National Materials Innovation Programme: CR&D Rd1
Support for collaborative industrial research that moves advanced-materials innovations toward practical use. The competition covers three priority growth themes and one strategic opportunity theme. Eligible project grant requests range from £500,000 to £1 million. Applications close at 16:00 UK time on 28 October 2026.
A Breakdown of the Global Open Science Hardware (GOSH) Movement
This seminar, hosted by the LIBRE hub project, will provide an in-depth introduction to the Global Open Science Hardware (GOSH) movement. Since its inception, GOSH has been instrumental in advancing open-source hardware within scientific research, fostering a diverse and active community. The seminar will cover the history of GOSH, its current initiatives, and future opportunities, with a particular focus on the contributions and activities of the Latin American branch. This session aims to inform researchers, educators, and policy-makers about the significance and impact of GOSH in promoting accessibility and collaboration in science instrumentation.
Glial and Neuronal Biology of the Aging Brain Symposium, Alana Down Syndrome Center and Aging Brain Initiative at Picower, MIT
The Aging Brain Initiative (ABI) is an interdisciplinary effort by MIT focusing on understanding neurodegeneration and discovery efforts to find hallmarks of aging, both in health and disease." "The Alana Down Syndrome Center (ADSC) aims to deepen knowledge about Down syndrome and to improve health, autonomy and inclusion of people with this genetic condition." "The ABI and the ADSC have joined forces for this year's symposium to highlight how aging-related changes to the brain overlap with neurological aspects of Down syndrome. Our hope is to encourage greater collaboration between the brain aging and Down syndrome research communities.
(Un)consciousness & (In)attention
In this talk, I shall not argue for any single thesis or theory in the realm of the (un)consciousness and (in)attention. Instead I will discuss specific examples where philosophers and psychologists can have genuine collaborations in this area. Since issues concerning phenomenological overflow is already too familiar for this audience, I will briefly discuss it only, and focus on other issues that have not been overworked. The exact contents are to be determined, but I will perhaps focus on recent controversies over “sustained representation of perspectival shape” (Morales, Bax, and Firestone, 2020, 2021).
Digitization as a driving force for collaboration in neuroscience
Many of the collaborations we encounter in our scientific careers are centered on a common idea that can be associated with certain resources, such as a dataset, an algorithm, or a model. All partners in a collaboration need to develop a common understanding of these resources, and need to be able to access them in a simple and unambiguous manner in order to avoid incorrect conclusions especially in highly cross-disciplinary contexts. While digital computers have entered to assist scientific workflows in experiment and simulation for many decades, the high degree of heterogeneity in the field had led to a scattered landscape of highly customized, lab-internal solutions to organizing and managing the resources on a project-by-project basis. Only with the availability of modern technologies such as the semantic web, platforms for collaborative coding or the development of data standards overarching different disciplines, we have tools at our disposal to make resources increasingly more accessible, understandable, and usable. However, without overarching standardization efforts and adaptation of such technologies to the workflows and needs of individual researchers, their adoption by the neuroscience community will be impeded. From the perspective of computational neuroscience, which is inherently dependent on leveraging data and methods across the field of neuroscience for inspiration and validation, I will outline my view on past and present developments towards a more rigorous use of digital resources and how they improved collaboration, and introduce emerging initiatives to support this process in the future (e.g., EBRAINS http://ebrains.eu, NFDI-Neuro http://www.nfdi-neuro.de).
Bench to bedside: Bridging the gap in neuroscience
This panel discussion aims to generate meaningful dialogue between emerging leaders in basic and clinical neuroscience. It promises to talk about the ground realities and what acts as a hindrance in people to people connection in the field. It aims to advocate for policy change that will revolutionize the field of neuroscience, allowing neuroscientists to collaborate with clinicians wherein the new research can be made available for public use