Neuroscience seminars

Neuronal computations are matched to optimally encode the sensory information that is available and relevant for the animal. However, the physical distribution of sensory information is often shaped by the animal’s own behavior. One prominent example is the encoding of optic flow fields that are generated during self-motion of the animal and will therefore depend on the type of locomotion. How evolution has matched computational resources to the behavioral constraints of an animal is not known. Here we use in vivo two photon imaging to record from a population of >3.500 local-direction selective cells. Our data show that the local direction-selective T4/T5 neurons in Drosophila form a population code that is matched to represent optic flow fields generated during translational and rotational self-motion of the fly. This coding principle for optic flow is reminiscent to the population code of local direction-selective ganglion cells in the mouse retina, where four direction-selective ganglion cells encode four different axes of self-motion encountered during walking (Sabbah et al., 2017). However, in flies we find six different subtypes of T4 and T5 cells that, at the population level, represent six axes of self-motion of the fly. The four uniformly tuned T4/T5 subtypes described previously represent a local snapshot (Maisak et al. 2013). The encoding of six types of optic flow in the fly as compared to four types of optic flow in mice might be matched to the high degrees of freedom encountered during flight. Thus, a population code for optic flow appears to be a general coding principle of visual systems, resulting from convergent evolution, but matching the individual ethological constraints of the animal.

GABAergic interneurons play crucial roles in the regulation of neural activity in the cerebral cortex. In this Dual Lecture, Prof Oscar Marín and Prof Beatriz Rico will discuss several aspects of the formation of inhibitory circuits in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Prof. Marín will provide an overview of the mechanisms regulating the generation of the remarkable diversity of GABAergic interneurons and their ultimate numbers. Prof. Rico will describe the molecular logic through which specific pyramidal cell-interneuron circuits are established in the cerebral cortex, and how alterations in some of these connectivity motifs might be liked to disease.

Modular structures in myriad forms — genetic, structural, functional — are ubiquitous in the brain. While modularization may be shaped by genetic instruction or extensive learning, the mechanisms of module emergence are poorly understood. Here, we explore complementary mechanisms in the form of bottom-up dynamics that push systems spontaneously toward modularization. As a paradigmatic example of modularity in the brain, we focus on the grid cell system. Grid cells of the mammalian medial entorhinal cortex (mEC) exhibit periodic lattice-like tuning curves in their encoding of space as animals navigate the world. Nearby grid cells have identical lattice periods, but at larger separations along the long axis of mEC the period jumps in discrete steps so that the full set of periods cluster into 5-7 discrete modules. These modules endow the grid code with many striking properties such as an exponential capacity to represent space and unprecedented robustness to noise. However, the formation of discrete modules is puzzling given that biophysical properties of mEC stellate cells (including inhibitory inputs from PV interneurons, time constants of EPSPs, intrinsic resonance frequency and differences in gene expression) vary smoothly in continuous topographic gradients along the mEC. How does discreteness in grid modules arise from continuous gradients? We propose a novel mechanism involving two simple types of lateral interaction that leads a continuous network to robustly decompose into discrete functional modules. We show analytically that this mechanism is a generic multi-scale linear instability that converts smooth gradients into discrete modules via a topological “peak selection” process. Further, this model generates detailed predictions about the sequence of adjacent period ratios, and explains existing grid cell data better than existing models. Thus, we contribute a robust new principle for bottom-up module formation in biology, and show that it might be leveraged by grid cells in the brain.

Entorhinal grid cells, so-called because of their hexagonally tiled spatial receptive fields, are organized in modules which, collectively, are believed to form a population code for the animal’s position. Here, we apply topological data analysis to simultaneous recordings of hundreds of grid cells and show that joint activity of grid cells within a module lies on a toroidal manifold. Each position of the animal in its physical environment corresponds to a single location on the torus, and each grid cell is preferentially active within a single “field” on the torus. Toroidal firing positions persist between environments, and between wakefulness and sleep, in agreement with continuous attractor models of grid cells.

Developmental epileptic encephalopathies are early-onset epilepsies, often refractory to therapy, with developmental delay or regression. These disorders carry poor neurodevelopmental prognosis, with long-term refractory epilepsy and persistent cognitive, behavioral and motor deficits. Mutations in the CACNA1A gene, encoding the pore-forming α1 subunit of CaV2.1 voltage-gated calcium channels, result in a spectrum of neurological disorders, including severe, early-onset epileptic encephalopathies. Recent work from the Rossignol lab helped characterize the phenotypic spectrum of CACNA1A-related epilepsies in humans. Using conditional genetics and novel animal models, the Rossignol lab unveiled some of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, including critical deficits in cortical inhibition, resulting in seizures and a range of cognitive-behavioral deficits. Importantly, Dr. Rossignol’s team demonstrated that the targeted activation of specific GABAergic interneuron populations in selected cortical regions prevents motor seizures and reverts attention deficits and cognitive rigidity in mouse models of the disorder. These recent findings open novel avenues for the treatment of these severe CACNA1A-associated neurodevelopmental disorders.

Animals depend on fast and reliable detection of novel stimuli in their environment. Neurons in multiple sensory areas respond more strongly to novel in comparison to familiar stimuli. Yet, it remains unclear which circuit, cellular, and synaptic mechanisms underlie those responses. Here, we show that spike-timing-dependent plasticity of inhibitory-to-excitatory synapses generates novelty responses in a recurrent spiking network model. Inhibitory plasticity increases the inhibition onto excitatory neurons tuned to familiar stimuli, while inhibition for novel stimuli remains low, leading to a network novelty response. The generation of novelty responses does not depend on the periodicity but rather on the distribution of presented stimuli. By including tuning of inhibitory neurons, the network further captures stimulus-specific adaptation. Finally, we suggest that disinhibition can control the amplification of novelty responses. Therefore, inhibitory plasticity provides a flexible, biologically plausible mechanism to detect the novelty of bottom-up stimuli, enabling us to make experimentally testable predictions.

I will argue that the circuit architecture of the early olfactory system provides an adaptive, efficient mechanism for compressing the vast space of odor mixtures into the responses of a small number of sensors. In this view, the olfactory sensory repertoire employs a disordered code to compress a high dimensional olfactory space into a low dimensional receptor response space while preserving distance relations between odors. The resulting representation is dynamically adapted to efficiently encode the changing environment of volatile molecules. I will show that this adaptive combinatorial code can be efficiently decoded by systematically eliminating candidate odorants that bind to silent receptors. The resulting algorithm for 'estimation by elimination' can be implemented by a neural network that is remarkably similar to the early olfactory pathway in the brain. Finally, I will discuss how diffuse feedback from the central brain to the bulb, followed by unstructured projections back to the cortex, can produce the convergence and divergence of the cortical representation of odors presented in shared or different contexts. Our theory predicts a relation between the diversity of olfactory receptors and the sparsity of their responses that matches animals from flies to humans. It also predicts specific deficits in olfactory behavior that should result from optogenetic manipulation of the olfactory bulb and cortex, and in some disease states.

3 short talks and a panel discussion on the topic of "Can connectomics help us understand the brain and sustain the revolution in AI?" Expect beautiful connectomics data, provocative dreaming, realistic critiques and everything in between. Students & post-docs, stay on to meet our 3 amazing speakers. Moderator: Dr Greg Jefferis https://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/group-leaders/h-to-m/gregory-jefferis/

The brain has a hugely diverse and heterogeneous nature. The exact role of heterogeneity has been relatively little explored as most neural models tend to be largely homogeneous. We trained spiking neural networks with varying degrees of heterogeneity on complex real-world tasks and found that heterogeneity resulted in more stable and robust training and improved training performance, especially for tasks with a higher temporal structure. Moreover, the optimal distribution of parameters found by training was found to be similar to experimental observations. These findings suggest that heterogeneity is not simply a result of noisy biological processes, but it may play a crucial role for learning in complex, changing environments.

How can neural networks learn to efficiently represent complex and high-dimensional inputs via local plasticity mechanisms? Classical models of representation learning assume that input weights are learned via pairwise Hebbian-like plasticity. Here, we show that pairwise Hebbian-like plasticity only works under specific requirements on neural dynamics and input statistics. To overcome these limitations, we derive from first principles a learning scheme based on voltage-dependent synaptic plasticity rules. Here, inhibition learns to locally balance excitatory input in individual dendritic compartments, and thereby can modulate excitatory synaptic plasticity to learn efficient representations. We demonstrate in simulations that this learning scheme works robustly even for complex, high-dimensional and correlated inputs. It also works in the presence of inhibitory transmission delays, where Hebbian-like plasticity typically fails. Our results draw a direct connection between dendritic excitatory-inhibitory balance and voltage-dependent synaptic plasticity as observed in vivo, and suggest that both are crucial for representation learning.

Cortical circuits process information by rich recurrent interactions between excitatory neurons and inhibitory interneurons. One of the prime functions of interneurons is to stabilize the circuit by feedback inhibition, but the level of specificity on which inhibitory feedback operates is not fully resolved. We hypothesized that inhibitory circuits could enable separate feedback control loops for different synaptic input streams, by means of specific feedback inhibition to different neuronal compartments. To investigate this hypothesis, we adopted an optimization approach. Leveraging recent advances in training spiking network models, we optimized the connectivity and short-term plasticity of interneuron circuits for compartment-specific feedback inhibition onto pyramidal neurons. Over the course of the optimization, the interneurons diversified into two classes that resembled parvalbumin (PV) and somatostatin (SST) expressing interneurons. The resulting circuit can be understood as a neural decoder that inverts the nonlinear biophysical computations performed within the pyramidal cells. Our model provides a proof of concept for studying structure-function relations in cortical circuits by a combination of gradient-based optimization and biologically plausible phenomenological models

It is clear that the cause of obesity is a result of eating more than you burn. It is physics. What is more complex to answer is why some people eat more than others? Differences in our genetic make-up mean some of us are slightly more hungry all the time and so eat more than others. We now know that the genetics of body-weight, on which obesity sits on one end of the spectrum, is in actuality the genetics of appetite control. In contrast to the prevailing view, body-weight is not a choice. People who are obese are not bad or lazy; rather, they are fighting their biology.

Working memory is the sketchpad of consciousness, the fundamental mechanism the brain uses to gain volitional control over its thoughts and actions. For the past 50 years, working memory has been thought to rely on cortical neurons that fire continuous impulses that keep thoughts “online”. However, new work from our lab has revealed more complex dynamics. The impulses fire sparsely and interact with brain rhythms of different frequencies. Higher frequency gamma (>35 Hz) rhythms help carry the contents of working memory while lower frequency alpha/beta (~8-30 Hz) rhythms act as control signals that gate access to and clear out working memory. In other words, a rhythmic dance between brain rhythms may underlie your ability to control your own thoughts.