Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control
Cognitive control guides behavior by controlling what, where, and how information is represented in the brain. Perhaps the most well-studied form of cognitive control has been ‘attention’, which controls how external sensory stimuli are represented in the brain. In contrast, the neural mechanisms controlling the selection of representations held ‘in mind’, in working memory, are unknown. In this talk, I will present evidence that the prefrontal cortex controls working memory by selectively enhancing and transforming the contents of working memory. In particular, I will show how the neural representation of the content of working memory changes over time, moving between different ‘subspaces’ of the neural population. These dynamics may play a critical role in controlling what and how neural representations are acted upon.
Hebbian Plasticity Supports Predictive Self-Supervised Learning of Disentangled Representations
Discriminating distinct objects and concepts from sensory stimuli is essential for survival. Our brains accomplish this feat by forming meaningful internal representations in deep sensory networks with plastic synaptic connections. Experience-dependent plasticity presumably exploits temporal contingencies between sensory inputs to build these internal representations. However, the precise mechanisms underlying plasticity remain elusive. We derive a local synaptic plasticity model inspired by self-supervised machine learning techniques that shares a deep conceptual connection to Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) theory and is consistent with experimentally observed plasticity rules. We show that our plasticity model yields disentangled object representations in deep neural networks without the need for supervision and implausible negative examples. In response to altered visual experience, our model qualitatively captures neuronal selectivity changes observed in the monkey inferotemporal cortex in-vivo. Our work suggests a plausible learning rule to drive learning in sensory networks while making concrete testable predictions.
Merging of cues and hunches by the mouse cortex
Many everyday decisions are based on both external cues and internal hunches. How does the brain put these together? We addressed this question in mice trained to make decisions based on sensory stimuli and on past events. While mice made these decisions, we causally probed the roles of cortical areas and recorded from thousands of neurons throughout the brain, with an emphasis on frontal cortex. The results are not what we thought based on textbook notions of how the brain works. This talk is based on work led by Nick Steinmetz, Peter Zatka-Haas, Armin Lak, and Pip Coen, in the laboratory I share with Kenneth Harris
Plasticity of Pain and Pleasure
What happens when the nervous system fails to adapt? Our perception of the world relies on a nervous system that learns and adapts to sensory information. Based on our experience we can predict what a wooden surface will feel like, that fire is hot, and that a gentle caress from a partner can be soothing. But our sensory experience of the world is not static – warm water can feel like fire on sunburned skin and the gentle brush of our clothes can be excruciating after an injury. In pathological conditions such as chronic pain, changes in nervous system function can cause normally innocuous sensory stimuli to be perceived as aversive or painful long after the initial injury has happened. These changes can sometimes be similar to the formation of a pain ‘memory’ that can modulate and distort our perception of sensory information. Our research program seeks to understand how fundamental processes that govern the formation and maintenance of plastic changes in the nervous system can lead to pathological conditions and how we can reverse engineer these changes to treat chronic conditions.
Distinct synaptic plasticity mechanisms determine the diversity of cortical responses during behavior
Spike trains recorded from the cortex of behaving animals can be complex, highly variable from trial to trial, and therefore challenging to interpret. A fraction of cells exhibit trial-averaged responses with obvious task-related features such as pure tone frequency tuning in auditory cortex. However, a substantial number of cells (including cells in primary sensory cortex) do not appear to fire in a task-related manner and are often neglected from analysis. We recently used a novel single-trial, spike-timing-based analysis to show that both classically responsive and non-classically responsive cortical neurons contain significant information about sensory stimuli and behavioral decisions suggesting that non-classically responsive cells may play an underappreciated role in perception and behavior. We now expand this investigation to explore the synaptic origins and potential contribution of these cells to network function. To do so, we trained a novel spiking recurrent neural network model that incorporates spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) mechanisms to perform the same task as behaving animals. By leveraging excitatory and inhibitory plasticity rules this model reproduces neurons with response profiles that are consistent with previously published experimental data, including classically responsive and non-classically responsive neurons. We found that both classically responsive and non-classically responsive neurons encode behavioral variables in their spike times as seen in vivo. Interestingly, plasticity in excitatory-to-excitatory synapses increased the proportion of non-classically responsive neurons and may play a significant role in determining response profiles. Finally, our model also makes predictions about the synaptic origins of classically and non-classically responsive neurons which we can compare to in vivo whole-cell recordings taken from the auditory cortex of behaving animals. This approach successfully recapitulates heterogeneous response profiles measured from behaving animals and provides a powerful lens for exploring large-scale neuronal dynamics and the plasticity rules that shape them.
Rapid State Changes Account for Apparent Brain and Behavior Variability
Neural and behavioral responses to sensory stimuli are notoriously variable from trial to trial. Does this mean the brain is inherently noisy or that we don’t completely understand the nature of the brain and behavior? Here we monitor the state of activity of the animal through videography of the face, including pupil and whisker movements, as well as walking, while also monitoring the ability of the animal to perform a difficult auditory or visual task. We find that the state of the animal is continuously changing and is never stable. The animal is constantly becoming more or less activated (aroused) on a second and subsecond scale. These changes in state are reflected in all of the neural systems we have measured, including cortical, thalamic, and neuromodulatory activity. Rapid changes in cortical activity are highly correlated with changes in neural responses to sensory stimuli and the ability of the animal to perform auditory or visual detection tasks. On the intracellular level, these changes in forebrain activity are associated with large changes in neuronal membrane potential and the nature of network activity (e.g. from slow rhythm generation to sustained activation and depolarization). Monitoring cholinergic and noradrenergic axonal activity reveals widespread correlations across the cortex. However, we suggest that a significant component of these rapid state changes arise from glutamatergic pathways (e.g. corticocortical or thalamocortical), owing to their rapidity. Understanding the neural mechanisms of state-dependent variations in brain and behavior promises to significantly “denoise” our understanding of the brain.
Neural circuit redundancy, stability, and variability in developmental brain disorders
Despite the consistency of symptoms at the cognitive level, we now know that brain disorders like Autism and Schizophrenia can each arise from mutations in >100 different genes. Presumably there is a convergence of “symptoms” at the level of neural circuits in diagnosed individuals. In this talk I will argue that redundancy in neural circuit parameters implies that we should take a circuit-function rather that circuit-component approach to understanding these disorders. Then I will present our recent empirical work testing a circuit-function theory for Autism: the idea that neural circuits show excess trial-to-trial variability in response to sensory stimuli, and instability in the representations across a timescale of days. For this we analysed in vivo neural population activity data recorded from somatosensory cortex of mouse models of Fragile-X syndrome, a disorder related to autism. Work with Beatriz Mizusaki (Univ of Bristol), Nazim Kourdougli, Anand Suresh, and Carlos Portera-Cailliau (Univ of California, Los Angeles).
Circuit and synaptic mechanisms of plasticity in neural ensembles
Inhibitory microcircuits play an important role regulating cortical responses to sensory stimuli. Interneurons that inhibit dendritic or somatic integration are gatekeepers for neural activity, synaptic plasticity and the formation of sensory representations. We have been investigating the synaptic plasticity mechanisms underlying the formation of ensembles in olfactory and orbitofrontal cortex. We have been focusing on the roles of three inhibitory neuron classes in gating excitatory synaptic plasticity in olfactory cortex- somatostatin (SST-INs), parvalbumin (PV-INs), and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP-INs) interneurons. Further, we are investigating the rules for inhibitory plasticity and a potential role in stabilizing ensembles in associative cortices. I will present new findings to support distinct roles for different interneuron classes in the gating and stabilization of ensemble representations of olfactory responses.
A paradoxical kind of sleep In Drosophila melanogaster
The dynamic nature of sleep in most animals suggests distinct stages which serve different functions. Genetic sleep induction methods in animal models provide a powerful way to disambiguate these stages and functions, although behavioural methods alone are insufficient to accurately identify what kind of sleep is being engaged. In Drosophila, activation of the dorsal fan-shaped body (dFB) promotes sleep, but it remains unclear what kind of sleep this is, how the rest of the fly brain is behaving, or if any specific sleep functions are being achieved. Here, we developed a method to record calcium activity from thousands of neurons across a volume of the fly brain during dFB-induced sleep, and we compared this to the effects of a sleep-promoting drug. We found that drug-induced spontaneous sleep decreased brain activity and connectivity, whereas dFB sleep was not different from wakefulness. Paradoxically, dFB-induced sleep was found to be even deeper than drug- induced sleep. When we probed the sleeping fly brain with salient visual stimuli, we found that the activity of visually-responsive neurons was blocked by dFB activation, confirming a disconnect from the external environment. Prolonged optogenetic dFB activation nevertheless achieved a significant sleep function, by correcting visual attention defects brought on by sleep deprivation. These results suggest that dFB activation promotes a distinct form of sleep in Drosophila, where brain activity and connectivity remain similar to wakefulness, but responsiveness to external sensory stimuli is profoundly suppressed.