Neuroscience seminars

The cerebral cortex contains an extraordinary diversity of excitatory projection neuron (PN) and inhibitory interneurons (IN), wired together to form complex circuits. Spatiotemporally coordinated execution of intrinsic molecular programs by PNs and INs and activity-dependent processes, contribute to cortical development and cortical microcircuits formation. Alterations of these delicate processes have often been associated to neurological/neurodevelopmental disorders. However, despite the groundbreaking discovery that spontaneous activity in the embryonic brain can shape regional identities of distinct cortical territories, it is still unclear whether this early activity contributes to define subtype-specific neuronal fate as well as circuit assembly. In this study, we combined in utero genetic perturbations via CRISPR/Cas9 system and pharmacological inhibition of selected ion channels with RNA-sequencing and live imaging technologies to identify the activity-regulated processes controlling the development of different cortical PN classes, their wiring and the acquisition of subtype specific features. Moreover, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) form patients affected by a severe, rare and untreatable form of developmental epileptic encephalopathy. By differentiating cortical organoids form patient-derived iPSCs we create human models of early electrical alterations for studying molecular, structural and functional consequences of the genetic mutations during cortical development. Our ultimate goal is to define the activity-conditioned processes that physiologically occur during the development of cortical circuits, to identify novel therapeutical paths to address the pathological consequences of neonatal epilepsies.

Tests used in the empirical sciences are often (implicitly) assumed to be representative of a target mechanism in the sense that similar tests should lead to similar results. In this talk, using resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) as an example, I will argue that this assumption does not necessarily hold true. Typically EEG studies are conducted selecting one analysis method thought to be representative of the research question asked. Using multiple methods, we extracted a variety of features from a single resting-state EEG dataset and conducted correlational and case-control analyses. We found that many EEG features revealed a significant effect in the case-control analyses. Similarly, EEG features correlated significantly with cognitive tasks. However, when we compared these features pairwise, we did not find strong correlations. A number of explanations to these results will be discussed.

This session is a double feature of the Cologne Theoretical Neuroscience Forum and the Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) Computational and Systems Neuroscience of the Jülich Research Center.

The brain combines signals across the eyes. This process is well-characterized for the perceptual anatomical pathway through V1 that primarily codes contrast, where interocular normalization ensures that responses are approximately equal for monocular and binocular stimulation. But we have much less understanding of how luminance is combined binocularly, both in the cortex and in subcortical structures that govern pupil diameter. Here I will describe the results of experiments using a novel combined EEG and pupillometry paradigm to simultaneously index binocular combination of luminance flicker in parallel pathways. The results show evidence of a more linear process than for spatial contrast, that may reflect different operational constraints in distinct anatomical pathways.

Neural correlates of visual working memory have been found in early visual, parietal, and prefrontal regions. These findings have spurred fruitful debate over how and where in the brain memories might be represented. Here, I will present data from multiple experiments to demonstrate how a focus on behavioral requirements can unveil a more comprehensive understanding of the visual working memory system. Specifically, items in working memory must be maintained in a highly robust manner, resilient to interference. At the same time, storage mechanisms must preserve a high degree of flexibility in case of changing behavioral goals. Several examples will be explored in which visual memory representations are shown to undergo transformations, and even shift their cortical locus alongside their coding format based on specifics of the task.

SES neuroscience, using imaging and other methods, has revealed generalizations of interest for population neuroscience and the study of individual differences. But beyond its scientific interest, SES is a topic of societal importance. Does neuroscience offer any useful insights for promoting socioeconomic justice and reducing the harms of poverty? In this talk I will use research from my own lab and others’ to argue that SES neuroscience has the potential to contribute to policy in this area, although its application is premature at present. I will also attempt to forecast the ways in which practical solutions to the problems of poverty may emerge from SES neuroscience. Bio: Martha Farah has conducted groundbreaking research on face and object recognition, visual attention, mental imagery, and semantic memory and - in more recent times - has been at the forefront of interdisciplinary research into neuroscience and society. This deals with topics such as using fMRI for lie detection, ethics of cognitive enhancement, and effects of social deprivation on brain development.

The rising and setting of the sun is accompanied by changes in both the irradiance and the spectral distribution of the sky. Since the discovery of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) 20 years ago, considerable progress has been made in understanding melanopsin's contributions to encoding irradiance. Much less is known about the cone inputs to ipRGCs and how they could encode changes in the color of the sky. I will summarize our recent connectomic investigation into the cone-opponent inputs to primate ipRGCs and the implications of this work on our understanding of circadian photoentrainment and the evolution of color vision.

Neurodegenerative diseases are chronic and inexorable conditions characterised by the presence of insoluble aggregates of abnormally ubiquinated and phosphorylated proteins. Recent evidence also suggests that protein misfolding can propagate throughout the body in a prion-like fashion via the interstitial or cerebrospinal fluids (CSF). As protein aggregation occurs well before the onset of brain damage and symptoms, new biomarkers sensitive to early pathology, together with therapeutic strategies that include eliminating seed proteins and blocking cell-to-cell spread, are of vital importance. The glymphatic system, which facilitates the continuous exchange of CSF and interstitial fluid to clear the brain of waste, presents as a potential biomarker of disease severity, therapeutic target, and drug delivery system. In this webinar, Associate Professor David Wright from the Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, will outline recent advances in using MRI to investigate the glymphatic system. He will also present some of his lab’s recent work investigating glymphatic clearance in preclinical models of motor neurone disease. Associate Professor David Wright is an NHMRC Emerging Leadership Fellow and the Director of Preclinical Imaging in the Department of Neuroscience, Monash University and the Alfred Research Alliance, Alfred Health. His research encompasses the development, application and analysis of advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the study of disease, with a particular emphasis on neurodegenerative disorders. Although less than three years post PhD, he has published over 60 peer-reviewed journal articles in leading neuroscience journals such as Nature Medicine, Brain, and Cerebral Cortex.

Cognitive functions like episodic memory require the formation of cohesive representations. Critical for that process is the entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry’s interaction with cortical information streams and the circuitry’s inner communication. With ultra-high field functional imaging we investigated the functional architecture of the human entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry. We identified an organization that is consistent with convergence of information in anterior and lateral entorhinal subregions and the subiculum/CA1 border while keeping a second route specific for scene processing in a posterior-medial entorhinal subregion and the distal subiculum. Our findings agree with information flow along information processing routes which functionally split the entorhinal-hippocampal circuitry along its transversal axis. My talk will demonstrate how ultra-high field imaging in humans can bridge the gap between anatomical and electrophysiological findings in rodents and our understanding of human cognition. Moreover, I will point out the implications that basic research on functional architecture has for cognitive and clinical research perspectives.

A key issue in understanding circuit operations is the extent to which neuronal spiking reflects local computation or responses to upstream inputs. Several studies have lesioned or silenced inputs to area CA1 of the hippocampus - either area CA3 or the entorhinal cortex and examined the effect on CA1 pyramidal cells. However, the types of the reported physiological impairments vary widely, primarily because simultaneous manipulations of these redundant inputs have never been performed. In this study, I combined optogenetic silencing of unilateral and bilateral mEC, of the local CA1 region, and performed bilateral pharmacogenetic silencing of CA3. I combined this with high spatial resolution extracellular recordings along the CA1-dentate axis. Silencing the medial entorhinal largely abolished extracellular theta and gamma currents in CA1, without affecting firing rates. In contrast, CA3 and local CA1 silencing strongly decreased firing of CA1 neurons without affecting theta currents. Each perturbation reconfigured the CA1 spatial map. Yet, the ability of the CA1 circuit to support place field activity persisted, maintaining the same fraction of spatially tuned place fields. In contrast to these results, unilateral mEC manipulations that were ineffective in impacting place cells during awake behavior were found to alter sharp-wave ripple sequences activated during sleep. Thus, intrinsic excitatory-inhibitory circuits within CA1 can generate neuronal assemblies in the absence of external inputs, although external synaptic inputs are critical to reconfigure (remap) neuronal assemblies in a brain-state dependent manner.

Astroglia-neuron interactions are involved in multiple processes, regulating development, excitability and connectivity of neural circuits. Accumulating number of evidences highlight a direct connection between aberrant astroglial genetics and physiology in various forms of epilepsies. Using zebrafish seizure models, we showed that neurons and astroglia follow different spatiotemporal dynamics during transitions from pre-ictal to ictal activity. We observed that during pre-ictal period neurons exhibit local synchrony and low level of activity, whereas astroglia exhibit global synchrony and high-level of calcium signals that are anti correlated with neural activity. Instead, generalized seizures are marked by a massive release of astroglial glutamate release as well as a drastic increase of astroglia and neuronal activity and synchrony across the entire brain. Knocking out astroglial glutamate transporters leads to recurrent spontaneous generalized seizures accompanied with massive astroglial glutamate release. We are currently using a combination of genetic and pharmacological approaches to perturb astroglial glutamate signalling and astroglial gap junctions to further investigate their role in generation and spreading of epileptic seizures across the brain.

Which nodes in a brain network causally influence one another, and how do such interactions utilize the underlying structural connectivity? One of the fundamental goals of neuroscience is to pinpoint such causal relations. Conventionally, these relationships are established by manipulating a node while tracking changes in another node. A causal role is then assigned to the first node if this intervention led to a significant change in the state of the tracked node. In this presentation, I use a series of intuitive thought experiments to demonstrate the methodological shortcomings of the current ‘causation via manipulation’ framework. Namely, a node might causally influence another node, but how much and through which mechanistic interactions? Therefore, establishing a causal relationship, however reliable, does not provide the proper causal understanding of the system, because there often exists a wide range of causal influences that require to be adequately decomposed. To do so, I introduce a game-theoretical framework called Multi-perturbation Shapley value Analysis (MSA). Then, I present our work in which we employed MSA on an Echo State Network (ESN), quantified how much its nodes were influencing each other, and compared these measures with the underlying synaptic strength. We found that: 1. Even though the network itself was sparse, every node could causally influence other nodes. In this case, a mere elucidation of causal relationships did not provide any useful information. 2. Additionally, the full knowledge of the structural connectome did not provide a complete causal picture of the system either, since nodes frequently influenced each other indirectly, that is, via other intermediate nodes. Our results show that just elucidating causal contributions in complex networks such as the brain is not sufficient to draw mechanistic conclusions. Moreover, quantifying causal interactions requires a systematic and extensive manipulation framework. The framework put forward here benefits from employing neural network models, and in turn, provides explainability for them.

Brains do not fossilise, but as they grow and expand during fetal and infant development, they leave an imprint in the bony braincase. Such imprints of fossilised braincases provide direct evidence of brain evolution, but the underlying biological changes have remained elusive. Combining data from fossil skulls, ancient genomes, brain imaging and gene expression helps shed light on the evolutionary changes shaping the human brain. I will highlight two examples separated by more than 3 million years: the evolution of brain growth in Lucy and her kind, and differences between modern humans and Neanderthals.

A diverse mix of neurotechnology talks and posters from researchers at Imperial and beyond. Visit our event page to find out more. The event is in-person but talk sessions will be broadcast via Teams.