain Prize, one of the world's most coveted science prizes. Abstract: In 1966 there appeared in Acta Physiologica Scandinavica an abstract of a talk given by Terje Lømo, a PhD student in Per Andersen’s laboratory at the University of Oslo. In it Lømo described the long-lasting potentiation of synaptic responses in the dentate gyrus of the anaesthetised rabbit that followed repeated episodes of 10-20Hz stimulation of the perforant path. Thus, heralded and almost entirely unnoticed, one of the most consequential discoveries of 20th century neuroscience was ushered into the world. Two years later I arrived in Oslo as a visiting post-doc from the National Institute for Medical Research in Mill Hill, London. In this talk I recall the events that led us to embark on a systematic reinvestigation of the phenomenon now known as long-term potentiation (LTP) and will then go on to describe the discoveries and controversies that enlivened the early decades of research into synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. I will end with an observer’s view of the current state of research in the field, and what we might expect from it in the future.

In sexually reproducing species, males and females respond to environmental sensory cues and transform the input into sexually dimorphic traits. Yet, how sexually dimorphic behavior is encoded in the nervous system is poorly understood. We characterize the sexually dimorphic nociceptive behavior in C. elegans – hermaphrodites present a lower pain threshold than males in response to aversive stimuli, and study the underlying neuronal circuits, which are composed of the same neurons that are wired differently. By imaging receptor expression, calcium responses and glutamate secretion, we show that sensory transduction is similar in the two sexes, and therefore explore how downstream network topology shapes dimorphic behavior. We generated a computational model that replicates the observed dimorphic behavior, and used this model to predict simple network rewirings that would switch the behavior between the sexes. We then showed experimentally, using genetic manipulations, artificial gap junctions, automated tracking and optogenetics, that these subtle changes to male connectivity result in hermaphrodite-like aversive behavior in-vivo, while hermaphrodite behavior was more robust to perturbations. Strikingly, when presented with aversive cues, rewired males were compromised in finding mating partners, suggesting that the network topology that enables efficient avoidance of noxious cues would have a reproductive "cost". To summarize, we present a deconstruction of a sex-shared neural circuit that affects sexual behavior, and how to reprogram it. More broadly, our results are an example of how common neuronal circuits changed their function during evolution by subtle topological rewirings to account for different environmental and sexual needs.

Resonance is defined as a maximal amplification of the response of a system to periodic inputs in a limited, intermediate input frequency band. Resonance may serve to optimize inter-neuronal communication, and has been observed at multiple levels of neuronal organization including membrane potential fluctuations, single neuron spiking, postsynaptic potentials, and neuronal networks. However, it is unknown how resonance observed at one level of neuronal organization (e.g., network) depends on the properties of the constituting building blocks, and whether, and if yes how, it affects the resonant and oscillatory properties upstream. One difficulty is the absence of a conceptual framework that facilitates the interrogation of resonant neuronal circuits and organizes the mechanistic investigation of network resonance in terms of the circuit components, across levels of organization. We address these issues by discussing a number of representative case studies. The dynamic mechanisms responsible for the generation of resonance involve disparate processes, including negative feedback effects, history-dependence, spiking discretization combined with subthreshold passive dynamics, combinations of these, and resonance inheritance from lower levels of organization. The band-pass filters associated with the observed resonances are generated by primarily nonlinear interactions of low- and high-pass filters. We identify these filters (and interactions) and we argue that these are the constitutive building blocks of a resonance framework. Finally, we discuss alternative frameworks and we show that different types of models (e.g., spiking neural networks and rate models) can show the same type of resonance by qualitative different mechanisms.

Almost everybody that has seen neurons under a microscope for the first time is fascinated by their beauty and their complex shape. Early on during development, however, there are hardly any signs of their future complexity, but the neurons look round and simple. How do neurons develop their sophisticated structure? How do they initially generate domains that later have distinct function within neuronal circuits, such as the axon? And, can a better understanding of the underlying developmental mechanisms help us in pathological conditions, such as a spinal cord injury, to induce axons to regenerate? Here, I will talk about the cytoskeleton as a driving force for neuronal polarization. We will then explore how cytoskeletal changes help to reactivate the growth program of injured CNS axons to elicit axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury. Finally, we will discuss whether axon growth and synapse formation may be processes in neurons that might exclude each other. Following this developmental hypothesis, it will help us to generate a novel perspective on regeneration failure in the adult CNS, and how we can overcome this failure to induce axon regeneration. Thus, this talk will describe how we can exploit developmental mechanisms to induce axon regeneration after a spinal cord injury.

We use the olfactory system and forebrain of (adult) zebrafish as a model to analyze how relevant information is extracted from sensory inputs, how information is stored in memory circuits, and how sensory inputs inform behavior. A series of recent findings provides evidence that inhibition has not only homeostatic functions in neuronal circuits but makes highly specific, instructive contributions to behaviorally relevant computations in different brain regions. These observations imply that the connectivity among excitatory and inhibitory neurons exhibits essential higher-order structure that cannot be determined without dense network reconstructions. To analyze such connectivity we developed an approach referred to as “dynamical connectomics” that combines 2-photon calcium imaging of neuronal population activity with EM-based dense neuronal circuit reconstruction. In the olfactory bulb, this approach identified specific connectivity among co-tuned cohorts of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that can account for the decorrelation and normalization (“whitening”) of odor representations in this brain region. These results provide a mechanistic explanation for a fundamental neural computation that strictly requires specific network connectivity.

Cerebral infection by the larvae of the cestode, Taenia solium (neurocysticercosis), is thought to be the leading cause of adult-acquired epilepsy worldwide. Despite this, little is known about the cellular mechanisms that underlie seizure development in this condition. In this talk I will present our recent data exploring multiple interactions between cestode larvae, neuroinflammatory processes and network excitability. We find that viable cestode larvae are able to strongly suppress microglial activation and inflammatory cytokine release with consequences for the modulation host neuroinflammatory responses and seizure development in vivo. At the same time, larvae produce and release glutamate, with acute excitatory effects on neuronal circuits. We hope that an improved understanding of epileptogenic mechanisms in neurocysticercosis will one day improve the management of this condition as well as other inflammatory causes of epilepsy.

The last decade in the field of neuroscience has been marked by intense debate on the meaning of the term fear. Whereas some have argued that fear (as well as other emotions) relies on cognitive capacities that are unique to humans, others view it as a negative state constructed from essential building blocks. This latter definition posits that fear states are associated with varying readouts that one could consider to be parallel processes or serial events tied to a specific hierarchy. Within this framework, innate defensive behaviors are considered to be common displays of fear states that lie under the control of hard-wired brain circuits. As a general rule, these defensive behaviors can be classified as either reactive or cognitive based on a thread imminence continuum. However, while evidence of the neuronal circuits that lead to these divergent behavioral strategies has accrued over the last decades, most literature has considered these responses in isolation. As a result, important misconceptions have arisen regarding how fear circuits are distributed in the brain and the contribution of specific nodes within these circuits to defensive behaviors. To mitigate the status quo, I will conduct a systematic comparison of brain circuits driving the expression of freezing and active avoidance behavior, which I will use as well-studied proxies of reactive and cognitive fear, respectively. In addition, I propose that by integrating associative information with interoceptive and exteroceptive signals the central nucleus of the amygdala plays a crucial role in biasing the selection of defensive behaviors.

Long-range projections link distant circuits in the brain, allowing efficient transfer of information between regions and synchronization of distributed patterns of neural activity. Understanding the functional roles of defined neuronal projection pathways requires temporally precise manipulation of their activity, and optogenetic tools appear to be an obvious choice for such experiments. However, we and others have previously shown that commonly-used inhibitory optogenetic tools have low efficacy and off-target effects when applied to presynaptic terminals. In my talk, I will present a new solution to this problem: a targeting-enhanced mosquito homologue of the vertebrate encephalopsin (eOPN3), which upon activation can effectively suppress synaptic transmission through the Gi/o signaling pathway. Brief illumination of presynaptic terminals expressing eOPN3 triggers a lasting suppression of synaptic output that recovers spontaneously within minutes in vitro and in vivo. The efficacy of eOPN3 in suppressing presynaptic release opens new avenues for functional interrogation of long-range neuronal circuits in vivo.

During sexual behavior, copulation related sensory information and modulatory signals from the brain must be integrated and converted into the motor and secretory outputs that characterize ejaculation (Lenschow and Lima, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2020). Studies in humans and rats suggest the existence of interneurons in the lumbar spinal cord that mediates that step: the spinal ejaculation generator (SEG). My work aimed at gaining mechanistic insights about the neuronal circuits controlling ejaculation thereby applying cutting-edge techniques. More specifically, we mapped anatomically and functionally the spinal circuit for ejaculation starting from the main muscle being involved in sperm expulsion: the bulbospongiosus muscle (BSM). Combining viral tracing strategies with electrophysiology, we specifically show that the BSM motoneurons receive direct synaptic input from a group of interneurons located in between lumbar segment 2 and 3 and expressing the peptide galanin. Electrically and optogenetically activating the galanin positive cells (the SEG) lead to the activation of the motoneurons innervating the BSM and the muscle itself. Finally, inhibition of SEG cells using DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) in sexual behaving animals is currently conducted to reveal whether ejaculation can be prevented.

All sensory perception and every coordinated movement, as well as feelings, memories and motivation, arise from the bustling activity of many millions of interconnected cells in the brain. The ultimate function of this elaborate network is to generate behavior. We use zebrafish as our experimental model, employing a diverse array of molecular, genetic, optical, connectomic, behavioral and computational approaches. The goal of our research is to understand how neuronal circuits integrate sensory inputs and internal state and convert this information into behavioral responses.

Genetic mutations of the SCN1A gene, the voltage gated sodium channel NaV1.1, cause well-defined epilepsies, including the severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy Dravet syndrome and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), as well as a severe form of migraine with aura, familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). More recently, they have been identified in an extremely severe early infantile encephalopathy. Functional studies and animal models have contributed to disclose pathological mechanisms, which can be often linked to a straightforward loss- vs gain- of channel function. However, although this simple dichotomy is pertinent and useful, detailed pathological mechanisms in neuronal circuits can be more complex, sometimes because of unexpected homeostatic or pathologic responses. I will compare pathological mechanisms of epilepsy and migraine mutations studied with cellular, animal and computational models, highlighting a novel homeostatic response implemented by CCK-positive GABAergic neurons in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome, which may be boosted in therapeutic approaches.

Colour vision is based on circuit-level comparison of the signals from spectral distinct types of photoreceptors. In our own eyes, the presence of three types of cones enable trichromatic colour vision. However, many phylogenetically ‘older’ vertebrates have four or more cone types, and in almost all their cases the circuits that enable tetra- or possibly even pentachromatic colour vision are not known. This includes the majority of birds, reptiles, amphibians, and bony fish. In the lab we study neuronal circuits for colour vision in non-mammalian vertebrates, with a focus on zebrafish, a tetrachromatic surface dwelling species of teleost. I will discuss how in the case of zebrafish, retinal colour computations are implemented in a fundamentally different, and probably much more efficient way compared to how they are thought to work in humans. I will then highlight how these fish circuits might be linked with those in mammals, possibly providing a new way of thinking about how circuits for colour vision are organized in vertebrates.

The synapse is the core component of the nervous system and synapse formation is the critical step in the assembly of neuronal circuits. The assembly and maturation of synapses requires the contribution of secreted and membrane-associated proteins, with neuronal activity playing crucial roles in regulating synaptic strength, neuronal membrane properties, and neural circuit refinement. The molecular mechanisms of synapse assembly and refinement have been so far largely examined on a gene-by-gene basis and with a perspective fully centered on neuronal cells. However, in the last years, the involvement of non-neuronal cells has emerged. Among these, microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, have been shown to play a key role in synapse formation and elimination. Contacts of microglia with dendrites in the somatosensory cortex were found to induce filopodia and dendritic spines via Ca2+ and actin-dependent processes, while microglia-derived BDNF was shown to promote learning-dependent synapse formation. Microglia is also recognized to have a central role in the widespread elimination (or pruning) of exuberant synaptic connections during development. Clarifying the processes by which microglia control synapse homeostasis is essential to advance our current understanding of brain functions. Clear answers to these questions will have important implications for our understanding of brain diseases, as the fact that many psychiatric and neurological disorders are synaptopathies (i.e. diseases of the synapse) is now widely recognized. In the last years, my group has identified TREM2, an innate immune receptor with phagocytic and antiinflammatory properties expressed in brain exclusively by microglia, as essential for microglia-mediated synaptic refinement during the early stages of brain development. The talk will describe the role of TREM2 in synapse elimination and introduce the molecular actors involved. I will also describe additional pathways by which the immune system may affect the formation and homeostasis of synaptic contacts.

Densely mapping neuronal circuits at synaptic resolution is providing unprecedented insight into the formation and structure of the cerebral cortex. I’ll present recent advances and discuss what we can learn about precision, plasticity and possible patterns in mammalian neuronal circuits.

Plasticity shapes the brain during development, and mechanisms of plasticity continue into adulthood to enable learning and memory. Nearly all brain functions are influenced by past events, reinforcing the view that the confluence of plasticity and computation in the same circuit elements is a core component of biological intelligence. My laboratory studies plasticity in the cerebral cortex during development, and plasticity during behaviour that is manifest as cortical dynamics. I will describe how cortical plasticity is implemented by learning rules that involve not only Hebbian changes and synaptic scaling but also dendritic renormalization. By using advanced techniques such as optical measurements of single-synapse function and structure in identified neurons in awake behaving mice, we have recently demonstrated locally coordinated plasticity in dendrites whereby specific synapses are strengthened and adjacent synapses with complementary features are weakened. Together, these changes cooperatively implement functional plasticity in neurons. Such plasticity relies on the dynamics of activity-dependent molecules within and between synapses. Alongside, it is increasingly clear that risk genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders disproportionately target molecules of plasticity. Deficits in renormalization contribute fundamentally to dysfunctional neuronal circuits and computations, and may be a unifying mechanistic feature of these disorders.

The “Nature versus Nurture” debate on the origin of behaviour has long been dominated by a genome versus experience dichotomy. However, evidence that genetically identical individuals kept under identical conditions are behaviourally different is incontrovertible. Where might such individuality come from? Neither genes nor the environment directly encode behaviour. They encode or influence processes, notably the development of neuronal circuits, that in turn control behaviour. An understanding of how neuronal circuits develop and function at the individual organism level is therefore essential for understanding the origin of individuals. I will discuss our efforts to address this issue over the past decade using the Drosophila fruit fly as a model system.