Neuro-Informatics seminars

Connectomic reconstruction of a cortical column

Brain Emulation Challenge workshop will tackle cutting-edge topics such as ground-truthing for validation, leveraging artificial datasets generated from virtual brain tissue, and the transformative potential of virtual brain platforms, such as applied to the forthcoming Brain Emulation Challenge.

Brain Emulation Challenge workshop will tackle cutting-edge topics such as ground-truthing for validation, leveraging artificial datasets generated from virtual brain tissue, and the transformative potential of virtual brain platforms, such as applied to the forthcoming Brain Emulation Challenge.

Lead author Mehdi Azabou will present on his work "POYO-1: A Unified, Scalable Framework for Neural Population Decoding" (https://poyo-brain.github.io/). Mehdi is an ML PhD student at Georgia Tech advised by Dr. Eva Dyer. Paper link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16046 Trends in NeuroAI is a reading group hosted by the MedARC Neuroimaging & AI lab (https://medarc.ai/fmri | https://groups.google.com/g/medarc-fmri).

We will discuss a recent paper by Taylor et al. (2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811923002896. They discuss the merits of highlighting results instead of hiding them; that is, clearly marking which voxels and clusters pass a given significance threshold, but still highlighting sub-threshold results, with opacity proportional to the strength of the effect. They use this to illustrate how there in fact may be more agreement between researchers than previously thought, using the NARPS dataset as an example. By adopting a continuous, "highlighted" approach, it becomes clear that the majority of effects are in the same location and that the effect size is in the same direction, compared to an approach that only permits rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. We will also talk about the implications of this approach for creating figures, detecting artifacts, and aiding reproducibility.

The last twenty years have witnessed extraordinarily rapid progress in basic neuroscience, including breakthrough technologies such as optogenetics, and the collection of unprecedented amounts of neuroimaging, genetic and other data relevant to neuroscience and mental health. However, the translation of this progress into improved understanding of brain function and dysfunction has been comparatively slow. As a result, the development of therapeutics for mental health has stagnated too. One central challenge has been to extract meaning from these large, complex, multivariate datasets, which requires a shift towards systems-level mathematical and computational approaches. A second challenge has been reconciling different scales of investigation, from genes and molecules to cells, circuits, tissue, whole-brain, and ultimately behaviour. In this talk I will describe several strands of work using mathematical, statistical, and bioinformatic methods to bridge these gaps. Topics will include: using artificial neural networks to link the organization of large-scale brain connectivity to cognitive function; using multivariate statistical methods to link disease-related changes in brain networks to the underlying biological processes; and using network-based approaches to move from genetic insights towards drug discovey. Finally, I will discuss how simple organisms such as C. elegans can serve to inspire, test, and validate new methods and insights in networks neuroscience.

Brains must integrate complex sensory information and compare to past events to generate appropriate behavioral responses. The neural circuit basis of these computations is unclear and the underlying structure unknown. Here, we mapped the comprehensive synaptic wiring diagram of the fruit fly larva brain, which contains 3,013 neurons and 544K synaptic sites. It is the most complete insect connectome to date: 1) Both brain hemispheres are reconstructed, allowing investigation of neural pathways that include contralateral axons, which we found in 37% of brain neurons. 2) All sensory neurons and descending neurons are reconstructed, allowing one to follow signals in an uninterrupted chain—from the sensory periphery, through the brain, to motor neurons in the nerve cord. We developed novel computational tools, allowing us to cluster the brain and investigate how information flows through it. We discovered that feedforward pathways from sensory to descending neurons are multilayered and highly multimodal. Robust feedback was observed at almost all levels of the brain, including descending neurons. We investigated how the brain hemispheres communicate with each other and the nerve cord, leading to identification of novel circuit motifs. This work provides the complete blueprint of a brain and a strong foundation to study the structure-function relationship of neural circuits.

In modern neuroscience, we often want to extract information from recordings of many neurons in the brain. Unfortunately, the activity of individual neurons is very noisy, making it difficult to relate to cognition and behavior. Thankfully, we can use the correlations across time and neurons to denoise the data we record. In particular, using recent advances in machine learning, we can build models which harness this structure in the data to extract more interpretable signals. In this talk, we present two such methods as well as examples of how they can help us gain further insights into the neural underpinnings of behavior.

Neuroscientists have many questions about connectomes that revolve around the ability to compare networks. For example, comparing connectomes could help explain how neural wiring is related to individual differences, genetics, disease, development, or learning. One such question is that of bilateral symmetry: are the left and right sides of a connectome the same? Here, we investigate the bilateral symmetry of a recently presented connectome of an insect brain, the Drosophila larva. We approach this question from the perspective of two-sample testing for networks. First, we show how this question of “sameness” can be framed as a variety of different statistical hypotheses, each with different assumptions. Then, we describe test procedures for each of these hypotheses. We show how these different test procedures perform on both the observed connectome as well as a suite of synthetic perturbations to the connectome. We also point out that these tests require careful attention to parameter alignment and differences in network density in order to provide biologically meaningful results. Taken together, these results provide the first statistical characterization of bilateral symmetry for an entire brain at the single-neuron level, while also giving practical recommendations for future comparisons of connectome networks.

Where in the brain consciousness resides remains unclear. It has been suggested that the subnetworks supporting consciousness should be bidirectionally (recurrently) connected because both feed-forward and feedback processing are necessary for conscious experience. Accordingly, evaluating which subnetworks are bidirectionally connected and the strength of these connections would likely aid the identification of regions essential to consciousness. Here, we propose a method for hierarchically decomposing a network into cores with different strengths of bidirectional connection, as a means of revealing the structure of the complex brain network. We applied the method to a whole-brain mouse connectome. We found that cores with strong bidirectional connections consisted of regions presumably essential to consciousness (e.g., the isocortical and thalamic regions, and claustrum) and did not include regions presumably irrelevant to consciousness (e.g., cerebellum). Contrarily, we could not find such correspondence between cores and consciousness when we applied other simple methods which ignored bidirectionality. These findings suggest that our method provides a novel insight into the relation between bidirectional brain network structures and consciousness. Our recent preprint on this work is here: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452022.

Large-scale, single neuron resolution recordings are inherently high-dimensional, with as many dimensions as neurons. To make sense of them, for many the answer is: reduce the number of dimensions. In this talk I argue we can distinguish weak and strong principles of neural dimension reduction. The weak principle is that dimension reduction is a convenient tool for making sense of complex neural data. The strong principle is that dimension reduction moves us closer to how neural circuits actually operate and compute. Elucidating these principles is crucial, for which we subscribe to provides radically different interpretations of the same dimension reduction techniques applied to the same data. I outline experimental evidence for each principle, but illustrate how we could make either the weak or strong principles appear to be true based on innocuous looking analysis decisions. These insights suggest arguments over low and high-dimensional neural activity need better constraints from both experiment and theory.

Many of the collaborations we encounter in our scientific careers are centered on a common idea that can be associated with certain resources, such as a dataset, an algorithm, or a model. All partners in a collaboration need to develop a common understanding of these resources, and need to be able to access them in a simple and unambiguous manner in order to avoid incorrect conclusions especially in highly cross-disciplinary contexts. While digital computers have entered to assist scientific workflows in experiment and simulation for many decades, the high degree of heterogeneity in the field had led to a scattered landscape of highly customized, lab-internal solutions to organizing and managing the resources on a project-by-project basis. Only with the availability of modern technologies such as the semantic web, platforms for collaborative coding or the development of data standards overarching different disciplines, we have tools at our disposal to make resources increasingly more accessible, understandable, and usable. However, without overarching standardization efforts and adaptation of such technologies to the workflows and needs of individual researchers, their adoption by the neuroscience community will be impeded. From the perspective of computational neuroscience, which is inherently dependent on leveraging data and methods across the field of neuroscience for inspiration and validation, I will outline my view on past and present developments towards a more rigorous use of digital resources and how they improved collaboration, and introduce emerging initiatives to support this process in the future (e.g., EBRAINS http://ebrains.eu, NFDI-Neuro http://www.nfdi-neuro.de).

The analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can greatly benefit from flexible analytic approaches. In particular, the advent of data-driven approaches to identify whole-brain time-varying connectivity and activity has revealed a number of interesting relevant variation in the data which, when ignored, can provide misleading information. In this lecture I will provide a comparative introduction of a range of data-driven approaches to estimating time-varying connectivity. I will also present detailed examples where studies of both brain health and disorder have been advanced by approaches designed to capture and estimate time-varying information in resting fMRI data. I will review several exemplar data sets analyzed in different ways to demonstrate the complementarity as well as trade-offs of various modeling approaches to answer questions about brain function. Finally, I will review and provide examples of strategies for validating time-varying connectivity including simulations, multimodal imaging, and comparative prediction within clinical populations, among others. As part of the interactive aspect I will provide a hands-on guide to the dynamic functional network connectivity toolbox within the GIFT software, including an online didactic analytic decision tree to introduce the various concepts and decisions that need to be made when using such tools

The Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) framework has emerged as a promising method for characterizing connections between brain regions in functional neuroimaging data. Two of the most appealing features of this framework are its ability to estimate the directionality of connections between network nodes and its ability to determine whether those connections apply to everyone in a sample (group-level) or just to one person (individual-level). However, there are outstanding questions about the validity and stability of these estimates, including: 1) how recovery of connection directionality is affected by features of data sets such as scan length and autoregressive effects, which may be strong in some imaging modalities (resting state fMRI, fNIRS) but weaker in others (task fMRI); and 2) whether inferences about directionality at the group and individual levels are stable across time. This talk will provide an overview of the GIMME framework and describe relevant results from a large-scale simulation study that assesses directionality recovery under various conditions and a separate project that investigates the temporal stability of GIMME’s inferences in the Human Connectome Project data set. Analyses from these projects demonstrate that estimates of directionality are most precise when autoregressive and cross-lagged relations in the data are relatively strong, and that inferences about the directionality of group-level connections, specifically, appear to be stable across time. Implications of these findings for the interpretation of directional connectivity estimates in different types of neuroimaging data will be discussed.

Technological advances have increased the availability of recordings from large populations of neurons across multiple brain areas. Coupling these recordings with dimensionality reduction techniques, recent work has led to new proposals for how populations of neurons can send and receive signals selectively and flexibly. Advancement of these proposals depends, however, on untangling the bidirectional, parallel communication between neuronal populations. Because our current data analytic tools struggle to achieve this task, we have recently validated and presented a novel dimensionality reduction framework: DLAG, or Delayed Latents Across Groups. DLAG decomposes the time-varying activity in each area into within- and across-area latent variables. Across-area variables can be decomposed further into feedforward and feedback components using automatically estimated time delays. In this talk, I will review the DLAG framework. Then I will discuss new insights into the moment-by-moment nature of feedforward and feedback communication between visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of macaque monkeys. Overall, this work lays the foundation for dissecting the dynamic flow of signals across populations of neurons, and how it might change across brain areas and behavioral contexts.

Behavior arises from the coordinated activity of numerous distinct brain regions. Modern experimental tools allow access to neural populations brain-wide, yet understanding such large-scale datasets necessitates scalable computational models to extract meaningful features of inter-region communication. In this talk, I will introduce Current-Based Decomposition (CURBD), an approach for inferring multi-region interactions using data-constrained recurrent neural network models. I will first show that CURBD accurately isolates inter-region currents in simulated networks with known dynamics. I will then apply CURBD to understand the brain-wide flow of information leading to behavioral state transitions in larval zebrafish. These examples will establish CURBD as a flexible, scalable framework to infer brain-wide interactions that are inaccessible from experimental measurements alone.

Rajanlab designs neural network models constrained by experimental data, and reverse engineers them to figure out how brain circuits function in health and disease. Recently, we have been developing a powerful new theory-based framework for “in-vivo tract tracing” from multi-regional neural activity collected experimentally. We call this framework CURrent-Based Decomposition (CURBD). CURBD employs recurrent neural networks (RNNs) directly constrained, from the outset, by time series measurements acquired experimentally, such as Ca2+ imaging or electrophysiological data. Once trained, these data-constrained RNNs let us infer matrices quantifying the interactions between all pairs of modeled units. Such model-derived “directed interaction matrices” can then be used to separately compute excitatory and inhibitory input currents that drive a given neuron from all other neurons. Therefore different current sources can be de-mixed – either within the same region or from other regions, potentially brain-wide – which collectively give rise to the population dynamics observed experimentally. Source de-mixed currents obtained through CURBD allow an unprecedented view into multi-region mechanisms inaccessible from measurements alone. We have applied this method successfully to several types of neural data from our experimental collaborators, e.g., zebrafish (Deisseroth lab, Stanford), mice (Harvey lab, Harvard), monkeys (Rudebeck lab, Sinai), and humans (Rutishauser lab, Cedars Sinai), where we have discovered both directed interactions brain wide and inter-area currents during different types of behaviors. With this powerful framework based on data-constrained multi-region RNNs and CURrent Based Decomposition (CURBD), we ask if there are conserved multi-region mechanisms across different species, as well as identify key divergences.

Rajanlab designs neural network models constrained by experimental data, and reverse engineers them to figure out how brain circuits function in health and disease. Recently, we have been developing a powerful new theory-based framework for “in-vivo tract tracing” from multi-regional neural activity collected experimentally. We call this framework CURrent-Based Decomposition (CURBD). CURBD employs recurrent neural networks (RNNs) directly constrained, from the outset, by time series measurements acquired experimentally, such as Ca2+ imaging or electrophysiological data. Once trained, these data-constrained RNNs let us infer matrices quantifying the interactions between all pairs of modeled units. Such model-derived “directed interaction matrices” can then be used to separately compute excitatory and inhibitory input currents that drive a given neuron from all other neurons. Therefore different current sources can be de-mixed – either within the same region or from other regions, potentially brain-wide – which collectively give rise to the population dynamics observed experimentally. Source de-mixed currents obtained through CURBD allow an unprecedented view into multi-region mechanisms inaccessible from measurements alone. We have applied this method successfully to several types of neural data from our experimental collaborators, e.g., zebrafish (Deisseroth lab, Stanford), mice (Harvey lab, Harvard), monkeys (Rudebeck lab, Sinai), and humans (Rutishauser lab, Cedars Sinai), where we have discovered both directed interactions brain wide and inter-area currents during different types of behaviors. With this framework based on data-constrained multi-region RNNs and CURrent Based Decomposition (CURBD), we can ask if there are conserved multi-region mechanisms across different species, as well as identify key divergences.