Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Topic: robustness

Seminar
4 seminars
ePoster
1 ePoster

In Neuroscience and Dynamical Systems

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

Relating circuit dynamics to computation: robustness and dimension-specific computation in cortical dynamics

Shaul Druckmann · Stanford department of Neurobiology and department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

Wed, Apr 23, 2025 · 15:00 UTC

Neural dynamics represent the hard-to-interpret substrate of circuit computations. Advances in large-scale recordings have highlighted the sheer spatiotemporal complexity of circuit dynamics within and across circuits, portraying in detail the difficulty of interpreting such dynamics and relating it to computation. Indeed, even in extremely simplified experimental conditions, one observes high-dimensional temporal dynamics in the relevant circuits. This complexity can be potentially addressed by the notion that not all changes in population activity have equal meaning, i.e., a small change in

Since the introduction of the term explainable artificial intelligence, many contrasting definitions and methods have been proposed. A key issue is that most of the extant explanations are not sufficiently clear either to practitioners or to users. While some researchers use interpretation algorithms as post-hoc explanations (Samek et al., 2021; Ribeiro, 2016), others argue that we should use models which are interpretable in the first place (Rudin, 2019). Although the latter is important, developers are not always willing to sacrifice accuracy by choosing a less complex interpretable model. H

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

Robustness in spiking networks: a geometric perspective

Christian Machens · Champalimaud Center, Lisboa

Wed, Feb 16, 2022 · 05:00 UTC

Neural systems are remarkably robust against various perturbations, a phenomenon that still requires a clear explanation. Here, we graphically illustrate how neural networks can become robust. We study spiking networks that generate low-dimensional representations, and we show that the neurons’ subthreshold voltages are confined to a convex region in a lower-dimensional voltage subspace, which we call a ‘bounding box.’ Any changes in network parameters (such as number of neurons, dimensionality of inputs, firing thresholds, synaptic weights, or transmission delays) can all be understood as def

Seminar · Brain Imaging

Neuroimaging reproducibility - pain points and roadmap for solid and reusable results

Jean-Baptiste Poline · McGill University

Thu, Jun 10, 2021 · 16:00 UTC

There is a growing body of evidence that reproducibility or replication is low in neuroscience and in neuroimaging in particular, but the factors affecting studies solidity are still generally poorly understood, and the solutions are not clearly exposed to the neuroimaging scientific community. In this talk, I will review the key factors contributing to irreproducible results in neuroimaging specifically in the context of explanatory or prediction studies and propose a series of practical steps to improve the neuroimaging (and neuroscience) results robustness and re-usability.

Seminar · Chronobiology

Building a synthetic cell: Understanding the clock design and function

Qiong Yang · U Michigan - Ann Arbor

Tue, Oct 20, 2020 · 08:00 UTC

Clock networks containing the same central architectures may vary drastically in their potential to oscillate, raising the question of what controls robustness, one of the essential functions of an oscillator. We computationally generate an atlas of oscillators and found that, while core topologies are critical for oscillations, local structures substantially modulate the degree of robustness. Strikingly, two local structures, incoherent and coherent inputs, can modify a core topology to promote and attenuate its robustness, additively. The findings underscore the importance of local modificat