Biology seminars

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

To function properly, the nervous system consumes vast amounts of energy, which is mostly provided by carbohydrate metabolism. Neurons are very sensitive to changes in the extracellular fluid surrounding them, which necessitated shielding of the nervous system from fluctuating solute concentrations in circulation. This is achieved by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that prevents paracellular diffusion of solutes into the nervous system. This in turn also means that all nutrients that are needed e.g. for sufficient energy supply need to be transported over the BBB. We use Drosophila as a model system to better understand the metabolic homeostasis in the central nervous system. Glial cells play essential roles in both nutrient uptake and neural energy metabolism. Carbohydrate transport over the glial BBB is well-regulated and can be adapted to changes in carbohydrate availability. Furthermore, Drosophila glial cell are highly glycolytic cells that support the rather oxidative metabolism of neurons. Upon perturbations of carbohydrate metabolism, the glial cells prove to be metabolically very flexible and able to adapt to changing circumstances. I will summarize what we know about carbohydrate transport at the Drosophila BBB and about the metabolic coupling between neurons and glial cells. Our data shows that many basic features of neural metabolism are well conserved between the fly and mammals.

Many of us came to biology from physics. There we have been trained on such classic examples as muon g-2, where experimental data and theoretical predictions agree to many significant digits. Now, working in biology, we routinely hear that it is messy, most details matter, and that the best hope for theory in biology is to be semi-qualitative, predict general trends, and to forgo the hope of ever making quantitative predictions with the precision that we are used to in physics. Colloquially, we should be satisfied even if data and models differ so much that plotting them on the same plot makes little sense. However, some of us won’t be satisfied by this. So can we take theory in biology seriously and predict experimental outcomes within (small) error bars? Certainly, we won’t be able to predict everything, but this is never required, even in traditional physics. But we should be able to choose some features of data that are nontrivial and interesting, and focus on them. We also should be able to find different classes of models --- maybe even null models --- that match biology better, and thus allow for a better agreement. It is even possible that large-dimensional datasets of modern high-throughput experiments, and the ensuing “more is different” statistical physics style models will make quantitative, precise theory easier. To explore the role of quantitative theory in biology, in this workshop, eight speakers will address some of the following general questions based on their specific work in different corners of biology: Which features of biological data are predictable? Which types of models are best suited to making quantitative predictions in different fields? Should theorists interested in quantitative predictions focus on different questions, not typically asked by biologists? Do large, multidimensional datasets make theories (and which theories?) more or less likely to succeed? This will be an unapologetically theoretical physics workshop — we won’t focus on a specific subfield of biology, but will explore these questions across the fields, hoping that the underlying theoretical frameworks will help us find the missing connections.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Reducing protein intake (and that of key amino acids) extends lifespan, especially during mid-life and early late-life. Yet, due to a powerful protein appetite, reducing protein in the diet leads to increased food intake, promoting obesity – which shortens lifespan. That is the protein paradox. In the talk I will bring together pieces of the jigsaw, including: specific nutrient appetites, protein leverage, macronutrient interactions on appetite and ageing, the role of branched-chain amino acids and FGF-21, and then I will conclude by showing how these pieces fit together and play out in the modern industrialised food environment to result in the global pandemic of obesity and metabolic disease.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Archaea have evolved to survive in some of the most extreme environments on earth. Life in extreme, nutrient-poor conditions gives the opportunity to probe fundamental energy limitations on movement and response to stimuli, two essential markers of living systems. Here we use three-dimensional holographic microscopy and computer simulations to show that halophilic archaea achieve chemotaxis with power requirements one hundred-fold lower than common eubacterial model systems. Their swimming direction is stabilised by their flagella (archaella), enhancing directional persistence in a manner similar to that displayed by eubacteria, albeit with a different motility apparatus. Our experiments and simulations reveal that the cells are capable of slow but deterministic chemotaxis up a chemical gradient, in a biased random walk at the thermodynamic limit.

Densely mapping neuronal circuits at synaptic resolution is providing unprecedented insight into the formation and structure of the cerebral cortex. I’ll present recent advances and discuss what we can learn about precision, plasticity and possible patterns in mammalian neuronal circuits.

Africa is blessed with a rich diversity and abundance in rodent and avian populations. This natural endowment on the continent portends research opportunities to study unique anatomical profiles and investigate animal models that may confer better neural architecture to study neurodegenerative diseases, adult neurogenesis, stroke and stem cell therapies. To this end, African researchers are beginning to pay closer attention to some of her indigenous rodents and birds in an attempt to develop spontaneous laboratory models for homegrown neuroscience-based research. For this presentation, I will be showing studies in our lab, involving cellular neuroanatomy of two rodents, the African giant rat (AGR) and Greater cane rat (GCR), Eidolon Bats (EB) and also the Striped Owl (SO). Using histological stains (Cresyl violet and Rapid Golgi) and immunohistochemical biomarkers (GFAP, NeuN, CNPase, Iba-1, Collagen 2, Doublecortin, Ki67, Calbindin, etc), and Electron Microscopy, morphology and functional organizations of neuronal and glial populations of the AGR , GCR, EB and SO brains have been described, with our work ongoing. In addition, the developmental profiles of the prenatal GCR brains have been chronicled across its entire gestational period. Brains of embryos/foetuses were harvested for gross morphological descriptions and then processed using immunofluorescence biomarkers to determine the pattern, onset, duration and peak of neurogenesis (Pax6, Tbr1, Tbr2, NF, HuCD, MAP2) and the onset and peak of glial cell expressions and myelination in the prenatal GCR. The outcome of these research efforts has shown unique neuroanatomical expressions and networks amongst Africa’s rich biodiversity. It is hopeful that continuous effort in this regard will provide sufficient basic research data on neural developments and cellular neuroanatomy with subsequent translational consequences.