Topic: interference

Relational thinking involves comparing abstract relationships between mental representations that vary in complexity; however, this complexity is rarely made explicit during everyday comparisons. This study explored how people naturally navigate relational complexity and interference using a novel relational match-to-sample (RMTS) task with both minimal and relationally directed instruction to observe changes in performance across three levels of relational complexity: perceptual, analogy, and system mappings. Individual working memory and relational abilities were examined to understand RMTS

Neural correlates of visual working memory have been found in early visual, parietal, and prefrontal regions. These findings have spurred fruitful debate over how and where in the brain memories might be represented. Here, I will present data from multiple experiments to demonstrate how a focus on behavioral requirements can unveil a more comprehensive understanding of the visual working memory system. Specifically, items in working memory must be maintained in a highly robust manner, resilient to interference. At the same time, storage mechanisms must preserve a high degree of flexibility in

Visual comparisons are ubiquitous, and they can also be an important source for learning (e.g., Gentner et al., 2016; Kok et al., 2013). In science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), key information is often conveyed through figures, graphs, and diagrams (Mayer, 1993). Comparing within and across visuals is critical for gleaning insight into the underlying concepts, structures, and processes that they represent. This talk addresses how people make visual comparisons and how visual comparisons can be best supported to improve learning. In particular, the talk will present a series of s

The role of attention in working memory remains controversial, but there is some agreement on the notion that the focus of attention holds mnemonic representations in a privileged state of heightened accessibility in working memory, resulting in better memory performance for items that receive focused attention during retention. Closely related, representations held in the focus of attention are often observed to be robust and protected from degradation caused by either perceptual interference (e.g., Makovski & Jiang, 2007; van Moorselaar et al., 2015) or decay (e.g., Barrouillet et al., 2007)

Neural correlates of visual working memory have been found in early visual, parietal, and prefrontal regions. These findings have spurred fruitful debate over how and where in the brain memories might be represented. Here, I will present data from multiple experiments to demonstrate how a focus on behavioral requirements can unveil a more comprehensive understanding of the visual working memory system. Specifically, items in working memory must be maintained in a highly robust manner, resilient to interference. At the same time, storage mechanisms must preserve a high degree of flexibility in

Learning in real life is often sequential: A learner first learns task A, then task B. If the tasks are related, the learner may adapt the previously learned representation instead of generating a new one from scratch. Adaptation may ease learning task B but may also decrease the performance on task A. Such interference has been observed in experimental and machine learning studies. In the latter case, it is mediated by correlations between weight updates for the different tasks. In typical applications, like image classification with feed-forward networks, these correlated weight updates can