45 min
A new experimental paradigm to study analogy transfer
Cognition, Cognitive Psychology and Psychology seminar by Dr Théophile Bieth, Sorbonne University, Paris Brain Institute
Hosted by Analogical Minds
Wednesday 23:00–00:30 Chicago (GMT-5)
Recording available
Recording
Abstract
Analogical reasoning is one of the most complex cognitive functions in humans that allows abstract thinking, high-level reasoning, and learning. Based on analogical reasoning, one can extract an abstract and general concept (i.e., an analogy schema) from a familiar situation and apply it to a new context or domain (i.e., analogy transfer). These processes allow us to solve problems we never encountered before and generate new ideas. However, the place of analogy transfer in problem solving mechanisms is unclear. This presentation will describe several experiments with three main findings. First, we show how analogy transfer facilitates problem-solving, replicating existing empirical data largely based on the radiation/fortress problems with four new riddles. Second, we propose a new experimental task that allows us to quantify analogy transfer. Finally, using science network methodology, we show how restructuring the mental representation of a problem can predict successful solving of an analogous problem. These results shed new light on the cognitive mechanism underlying solution transfer by analogy and provide a new tool to quantify individual abilities.
Topics
Show 1 more topic
Related seminars
Learning by Analogy in Mathematics
Video · 42 min · Nov 10, 2022Pooja Sidney, University of KentuckyMore on analogy and problem solving
More from Analogical Minds
All talksAnalogy and Law
Mar 21, 2024Dr An Hertogen*, Dr. Fred Schauer**, Joe Blass***, David G. Kamper****Spatial matching tasks for insect minds: relational similarity in bumblebees
Apr 6, 2023Gema Martin-OrdasAnalogical Reasoning and Generalization for Interactive Task Learning in Physical Machines
Video · 1 h 2 min · Mar 30, 2023Shiwali MohanExplaining an asymmetry in similarity and difference judgments
Mar 23, 2023Nick Ichien