Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

17 results

Upcoming first, then newest

How reliably can non-invasive brain stimulation establish causal relationships in cognition, and which factors change its effects? This workshop examines the empirical, methodological and theoretical limits of causal inference with transcranial stimulation. It connects stimulation protocols, individual variability and biomarkers with multi-laboratory replication and open-science practice. The programme covers concurrent TMS-fMRI, white-matter pathways, paired associative stimulation, electric-field modelling and memory-related electrical stimulation. A satellite session includes practical TMS-

Dec 2–4, 2026

Workshop · Neuroscience

…Professor of Epidemiology and Causal Inference, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam) on 'dark causal inference' — implied but unstated causal reasoning that pervades epidemiology — the misuse of 'association' language, and gaps in teaching causal reasoning.

Wed, Sep 23, 2026 · 17:00 UTC

Seminar · Epidemiology

Bayesian causal inference predicts center-surround interactions in MT

Gabor Lengyel, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, Gregory DeAngelis, Ralf Haefner · COSYNE 2025

Center-surround processing (CSP) is a ubiquitous feature of the brain, starting from early sensory processing (e.g., context-dependent retinal encoding) to representing abstract concepts (e.g., context-dependent object representation), manifesting itself in both behavior and neural responses. While CSP in neural responses is typically modeled using divisive normalization or in purely descriptive terms, none of them can account for the bewildering range of effects documented for CSP of motion alone. Furthermore, a normative model that links these neural effects to function and behavior is still

ePoster · Computational Neuroscience

Atypical development of causal inference in autism

Melissa Monti, Cristiano Cuppini · FENS Forum 2024

In everyday life, the brain integrates information from different sensory modalities to form a coherent perception of the surrounding environment. This process, known as multisensory integration, enhances the brain’s response to redundant congruent sensory cues and emerges gradually during the developmental period, based on our experience with cross-modal stimuli. Consequently, integrative abilities develop in an altered form in individuals subjected to atypical multisensory experiences during the developmental period, such as those on the autistic spectrum. However, to interact with and corre

ePoster · Neuroscience

Center-surround processing (CSP) is a ubiquitous feature of the brain, starting from early sensory processing (e.g., context-dependent retinal encoding) to representing abstract concepts (e.g., context-dependent object representation), manifesting itself in both behavior and neural responses. CPS in neural responses is typically modeled using normalization models or in purely descriptive terms. However, a normative model that could enhance our understanding of the function of CSP and link these neural effects to behavior is still lacking. Here, we build on a recently developed normative model

ePoster · Neuroscience

Bayesian inference on virtual brain models of disorders

Meysam Hashemi, Marmaduke Woodman, Viktor Jirsa · FENS Forum 2024

…In this study our aim is to conduct inference and prediction on the local and global dynamics using virtual brain models, affected by disorders. Inference algorithms are necessary to efficiently estimate the unknown parameters (such as regional excitability parameters and global scaling factor on connectome), ideally incorporating measures of uncertainty. In this work, we provide f

ePoster · Neuroscience

Causal inference based on temporal relationships is fundamental for adaptive, intelligent behavior. However, standard value-based reinforcement learning (RL) models learn estimates of temporally discounted average future reward, leading to ambiguity about future reward timing and magnitude. Extending these algorithms to learn a set of values that differ in their sensitivity to reward prediction errors (RPEs) and temporal discounting can support inference. Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons, known to encode RPEs, display signatures of learning about distributions of reward magnitude. However, it is

ePoster · Neuroscience

A causal inference model of spike train interactions in fast response regimes

Zachary Saccomano & Asohan Amarasingham · COSYNE 2023

The idea of estimating synaptic connectivity and strength from parallel spike trains has been entertained since the late 1960s, but the last few years have seen a resurgence in proposed methods. A majority of model-free techniques estimate synaptic coupling via a “separation of timescales” (SOT) principle applied to the cross-correlogram (CCG). That is, a joint distribution is implicitly specified on paired spike trains where it is common to include a fast timescale component (modeling synaptic coupling) and a coarse timescale component (modeling network effects). Such models provide insights

ePoster · Neuroscience

Animals learn from experience the value of environmental stimuli and adjust their behavior accordingly. At the core of animal conditioning lies the capacity to associate a neural activity pattern induced by an unconditioned stimulus (US) with the pattern arising in response to a conditioned stimulus (CS). Reward-modulated associative synaptic plasticity has been successful in explaining conditioning when the neural representations of behavioral stimuli are unmixed. However, this assumption is inconsistent with the fact that neurons --- particularly in high-level, cognitive areas --- display mi

ePoster · Computational Neuroscience

Divisive normalization as a mechanism for hierarchical causal inference in motion perception

Boris Penaloza, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, Gabor Lengyel et al. · COSYNE 2023

Causal inference (CI) has been proposed as a universal computational motif in the brain [Shams & Beierholm 2020]. However, its neural implementation is unclear. Likewise, Divisive Normalization (DN) has been proposed as a canonical circuit motif [Heeger 2011], but there are competing theories about the computations that DN implements (gain control, attention). In this work, we unified both by showing how an extended DN model can account for neural predictions made by a CI model [Shivkumar et al. 2022] in the context of hierarchical motion perception. Specifically, we generated CI predicti

ePoster · Computational Neuroscience

Mesolimbic dopamine release conveys causal associations

Huijeong Jeong, Annie Taylor, Joseph Floeder et al. · COSYNE 2023

Learning to predict rewards based on environmental cues is essential for survival. It is widely believed that animals learn to predict rewards by updating predictions whenever the outcome deviates from expectations. Such violations of predictions are called reward prediction errors (RPEs). RPEs are the critical teaching signal in the most widely accepted model for associative learning—temporal difference reinforcement learning (TDRL). As TDRL RPE has been successful at explaining the activity dynamics of dopamine, it has become the dominant theory of dopamine’s role as the critical regulator o

ePoster · Neuroscience

A major challenge for causal inference from time-series data is the trade-off between computational feasibility and accuracy. Motivated by process motifs for lagged covariance in an autoregressive model with slow mean-reversion, we propose to infer networks of causal relations via pairwise edge measure (PEMs) that one can easily compute from lagged correlation matrices. Motivated by contributions of process motifs to covariance and lagged variance, we formulate two PEMs that correct for confounding factors and for reverse causation. To demonstrate the performance of our PEMs, we consider netwo

Fri, Nov 18, 2022 · 19:00 UTC

Seminar · Statistics

Causal inference can explain hierarchical motion perception and is reflected in neural responses in MT

Sabyasachi Shivkumar, Zhexin Xu, Gábor Lengyel et al. · COSYNE 2022

Causal inference (CI) has recently been proposed as a universal computational motif in the brain [Shams \& Beierholm 2020]. However, how CI is implemented by neural circuits, and its signatures in terms of single neuron responses, are still unclear. We have investigated this question in the context of complex motion processing. Motion perception deviates from retinal motion [Johansson 1973] a computation that can be understood in terms of hierarchical CI over which moving elements to integrate into coherent 'groups' vs segment into different ones [Gershman et al. 2016, Shivkumar et al. 202

ePoster · Neuroscience

Natural perception relies inherently on inferring causal structure in the environment. However, the neural mechanisms and functional circuits that are essential for representing and updating the hidden causal structure during multisensory processing are unknown. To address this, monkeys were trained to infer the probability of a potential common source from visual and proprioceptive signals on the basis of their spatial disparity in a virtual reality system. The proprioceptive drift reported by monkeys demonstrated that they combined historical information and current multisensory signals to e

Thu, Dec 2, 2021 · 13:15 UTC

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

Multisensory Perception: Behaviour, Computations and Neural Mechanisms

Uta Noppeney · Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

…First, we need to solve the causal inference problem - deciding whether signals come from a common cause and thus should be integrated, or come from different sources and be treated independently. Second, when there is a common cause, we should integrate signals across the senses weighted in proportion to their sensory reliabilities. I discuss recent research at the behavioural, computational and neu

Mon, Jan 18, 2021 · 16:00 UTC

Seminar · Behavioral Neuroscience