Towards understanding the microcircuit in monkey primary visual cortex in-vivo
Neuroscience ePoster by Nicole Carr, Shude Zhu, Kenji Lee, Xiaomo Chen, Ruobing Xia, Alec Perliss and 2 more
Part of COSYNE 2023 posters, Boston University; Stanford University; Boston University; Psychological and Brain Sciences
Saturday
Abstract
The primary visual cortex (V1) is fundamental for visual processing. Transcriptomics suggests that the microcircuit in V1 consists of many inhibitory and excitatory cell types1. However, exactly how those diverse cell populations participate in visual cognition in vivo is unknown.
To address this question, we recorded from V1 of two anesthetized monkeys using high-density Neuropixel probes across all layers of cortex2. We identified single neuron waveforms using Kilosort2, followed by rigorous manual curation. Our final dataset was composed of 801 negative spiking neurons (from 2529 units, 5 sessions). We used histology and current source density to assign neurons to layers and then applied a recently developed nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique (WaveMAP3) to delineate candidate cell types.
WaveMAP revealed 9 candidate cell types ranging from narrow and triphasic, to broad biphasic waveforms. These candidate cell types were localized to distinct laminae, demonstrated heterogeneous firing rate responses, functional properties, and spatial profiles. Four of the narrow spiking cell classes were largely localized to Layer 4 of V1 and were likely stellate cells. Of these narrow spiking classes, one cell class demonstrated backpropagating action potentials (recently shown in mouse V14), whereas another had the highest and most sustained firing rates. Narrow, triphasic waveforms were in all layers except layer 2/3 and had the slowest and lowest visual response suggesting these are perhaps outputs from V1. In contrast, broad spiking waveforms were found in all layers. Of note, there was a cell class localized to Layer 5/6, with the broadest waveforms, robust firing rates, and the shortest response latency, which resembles Layer 6 pyramidal neurons that receive direct geniculocortical input.
Together, our results show that high density electrophysiology and machine learning analysis help delineate cell types within a cortical column, furthering our understanding of microcircuits in the visual cortex.
Topics
Details
- Session
- Poster Session II
Related ePosters
- Sep 28, 2022Online
A Large Dataset of Macaque V1 Responses to Natural Images Revealed Complexity in V1 Neural Codes
Mar 11, 2023Montreal, Canada
More in Poster Session II
All postersAn accessible hippocampal dataset for benchmarking models of cognitive mapping
Mar 11, 2023Alexandra Keinath et al.AI-driven cholinergic theory enables rapid and robust cortex-wide learning
Mar 11, 2023Maija Filipovica et al.All-Optical Investigation of Schaller Collateral Synapses in vivo
Mar 11, 2023Cynthia Rais et al.Assemblies and the k-Cap Process: The Effects of Locality on Neural Firing Dynamics
Mar 11, 2023Mirabel Reid et al.
More with Nicole Carr
All their workDistinct neural dynamics in prefrontal and premotor cortex during decision-making
ePoster · Mar 12, 2023COSYNE 2023Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is a key cortical locus for perceptual decisions
ePoster · Mar 12, 2023COSYNE 2023
More with Kenji Lee
All their workMulti-modal composition of physiological signals to delineate candidate cell types in-vivo
ePoster · Mar 12, 2023COSYNE 2023