The balance of excitation and inhibition and a canonical cortical computation
Excitatory and inhibitory (E & I) inputs to cortical neurons remain balanced across different conditions. The balanced network model provides a self-consistent account of this observation: population rates dynamically adjust to yield a state in which all neurons are active at biological levels, with their E & I inputs tightly balanced. But global tight E/I balance predicts population responses with linear stimulus-dependence and does not account for systematic cortical response nonlinearities such as divisive normalization, a canonical brain computation. However, when necessary connectivity conditions for global balance fail, states arise in which only a localized subset of neurons are active and have balanced inputs. We analytically show that in networks of neurons with different stimulus selectivities, the emergence of such localized balance states robustly leads to normalization, including sublinear integration and winner-take-all behavior. An alternative model that exhibits normalization is the Stabilized Supralinear Network (SSN), which predicts a regime of loose, rather than tight, E/I balance. However, an understanding of the causal relationship between E/I balance and normalization in SSN and conditions under which SSN yields significant sublinear integration are lacking. For weak inputs, SSN integrates inputs supralinearly, while for very strong inputs it approaches a regime of tight balance. We show that when this latter regime is globally balanced, SSN cannot exhibit strong normalization for any input strength; thus, in SSN too, significant normalization requires localized balance. In summary, we causally and quantitatively connect a fundamental feature of cortical dynamics with a canonical brain computation. Time allowing I will also cover our work extending a normative theoretical account of normalization which explains it as an example of efficient coding of natural stimuli. We show that when biological noise is accounted for, this theory makes the same prediction as the SSN: a transition to supralinear integration for weak stimuli.
Primary Motor Cortex Circuitry in a Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease
The primary motor cortex (M1) is a major output center for movement execution and motor learning, and its dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD). While human studies have indicated that a loss of midbrain dopamine neurons alters M1 activation, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unclear. Using a mouse model of PD, we uncovered several shifts within M1 circuitry following dopamine depletion, including impaired excitation by thalamocortical afferents and altered excitability. Our findings add to the growing body of literature highlighting M1 as a major contributor in PD, and provide targeted neural substrates for possible therapeutic interventions.
Co-tuned, balanced excitation and inhibition in olfactory memory networks
Odor memories are exceptionally robust and essential for the survival of many species. In rodents, the olfactory cortex shows features of an autoassociative memory network and plays a key role in the retrieval of olfactory memories (Meissner-Bernard et al., 2019). Interestingly, the telencephalic area Dp, the zebrafish homolog of olfactory cortex, transiently enters a state of precise balance during the presentation of an odor (Rupprecht and Friedrich, 2018). This state is characterized by large synaptic conductances (relative to the resting conductance) and by co-tuning of excitation and inhibition in odor space and in time at the level of individual neurons. Our aim is to understand how this precise synaptic balance affects memory function. For this purpose, we build a simplified, yet biologically plausible spiking neural network model of Dp using experimental observations as constraints: besides precise balance, key features of Dp dynamics include low firing rates, odor-specific population activity and a dominance of recurrent inputs from Dp neurons relative to afferent inputs from neurons in the olfactory bulb. To achieve co-tuning of excitation and inhibition, we introduce structured connectivity by increasing connection probabilities and/or strength among ensembles of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. These ensembles are therefore structural memories of activity patterns representing specific odors. They form functional inhibitory-stabilized subnetworks, as identified by the “paradoxical effect” signature (Tsodyks et al., 1997): inhibition of inhibitory “memory” neurons leads to an increase of their activity. We investigate the benefits of co-tuning for olfactory and memory processing, by comparing inhibitory-stabilized networks with and without co-tuning. We find that co-tuned excitation and inhibition improves robustness to noise, pattern completion and pattern separation. In other words, retrieval of stored information from partial or degraded sensory inputs is enhanced, which is relevant in light of the instability of the olfactory environment. Furthermore, in co-tuned networks, odor-evoked activation of stored patterns does not persist after removal of the stimulus and may therefore subserve fast pattern classification. These findings provide valuable insights into the computations performed by the olfactory cortex, and into general effects of balanced state dynamics in associative memory networks.
Cellular mechanisms behind stimulus evoked quenching of variability
A wealth of experimental studies show that the trial-to-trial variability of neuronal activity is quenched during stimulus evoked responses. This fact has helped ground a popular view that the variability of spiking activity can be decomposed into two components. The first is due to irregular spike timing conditioned on the firing rate of a neuron (i.e. a Poisson process), and the second is the trial-to-trial variability of the firing rate itself. Quenching of the variability of the overall response is assumed to be a reflection of a suppression of firing rate variability. Network models have explained this phenomenon through a variety of circuit mechanisms. However, in all cases, from the vantage of a neuron embedded within the network, quenching of its response variability is inherited from its synaptic input. We analyze in vivo whole cell recordings from principal cells in layer (L) 2/3 of mouse visual cortex. While the variability of the membrane potential is quenched upon stimulation, the variability of excitatory and inhibitory currents afferent to the neuron are amplified. This discord complicates the simple inheritance assumption that underpins network models of neuronal variability. We propose and validate an alternative (yet not mutually exclusive) mechanism for the quenching of neuronal variability. We show how an increase in synaptic conductance in the evoked state shunts the transfer of current to the membrane potential, formally decoupling changes in their trial-to-trial variability. The ubiquity of conductance based neuronal transfer combined with the simplicity of our model, provides an appealing framework. In particular, it shows how the dependence of cellular properties upon neuronal state is a critical, yet often ignored, factor. Further, our mechanism does not require a decomposition of variability into spiking and firing rate components, thereby challenging a long held view of neuronal activity.
The many faces of KCC2 in the generation and suppression of seizures
KCC2, best known as the neuron-specific chloride extruder that sets the strength and polarity of GABAergic Cl-currents, is a multifunctional molecule which interacts with other ion-regulatory proteins and (structurally) with the neuronal cytoskeleton. Its multiple roles in the generation and suppression of seizures have been widely studied. In my talk, I will address some fundamental issues which are relevant in this field of research: What are EGABA shifts about? What is the role of KCC2 in shunting inhibition? What is meant by “the balance between excitation and inhibition” and, in this context, by the “NKCC1/KCC2 ratio”? Is down-regulation of KCC2 following neuronal trauma a manifestation of adaptive or maladaptive ionic plasticity? Under what conditions is K-Cl cotransport by KCC2 promoting seizures? Should we pay more attention to KCC2 as molecule involved in dendritic spine formation in brain areas such as the hippocampus? Most of these points are of potential importance also in the design of KCC2-targeting drugs and genetic manipulations aimed at combating seizures.